Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Is this the appeal of Fascism?

Caesercel

Caesercel

mentally crippled by lonely teen years
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Posts
25,044
Online time
1m 26s
Maybe because fascism never took root where I live I just don't get it. But here's a post I saw on 4chan and I wonder if this is it.

i'm the total opposite a fascist politically, but surely wanting to transform the whole of society into a libidinally charged fantasy themepark is a desire that's extremely easy to understand. everyone becomes a character in a story that's fully meaningful and comprehensible to you; every space becomes a kind of ritualistic theatre/bdsm dungeon. there's no emptiness, no ambiguity, no contradiction, just everyone working together all the time to produce life as one big sexy spectacle. it's like asking a guy why he'd want to live in the Playboy Mansion. compare that to present conditions of life, where society is organised around obscure and meaningless flows of capital, and aesthetic/spiritual/libidinal meaning is something you're left to simulate yourself on your own screen or in your tiny apartment, small solitary yearnings that amount to nothing

The par about ritualistic fantasy theatre does make sense

IMG 20260204 072156


IMG 20260204 072250



IMG 20260204 072439
 
People naturally trust those who look and act like them more than they do out-groups. That biological instinct explains most of what drives nationalism
 
People naturally trust those who look and act like them more than they do out-groups. That biological instinct explains most of what drives nationalism
agree
 
everyone becomes a character in a story that's fully meaningful and comprehensible to you; every space becomes a kind of ritualistic theatre/bdsm dungeon. there's no emptiness, no ambiguity, no contradiction, just everyone working together all the time to produce life as one big sexy spectacle. it's like asking a guy why he'd want to live in the Playboy Mansion. compare that to present conditions of life, where society is organised around obscure and meaningless flows of capital, and aesthetic/spiritual/libidinal meaning is something you're left to simulate yourself on your own screen or in your tiny apartment, small solitary yearnings that amount to nothing
Wouldn’t this apply in any sort of nationalistic authoritarian system with a national ethos or myth? I assume the USSR wasn’t much different either, save for the fact that it replaced racial and “returning to our old glory” rhetoric with appeals to universal humanist morals and the Soviets as leading a global charge toward utopia
 
Last edited:
Wouldn’t this apply in any sort of nationalistic authoritarian system with a national ethos or myth? I assume the USSR wasn’t much different either, save for the fact that it replaced racial and “returning to our old glory” rhetoric with appeals to universal humanist morals and the Soviets as leading a global charge toward utopia
Maybe so. But I assume it was a tad bit less larpy in SU
 
Maybe because fascism never took root where I live I just don't get it. But here's a post I saw on 4chan and I wonder if this is it.



The par about ritualistic fantasy theatre does make sense

View attachment 1665057

View attachment 1665058


View attachment 1665059
Under Stalin, the NKVD would push a bottle up a man's anus to force him to confess that he was an enemy of the people and a national-traitor.
 
you cant get it because your a nigger who has said before that he wishes whites were all killed by jews so i wouldn't expect you to get it shitskin.
 
you cant get it because your a nigger who has said before that he wishes whites were all killed by jews so i wouldn't expect you to get it shitskin.
Are these white killing jews in the room with us right now?
 
People naturally trust those who look and act like them more than they do out-groups. That biological instinct explains most of what drives nationalism
Boiling it down to just this is just an oversimplification
 
Are these white killing jews in the room with us right now?
? nigger what i said that YOU said that you want whites to be killed by jews.
 
whats the Appeal of communism and socialism that you love so much then.
 
Wouldn’t this apply in any sort of nationalistic authoritarian system with a national ethos or myth? I assume the USSR wasn’t much different either, save for the fact that it replaced racial and “returning to our old glory” rhetoric with appeals to universal humanist morals and the Soviets as leading a global charge toward utopia
No, because the USSR was an international and self-suppressing state. It was essentially an empire where the majority of the population was second-class - ethnic Russians. Russian cities received inferior supplies compared to other republics within the USSR. The USSR spent billions of dollars on giving money to non-Russians, building infrastructure, hospitals, and schools in the name of international solidarity. There was no myth in the USSR. The USSR talked a lot about colonialism and imperialism, but its own villagers couldn't leave their villages without permission, which meant they were slaves.
 
