Serious It is better to be low IQ than high IQ

[mylifeistrash]

This line of thinking needs to be put to rest. Why tear open your own back with a whip in an attempt to render yourself the most wretched man alive? "Ugly people are stupid too and Chad just wins because he is the best at everything always - I'm the most blackpilled and I'm going to lie in my own urine now". It is the antithesis of blackpilled to consider Chad some kind of Renaissance man polymath - people cruise through life effectively on their face alone and you're buying right into the presentation to accept the adored as universally better. What fuckin' "good genes" are geneticopers always talking about? "You have a strong jawline, I can see where it helped you develop this elegant and original biochemical assay" "Wow man, your brow ridge is so heavy, how'd a guy like you end up having a heart attack at age 44?" The way "good genes come in packages" gets trotted out to inaugurate festivals of self-flagellation, you'd think people seriously believed that every element human development was emergent from a single pair of alleles: a good one or a bad one.

Stop the cuckoldry.

because it's been studied by science ENDLESSLY

https://www.google.com/search?q=attractiveness+iq&oq

 

[ArtoriasWolf]

exactly.

It's like saying

"People with bad genetics are happier"

no they are, they're poor, confused, in pain and hate life.

 

[Deleted member 2798]

Nearly everyone who says "I'm high iq, can't relate to normies" is actually low IQ.

The reason they can't relate is because they're socially retarded. No shit people don't want to debate politics while they're eating their lunch. Get a fucking grip and stop being so boring.

"Buh what about deeeep topics" you are 100% low iq if you are obsessed with politics and societal issues. The reason people don't care is because they are smart enough to work out it is a waste of time.

As for everything else... people are not into the same stuff you are. Of course gitls aren't going to care about fucking electrical engineering or whatever. Find people who are and stop being a whiny bitch.

Severe misunderstanding of the issue. It's not confined to what people do or don't find interesting. It bleeds into awareness, inhibition, communication, any number of different things. Anyone pestering a slut about Wittgenstein is socially stunted, no shit. I've never seen or heard of a person doing this. You don't end up an incel just for being somewhat intelligent but it certainly helps. If you want, I can dig up research showing that celibacy scales with educational attainment and IQ - there's plenty of it.

because it's been studied by science ENDLESSLY

https://www.google.com/search?q=attractiveness+iq&oq

Well, I don't know who science is, but you might want to be a bit more skeptical of him and what he's studied:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937789

 

[idkwattodowithlife]

This line of thinking needs to be put to rest. Why tear open your own back with a whip in an attempt to render yourself the most wretched man alive? "Ugly people are stupid too and Chad just wins because he is the best at everything always - I'm the most blackpilled and I'm going to lie in my own urine now". It is the antithesis of blackpilled to consider Chad some kind of Renaissance man polymath - people cruise through life effectively on their face alone and you're buying right into the presentation to accept the adored as universally better. What fuckin' "good genes" are geneticopers always talking about? "You have a strong jawline, I can see where it helped you develop this elegant and original biochemical assay" "Wow man, your brow ridge is so heavy, how'd a guy like you end up having a heart attack at age 44?" The way "good genes come in packages" gets trotted out to inaugurate festivals of self-flagellation, you'd think people seriously believed that every element human development was emergent from a single pair of alleles: a good one or a bad one.

Stop the cuckoldry.

its not about being the most black pilled. its about unveiling some of the dark truths that are in our lives.

i think your coming from an angle that some incels have a self-defeatist mindset. okay, well some do... and i guess thats understandable since most of us are at the bottom pits of society. however not all of us sway down there... a lot of us cant be neets (especially if you dont live in a socialist country that gives welfare). i dont criticise what choices incels make in their lives.

i also like to know where i lie in society, it gives me a sense of comfort or gives some type of revelation (telling me that its my genetics or out of my control), and it doesn't matter how depressing it may seem for me or for others. i also care to share some of these dark truths with my fellow incels, just so that they could comfort in their own way. i find if some dont want to accept, then thats fine, but then i know that in the end, theyll just end up hurting themselves more. otherwise, not knowing where i lie society, pains me. id at least like to acknowledge or know whats going on with my life... bottled up frustrations doesnt take us to good places and im glad we have this forum.

and yes good genes does come in a package, i wouldn't say it with 100% certainty. some people could be born with a mix or a combination of good and bad traits. this is analogous to being attractive to ten girls to be with one girl, e.g. being a high tier chad of some sort, with hardly any flaws.

