Hypocrisy .is Wikipedia Article is cucked

[Reinhard Heydrich]

Incel - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

"The Guardian reports that users on the website encourage mass shootings.[23]"

First let's take a look at the rule post, in the front page of the website:

• Do not post illegal content. If in doubt, don't post it.

It is loud and clear that Mass shootings, obviously illegal, are prohibited by the site rules.

By that logic, Facebook live encourages killing kebab and slitting oneitis throat.

Snapchat encourages cartel behadings etc.

So the main takeaway of all of this is: water is wet.

 

[Adolf Hitler]

Water is wet

 

[Reinhard Heydrich]

Water is wet

Unrelated, but nice profile name and profile description and avi

 

[Adolf Hitler]

Unrelated, but nice profile name and profile description and avi

 

[PhilipBlake]

cucked wiki

 

[Immolator]

I didn’t know this place had a Wikipedia article. First time hearing about it.

They should’ve added a section saying that this place is a honeypot.

 

[Reinhard Heydrich]

I didn’t know this place had a Wikipedia article. First time hearing about it.

It seems to be predated by the incel wiki article

Incels.is

Incels.is is the largest incel forum in the incelosphere. Created by SergeantIncel and Master on Nov. 7th, 2017, it was made directly in response to the ban of the...

incels.wiki

which is much less biased and more informative.

 

[wantedwanter]

>THE GUARDIAN reports that users on the website encourage mass shootings.

i.e. NOT WIKIPEDIA.

Wikipedia merely exists to provide whatever information exists on any given subject matter and hold the source accountable as per their neutrality policy, and it's up to you to trust what's being said.

Wikipedia is one of the most successful projects on the world wide web deriving from a free and open source philosophy and deserves such respect.

 

[NirvanaFan1988]

Water is wet

 

[5ft4ropeconnoisseur]

IDF edits wikipedia articles

 

[Reinhard Heydrich]

i.e. NOT WIKIPEDIA.

Wikipedia merely exists to provide whatever information exists on any given subject matter and hold the source accountable as per their neutrality policy, and it's up to you to trust what's being said.

Wikipedia is one of the most successful projects on the world wide web deriving from a free and open source philosophy and deserves such respect.

If it is about relaying what other sites are saying, then your point holds.

 

[Reinhard Heydrich]

IDF edits wikipedia articles

ADL would be more accurate

 

[5ft4ropeconnoisseur]

ADL would be more accurate

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/aug/18/wikipedia-editing-zionist-groups

 

[Thaway]

all of wikipedia is jew propaganda