I’d say yes because lighter is just easier on the eyes and not as harsh to look at compared to some curry that’s black as soot
Discussion Is white skin INHERENTLY more attractive - I don't think there is any solid data behind this idea
[UWSL]I think we are using the wrong word here with attractive. Maybe its not a sexual thing. What we were pointing out about white skin being worshipped by non-white peoples is somewhat different than what a few others were saying regarding sexual attraction. White skin is seen as more trustworthy by Indians, yes, and perhaps by everyone in comparison to darker skin tones. More trustworthy is not necessarily something to do with sexual attraction. I don't think the average Indian curry normie is purely sexually more attracted to a white foid than his curry foid. But, he might trust his money to be managed by a white accountant instead of a curry accountant, or a black accountant.[/UWSL]
[UWSL]Basically, I think OPs post is more or less a way of saying this^[/UWSL]
[UWSL]IF white skin is seen as more attractive, then it is based on the fact that white people are (or at one time, were) more trustworthy for a number of different reasons which combine to form a history and give them credit.[/UWSL]
[UWSL] Something like that...[/UWSL]
Last edited:
Use your fucking eyes
Irrelevant. When you think of natural things that are brown in nature, shit and mud come to mind almost instantly. When you think of natural things that are white in nature, snow and clouds come to mind almost instantly.
I dont care. Brown is just a bad color on human skin. Brown may look good on animals, or food, but not on skin. There is a massive difference between having brown hair VS having brown skin.
It's inherent because even before 200 years people loved white skin. Sand Niggers constantly kidnapped white women from europe and loved their white skin. Indian Aryan rulers were all fair skinned. Japan also loved white skin and they tried dying their faces white (Geishas).
It doesn't.
Nah.
No, white is seen as better because it has always always been associated with ruling class.
Nah, Indians loved white skin even BEFORE British colonized them. They were also formerly ruled by Iranians, Turks, and Aryans, so they have always adored the skin color of their rulers
She is happy because her kid is NOT shitskin.
its just common sense
Ok, so either you are really dumb or you are just pig-headed (a bit of both maybe?)
For example, the color brown was very popular in interior design in the 70s. You had brown walls everywhere. Did people think of shit constantly in those years?
In Tamil Nadu, the God Murugan has 2 wives, one white and one black. This goes back at least 1000 years
Eyes trigger feelings. Where do these feelings come from is what is in dispute.Use your fucking eyes
- Culture ? (worship of the white man)
- Our genes ? (INHERENT preference for white skin)
To you maybe. With other people and other contexts it may be different.
For example, the color brown was very popular in interior design in the 70s. You had brown walls everywhere. Did people think of shit constantly in those years?
This is totally arbitrary. It just reflects your feelings.
And white aristocratic women in Europe at the same time fucked their nigger pages
But Krishna's name means: the black
We (I am jap) are already white. The white makeup is just to hide skin imperfections. The white color is just the same as the skin underneath.
How do you know it was "always"? In most ancient sources (let us say ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia), skin color is not even mentioned because they lived in a homogeneous population. Mesopotamians called themselves "the black headed people". It had no negative connotations
Not in the South. And again, there is Krishna, the black, one of the most widely worshiped Hindu deity.Nah, Indians loved white skin even BEFORE British colonized them. They were also formerly ruled by Iranians, Turks, and Aryans, so they have always adored the skin color of their rulers
In Tamil Nadu, the God Murugan has 2 wives, one white and one black. This goes back at least 1000 years
M
Its more about bone structure, and larger statures, along with their Conqueror/colonizer status and superior wealth being the founders and dominant powers of pretty much the Entirety of the First World.
Look at all the countries where impovished second and third world ethnics are literally putting their lives on the line, risking death to get into. All White Dominated and colonized countries
Look at all the countries where impovished second and third world ethnics are literally putting their lives on the line, risking death to get into. All White Dominated and colonized countries
What is "common sense" exactly, if not the cultural consensus of a given place at a certain point in time?
yeah, you answered your own question. Its one hell of a drug
So you think that the attraction to white skin is cultural and NOT inherent (genetic)?
its hard to argue its cultural when literally every culture values white skin, and sees them as Gods. Even lands that have never seen white people like the Mayans. I think attraction to black bodies and k-pop stars is cultural though.