1. Tall men make more money
Ever heard the stat about CEOs of Fortune 500 companies? According to the much-touted factoid, more than half stand at six feet tall - and a whopping 90pc are above average height.

While those figures originate from a study done way back in 1980, there's plenty more research out there to suggest that tall men really do get ahead in business.

For example, a study published in the Spring edition of the Journal of Human Capital found that an increase in height from the 25th to 75th percentile (roughly 4-5 inches) in the Western world results in a salary increase between 9 and 15pc.

As Timothy Judge told Malcolm Gladwell in his essay Why Do We Love Tall Men, “If you take this over the course of a 30-year career and compound it, we’re talking about a tall person enjoying literally hundreds of thousands of dollars of earnings advantage.”

Interestingly, an increase in height for women does not result in such an emphatic increase in earnings.

2. Tall men are more attractive to women
How many couples do you know where the man is shorter than the women?

Up until recently, it was a truth universally acknowledged that men sought out shorter women, while women gravitated towards taller men.

However, a joint study conducted by researchers at Rice University and the University of North Texas last year found that men don't particularly care about their partner's height - whereas women definitely do.

After looking at the data from just under 1,000 Yahoo! personal dating ads, the researchers concluded that only 13pc of men were specifically searching for a shorter woman, but 49pc of women required a taller man. This figure increased to 55pc when the researchers asked the women open-ended questions related to attraction.

3. Tall people are more authoritative
Not only are taller men likely to earn better salaries and attract more women than shorter men, but they're also seen as more authoritative when walking into a room of strangers - or onto a pitch of football players.

That's according to evolutionary psychologist Gert Stulp from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, who studied referees in the French and German football leagues and the 2010 World Cup.

The taller referees, found Stulp, were assigned to high profile games, proving a positive correlation between height and perceived ability. he concluded that "taller referees were better able to maintain control of the game" due to their natural social dominance.

On average, referees were also taller than their assistants (the humble linesmen).

4. Tall people have better hearts
Yes, you read that right. Although we're talking about the physical kind, not the emotional symbol, in case you're wondering.

According to research published by the University of Leicester in last month, every 2.5in jump in height decreases your risk of heart disease by 13.5 pc. That means someone who is 5ft tall has a 32pc higher risk of suffering from coronary disease than someone who is 6in taller.

One possible theory to explain the discrepancy is that factors such as nutrition and socioeconomic environment that determine eventual height during childhood are linked to heart health. In layman's terms: good nutrition during your childhood could help you grow tall and develop a healthy heart.

However, 80pc of our final height is believed to be dictated by genes, which suggests evolution could be at play.

5. Tall men keep their wits about them
Short men are more likely to develop and die from dementia, according to a massive study of nearly 220,000 people across Britain that was completed at the end of last year.

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh found that men who were 5ft 5in inches or shorter were 50pc more likely to develop, and die from dementia, than those who were 5ft 8in inches or taller.

A gap of 2.8 in between any height raised the risk of dying from dementia by 24 per cent.

Lead author, Dr Tom Russ, of the University of Edinburgh’s College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine, said: “This just shows the importance of intervening early to make sure children have proper nutrition and are not at risk.

“We found that shorter adult height was associated with an increased risk of subsequent dementia death and that this association was stronger in men than it was in women.

source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the...ore-attractive-and-have-healthier-hearts.html

also attractive and taller men are more smarter than unattractive, and shorter men (on average).

Source:

In my previous post, I explain that men on average are slightly but significantly more intelligent than women, not because they are men, but because they are taller. But why are taller people more intelligent than shorter people?
The real answer is we don’t know for sure, but there are two possible explanations. First, both height and intelligence may be indicators of underlying health. According to this view, people who are genetically and developmentally healthier simultaneously grow taller and become more intelligent than those who are less healthy, producing the positive correlation between height and intelligence.

