Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Issue with ‚Chad only‘ hypothesis

A

Arbitrary

Greycel
-
Joined
Jun 9, 2025
Posts
144
Men who are

-Normies
-Mainstreamer
-Extraverted
-Agreeable

and have

-Stable middle-class family
-Stable average employment

and don’t have extremely negative attributes seem to be able to enter relationships with Beckys reliably through warm approach.

At least that‘s my obervation for where I life for women in my age.
 
Being an NT mtn is all it takes. I think Chad only means that normie tier men are husband material, not the men foids are truly sexually attracted to. Just look at r/deadbedrooms for example.
 
Being an NT mtn is all it takes. I think Chad only means that normie tier men are husband material, not the men foids are truly sexually attracted to. Just look at r/deadbedrooms for example.
Thank you for the clarification, I wasn‘t familiar with the context of ‚Chad only‘.
 
people make this misassumption all the time
sadly the internet demands three word explanations, so much so that if you say something like 'normies get dates and marriage, but women arent attracted to 80% of men', ehich is proven, for some reason you've lost any readers at that point, including here. so its 'foid is chad only'
i prefer not to make the claim and focus on sub 5 non nt

strawmanning 'chad only' as a claim about partnership in general is an effective way to believe the blackpill is silly, despite it being a misrepresentation at its core
Being an NT mtn is all it takes. I think Chad only means that normie tier men are husband material, not the men foids are truly sexually attracted to. Just look at r/deadbedrooms for example
 
chad only = what foids are naturally attracted to. they marry normie men for societal expectations but that is also falling with majority of millennials remaining unmarried and foids these days just fuck around ig
 
people make this misassumption all the time
sadly the internet demands three word explanations, so much so that if you say something like 'normies get dates and marriage, but women arent attracted to 80% of men', ehich is proven, for some reason you've lost any readers at that point, including here. so its 'foid is chad only'
i prefer not to make the claim and focus on sub 5 non nt

strawmanning 'chad only' as a claim about partnership in general is an effective way to believe the blackpill is silly, despite it being a misrepresentation at its core
Makes sense. The misunderstanding results from the lack of context: ‚Chad only‘ is not meant literally, it substitutes the definition you gave. However this is not obvious on first sight
 
Makes sense. The misunderstanding results from the lack of context: ‚Chad only‘ is not meant literally, it substitutes the definition you gave. However this is not obvious on first sight
yeah, its also not entirely true that it began as a claim about preference. it began as a claim that many foids only sleep with chad. hence the only. also true, but not what it means today, and its partly our fault its misunderstood considering it contains the word only. chadsexual is a better term

i think at this point the approach a lot of users here have isnt centred around convincing bluepillers / winning arguments with them, or making it easy to spread. its about enjoyment for those who are here, not those who arent, and thats reasonable, its better.
its a correct statement that many women only sleep with chad. but its not universal and if a person wants to, its easy to argue some foids dont therefore incel = btfo. but unlike reddit i dont think we try constantly to be as advantageously positioned to our critics as we can, if it requires concessions. it would be easier to prove but who cares. redditors famously cherrypick the most suitable posts made here anyway
 
Last edited:
Men who are

-Normies
-Mainstreamer
-Extraverted
-Agreeable

and have

-Stable middle-class family
-Stable average employment

and don’t have extremely negative attributes seem to be able to enter relationships with Beckys reliably through warm approach.

At least that‘s my obervation for where I life for women in my age.
Chad only is multi dimensional women wants only chad and when they can't they settle with them doesn't mean they like them or desire them
 
Alpha fucks beta buxx ; only Chad is really desired, the woman settles for a beta provider but will fantasize of Chad
 
Chad only just means, if women could choose they would only get with chad. Alas there's so much chad around, so they have to settle. But normies do get tons of sex, you just have to be 5/10, 6/10 and NT.
 
Posting a thread about Chad getting all the women, is like right wingers, who are posting 24/7, that some sandnigger was on a killing spree.

The real cause of these Problems are all the same:

Jews

End of story
 
Men who are

-Normies
-Mainstreamer
-Extraverted
-Agreeable

and have

-Stable middle-class family
-Stable average employment

and don’t have extremely negative attributes seem to be able to enter relationships with Beckys reliably through warm approach.

At least that‘s my obervation for where I life for women in my age.
yes but you need to be NT and well adjusted, and jump through hoops for some skank. otherwise its ovER if you are sub8.
 
Most men are settled on
 

Similar threads

DarkStar
Replies
14
Views
1K
Thugs-5-Less
Thugs-5-Less
SwiftQuill
Replies
6
Views
2K
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
WeirdPanda
Replies
9
Views
537
Yabadadabadoo
Yabadadabadoo
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
5
Views
946
Enigmaz
Enigmaz

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top