Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It’s over for altrightcels

  • Thread starter Reddit_is_for_cucks
  • Start date
A lot of people bashing white women in this thread but I thought I would post the std statistics just to straighten things out

Chlamydia
highest
lowest
  • Whites (/100,000)
    • Men - 95.9
    • Women - 260.5
  • Blacks (/100,00)
    • Men - 809.2
    • Women - 1,613.6
  • Hispanics (/100,000)
    • Men - 192.2
    • Women - 574.7
  • Asians (/100,000)
    • Men - 61.7
    • Women - 158.7
Gonorrhea
highest
lowest
  • Whites
    • M - 28.8
    • W - 33.1
  • Blacks
    • M - 467.7
    • W - 456.3
  • Hispanics
    • M - 62.1
    • W - 58.5
  • Asians
    • M - 20.2
    • W - 13.7
Syphilis
highest
lowest
  • Whites
    • M - 5.1
    • W - 0.3
  • Blacks
    • M - 28.9
    • W - 4.9
  • Hispanics
    • M - 10.4
    • W - 0.8
  • Asians
    • M - 4.0
    • W - 0.1

Here is the source: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats12/minorities.htm

So it is one thing to say white women are stuck up/snobby/wont date you but completely another thing to call them slutty especially in comparison to hispanic and black women who take the cake for whoredom
 
A lot of people bashing white women in this thread but I thought I would post the std statistics just to straighten things out

Chlamydia​

highest

lowest

  • Whites (/100,000)
    • Men - 95.9
    • Women - 260.5
  • Blacks (/100,00)
    • Men - 809.2
    • Women - 1,613.6
  • Hispanics (/100,000)
    • Men - 192.2
    • Women - 574.7
  • Asians (/100,000)
    • Men - 61.7
    • Women - 158.7

Gonorrhea​

highest

lowest

  • Whites
    • M - 28.8
    • W - 33.1
  • Blacks
    • M - 467.7
    • W - 456.3
  • Hispanics
    • M - 62.1
    • W - 58.5
  • Asians
    • M - 20.2
    • W - 13.7

Syphilis​

highest

lowest

  • Whites
    • M - 5.1
    • W - 0.3
  • Blacks
    • M - 28.9
    • W - 4.9
  • Hispanics
    • M - 10.4
    • W - 0.8
  • Asians
    • M - 4.0
    • W - 0.1

Here is the source: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats12/minorities.htm

So it is one thing to say white women are stuck up/snobby/wont date you but completely another thing to call them slutty especially in comparison to hispanic and black women who take the cake for whoredom

Suburban white roasties are slutting it up every weekend at my campus, but they are probably on every contraceptive and std prevention scheme known to man. Anyways, people are encouraged to be sluts nowadays and the Chads and high status normies love it because only low status males lose out. Drop your average college slut in Saudi Arabia and I bet she behaves better even if foids are inherently disposed to certain actions
Jfl at altrightcels giving a shit about white women.

Women are trash and can’t be trusted. They are loyal to nobody that’s why in past men kept them in check.

Sooner you accept that women are trash, more happier you’ll be

It's pretty much over for someone if they spend their time commenting on a porn site and getting butthurt over fake videos

Ashkenazi jews might have pushed for it, but purging them wouldn't solve it either. Why? Because foids LOVE this society. I mean, they can have sex with chad or brad for years and years with no consequence and get extra support in all aspects of life.

I agree 100%. In fact it'd probably be like this without any Jewish influence. The anglosphere and the nords started pushing these progressive policies at the end of the nineteenth century
 
Suburban white roasties are slutting it up every weekend at my campus, but they are probably on every contraceptive and std prevention scheme known to man.
Well thats great, but this is anecdotal and the statistics I provided prove that however much you may think white women are slutting it up, hispanic women are at least twice as slutty by some metrics and black women are almost ten times as likely to have an std than white women. So don't be surprised if I disregard your little anecdote about white women on your college campus entirely.