This is a plausible theory. In our paper, however, Reyniers and I produce evidence against it. In the analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, we control for the respondent’s health, by using four indicators of health and producing a latent variable for health using principal component analysis in order to eliminate random measurement error. The association between height and intelligence does not diminish at all when we control for health. In fact, once we control for other demographic and social variables, health is not significantly correlated with intelligence at all; it actually has a nonsignificantly negative association with intelligence. So, at least in our sample, health is unlikely to be the common cause for both height and intelligence.

In our paper, Reyniers and I propose a second possible explanation. It consists of three separate mechanisms.

1. Assortative matingof tall men and beautiful women. Because height is desirable in men and physical attractiveness is desirable in women, there should be assortative mating between tall men and beautiful women (and short men and less beautiful women). Because both height and physical attractiveness are heritable, this will create an extrinsic (non-causal) correlation among their children between height and physical attractiveness, where tall people (both men and women) are more beautiful than short people.

2. Assortative mating of intelligent men and beautiful women. Because intelligent men tend to attain higher status, at least in the evolutionarily novel environment in recent history, and high status is desirable in men, and because physical attractiveness is desirable in women, there should be assortative mating between intelligent (and thus high-status) men and beautiful women. Because both intelligence and physical attractiveness are heritable, this will create an extrinsic (non-causal) correlation among their children between intelligence and physical attractiveness, where more attractive people are more intelligent than less attractive people.

article continues after advertisement

3. Extrinsic correlation between height and physical attractiveness (produced by Mechanism 1 above) and extrinsic correlation between intelligence and physical attractiveness (produced by Mechanism 2 above) will create a second-order extrinsic correlation between height and intelligence.

We believe that this may be why taller people are more intelligent than shorter people. Another factor contributing to the seeming male advantage in intelligence is that taller parents are more likely to have sons than shorter parents. So, over many generations, more sons will inherit their parents’ genes inclining them to be taller and more intelligent, and more daughters will inherit their parents’ genes inclining them to be shorter and less intelligent. But, once again, the crucial factor is height, not sex.

In our paper, we present evidence for all of the crucial mechanisms: Taller people are on average physically more attractive than shorter people; physically more attractive people are on average more intelligent than physically less attractive people; taller people are on average more intelligent than shorter people; and taller parents are more likely to have sons than shorter parents. But the issue is far from resolved. While there is no doubt that taller people are indeed more intelligent than shorter people, the question of why this is so is one of the remaining puzzles in evolutionary psychology.

sources: https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/...taller-people-more-intelligent-shorter-people

"As the graph below shows, attractive NCDS respondents are significantly more intelligent than unattractive NCDS respondents. Attractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 104.23, whereas unattractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 91.81. The difference between them is 12.42. This mean difference implies a correlation coefficient of r = .381, which is reasonably large in any survey data."

attractive people on average have 12+ more iq points than unattractive people.




yep and chads are winning in life. accepting defeat doesnt necessarily imply cuckoldry, it just means that you've learnt the truth, and moved on...

 

[_incelinside]

I have the exact opposite problem. My IQ is super low and as a result I don't feel like I belong unless I'm around ghetto high school drop outs.

I know far less about current events, politics, history, culture, science, technology etc. compared to the average person. A lot of the time my coworkers will be talking about something and I'll have no idea what the hell they're talking about and they'll ask me for my opinion, which is always awkward. Everything has to be dumbed down to me. It also doesn't help that I have the vocabulary of maybe a 4th grader.

