Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Isn't judging people by their looks online the same as racism?

crew2

crew2

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Posts
1,877
I was discussing this yesterday with a friend and was saying besides things that society has manifested is there any real difference between having red hair like I have and someone having black skin? I mean both are literally physical attributes. Just because someone is black doesn't mean they went through years of slavery or something, that was hundreds of years ago. So why is it perfectly ok to mock red hair but not mention someone's race?

Furthermore if it is completely out of the question to judge someone based on their skin colour which IS an entirely physical thing no matter what shit you hear why is it okay to judge people positively or negatively on other physical things i.e. judging someone based on their looks on Tinder?

If racism i.e. judging someone negatively based on their physical skin colour isn't ok shouldn't judging someone on their frame or hairline or jaw be outlawed too? Sure the makers of Tinder will say that they also have the bio that people can match on but if this is the case why not just allow bios on dating apps/sites and remove the adding of photos?

My point being isn't swiping left on someone based on their looks the exactly the same as excluding someone from a job interview group because they are black and shouldn't be facilitated whatsoever legally?
 
Everyone is racist.
 
Racism is just an offshoot of primal evaluation. Lookism is far more central to human judgment than racism.
Society is bluepilled and won't accept the truth about how all humanity is equally guilty of their biology.
It was just that the jews hate whites because they are (were) resourceful enough to have been a threat.
So they contort the context of racism to be the general case of (lower class demographics being oppressed) instead of racial prejudice/ racial based policies/ actions/ thoughts/ etc.


1540714413916

Women don't care to ever be morally accountable for their own darkness. They'll just shrugover/ brushover/ dudebro attitude evade/ etc.
 

Attachments

  • Redpill Comics.mp4
    1.8 MB · Views: 52
Yep. the actual term for discrimination against looks is lookism and its more normalized to make fun of peoples looks than race because people don't really care about empathy or being a good person. They will only empathize with what they are told to.
 
No.

It's worse.


Next day on IT: "inkel thinks not being able to fuck 99% of the world's women is literally worse than holocaust times a million"
 
It’s lookist but good luck changing that. Racism is part-instinctual/part-social whereas lookism is purely instinctual. Also, you’ll never see an ugly coalition or rebellion form as you would with ethnic groups because we’re divided among the races and unlikely to have enough allies or resources to do anything. It never thought of beginning for us.
 
That's why it's called lookism
 
Aren't you a Chad-lite though?
 
Yep. the actual term for discrimination against looks is lookism and its more normalized to make fun of peoples looks than race because people don't really care about empathy or being a good person. They will only empathize with what they are told to.

If your race and genetics determines your looks than really it should come under that alongside heightism.
 

Similar threads

SoycuckGodOfReddit
Replies
21
Views
502
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
MisanthropicMemes
Replies
1
Views
132
VλREN
VλREN
JollyGentleman
Replies
5
Views
251
JollyGentleman
JollyGentleman
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
7
Views
307
fastnbulbous
fastnbulbous

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top