Boiling it down to just this is just an oversimplification
That’s most of what it comes down to though. But yeah I agree religious and cultural differences matter as well. Hence why Yugoslavia broke down into violent ethnic conflict despite the Bosnians, Croats, and Serbs more or less all looking the same.

But the normie view of “it’s only culture” and pretending phenotype doesn’t matter is just purely dishonest. Phenotypic similarity is what explains the successful assimilation of “lesser whites” such as Southern and Eastern Europeans into Anglo-America. They initially faced prejudice, in large part due to Catholic/Orthodox roots, but phenotype made it so that culture was the only meaningful distinction.

Therefore they had the option not only to “integrate” in a loose sense of the word, but to literally assimilate into the Anglo-American body and become more or less indistinguishable today (save for last names). As soon as they left their culture at the door, they lost minority status and became invisible
 
Last edited:
whats the Appeal of communism and socialism that you love so much then.
The logic checks out.

you literally said that sewer stomper put an image of that in a thread where you two were arguing retarded nigger dont deny it https://incels.is/threads/red-man-vs-green-man.836009/ heres the thread you nigger.
That was taken out of context and sewer stomper was acting like a lying nigger. That much is mentioned in the thread that you posted. Or did you forget to read that part.
 
The logic checks out.


That was taken out of context and sewer stomper was acting like a lying nigger. That much is mentioned in the thread that you posted. Or did you forget to read that part.
saying it would be nice if the jews killed of the whites is not taken out of context if you hate whites at least dont deny it admit your views thats better than being a coward. also there was a image where you said futanari porn isnt gay so kys gar nigger faggot.
 
also you still cant answers me on one successful communism country so kys you jew loving nigger how does it feel to worship jews.
 
No, because the USSR was an international and self-suppressing state. It was essentially an empire where the majority of the population was second-class - ethnic Russians. Russian cities received inferior supplies compared to other republics within the USSR. The USSR spent billions of dollars on giving money to non-Russians, building infrastructure, hospitals, and schools in the name of international solidarity. There was no myth in the USSR. The USSR talked a lot about colonialism and imperialism, but its own villagers couldn't leave their villages without permission, which meant they were slaves.
I see. Makes sense tbh, considering the USSR was kind of a “reaction” to the Russian Empire. Same way Anglo countries, Germany, and France today attempt to justify their anti-white or pro-multiculturalist policies as a reaction to colonialism or imperialism
 
I see. Makes sense tbh, considering the USSR was kind of a “reaction” to the Russian Empire. Same way Anglo countries, Germany, and France today attempt to justify their anti-white or pro-multiculturalist policies as a reaction to colonialism or imperialism
If the fascists and Nazis had behaved like communists, then after the capture of Poland and the Czech Republic, Hitler would have demanded that the Czechs and Poles be given the best food supplies to the Czechs and Poles (sausage, cheese, milk, butter, meat) at the same time, it worsened the supply of goods to German stores. Or if Hitler had built hospitals for Czechs and Poles without doing it for Germans. Or if Mussolini would have given out free food to Ethiopians. This is what Bolshevism and internationalism look like: you show contempt for your own people while caring about some foreign ragamuffins.
 
saying it would be nice if the jews killed of the whites is not taken out of context if you hate whites at least dont deny it admit your views thats better than being a coward. also there was a image where you said futanari porn isnt gay so kys gar nigger faggot.

>The other user mentioned how jews are perpetrating white genocide
>I posited how can jews be responsible when they are a second class minority
>The other user pointed out that whites were a minority in colonial regions yet they committed genocide
>I counter argued that's like comparing apples and oranges. This would be equivalent if jews were openly in power and openly killing whites.

Here's the context you absolute lying disingenous faggot little reading comprehensionlet troon. This is why memeographics from /pol/ work on you so well. You absolutely REFUSE to read like a typical brainlet.
 
Both Fascism and Communism are epic tbh. Everyone loves Totalitarianism, Patriotism and collectivism.
 
I will TRY to engage with you without arguments or insults to make an understanding.