Your posts come across as intelligent though

 

[Deleted member 2798]

its not about being the most black pilled. its about unveiling some of the dark truths that are in our lives.

i think your coming from an angle that some incels have a self-defeatist mindset. okay, well some do... and i guess thats understandable since most of us at the bottom pits of society. however not all of us sway down there... a lot of us cant be neets (especially if you dont live in a socialist country that gives welfare). i dont criticise what choices incels in make their lives.

i also like to know where i lie in society, it gives me a sense of comfort or gives some type of revelation (telling me that its my genetics or out of my control), and it doesn't matter how depressing it may seem for me or for others. i also care to share some of these dark truths with my fellow incels, just so that they could comfort in their own way. i find if some dont want to accept, then thats fine, but then i know that in the end, theyll just end up hurting themselves more. otherwise, not knowing where i lie society, pains me. id at least like to acknowledge or know whats going on with my life... bottled up frustrations doesnt take us to good places and im glad we have this forum.

and yes good genes does come in a package, i wouldn't say it with 100% certainty. some people could be born with a mix or a combination of good and bad traits. this is analogous to being attractive to ten girls to be with one girl, e.g. being a high tier chad of some sort, with hardly any flaws.


source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the...ore-attractive-and-have-healthier-hearts.html

also attractive and taller men are more smarter than unattractive, and shorter men (on average).


sources: https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/...taller-people-more-intelligent-shorter-people

"As the graph below shows, attractive NCDS respondents are significantly more intelligent than unattractive NCDS respondents. Attractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 104.23, whereas unattractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 91.81. The difference between them is 12.42. This mean difference implies a correlation coefficient of r = .381, which is reasonably large in any survey data."

attractive people on average have 12+ more iq points than unattractive people.




yep and chads are winning in life. accepting defeat doesnt necessarily imply cuckoldry, it just means that you've learnt the truth, and moved on...

Well, give yourself solace if needed, but you shouldn't extend it to inferring relationships where there probably aren't m/any. One could be both a lookscel and a lowIQcel independenly and acknowledge that while both are anchors on success, it doesn't imply a causal nexus.

As for taller men having higher incomes, I believe it. Money is bound up in social transactions and people are constantly throwing out obstacles for manlets. Here especially it is a bad idea to ignore the broader context and conclude "tall men are smart and talented".

As for the last study linked, this was the one done on kids with attractiveness ratings given by teachers, right? Odd, confounding methods: the subjects hadn't even gone through puberty - there is also the possibility of bias in the ratings, as who knows if temperament, behavior, or intelligence itself influenced how "attractive" a teacher considered their pupils (non-peer ratings don't count for shit tbh tbh).

I linked a large metaanalysis in a response to @mylifeistrash and consider it a more robust treatment of the topic. From a classical genetic perspective as well, "good genes come in packages" usually doesn't make much sense.

If genetic determinism suits you, so be it. I'd like to rally incels out of self-hatred and into world-hatred though.

 

[Percolator]

Agreed, word for word, OP. Thanks.

I don't know about the thread but that's a high IQ sig.

 

[Deleted member 1252]

I don't know about the thread but that's a high IQ sig.

Lars von Trier is a blackpilled director.

 

[Percolator]

Lars von Trier is a blackpilled director.

The way he got shun at Cannes was disgusting. He's blackpilled and great.

 

[FortunateMilkman]

When you're low iq you live a life of ignorance or atleast can't understand the true depth of things like the blackpill (there are lots of low iq incels)

 

[NormieKiller]

I'm not low-IQ but not high-IQ neither. I feel like most people are very uninteresting and hard to relate to, especially nowadays.

 

[BradPitt]

IQ is a joke anways.

It's a poor way of measuring Intelligence, that being said, it's the only thing we've got.

And yeah, being low IQ is way better. JFL @ valueing intelligence.

 

[Semicel]

Everybody who thinks having a low IQ is better = bluepilled. That's by definition a blue-pill way of thinking.
Having a high IQ is better, though not too high.

 

[Evidential]

I have a fluctuating IQ lmao. Can't think rationally outside around people. Literally a retard.

It also doesn't help that I have the vocabulary of maybe a 4th grader.

Same here.

 

[mylifeistrash]

Well, give yourself solace if needed, but you shouldn't extend it to inferring relationships where there probably aren't m/any. One could be both a lookscel and a lowIQcel independenly and acknowledge that while both are anchors on success, it doesn't imply a causal nexus.