That is what they do TODAY. In the past, the evidence is inconclusive
Very hard to say what the Mayans thought. The evidence is fragmentary and the presence of the Spaniards introduce bias in the few first-hand account that exist.
Why?
What evidence do you have that foids were not always attracted to black bodies?
kids are just racist, until you show them that black people can be cool. In a way, one of the main things the educational system does force kids to unlearn racism,
Kids are already immersed in their culture. They learn it while learning to speak
It is true that white skin is seen as "better" but it's the reasons for why that is and how prevalent or rampant it is that we are debating with you about. However, you are unable to grasp. I'm beginning to think you are an idiot, a significantly below average IQ person. It's okay. Just accept it and move on.
The darker skinned people today always adore lighter skin people yes. Hard to say they adored the "skin" of their rulers. They certainly worship the white man, but almost certain it's not related to just "beauty".Nah, Indians loved white skin even BEFORE British colonized them. They were also formerly ruled by Iranians, Turks, and Aryans, so they have always adored the skin color of their rulers
She looks like a scary food version of a retarded chucky doll android who might kill you in your sleep.
You are obsessed with Persian and certain middle eastern women.
You mean "he" ?
I know women married to shitskin guys (my 2 cousins, one is married to an All-American women from the mid-west and another is married to an Eastern European women) and several friend/colleagues who were Indian mid- SMV range, Normies who married white women of European decent and have brown children. The white moms are just as happy with her kids brown color. Maybe they'll have other problems but..idk..
bump
there was a post of a lightskin blue eyes indian guy who was maybe 9/10. The user gave him regular indian skin and black eyes and he was miles uglier.
Anyone remember that post?
Ü
Probably the influence of western media, could have been the result of the British empire, but the whole idea of America being ‘the place to live’ in the 20th century probably has more to do with it
So the preference for white skin is not inherent (genetic), just cultural, right?
Can you try to locate it? Was it a photoshop posted only on .is or is it on the interWebs ?
I don’t think so. It‘s just a worldwide cultural worshipping of cumskin sluts. since basically every country on the planet puts white whores on a pedestal, it’s no wonder there’s a broader desiring of pasty pig-skinned sluts.
Yes
Don't know, but dark skin on foids is a big turn off for me.
Ü
It’s hard to say because the pre-abrahamic ancient societies that our societies stemmed from had culture that largely mirrored human instinct.
Why does any of this matter? No offense. I mean, none of us are getting laid anyway right? So who cares? The race pill is just another one of a long list of copes. To answer the OP question no, it is all propaganda. It is possible to train someone to be opposed to white skin as well so therefore it cannot be inherently attractive. That said I won't go out of my way to prove it or otherwise, it is a waste of time. Let the cumskins have their superiority cope. It doesn't effect you at all other than being slightly annoying to read about.
I partially agree. It's definitely a cumskim cope. I believe one of reasons the title statement was posed by OP was to explore this very point which you just summarised.
There are quite a few (as you can see) who strongly believe it's inherently more attractive, like some sort of magic. [UWSL]But then again, when worship happens, its effects do kinda behave like magic. The western culture was once much better than it is now. The skin color the whole world associates with that is "the white man". So, it's not a stretch to argue that this worship of the white skin is really due to the previous success of European Western culture or religion in comparison to or in relationship with other cultures and/or religions. [/UWSL]
I feel like most studies have shown that people are typically more attracted to their own race, or they will at least have a greater majority of their own race find them attractive as opposed to other races.
For example, even if studies show that the majority of X race men are attracted to Y race girl, X race girls are still likely going to have X men as the largest group that finds them attractive.
For example, even if studies show that the majority of X race men are attracted to Y race girl, X race girls are still likely going to have X men as the largest group that finds them attractive.
Similar threads
Blackpill
Men's Faces Convey Information about their Bodies and their Behavior: What you see is what you get
- Lazyandtalentless
- Inceldom Discussion
NIGGER BOJANGLES
Users who are viewing this thread