Drop your average college slut in Saudi Arabia and I bet she behaves better even if foids are inherently disposed to certain actions

SA is also an islamic theocracy. Apples and oranges. Certain behaviors there simply arent tolerated, for instance homosexuality is punishable by death.

I agree 100%. In fact it'd probably be like this without any Jewish influence. The anglosphere and the nords started pushing these progressive policies at the end of the nineteenth century

Jews exist as a people apart. Them being in charge of our news and entertainment media has been an unmitigated disaster and their religious teachings allow for degrading the goyim(nonjews). Just fucking rope yourself if you think we would have allowed our women to become degenerate whores if white men were in charge of cultural norms in our own country.
 
Last edited:
Oh boy, what have I started
 
Well thats great, but this is anecdotal and the statistics I provided prove that however much you may think white women are slutting it up, hispanic women are at least twice as slutty by some metrics and black women are almost ten times as likely to have an std than white women. So don't be surprised if I disregard your little anecdote about white women on your college campus entirely.

My point, if it didn't come off clearly, is that a suburban white roastie will come from a family where she has access to "every contraceptive scheme known to man". It's an exaggeration of course but those women will at the least have access to more resources than poorer women. If you look at your std stats it pretty much matches up with average income level. The poorer ethnicites have worse std rates and higher income ones have better std rates. It's just that white families have a greater average income than black families so that relationship starts appearing. Wealthier women actually have marginally more sex, but greater access to contraceptives https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/26_class_gaps_unintended_pregnancy.pdf Of course they will also have greater access to safe sex schemes especially in a country like the US with our medical system. Conservative countries with less slutting around and with fewer average life partners still have higher std rates than western ones because people in Mozambique will have a harder time getting a condom. The chart doesn't come off as that much of a surprise when you factor in the availability of protection. I'm just pointing out that the possible flaws in the std chart. I don't really have a stake in the race war.



Jews exist as a people apart. Them being in charge of our news and entertainment media has been an unmitigated disaster and their religious teachings allow for degrading the goyim(nonjews). Just fucking rope yourself if you think we would have allowed our women to become degenerate whores if white men were in charge of cultural norms in our own country.

Yea but the progressive movement started at a time when Jews were still discriminated against. We are simply 100+ years into constantly changing progressive policies. In fact many progressives, while rapidly improving women's rights, actually heavily discriminated against Jews. Jews were not making laws and shaping culture in the 1890s like they were today
 
My point, if it didn't come off clearly, is that a suburban white roastie will come from a family where she has access to "every contraceptive scheme known to man". It's an exaggeration of course but those women will at the least have access to more resources than poorer women. If you look at your std stats it pretty much matches up with average income level. The poorer ethnicites have worse std rates and higher income ones have better std rates. It's just that white families have a greater average income than black families so that relationship starts appearing. Wealthier women actually have marginally more sex, but greater access to contraceptives

Not one table in the study you mentioned dealt with race, so you are simply speculating that higher income hispanics/blacks have a lower std rate because of access to contraceptives. If std rate is anything like violent crime then level of income makes no difference in regard to poor decision making because rich black people are more likely to be incarcerated for a violent crime than a poor white person.

Of course they will also have greater access to safe sex schemes especially in a country like the US with our medical system. Conservative countries with less slutting around and with fewer average life partners still have higher std rates than western ones because people in Mozambique will have a harder time getting a condom.
But we aren't comparing white women to black women in mozambique, the study I posted compared white women in the US to black women also in the US
I'm just pointing out that the possible flaws in the std chart.
With extremely faulty logic
I don't really have a stake in the race war.
Then why are you defending nonwhite women like a whiteknight beta cuck? The evidence against their sluttiness is quite clear, and thats without even factoring in average life partners.
Yea but the progressive movement started at a time when Jews were still discriminated against. We are simply 100+ years into constantly changing progressive policies. In fact many progressives, while rapidly improving women's rights, actually heavily discriminated against Jews. Jews were not making laws and shaping culture in the 1890s like they were today
Jews were let out of their ghettos when egalitarianism became popularized throughout europe in the early 1800s. They started scheming to overthrow the European order as soon as they were let out and allowed to integrate into society. The two major tools they used to do so were zionism (which led to the dispossession of the palestianian peoples and the resulting radicalization of the entire muslim world) and marxism/communism(which killed 100 million people worldwide, notably in eastern europe, russia and china), both of which have ravaged the world in the past 100 years. The jews are our misfortune and for you to make light of jewish influence and act like they are not front and center in all atrocities of the world makes me very suspicious of you
 