As for taller men having higher incomes, I believe it. Money is bound up in social transactions and people are constantly throwing out obstacles for manlets. Here especially it is a bad idea to ignore the broader context and conclude "tall men are smart and talented".

As for the last study linked, this was the one done on kids with attractiveness ratings given by teachers, right? Odd, confounding methods: the subjects hadn't even gone through puberty - there is also the possibility of bias in the ratings, as who knows if temperament, behavior, or intelligence itself influenced how "attractive" a teacher considered their pupils (non-peer ratings don't count for shit tbh tbh).

I linked a large metaanalysis in a response to @mylifeistrash and consider it a more robust treatment of the topic. From a classical genetic perspective as well, "good genes come in packages" usually doesn't make much sense.

If genetic determinism suits you, so be it. I'd like to rally incels out of self-hatred and into world-hatred though.

There were countless studies and articles and you linked one.

Amount of evidence that shows atttractive people have higher IQ? Nearly infinite.

Evidence that shows the opposite? Zero

Accept reality and stop coping, or don't. No one cares.

 

[Deleted member 2119]

Being so dumb that you lose all of your self awareness > High IQ

Ignorance is bliss

 

[Pewaraw]

Yes turn into an alcoholic or substance abuser like most great minds in history

What the fuck are you talking about? I do the same and I was not,am not and will not be a great mind in history.

 

[June3cel2]

A decently above average IQ is all I have in this life.

 

[LowBorn]

High IQ gives a lot of existential worries that lower IQ does not have to contend with. If the high IQ is given with large amounts of imagination, it is literally hell. I have meds to shut down my imagination and it often works, it is some kind of shizo meds but I am no shizo. It´s just hte imagination. You can see so many options and possibilities but you also are clever enough to realize they are impossible.The curse of a high IQ is real but ofc there is advantages too. If you find like minded people you can have epic discussions and thought experiments that is real tantalizing. I just wish IQ was the decider for partners and general vildation and not envy and hate.

 

[yung incel]

Autist thinking he is high IQ cope. The world favors high IQ, you just don't have the social intelligence required.

 

[heroinfather]

OP is a bragging fag fuck off

 

[LowBorn]

Social intelligence is something else entirely and I am very well aware that I lack it. Severely.

 

[anon_899]

Low IQ here, it doesn't help if you're still self aware

 

[Deleted member 2798]

There were countless studies and articles and you linked one.

Amount of evidence that shows atttractive people have higher IQ? Nearly infinite.

Evidence that shows the opposite? Zero

Accept reality and stop coping, or don't. No one cares.

It's an aggregation of data across multiple studies and raises issues with previous analyses. Did you even open the link? You gave me some Google results that were mostly popsci magazine articles, which makes me think you probably didn't read those either.

Corroborating a point with the coveted "SOURCES!" is more than "rounding up" a few studies, dumping them into the argument, and wiping your hands saying "look, they exist AND there are more of them!"

Let me fly against the tenets of the Rational Redditor here and use some illustrative examples. Why is there a stereotype of currycels and ricecels being strongly overrepresented in high level academic and technical work? Why is this, in fact, borne out in my personal experience? Why do I looks/heightmog almost everyone I've met who's more intelligent than me? Why aren't hunter-eyed jocksuckers renowned for their critical thinking abilities? Why do these same people almost invariably talk like lobotomy patients? When was the last time you got a good look at an eminent mind? Look at this chad!

Being a contrarian isn't worth blowing Chad. Self-abasement is gay as hell. Chad is a stupid fuck.

 

[sadafcel]

Def low IQ, so I wouldn't realise what a fucking failure I am.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

OP is a bragging fag fuck off

You are all probably decently high IQ. Otherwise you would probably be in cucktears. I'm pretty sure most people here can relate with hating ghetto fucks and the way they talk.
Ok maybe you can't relate, since you're angry at the "bragging." You should fit in at twitter.

 

[mylifeistrash]

It's an aggregation of data across multiple studies and raises issues with previous analyses. Did you even open the link? You gave me some Google results that were mostly popsci magazine articles, which makes me think you probably didn't read those either.

