Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based It would be based if the entire humanity converted to Islam

RealSchizo

RealSchizo

2/10 , 5'5 , boneless face. Abandon all hope.
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 22, 2022
Posts
14,012
Imagine a world where no man is a cuck and loves and fears his God more than anything else.

So in the case of Islam Based Mohammed wrote in the Quaran that if the women does not obey then you shall beat her like a stray dog.

I am not a muslim, but just thought it would be based if every man was.

I'd enjoy beating my whore wife. Men in Afghanistan are the biggest moggers in the world.
 
Cringelam is fucking gay and retarded.
 
Cringelam is fucking gay and retarded.
Islam in its purest form is the most blackpilled religion.

-Exposes the true nature of foids

-Hates on shitdogs

-The man is given the main role like how it is supposed to be which is the other way around in Western shitholes.

Have fun being bossed around by women jfl. I may geomaxx to some radical islamic country in the future get away from this shitty society.
 
Islam in its purest form is the most blackpilled religion.

-Exposes the true nature of foids

-Hates on shitdogs

-The man is given the main role like how it is supposed to be which is the other way around in Western shitholes.

Have fun being bossed around by women jfl. I may geomaxx to some radical islamic country in the future get away from this shitty society.
It promotes polygamy for starters which means it favors chads, not incels.
It isn't as anti-female as it's portrayed either, they actually worship females quite a lot just in a different way, maybe it's more based than the way the west currently treats females but that's not saying a lot, Islam isn't the only patriarchal religion that exists so I always find people who shill for it exclusively on here like it is kind of sus.
Muslim countries weren't even that culturally conservative until recently, it's a modern development, the Ottoman empire promoted homosexuality and lots of cringe shit.
 
the Ottoman empire promoted homosexuality and lots of cringe shit.
Turks have always been faggots and they aren't muslims like most of them are westernized and cucked.
 
It promotes polygamy for starters which means it favors chads, not incels.
polygamy is for rich men not necessarily Chad. men who practice polygamy have a shit ton of responsibilities and by extension a shit ton of expenses to pay. rich men have and always will have harems since women will always be viewed in one way or another as property to men (Islam just makes sure the men can't go out to get milk). Islam actually cockblocks Chad hard since unless he's rich or has enough money to get approval from the girl's father he'll be on this forum like us.
 
Turks have always been faggots and they aren't muslims like most of them are westernized and cucked.
Christianity is still more based the problem is we don't live under a theocracy so Christianity currently has no teeth to enforce anything, without a way to use force religious structuce become meaningless, if I was going to shill for an Abrahamic religion I would still pick Christianity, it's also anti-foid in actuality it's just that modern Christians are ignorant cucks. Islam isn't immune to becoming gay and retarded like Christianity did.
It worked well for white people for a long time.
 
polygamy is for rich men not necessarily Chad. men who practice polygamy have a shit ton of responsibilities and by extension a shit ton of expenses to pay. rich men have and always will have harems since women will always be viewed in one way or another as property to men. Islam actually cockblocks Chad hard since unless he's rich or has enough money to get approval from the girl's father he'll be on this forum like us.
Monogamy is still better. There will be less incels in a monogamous structure overall and I don't see how this is debatable.
 
Christianity is still more based the problem is we don't live under a theocracy so Christianity currently has no teeth to enforce anything, without a way to use force religious structuce become meaningless, if I was going to shill for an Abrahamic religion I would still pick Christianity, it's also anti-foid in actuality it's just that modern Christians are ignorant cucks. Islam isn't immune to becoming gay and retarded like Christianity did.
It worked well for white people for a long time.
true tbh. In the 20s,30s it worked just fine but it was short lived due to the jews becoming involved in the decadence of culture.
 
Islam is right about foids and fags only. Everything else, such as drinking camel piss, kissing little boys, flying donkey monsters, cleaning your ass with rocks, the eyes being the leather strap of the anus etc. is all bullshit though.
 