Last edited:
Not one table in the study you mentioned dealt with race, so you are simply speculating that higher income hispanics/blacks have a lower std rate because of access to contraceptives. If std rate is anything like violent crime then level of income makes no difference in regard to poor decision making because rich black people are more likely to be incarcerated for a violent crime than a poor white person.


But we aren't comparing white women to black women in mozambique, the study I posted compared white women in the US to black women also in the US

With extremely faulty logic

Then why are you defending nonwhite women like a whiteknight beta cuck? The evidence against their sluttiness is quite clear, and thats without even factoring in average life partners.


You guys were arguing about which race is more degenerate or whatever. Literally my only point is that you couldn't even determine who has the most sex out of that std chart for a number of reasons. That's what all my posts have been addressing. You have just assumed I came here to attack white women so you completely glossed over everything. You would have been better off just posting a chart of which ethnicity has the most sex and then a gender breakup from there because it was literally posted last week. The point of the Brookings report was to look at other factors. Maybe it's because of a lack of access and not just sex. Maybe it's because blacks and hispanics just don't like protection. Maybe it's because people are born with them. Maybe it is because they have more sex! You can't determine any of that from your link and your link makes no attempt to even draw that conclusion. Maybe I'm being pedantic

Jews were let out of their ghettos when egalitarianism became popularized throughout europe in the early 1800s. They started scheming to overthrow the European order as soon as they were let out and allowed to integrate into society. The two major tools they used to do so were zionism (which led to the dispossession of the palestianian peoples and the resulting radicalization of the entire muslim world) and marxism/communism(which killed 100 million people worldwide, notably in eastern europe, russia and china), both of which have ravaged the world in the past 100 years. The jews are our misfortune and for you to make light of jewish influence and act like they are not front and center in all atrocities of the world makes me very suspicious of you

This has to be the top cope out there. I agree about Zionists, but you guys are literally always proselytizing in unrelated threads about muh Jews. I wish we could get a megathread for you guys going. The progressive movement was prevalent in countries even without a significant number of Jews. The ethnic population had far more to do with it's policies than a miniscule amount of despised Jews. It's a cope to blame all your problems on the Jews. In fact if we look at the countries today, the countries where the Jews were most prevalent in around the early twentieth century, EE, are more conservative than the countries that they weren't prevalent in. I don't wish to go further down the rabbit hole with you.
 
It's over for the west within the next 100 years, but as incels there's no point in caring. I'm half ethnic and I used to care about not having an identity and the differences in average IQs between races. You can be an activist like nazicel ITT but it's a waste of time. Even if you purged all non-whites it won't solve the issue. Why? Because the issue is foids, with it all starting with them receiving the right to vote.

Ashkenazi jews might have pushed for it, but purging them wouldn't solve it either. Why? Because foids LOVE this society. I mean, they can have sex with chad or brad for years and years with no consequence and get extra support in all aspects of life.
50 years tops. But your points are relevant.
Jews were let out of their ghettos when egalitarianism became popularized throughout europe in the early 1800s. They started scheming to overthrow the European order as soon as they were let out and allowed to integrate into society. The two major tools they used to do so were zionism (which led to the dispossession of the palestianian peoples and the resulting radicalization of the entire muslim world) and marxism/communism(which killed 100 million people worldwide, notably in eastern europe, russia and china), both of which have ravaged the world in the past 100 years. The jews are our misfortune and for you to make light of jewish influence and act like they are not front and center in all atrocities of the world makes me very suspicious of you
Great post, all very true and valid points. Fuck the kikes tbh tbh
 
Last edited:
I agree about Zionists, but you guys are literally always proselytizing in unrelated threads about muh Jews.
You agree about zionists? Do you not agree that communism/marxism was a jewish tool to grab power over the goyim and that it resulted in 100 million deaths worldwide in the past century? Also this isn't an unrelated thread, this is a thread about the altright, an antisemitic movement.