Corroborating a point with the coveted "SOURCES!" is more than "rounding up" a few studies, dumping them into the argument, and wiping your hands saying "look, they exist AND there are more of them!"

Let me fly against the tenets of the Rational Redditor here and use some illustrative examples. Why is there a stereotype of currycels and ricecels being strongly overrepresented in high level academic and technical work? Why is this, in fact, borne out in my personal experience? Why do I looks/heightmog almost everyone I've met who's more intelligent than me? Why aren't hunter-eyed jocksuckers renowned for their critical thinking abilities? Why do these same people almost invariably talk like lobotomy patients? When was the last time you got a good look at an eminent mind? Look at this chad!

Being a contrarian isn't worth blowing Chad. Self-abasement is gay as hell. Chad is a stupid fuck.

No I didn't because:

- You couldn't have read them all. It would take weeks.
- You didn't even have your IQ tested and neither did these people you assume to be smart.
- I don't care about your endless coping.

What's happening is you're seeing incels with average IQs study dumb shit Chads don't care about, then declaring them to be smart because they waste their life in some meaningless garbage bullshit like comp science or whatever trash low IQ indians flock towards. (Any retard can program java or work with computers)


Even if... you managed to disprove attractiveness and IQ, you gotta work on height and IQ.

And

Even if

you did that, then you gotta do race and IQ. Which shows that India and other SEA countries have a low as fuck IQ.

Stop your coping. If you're ugly chances are you're stupid as fuck.

Also lol @ India: https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country

average IQ: 82


And finally, if Chad wanted, and he doesn't, but if he wanted

he could dominate all these worthless coping incel STEM subjects

 

[Deleted member 5861]

No I didn't because:

- You couldn't have read them all. It would take weeks.
- You didn't even have your IQ tested and don't even know if you're high IQ, which you're probably not
- I don't care about your endless coping.

If you believe in racepill then can you explain why rice cels and (westernized) curries are least attractive despite being the smartest? Kind of hypocritical isn't it?

Autist thinking he is high IQ cope. The world favors high IQ, you just don't have the social intelligence required.

Explain curries and ricecels then.

Everybody who thinks having a low IQ is better = bluepilled. That's by definition a blue-pill way of thinking.
Having a high IQ is better, though not too high.

Because rice cels and curries have it so much better...

 

[SkyJude]

Having a high IQ is a bless and a curse
Being stupid is way easier. Most females dont even care how smart you are

 

[mylifeistrash]

If you believe in racepill then can you explain why rice cels and (westernized) curries are least attractive despite being the smartest? Kind of hypocritical isn't it?

Explain curries and ricecels then.

Because rice cels and curries have it so much better...

Is this a joke? India's average is 82. They're dumb as shit along with all of SEA.
https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country

The asians with a high IQ are better looking than the low IQ asians and come from rich countries, proving the common sense that more attractive = smarter.

Ugly ass eastern euro's vs nordic countries, nordic blows them away.

If you compare with the same race, the the more attractive countries shit all over the ugly ones.
South Korea vs Philippines.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Nearly everyone who says "I'm high iq, can't relate to normies" is actually low IQ.

The reason they can't relate is because they're socially retarded. No shit people don't want to debate politics while they're eating their lunch. Get a fucking grip and stop being so boring.

"Buh what about deeeep topics" you are 100% low iq if you are obsessed with politics and societal issues. The reason people don't care is because they are smart enough to work out it is a waste of time.

As for everything else... people are not into the same stuff you are. Of course gitls aren't going to care about fucking electrical engineering or whatever. Find people who are and stop being a whiny bitch.

If you don't want to hear people whine then get the fuck out of a forum about incels JFL. And I really know I'm a turbo autist, but that really isn't as relevant as you think to this thread. You sound alot like a cucktears fag anyway "get a fucking grip and stop being so boring" " Find people who are and stop being a whiny bitch." Go to twitter and you will see retards love talking politics all the time, just in a sheepish way. And really I mean anything that requires someone with a hint of logic, I don't want to have conversations about how some guy is ugly or the room is cold. Thats simple observation. May as well talk to a baby, at least they aren't as shallow. And I will not talk like "yo shawty is plump know what im saying cuz." Are you one of those people? Sounds like you are, you have to be to have this stupid of a reply.

