Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's odd that left-wingers say race doesn't exist, but also seem to view races very differently

Hoppipolla

Hoppipolla

hop on jj2
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Posts
12,128
Online time
1d 8h
For example American Indian tribes fought over land a lot apparently, but when white people went over and fought them for land, that's somehow completely different?

How can it be different if there's no such thing as race? Surely they're just another group of humans who are no different at all because race doesn't exist.

There are probably lots of other examples of them treating the races differently even when it makes no sense if they see race as just a social construct.
 
Sorry if that was a bit of a word salad by the way, lol

I hope it made sense!
 
white men get shamed for being white males, thats sexism and racism. And saying Europeans dont have culture is baffling, the amount of interesting culture and history is crazy, the reason u don’t see our culture is coz immigrants are taking over
 
Their argument is anti colonialism
 
Their argument is anti colonialism

But what makes the Brits different to the American Indian tribes? If there's no such thing as race.
 
There's the belief that there are good people and bad people on every race so race shouldn't matter.
But at the same time, there is the reality of the great replacement, ethnic crime rates and communautarism from those same races.

So if you're realistic and not living in wonderland, there might be a contradiction in your mind between beliefs and reality
 
But what makes the Brits different to the American Indian tribes? If there's no such thing as race.
Their argument is they committed genocide and blah blah. But they don’t admit whites have superior IQ that’s how we civilized them.
 
Their argument is they committed genocide and blah blah. But they don’t admit whites have superior IQ that’s how we civilized them.

But the American Indians as I understand regularly killed people from other tribes and probably "genocided" other tribes. So why is it different?
 
But the American Indians as I understand regularly killed people from other tribes and probably "genocided" other tribes. So why is it different?
It’s not really different besides the scale. These Indians literally use to sacrifice babies but we are supposed to sympathize with them for being conquered by the white man. Kek.
 
Their argument is they committed genocide and blah blah. But they don’t admit whites have superior IQ that’s how we civilized them.
You didn't civilize them, your ancestors did
 
Their argument is they committed genocide and blah blah. But they don’t admit whites have superior IQ that’s how we civilized them.
They tried to genocide each other too though.

Also, as mich as the holocaust is questionable, so is the alleged attempted genocide of natives.

It wouldn't be the first time certain people would slread rumors and lies about white people (Europeeans).
 
It’s not really different besides the scale. These Indians literally use to sacrifice babies but we are supposed to sympathize with them for being conquered by the white man. Kek.
Maybe whites did try to genocide them, because they saw them for the savages that they were.

Not saying that it's justified, but people in general had a different moral compass than todays prople.

Just like back in the day slavery was seen as something completely normal.
 
Maybe whites did try to genocide them, because they saw them for the savages that they were.

Not saying that it's justified, but people in general had a different moral compass than todays prople.

Just like back in the day slavery was seen as something completely normal.
I think it was totally justified
 
I think it was totally justified
Eh, idk, tbh, man. Morals really are man made.
In the end they are supposed to serve humans to better survive as a group.

I am sure that if we'd have grown up among the natives back then we would have thought differently.

It's a matter of perspective.

Today we have aftican tribes who eat each other and they view it as absolutely normal.
Some may not even be aware that there are people out there who are desgusted by this and consider is one of the worst crimes.

What I would agree on though is that some moral codes are objectively better than others.
 
Eh, idk, tbh, man. Morals really are man made.
In the end they are supposed to serve humans to better survive as a group.

I am sure that if we'd have grown up among the natives back then we would have thought differently.

It's a matter of perspective.

Today we have aftican tribes who eat each other and they view it as absolutely normal.
Some may not even be aware that there are people out there who are desgusted by this and consider is one of the worst crimes.

What I would agree on though is that some moral codes are objectively better than others.
You wouldn’t be on this form if we didn’t kill natives
 
We? Aren't you part native and such as well?
Jfl
Yes and I don’t care what happened to them I’m happy it happened I’m only a quarter
 
Yes and I don’t care what happened to them I’m happy it happened I’m only a quarter
Jfl.

Brocel, you aren't white. That's a fact.
Maybe your kids, if you were to breed a pure white foid, but not you.
 
Jfl.

Brocel, you aren't white. That's a fact.
Maybe your kids, if you were to breed a pure white foid, but not you.
I never claimed to be fully white but I have white skin
 
isnt that just mexican
I mean basically i resemble a white Hispanic. Irish, Scottish, and 25% native. Don’t have brown skin though. But regardless even if I was full blooded native I would recognize America is better off ran by whites than natives.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top