Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious IT is a hellhole of intellectual dwarfism and our focus on them is holding us back

Gyros_Pretcel

Gyros_Pretcel

19th c. Church of Hamlossus high priest contender
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Posts
9,654
Random bad english sophistery ngl. See it as an experiment. I don't usually post, because of my lack of energy, self doubt and generally I feel I am a pretentious loser, but here we go. Even though this will be just a waste of energy in the grand scheme of things and a drop in the pool of the usual topics. Could you call this an incomplete essay about the status quo?

IT doesexactly do what they criticize conservatives of doing. Claiming pointing out oppression to be discriminatory against both the target and the oppressor. Why do you hate white people? You are the real racist, because racism doesn't exist and you make this bad shit up about black people, you victimize them and treat them like children. Are you a racist? Why do you hate black people?

This is just one example of many.

They shouldn't be used as the standard example for how academics or political ideologies view us. I know there is a type of media which perpetuates the same memes, but this recriuts itself from the same pool of gullible idiots, whose job is it to bolster the status quo for the oligarchy with all its inconsistencies and false opposition spiel.

They are no people with a consistent ideology, just "enlightend" literal centrists appealing to the status quo and shouldn't be taken seriously or used to make a case for or against any part of the political spectrum.

They are always portrayed as leftist, but I know for a fact they would jump on you like a pack of starved dogs the moment an actual leftist showed up. What we perceive today as feminism (feminazism) is just the second wave part from the seventies, that finally entered the mainstream and is basically a hate culture. Maybe okay for it's time of initial occurence as a form of radical protest, principal opposition and edgy counter culture but outdated for today and especially int the light of the just newly arisen modern problems. The reason we have so much bullshit in the media and entertainment sector is that companies finally just decided to run with it superficially appealing to both types of progressives leftists and "leftists" (liberals ideologically stuck in the 70s) at the first glance. There is no ideology behind their action besides maling money. Stirring controversy actually helps their exploitative wagecuck paradigm. You promote your bs product, but most importantly you keep the false dichotomy going through bastardizing both sides at the same time and keeping people railed up about imagimary constructed issues while you empy everyone pockets in the meanwhile. The trick is to allow a maximum of controversy within the beneficial political spectrum to keep people engaged in a nonsensical fake debate and leave a big fog of almost true, but fake news.

Most of the pro incel arguments are in fact, feminist, gender critical and progressive in nature.

The same toxic masculinity (chads, simps, positive discriminators) that damages females is the one that damages incels as well and yes we know females are not the agents of feminism they portray themselves as most of the time. Feminism usually just means: "I am female, so I am right." to them free from any broader scientific interdisciplinary grounding.

I know a lot of people here want to go back ti simpler times. But I actually think this is rooted in not having seen the actual alternative yet, the system does not want to know you of.

It's upon us to build a good faith alternative to the current system and we should start politcizing ourselves from bottom up as the oppressed class we are. It needs a big hammer to crush these social fascists.
 
Ye I should break it down more instead of using big words. Never began. Just felt to get sth out there without just arguing off topic in other's threads.
 
Ye I should break it down more instead of using big words. Never began. Just felt to get sth out there without just arguing off topic in other's threads.
true do this tldr
 
Arbitrary awful english sophistery ngl. Consider it to be an investigation. I don't typically post, as a result of my absence of vitality, self uncertainty and by and large I believe I am a vainglorious failure, however here we go. Despite the fact that this will be only a misuse of vitality when it's all said and done and a drop in the pool of the standard points. Would you be able to call this a fragmented article about the norm?

IT does exactly do what they censure moderates of doing. Asserting calling attention to persecution to be unfair against both the objective and the oppressor. For what reason do you despise white individuals? You are the genuine bigot, since bigotry doesn't exist and you make this awful poop up about individuals of color, you deceive them and treat them like youngsters. Is it accurate to say that you are a supremacist? For what reason do you abhor individuals of color?

This is only one case of many.

They shouldn't be utilized as the standard model for how scholastics or political philosophies see us. I know there is a kind of media which sustains similar images, however this recriuts itself from a similar pool of naïve nitwits, whose activity is it to reinforce the norm for the theocracy with every one of its irregularities and bogus restriction spiel.

They are no individuals with a steady belief system, just "enlightend" strict anti-extremists engaging the norm and shouldn't be paid attention to or used to put forth a defense possibly in support of any piece of the political range.

They are constantly depicted as radical, however I know beyond all doubt they would hop on you like a pack of starved mutts the second a genuine liberal appeared. What we see today as woman's rights (feminazism) is only the second wave part from the seventies, that at long last entered the standard and is fundamentally a loathe culture. Perhaps alright for it's season of starting occurence as a type of radical dissent, head restriction and tense counter culture yet obsolete for now and particularly int the light of the equitable recently emerged present day issues. The explanation we have such a great amount of bologna in the media and amusement area is that organizations at last simply chose to go for it cursorily engaging the two kinds of progressives radicals and "liberals" (dissidents ideologically stuck during the 70s) at the main look. There is no belief system behind their activity other than maling cash. Mixing debate really helps their exploitative wagecuck worldview. You advance your bs item, yet above all you prop the bogus division up through perverting the two sides simultaneously and keeping individuals railed up about imagimary built issues while you empy everybody pockets in the in the mean time. Try to permit a limit of discussion inside the gainful political range to keep individuals occupied with an outlandish phony discussion and leave a major haze of practically obvious, however counterfeit news.