The ethnic population had far more to do with it's policies than a miniscule amount of despised Jews.
Maybe on minor issues, but major policy that jews wanted was pushed through, the balfour declaration for instance was passed at the expense of the interests of western countries in favor of the jews

It's a cope to blame all your problems on the Jews.
Holding people responsible is not the same as blaming all your problems on jews


In fact if we look at the countries today, the countries where the Jews were most prevalent in around the early twentieth century, EE, are more conservative than the countries that they weren't prevalent in.
Of course, because those countries were occupied by communist/bolshevik jews who murdered their people by the millions and don't want to allow jews to get hold of their country again.

I don't wish to go further down the rabbit hole with you.

Sure you don't, because you're wrong. You would have me believe that even though jews were kicked out of over 100 countries all throughout the middle ages that they are not responsible for anything nefarious in this wildly degenerate era wherein jews have vastly more influence than anyone else for their percentage of the population. You are completely full of shit
 
Hitler supported all Germans who didn't buy into Marxist Jewish propaganda. You're buying into that propaganda by saying this false statement right now.

His first target were German retards, who were first sterilized due to the eugenics program, and then killed (euthanasia), so they didn't consume precious resources during the war. Gas chambers and gas vans were first tested on retards, before they went operational on a large scale. Euthanasia became the initial test run for the later holocaust on jews.

There were at least some "soft" criteria, under which omega men and incels could be easily sorted into the retards bucket, ready for euthanasia.

BTW: what does it help to rant, about women of which race are sluttier, if one can't pick up any of them? No matter if slut or virgin, black, white, asian, brown, they will usually not accept any omega men.
 
Last edited:
Gas chambers and gas vans were first tested on retards, before they went operational on a large scale. Euthanasia became the initial test run for the later holocaust on jews.
You mean the gas chambers that if you investigate will get you thrown in jail? Yea, the gassing narrative is a complete fabrication along with much of the holohoax.
 
Euthanasia, especially Aktion T4, happened a few years before the holocaust, beginning in 1939 and officially ending in 1941. The killings were disrupted due to protests by clerics in 1941, but some continued as covert actions in later concentration and death camps. They mostly targeted German citizens, and required major efforts to deceive relatives of the victims about their death. The total number of T4 victims was about 70000, much less than later genocide and POW targets. So they had no problems with capacity of gas chambers and crematoria. They also used carbon momoxide, sometimes exhaust fumes from trucks, pipelined inside of the vehicles, which doesn't leave long term traces or colored stains. A lot of these processes could be uncovered.

Much of the nazi ideology was basically about human breeding, which included procreation of desirable personal and racial features, and eugenics, outbreeding or culling out (ausmerzen) of undesirable features, thus also people who had them. Much of this breeding ideology wasn't specific to the nazis, but widespread in the Western world, just not pursued as far as arranged mating and culling out.

Now imagine how incels, who are rejected by all women and have tons of undesirable genes, which make them unfit for life, would fare in a system of human breeding, with intent to cull out unfit life...
 
So they had no problems with capacity of gas chambers and crematoria.
STOP perpetuating the gas chambers myth. IT HAS BEEN DEBUNKED by Henri Roques. People have been thrown in jail in germany for attempting to investigate these gas chambers. Look up the Leuchter Report and its surrounding controversy if you don't believe me
Now imagine how incels, who are rejected by all women and have tons of undesirable genes, which make them unfit for life, would fare in a system of human breeding, with intent to cull out unfit life...
Exactly, in two or three generations THERE WOULD BE NO INCELS, thus the incel problem would be solved
 
Last edited:
I know the penal laws, §130 StGB, that penalize holocaust denial, as well as a number of people who got prison terms or serious fines. It's basically the behavior of an authoritarian system, enforcing a state ideology by threats of prison. No doubt there's plenty of political abuse and blackmail with this topic, but penalization is probably the most powerful argument to give this denial credibility. So, if you can go to jail for saying the earth is flat, or the sun turns around the earth, does this make it true? Leuchter report, as far as I know, only says they found no traces of hydrocyanic acid in the concrete and brick samples. The idea of breeding and culling out useless people was official ideology, not just something pursued secretly somewhere in occupied Poland. Euthanasia killings had gone public already from 1939 to 1941.

