Sorry, but I do not understand it, either. What does it mean "too many children". Too many people, on Earth is a problem? For whom? Definitely not for me and for the Earth itself.
I find the "overpopulation" theory as the main reason, why people should be wave of the Globalist threat. Globalist forces want Humanity to be small. What for? Smaller populations are easier to be ruled and manipulated, it is obvious. In bigger populations, much more policies must be implemented to control the population. China is the best example, it has the most sophisticated, surveillance system, the most sophisticated censorship and so on.
India, which is a Democracy, does not have such problems with its own population as China has. Of course, India is in worse social-economic condition, but it is a country which started economic reforms later than China and these reforms were not as wide and far reaching as in PRC. Yet, India today grows faster than PRC and despite demographic growth, economic growth helps fighting poverty and economic exclusion in the fast pace.
I could risk a theory, that India will show eventually, which model is better. Marxism, combined with totalitarian Autocracy as in People's Republic of China. Or Nationalism, Corporatism, read, True Democracy, combined with anti-Communism and anti-Liberalism, as in India. I could risk theory, that India will become the first, true National-Corporatist state.
When it comes to demographics, I partly agree. As a "nearly geographer", I consider demography as one of the most important factors in social sciences, as a whole. Without analysis of demographics, one cannot evaluate anything, related to society, politics, economy and so on.
I do not agree, that world is a problem with "overpopulation". Earth is big enough to be able to inhabit about 15-20 billion people. I don't believe in all these pseudo-scientific projections about "ongoing hunger" or "water wars". Especially, if these problems are emphasized by people who believe in technological and social progress. People are already able to transform the environment. What is the problem to turn the desert into forest? No problem, if we are able to evaluate the geographic condition, including climate change. I wrote, that Europe could have 1,5 or even 2 billion inhabitants. Now, it has about 650-700 million, if I am correct. There's a lot of free space in countries, like France, Ukraine, Spain, Finland, Sweden, Poland and naturally Russia.
People, who do not believe it, make a comparison, between India and Russia. Compare geographic conditions and population density. Russia could inhabit 5 billion people.
Thus liberal values in such countries gradually weaken and it is understandable that liberal parties don't like it. I disagree. Mixture of Liberalism and anti-immigration policies, doesn't add up. Mostly, because Liberalism emphasize the role of the individual freedom and opposes such a thing like Nationalism, which bases itself on the Conservative (rather Corporatist) measures, where an individual is only a part of the greater social structure, like Nation, Family, local group.
Liberalism today is stricly correlated with Globalism and Globalists in vast majority support Liberalism, rather than Conservativism, I suppose. Besides, Conservative values, like Family-oriented society and organic structures within the society (role of the local Church or other religious congregation) help to defend against weakening demographic growth. It is obvious and clearly visible, that Conservative-Christian families, for example in USA have much bigger offspring.
Masons who think that "humanity should progress" have no monopoly for moralism.