The vast majority of the master incel contentions are truth be told, women's activist, sexual orientation basic and dynamic in nature.

The equivalent harmful manliness (chads, simps, positive discriminators) that harms females is the one that harms incels also and yes we realize females are not simply the specialists of woman's rights they depict as more often than not. Women's liberation normally just signifies: "I am female, so I am right." to them liberated from any more extensive logical interdisciplinary establishing.

I know many individuals here need to return ti less difficult occasions. In any case, I really think this is established in not having seen the real other option yet, the framework wouldn't like to know you of.

It's upon us to manufacture a decent confidence option in contrast to the current framework and we should begin politcizing ourselves from base up as the abused class we may be. It needs a major mallet to pulverize these social extremists.
 
it's a bunch of government shills combined with stupid soyboys, trannies, and a few weird chicks
 
Arbitrary awful english sophistery ngl. Consider it to be an investigation. I don't typically post, as a result of my absence of vitality, self uncertainty and by and large I believe I am a vainglorious failure, however here we go. Despite the fact that this will be only a misuse of vitality when it's all said and done and a drop in the pool of the standard points. Would you be able to call this a fragmented article about the norm?

IT does exactly do what they censure moderates of doing. Asserting calling attention to persecution to be unfair against both the objective and the oppressor. For what reason do you despise white individuals? You are the genuine bigot, since bigotry doesn't exist and you make this awful poop up about individuals of color, you deceive them and treat them like youngsters. Is it accurate to say that you are a supremacist? For what reason do you abhor individuals of color?

This is only one case of many.

They shouldn't be utilized as the standard model for how scholastics or political philosophies see us. I know there is a kind of media which sustains similar images, however this recriuts itself from a similar pool of naïve nitwits, whose activity is it to reinforce the norm for the theocracy with every one of its irregularities and bogus restriction spiel.

They are no individuals with a steady belief system, just "enlightend" strict anti-extremists engaging the norm and shouldn't be paid attention to or used to put forth a defense possibly in support of any piece of the political range.

They are constantly depicted as radical, however I know beyond all doubt they would hop on you like a pack of starved mutts the second a genuine liberal appeared. What we see today as woman's rights (feminazism) is only the second wave part from the seventies, that at long last entered the standard and is fundamentally a loathe culture. Perhaps alright for it's season of starting occurence as a type of radical dissent, head restriction and tense counter culture yet obsolete for now and particularly int the light of the equitable recently emerged present day issues. The explanation we have such a great amount of bologna in the media and amusement area is that organizations at last simply chose to go for it cursorily engaging the two kinds of progressives radicals and "liberals" (dissidents ideologically stuck during the 70s) at the main look. There is no belief system behind their activity other than maling cash. Mixing debate really helps their exploitative wagecuck worldview. You advance your bs item, yet above all you prop the bogus division up through perverting the two sides simultaneously and keeping individuals railed up about imagimary built issues while you empy everybody pockets in the in the mean time. Try to permit a limit of discussion inside the gainful political range to keep individuals occupied with an outlandish phony discussion and leave a major haze of practically obvious, however counterfeit news.

The vast majority of the master incel contentions are truth be told, women's activist, sexual orientation basic and dynamic in nature.

The equivalent harmful manliness (chads, simps, positive discriminators) that harms females is the one that harms incels also and yes we realize females are not simply the specialists of woman's rights they depict as more often than not. Women's liberation normally just signifies: "I am female, so I am right." to them liberated from any more extensive logical interdisciplinary establishing.

I know many individuals here need to return ti less difficult occasions. In any case, I really think this is established in not having seen the real other option yet, the framework wouldn't like to know you of.

It's upon us to manufacture a decent confidence option in contrast to the current framework and we should begin politcizing ourselves from base up as the abused class we may be. It needs a major mallet to pulverize these social extremists.
Idk what to make out of these types of posts Are you mocking me or training your english vocabulary/writings kills through synnonymon use.
it's a bunch of government shills combined with stupid soyboys, trannies, and a few weird chicks
Basically ye, most important they paint a carricature of the only people that would actually help us.
 
Last edited:
Idk what to make out of these types of posts Are you mocking me or training your english vocabulary/writings kills through synnonymon use.

Basically ye.
preparing my english jargon/compositions executes through synonym utilization, obviously.
 
Arbitrary awful english sophistery ngl. Consider it to be an investigation. I don't typically post, as a result of my absence of vitality, self uncertainty and by and large I believe I am a vainglorious failure, however here we go. Despite the fact that this will be only a misuse of vitality when it's all said and done and a drop in the pool of the standard points. Would you be able to call this a fragmented article about the norm?

IT does exactly do what they censure moderates of doing. Asserting calling attention to persecution to be unfair against both the objective and the oppressor. For what reason do you despise white individuals? You are the genuine bigot, since bigotry doesn't exist and you make this awful poop up about individuals of color, you deceive them and treat them like youngsters. Is it accurate to say that you are a supremacist? For what reason do you abhor individuals of color?