So, you say it: with or without Euthanasia, the genetic strains of today's incels will go extinct, if no measures are taken. A government even doesn't need to make their hands dirty with sterilization or killing; they will simply not procreate. But if it insists on living people, to fulfill tight norms or at least be useful, sterilization or killing become options. But new incels will come out of the next generations, who have the bad luck of all undesirable features for women. Like with gays: they don't normally procreate, but they have always existed, just because new ones came out of the mainstream.
 
I know the penal laws, §130 StGB, that penalize holocaust denial, as well as a number of people who got prison terms or serious fines. It's basically the behavior of an authoritarian system, enforcing a state ideology by threats of prison. No doubt there's plenty of political abuse and blackmail with this topic, but penalization is probably the most powerful argument to give this denial credibility. So, if you can go to jail for saying the earth is flat, or the sun turns around the earth, does this make it true? Leuchter report, as far as I know, only says they found no traces of hydrocyanic acid in the concrete and brick samples. The idea of breeding and culling out useless people was official ideology, not just something pursued secretly somewhere in occupied Poland. Euthanasia killings had gone public already from 1939 to 1941.

So, you say it: with or without Euthanasia, the genetic strains of today's incels will go extinct, if no measures are taken. A government even doesn't need to make their hands dirty with sterilization or killing; they will simply not procreate. But if it insists on living people, to fulfill tight norms or at least be useful, sterilization or killing become options. But new incels will come out of the next generations, who have the bad luck of all undesirable features for women. Like with gays: they don't normally procreate, but they have always existed, just because new ones came out of the mainstream.
Im not sure if you are agreeing or disagreeing with me. Your post reads like an incoherent mess, maybe I'm just not understanding what you're trying to say?
 
I have no time machine to travel back and see what really happened. But for me, denying these mass killings appears not credible. I would be really happy if it was, due to their massive abuse for emotional blackmail, but I don't want to take another bluepill to hide ugly truths. The ideology behind all this was publicized even then, all the breeding, eugenics and even usage of terms like "culling out"/"ausmerzen". If you've watched the propaganda film "Der ewige Jude"/ "The Eternal Jew", you could see an undisguised line of arguments, of Jews being an own species, with inherent parasitic, harmful and cruel features (equated to rats), ending in an announcement of their extermination - and then older footage, of rallies and cheering crowds, mounted after that. I am still planning to read through Mein Kampf, which started quite boring and tedious, but gave some insight to plans and intentions.

So while individual events or details may be exaggerated or fabricated, for wartime propaganda and the massive, later emotional blackmail, I think the basic facts were true. It shouldn't be penalized or threatened with social sanctions to say otherwise, but denial here is very much "I don't like it, thus it doesn't exist".

And for Incels, people who have a somewhat limited fitness for life, it should be clear what to expect from a human breeding, organic society, where the uppermost goal is to have "useful", "productive" and "norm fitting" people. And one that enforces these demands with threat of extermination, or by doing so.
 
JFL @ the rage about that one ethnic hating white foids. "They hate them because they want them." It's like we're on IncelTears.

If you ever feel compelled to defend any foid for any reason you're not black pilled. As an honorable mention though I guess ethnostaters can be considered white pilled. JFL.
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
30
Views
631
AntoCel
A
Gogetacel
Replies
11
Views
322
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
notcracklord
Replies
12
Views
540
zangano1
zangano1
J
Replies
20
Views
285
go2sleep
go2sleep

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top