Islam is right about foids and fags only. Everything else, such as drinking camel piss, kissing little boys, flying donkey monsters, cleaning your ass with rocks, the eyes being the leather strap of the anus etc. is all bullshit though.
Ive never heard about the camel piss thing tbh people keep mentioning it tho
 
Monogamy is still better. There will be less incels in a monogamous structure overall and I don't see how this is debatable.
Polygamy just provides an outlet for human nature. women will always flock to men with more resources, men with resources will always live in sexual abundance. Islam just sets a limit to it. Instead of a fat rich man deflowering hundreds of low value men's prospective wives, he's confined to fucking and looking after 4 women.
 
Ive never heard about the camel piss thing tbh people keep mentioning it tho
It's supposed to be mixed with camel milk. And drinking the camel piss-milk mixture is said to cure disease or some crap
 
women will always flock to men with more resources, men with resources will always live in sexual abundances.
Some will do it yes but that doesn't mean it's good or that we should promote it, evil will always exist but you don't have to embrace it and advocate for it and add fuel to the fire.
 
Some will do it yes but that doesn't mean it's good or that we should promote it, evil will always exist but you don't have to embrace it and advocate for it and add fuel to the fire.
it ain't evil since the men are forced to provide and can't escape their responsibilities like the chads who pump and dump in the west.
 
it ain't evil since the men are forced to provide and can't escape their responsibilities like the chads who pump and dump in the west.
Polygamy is evil because it creates more incels than monogamy.
Yes I'm against chads pump and dumping but that doesn't mean you have to advocate for Islam, there are other alternatives.
I support enforced monogamy with strict punishments for sex outside of marriage.
 
Polygamy is evil because it creates more incels than monogamy.
human greed is way too powerful (for both men and women). it's impossible to enforce monogamy to this degree. rich men will always find cracks in the system to have harems and women would rather elope with a rich man and join his harem than marry a low value man
Yes I'm against chads pump and dumping but that doesn't mean you have to advocate for Islam, there are other alternatives.
I support enforced monogamy with strict punishments for sex outside of marriage.
regulated polygamy is the best way to quarantine men with extremely high SMV (again polygamy isn't for chad it's for rich men since even just two wives would be expensive AF).
 
human greed is way too powerful (for both men and women). it's impossible to enforce monogamy to this degree.
You are basically making the argument that libertarians make that crime will always exist so you should just make everything legal. Some people will do it but it's still evil and when you catch them you punish them so less people do it overall. You are acting like monogamy has never existed when that's the system white people lived under for the majority of their history.
Also I don't really care if it's for chad or rich men or rich chad, it's wrong regardless.
 
You are basically making the argument that libertarians make that crime will always exist so you should just make everything legal.
no I'm saying provide a legal alternative.
 
Imagine a world where no man is a cuck and loves and fears his God more than anything else.

So in the case of Islam Based Mohammed wrote in the Quaran that if the women does not obey then you shall beat her like a stray dog.

I am not a muslim, but just thought it would be based if every man was.

I'd enjoy beating my whore wife. Men in Afghanistan are the biggest moggers in the world.
It could be better I guess if everyone strictly adhered to the rules. But then again medieval christianity would probably be better than islam. Muslims nowadays are cucked and low IQ.
 
I don't want to, I want it to be illegal.
"Just let homeless people do meth bro because they are going to do it anyway, provide a legal alternative." :soy:
what does meth have to do with sex?
 
what does meth have to do with sex?
It's the same logic, people are going to do something which is harmful even though it's illegal so just provide an alternative to let them do it legally, problem solved!
 
It's the same logic, people are going to do something which is harmful even though it's illegal so just provide an alternative to let them do it legally, problem solved!
why is polygamy harmful?
 
Christianity used to be the same way. Both religions are 90% alike, if not more. If people simply returned to old Christianity, that would give the same result.
 
It promotes polygamy for starters which means it favors chads, not incels.
It isn't as anti-female as it's portrayed either, they actually worship females quite a lot just in a different way, maybe it's more based than the way the west currently treats females but that's not saying a lot, Islam isn't the only patriarchal religion that exists so I always find people who shill for it exclusively on here like it is kind of sus.
Muslim countries weren't even that culturally conservative until recently, it's a modern development, the Ottoman empire promoted homosexuality and lots of cringe shit.
Islam doesn't really ''promote'' polygamy in general, it's only adviced during times of war, when there are more females than males. I agree with OP that society would be better off if everyone practiced islam and followed its rules, but imo christianity would be better. Either way both religions are retarded and are not real solutions, muslims are also cucked anyway
 
why is polygamy harmful?
I explained already, because it creates incels by creating hyper competitive sexual competition where only the top men (rich or chad or rich chad, whatever it is, doesn't matter, the point is many men won't have wives under this system) have wives.
In a monogamous system there is less competition so more men will have a wife and won't be lonely.
 