This is only one case of many.

They shouldn't be utilized as the standard model for how scholastics or political philosophies see us. I know there is a kind of media which sustains similar images, however this recriuts itself from a similar pool of naïve nitwits, whose activity is it to reinforce the norm for the theocracy with every one of its irregularities and bogus restriction spiel.

They are no individuals with a steady belief system, just "enlightend" strict anti-extremists engaging the norm and shouldn't be paid attention to or used to put forth a defense possibly in support of any piece of the political range.

They are constantly depicted as radical, however I know beyond all doubt they would hop on you like a pack of starved mutts the second a genuine liberal appeared. What we see today as woman's rights (feminazism) is only the second wave part from the seventies, that at long last entered the standard and is fundamentally a loathe culture. Perhaps alright for it's season of starting occurence as a type of radical dissent, head restriction and tense counter culture yet obsolete for now and particularly int the light of the equitable recently emerged present day issues. The explanation we have such a great amount of bologna in the media and amusement area is that organizations at last simply chose to go for it cursorily engaging the two kinds of progressives radicals and "liberals" (dissidents ideologically stuck during the 70s) at the main look. There is no belief system behind their activity other than maling cash. Mixing debate really helps their exploitative wagecuck worldview. You advance your bs item, yet above all you prop the bogus division up through perverting the two sides simultaneously and keeping individuals railed up about imagimary built issues while you empy everybody pockets in the in the mean time. Try to permit a limit of discussion inside the gainful political range to keep individuals occupied with an outlandish phony discussion and leave a major haze of practically obvious, however counterfeit news.

The vast majority of the master incel contentions are truth be told, women's activist, sexual orientation basic and dynamic in nature.

The equivalent harmful manliness (chads, simps, positive discriminators) that harms females is the one that harms incels also and yes we realize females are not simply the specialists of woman's rights they depict as more often than not. Women's liberation normally just signifies: "I am female, so I am right." to them liberated from any more extensive logical interdisciplinary establishing.

I know many individuals here need to return ti less difficult occasions. In any case, I really think this is established in not having seen the real other option yet, the framework wouldn't like to know you of.

It's upon us to manufacture a decent confidence option in contrast to the current framework and we should begin politcizing ourselves from base up as the abused class we may be. It needs a major mallet to pulverize these social extremists.
Read every word
 
Hqdefault 3
 
Yes.

Which is why I've never been there.

As far as I'm concerned, they're normies.

If I wanted to see what normies think, I'd just go on fb.
 
Most of the pro incel arguments are in fact, feminist, gender critical and progressive in nature.

Cope.

Just do a search for "incels" on r/GenderCritical, which is the most active explicitly feminist subreddit. They hate incels over there. I even saw one paranoid post where they were accusing incels of infiltrating the trans community.

They view men who get together to discuss strategies to deal with the stacked odds against them in the dating scene, as the equivalent of women getting together to discuss how to filter out "low value" and "negative value" men. Then they accuse men of hypocrisy. JFL.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/ex7pnq/funny_how_men_get_together_to_discuss_dating/
 
Last edited:
Cope.

Just do a search for "incels" on r/GenderCritical, which is the most active explicitly feminist subreddit. They hate incels over there. I even saw one paranoid post where they were accusing incels of infiltrating the trans community.

They view men who get together to discuss strategies to deal with the stacked odds against them in the dating scene, as the equivalent of women getting together to discuss how to filter out "low value" and "negative value" men. Then they accuse men of hypocrisy. JFL.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/ex7pnq/funny_how_men_get_together_to_discuss_dating/

Well you are exactly describing the same type of issue as with IT. Labels are sometimes misleading or have nothing in common with reality and made up.
 
Cope.

Just do a search for "incels" on r/GenderCritical, which is the most active explicitly feminist subreddit. They hate incels over there. I even saw one paranoid post where they were accusing incels of infiltrating the trans community.

They view men who get together to discuss strategies to deal with the stacked odds against them in the dating scene, as the equivalent of women getting together to discuss how to filter out "low value" and "negative value" men. Then they accuse men of hypocrisy. JFL.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/ex7pnq/funny_how_men_get_together_to_discuss_dating/

Female brain is always on danger alert mode, like they are closer to chimps in that sense
 
Cope.

Just do a search for "incels" on r/GenderCritical, which is the most active explicitly feminist subreddit. They hate incels over there. I even saw one paranoid post where they were accusing incels of infiltrating the trans community.

They view men who get together to discuss strategies to deal with the stacked odds against them in the dating scene, as the equivalent of women getting together to discuss how to filter out "low value" and "negative value" men. Then they accuse men of hypocrisy. JFL.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/ex7pnq/funny_how_men_get_together_to_discuss_dating/

Everything changes when the perspective comes from a pro-female one. If it's a female saying Chads only it's amazing, look how empowereed that qween is type of stuff.

If it's a dude saying the exact same thing and being mad at being rejected/excluded (a normal human reaction) it's misogyny and terrorism.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top