I will start with Marxism instead of fascism because this is where I began. My political journey began as a Marxist Leninist anti revisionist (after lots of indoctrination from watching YouTubers like Hakim, finnish Bolshevik, badempenada, exc) and I used to be a theorycel who read Marx and engels but more so Lenin and Stalin. I would say Marxism was appealing because:
A. It was extremely structured and claimed to have an exact single truth to everything. Anything falling outside of it was either a capitalist dogma or revisionism that existed to try and subvert the proletariat and stop us from advancing ourselves. (Clear boundaries against things like worship of the individual, identity politics, exc)
B. It had a logically appealing base from its dialectical materialism, it's thinking was very deterministic which is easy for people to understand
C. It offered a "revolutionary" change that people are very desperate for. The general feeling of heritage Americans is that we are living in a crumbling empire where everything is slowly getting worse, the youth are moving father away from center politics (Republicans and Democrats), everyone can tell SOMETHING is terribly wrong.

And then there is the reason I left it. Despite all the "logical" arguments I had made myself against fascists and nationalist online, there was no real life basis for them, all personal experience proved the opposite as if I had been indoctrinated into a lie. There was no comradery to be found with the people I was defending. The fascist would say "black people are violent and hate us", I would say "no they aren't, the bourgeoise are using inter-class conflict to keep us divided while they are the ones robbing you of your own labor!" But then the niggers would be like "yeah fuck yo bitch ass crakkkas we gon enslave yo yt asses".

I think most significant was my experience during highschool while I had been a Marxist. I went to a minority white school which I think most people would imagine would make me "anti racist" and such, my parents are also extremely pro BLM so it wasn't "taught" racism like the liberals say. But despite this I came out of highschool far different at the end.

The Hispanic kids would wave their own flags around the halls as proud nationalists, many of them couldn't speak English at all, some would bring knives to school and threaten people, and worst of all they were not keeping their hatred of white people (or me) hidden.

They would blurt out they hated white people during class in front of teachers and there'd be nothing but agreement. Even some fat Mexican I used to give my school lunch to (since I never wanted it) said they hated us to my face. The teachers would spout a bunch of anti white bullshit about how we commit most the crime, we are terrorist and shooters, we never invented baths and had to be shown how by niggers, exc.

The worst case was one where a teacher even made a graph on the board showing "racism" with white people at the top and then pointed at me and said "you are part of the problem". I remember that class being notable because despite the fact I did all the homework for one of the lazy Mexican kids in that class, he ended up stealing money from me.

At one point (this was when I was still a leftist) I was the only person brought into the principles office by a Jew and a Indian and called a Nazi during a debacle over jokes the class was making despite the fact the Mexican students blatantly talked about gassing Jews in front of the teachers, nothing happened to them.

In the end I basically found that all non-whites seemed to have at best a resentment for white people including me despite the fact I had not done anything to them, they were very threatening, rude, and had called me out for my race before

On top of this the ideas I had about race not being real was proven false in practice because, despite the fact I never studied and went to the exact same classes as everyone else and did all the same things, they continuously scored far lower than me on all the tests (excluding one Asian, of course.)

There was as well a point where some Mexican threatened to jump and rape me with his group, I think that was the beginning of a tipping point when I realized "these people shouldn't even be here according to my ancestors laws, I've been nothing but nice, and they want to kill me?"

The journey towards the right mainly began on twitter and discord (jfl) where I interacted with like-minded people and got into arguments. The fact it is usually rabid anti whites or just foreigners who hold contempt for us arguing against white nationalist who are defending us made things very clear, it is us vs the people who hate us (which seemed to be everywhere in real life, despite leftoids claiming "that only exist online!").

When I go into the comments of a post and it's all either black people defending antiwhite atrocity or murder like Austin Metcalf, or white people calling it evil, the side to take is very predetermined.

The actual transition out of Marxism wasn't immediate of course, it began with me reading Kims book on nationalism (how you innately love and identify with your own people), then karl otto paetel (a explicit ethno nationalist), even strasser (who was more of a egalitarian nationalist than a racialist). But once I read Dugins book and made a Twitter account it was basically clear what side I stood on from there. I am on the side of young white men against the rabid anti white niggers and rioters, the brown foreigners who want to claim my country and resources for themselves, the feminist and queers who supported Kill all men bullshit, and everyone else who attacks me for my existence.