Christianity used to be the same way. Both religions are 90% alike, if not more. If people simply returned to old Christianity, that would give the same result.
Exactly, it's not even about the religion, it's more so about culture
 
It didn't ''promote'' homosexuality, AFAIK it was only practiced by the elites, and it wasn't made public or anything
Someone made a thread about this on here, I'll try to find it, I think it was @GeckoBus
 
.is servers working for u guys?
 
Christianity is still more based the problem is we don't live under a theocracy so Christianity currently has no teeth to enforce anything, without a way to use force religious structuce become meaningless, if I was going to shill for an Abrahamic religion I would still pick Christianity, it's also anti-foid in actuality it's just that modern Christians are ignorant cucks. Islam isn't immune to becoming gay and retarded like Christianity did.
It worked well for white people for a long time.
You're pretty correct in 95% of what you've said here. However, living under a theocracy is an unrealistic expectation, and even if we did, modern-day people would never follow Christianity how it used to be followed. Modern-day Christians are eternal LARPers, I swear to God that they don't actually want to be following God and worshiping him, they just want the aesthetic of doing so. They never go out of their way to protect their beliefs or have any meaningful influence. Someone will say 'Jesus did such and such, and it was bad', and then instead of defending against blasphemy of the person they literally believe to be God, they'll then go—"Okay, now do Muhammad."

Uh, alright, but what about Jesus? They're criticizing your beliefs, what changes if they then criticize the beliefs of a religion you don't follow? It's like Christians are afraid of being rightfully upset and showing it in any meaningful way. A 50-foot Hindu god statue will be built in Texas, and Christians will at most post an angry tweet about it and ask Greg Abbott why he allowed it there.

My, and now I've just gone on a rant about modern-day Christians. Regardless, Islam will be the same way in a few decades or so. God truly is dead.
 
I explained already, because it creates incels by creating hyper competitive sexual competition where only the top men (rich or chad or rich chad, whatever it is, doesn't matter, the point is many men won't have wives under this system) have wives.
In a monogamous system there is less competition so more men will have a wife and won't be lonely.
There are very few men who could afford polygamy (2-4 women) and even less, FULL polygamy (4 women) so idk about hyper competitive. you'll never find a monogamous system that's strong enough to prevent human nature. God made women chadsexual and men desire multiple sex partners. truecels will always exist since there will always be men so undesirable that women would rather move over to a nunnery than stay engaged to them.
 
You're pretty correct in 95% of what you've said here. However, living under a theocracy is an unrealistic expectation, and even if we did, modern-day people would never follow Christianity how it used to be followed. Modern-day Christians are eternal LARPers, I swear to God that they don't actually want to be following God and worshiping him, they just want the aesthetic of doing so. They never go out of their way to protect their beliefs or have any meaningful influence. Someone will say 'Jesus did such and such, and it was bad', and then instead of defending against blasphemy of the person they literally believe to be God, they'll then go—"Okay, now do Muhammad."

Uh, alright, but what about Jesus? They're criticizing your beliefs, what changes if they then criticize the beliefs of a religion you don't follow? It's like Christians are afraid of being rightfully upset and showing it in any meaningful way. A 50-foot Hindu god statue will be built in Texas, and Christians will at most post an angry tweet about it and ask Greg Abbott why he allowed it there.