 

[bignuggies7]

Ignorance is bliss. The lower your IQ, the happier you will be.

The more abstractly you are able think about social interaction, life, perception, and existence, the more miserable you will be for all kinds of reasons

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Is this a joke? India's average is 82. They're dumb as shit along with all of SEA.
https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country

The asians with a high IQ are better looking than the low IQ asians and come from rich countries, proving the common sense that more attractive = smarter.

I clearly said westernized curries. America only accepts the smartest curries, and they're still unattractive as hell. Anyways I'm not talking about smart chads, all he has to do is exist and people will worship him. And about the rice cels, why is inceldom such a major problem in Japan when they're supposedly so attractive?

 

[Deleted member 2798]

No I didn't because:

- You couldn't have read them all. It would take weeks.
- You didn't even have your IQ tested and neither did these people you assume to be smart.
- I don't care about your endless coping.

Of course not, I don't have extensive familiarity with the literature on IQ. But all of the results on the first page you linked are Psychology Today and fuckin' Daily Mail articles about the same study. You go in wanting to believe your backwards hat, neon shorts prince is a dreamy, dashing genius, show me a few motherfucking magazine articles about the same flawed study and declare the question "solved by Mistuh Science".

First guy did have his IQ tested. It was around 150 or something - I'd have to take his word, of course, but he was a MENSA member, so he had your beloved credentials. I haven't, but I'll bet you my right arm that it's over 100. It's at least high enough not to be Chad's confused, masochistic suckslave.

Go take a look at history's most accomplished scientists and inventors. Report back with the first Chad you find.

What's happening is you're seeing incels with average IQs study dumb shit Chads don't care about, then declaring them to be smart because they waste their life in some meaningless garbage bullshit like comp science or whatever trash low IQ indians flock towards. (Any retard can program java or work with computers)

"Chad could have as many patents on disruptive, novel technologies as he wanted, but he's too busy getting blown by me". Fuck off with this shit. Ever think they might not care because their animal brains orient them in baser directions?

Even if... you managed to disprove attractiveness and IQ, you gotta work on height and IQ.

Just ran through a few abstracts, and most seem to agree on a pleiotropic effect. Still, lanklets aren't Chads.

And

Even if

you did that, then you gotta do race and IQ. Which shows that India and other SEA countries have a low as fuck IQ.

Stop your coping. If you're ugly chances are you're stupid as fuck.

No interest. I'm sure racial differences in average IQ are legitimate. So how about Tyrone's big brain? And the notoriously slow Chinamen? Can't remember - the scale ascends from high to low right?

Also lol @ India: https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country

average IQ: 82

"The Indians". Probably the most ethnically and socially heterogeneous country on Earth. The ones you see coming over here for degrees aren't exactly cut from the same cloth as streetshitters.

And finally, if Chad wanted, and he doesn't, but if he wanted

he could dominate all these worthless coping incel STEM subjects

I've met STEM Chads and they're usually mediocre.

 

[Detro]

Wanna talk politics or philosophy, or any other deep conversation that can get intellectual and deep? Something that lots of smart guys are obsessed about it and think all day? Forget about it, normies will only talk small-minded pop culture politics like sheep

Maybe it's just that I don't have friends but even intelligent people don't casually get into deep conversations about philosophy.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Maybe it's just that I don't have friends but even intelligent people don't casually get into deep conversations about philosophy.

Posters here keep nitpicking on the politics and phillosphy part. I mean conversations besides talking about how ugly some random guy is. Anything more than simple observation.
Also the not casually talking philosophy part is not true based on my experiences.

 

[shoji]

My IQ is 94 and I still feel like I don't belong

 

[Deleted member 5861]

My IQ is 94 and I still feel like I don't belong

You might just be ugly.

 

[shoji]

You might just be ugly.

yeah that's most likely why