Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL IT's closest encounter with Must-Read Content ever recorded

IT being braindead as usual. What's new?
 
I would like to see IT try and debunk one of our actual posts instead of just screenshotting our worst moments/shitposts
 
What a retarded strawman, notice how they never go after r/blackpillscience which uses the one medium they hold as gospel
 

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1iyplyo/dude_convinces_llm_designed_to_affirm_whatever_it/?share_id=ZaznVZi5jk1DaGTyomtNz&utm_content=1&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1


They did the same thing with my thread… I bet they didn’t even bother to read the PDF or my essay before jumping to conclusions.

"ChatGPT was just agreeing with you! :foidSoy::soy:

No, I actually took the time to read the PDF first, then clicked on the search button, which allows ChatGPT to go beyond just assuming what the PDF says. Instead of giving a generic response, it fully processes the entire document, identifies key arguments, and provides a structured analysis based on the content. This means it wasn’t just agreeing with me; it was breaking down the points, assessing them, and forming a response based on the actual material.

@Mr. Agent Clark then copied the essay into ChatGPT and engaged with its response. ChatGPT tends to lean bluepill by default, which you can see for yourself if you ask something like, "Do looks matter?"
 
Last edited:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1iyplyo/dude_convinces_llm_designed_to_affirm_whatever_it/?share_id=ZaznVZi5jk1DaGTyomtNz&utm_content=1&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1


They did the same thing with my thread… I bet they didn’t even bother to read the PDF or my essay before jumping to conclusions.

"ChatGPT was just agreeing with you! :foidSoy::soy:

No, I actually took the time to read the PDF first, then clicked on the search button, which allows ChatGPT to go beyond just assuming what the PDF says. Instead of giving a generic response, it fully processes the entire document, identifies key arguments, and provides a structured analysis based on the content. This means it wasn’t just agreeing with me; it was breaking down the points, assessing them, and forming a response based on the actual material.

@Mr. Agent Clark then copied the essay into ChatGPT and engaged with its response. ChatGPT tends to lean bluepill by default, which you can see for yourself if you ask something like, "Do looks matter?"


https://www.psy.uq.edu.au/~uqbziets/Gangestad2005evolution_of_physical_attractiveness.pdf?utm_source
 
I like to post,

DNR

On them
 
r/SexHaversVictimisation just being their usual selves
 
They're illiterate, stupid, and lazy.
 
I would like to see IT try and debunk one of our actual posts instead of just screenshotting our worst moments/shitposts
If that happens they'll ignore the post and focus on the title. They legitimately cannot read for more than three seconds. I remember arguing with them and they upvoted me because they thought I was agreeing with them.
 
If that happens they'll ignore the post and focus on the title. They legitimately cannot read for more than three seconds. I remember arguing with them and they upvoted me because they thought I was agreeing with them.
Lmao
 
If that happens they'll ignore the post and focus on the title. They legitimately cannot read for more than three seconds. I remember arguing with them and they upvoted me because they thought I was agreeing with them.
Canadian Lol GIF
 
I would like to see IT try and debunk one of our actual posts instead of just screenshotting our worst moments/shitposts
 
This is essence of reddit pseudo intellectualism, They don't actually read the thread because it is too intelligent for the so they dismiss it via cherry-picking the title. You should never argue with a dumb person that thinks they are smart.
 
They can't read anything longer than a sentence because they're all retards who lack basic reading comprehension skills like all foids
 
The most idiotic cherry picking I've ever seen
 

Similar threads

Lv99_BixNood
Replies
42
Views
2K
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
17
Views
902
_Antediluvian
_Antediluvian
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
3
Views
783
ducster
ducster
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
36
Views
2K
endoftheskies
endoftheskies
anon65
Replies
11
Views
1K
Uninvited
Uninvited

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top