My, and now I've just gone on a rant about modern-day Christians. Regardless, Islam will be the same way in a few decades or so. God truly is dead.
The teeth of Christianity has to come from the state, Christianity basically teaches you to be nigger cattle and worship authority, which is fine for most people since this is how they are going to live by default anyway, that's partly why you have so many Christians that won't do anything except post an angry message on Facebook or whatever like you said, they are supposed to be meek, there is a reason monarchy is the only form of government God ever officially endorses in The Bible, democracy and Christianity do not mix, it's water and oil.
Imagine if there was a Christian militia that was funded and backed up by the state, don't you think many people would want to join that and would support that including the pissed off Christians posting on Facebook? I don't think it's impossible for such a thing to exist in the future, however I don't think it's likely something like this will exist anytime soon. We need holy armies, holy cities, holy governments, ect, and they need to exist in the United States and other western countries.
 
You're pretty correct in 95% of what you've said here. However, living under a theocracy is an unrealistic expectation, and even if we did, modern-day people would never follow Christianity how it used to be followed. Modern-day Christians are eternal LARPers, I swear to God that they don't actually want to be following God and worshiping him, they just want the aesthetic of doing so. They never go out of their way to protect their beliefs or have any meaningful influence. Someone will say 'Jesus did such and such, and it was bad', and then instead of defending against blasphemy of the person they literally believe to be God, they'll then go—"Okay, now do Muhammad."

Uh, alright, but what about Jesus? They're criticizing your beliefs, what changes if they then criticize the beliefs of a religion you don't follow? It's like Christians are afraid of being rightfully upset and showing it in any meaningful way. A 50-foot Hindu god statue will be built in Texas, and Christians will at most post an angry tweet about it and ask Greg Abbott why he allowed it there.

My, and now I've just gone on a rant about modern-day Christians. Regardless, Islam will be the same way in a few decades or so. God truly is dead.
the only thing Christians have accomplished in the modern era is inadvertently providing us with anime nuns.
 
You're pretty correct in 95% of what you've said here. However, living under a theocracy is an unrealistic expectation, and even if we did, modern-day people would never follow Christianity how it used to be followed. Modern-day Christians are eternal LARPers, I swear to God that they don't actually want to be following God and worshiping him, they just want the aesthetic of doing so. They never go out of their way to protect their beliefs or have any meaningful influence. Someone will say 'Jesus did such and such, and it was bad', and then instead of defending against blasphemy of the person they literally believe to be God, they'll then go—"Okay, now do Muhammad."

Uh, alright, but what about Jesus? They're criticizing your beliefs, what changes if they then criticize the beliefs of a religion you don't follow? It's like Christians are afraid of being rightfully upset and showing it in any meaningful way. A 50-foot Hindu god statue will be built in Texas, and Christians will at most post an angry tweet about it and ask Greg Abbott why he allowed it there.

My, and now I've just gone on a rant about modern-day Christians. Regardless, Islam will be the same way in a few decades or so. God truly is dead.
This is kind of why I'm been considering joining the LDS although I would need to look into it more before I seriously consider it, but I know many of them want to create a holy city in the United States and support the United States becoming a theocracy.
I wonder if that would make me the only Mormon on this site.
 
Last edited:
Imagine a world where no man is a cuck and loves and fears his God more than anything else.

So in the case of Islam Based Mohammed wrote in the Quaran that if the women does not obey then you shall beat her like a stray dog.

I am not a muslim, but just thought it would be based if every man was.

I'd enjoy beating my whore wife. Men in Afghanistan are the biggest moggers in the world.
Islam in its purest form is the most blackpilled religion.

-Exposes the true nature of foids

-Hates on shitdogs

-The man is given the main role like how it is supposed to be which is the other way around in Western shitholes.

Have fun being bossed around by women jfl. I may geomaxx to some radical islamic country in the future get away from this shitty society.
Read "sahih bukhari 8:82:830" then come back again
 
Someone made a thread about this on here, I'll try to find it, I think it was @GeckoBus
Literature and art flourished as significant mediums for discussing gender and sexuality, with Ottoman poets openly exploring same-sex love in the arts until the 19th century, when Westernization led to the stigmatization of homosexuality, potentially influencing the censorship of certain literary scenes.

The real question people should ask themselves is why they think people would act differently in the past than in the present. Especially people who believe in evolution and genetic determinsm. Did faggots not exist in the past? Did humans not react to looks, did they have no sex drive? Do islamic men not get a boner from seeing fat tits? These are the mysteries.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top