It's easy to say "race isn't real" "just don't identify as white" but that logic doesn't work outside the Internet. In real life your uniform is the color of your skin, people mostly stick to their own and take their own side. Brown people argue in favor of brown people, black people argue in favor of black people, and finally when I was introduced to white nationalist I was shown white people who argued in favor of white people, something I had been severely lacking in and it was weighing on me.

My entire life I was told by my classmates, teachers, education books, and media that "white people caused everything bad" "white people are evil and violent" "white people are school shooters and Nazis" "white people are weak and weirdos" and so of course, when stood in front of a large community of people who said "it's okay to be white", as a white man who had been insulted myself, should I slap their hand away?

Marxist arguments were very abstract while "fascist" arguments were very personally probable and connectable to my own life. When a fascist says that Jews run everything, I began to relate because I would notice this myself. I'd be watching some Netflix or other modern show, it would have a scene where "evil white men" are killed by a fat black woman, id Google who made it, and it was a team of Jews. This repeated with every single movie, show, media article, exc I didn't like until I found that it was basically Jews producing everything that I hated about modern media

I remember a specific laughable moment when I was arguing with a Marxist about transgenderism being Jewish, they pulled out an article in defense of transgenderism and said "bet you think this was made by a Jew, huh?" Claiming it was not and then I googled it and the man behind it was in fact Jewish, causing them to crash out and get mad at me for something I hadn't even thought of checking before they mentioned it.

In essence Marxism is the ideology of read dogma from books, while fascism is the ideology of lived experience. Marxism says that race doesn't exist, real life says that blacks and Mexicans hate you for your race. Marxism says that borders and nations don't exist, real life says that Mexicans claim my land belongs to their nation and it should be annexed back with me kicked out. Marxism claims Jews are just like everyone else and antisemitism is wrong, real life says that every single movement and organization I hate is directly ran or funded by Jews once I look up the names on Wikipedia or otherwise.

In large part it is white people being fed up with the hypocrisy, disrespect, and disenfranchisement. We do not believe that we are obligated to give up our inheritance to a foreign tribe that wants to take it from us just because "we are all proletariats!", they do not hold the generosity and tolerance for us that we are expected to give to them.

I can very clearly see what is happening in the world just like you can, though you do not care because you are not white and expect us to surrender without struggle. White people are around 5% of the earth, we are becoming a minority in all of our own countries and cities, our death rate has exceeded our birth rate, and non-whites are increasingly in charge of our politics, we are in essence being conquered whether you call it that or not. White nationalism is just visual learning.

I was told that Hitler was the most evil man to exist, that he was the devil and so to be good was to be the opposite of him, and that Americas war against Hitler was the only good war we ever fought. But where has it left white people?
Screenshot 2025 09 24 15 39 59 62 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 05 07 16 17 52 43 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 06 14 01 38 51 78 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 12 02 19 51 19 15 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 09 17 21 33 23 74 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb


We are now hated minorities in our own country. The people around us do not look or talk like us, they tell us they hate us and want to take over, they say we are the evil enemy and what is wrong with society, and their misbehavior and crime is destroying all the trust and safety we have in our civilization.

So what was the alternative?
Screenshot 2025 06 19 09 03 38 77 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 05 21 14 36 53 96 f9ee0578fe1cc94de7482bd41accb329
Screenshot 2025 09 06 22 57 34 06 1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f92
Screenshot 2025 10 24 23 38 03 97 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2

The paths laying before young white man is to either accept your defeat, that you are the villain that must be purged, and that it is fat brown people's right to take your country from you. Or to accept your inheritance. America was a white country made by white men for white men, not for all the people who hate us, and our forefathers explicitly stated this. I'm sure you've seen the popular lines like "you either believe what your ancestors said about Jews or what the Jews say about your ancestors!" And this applies to race as a whole. Brown people say America belongs to them, our founding fathers say it belongs to me. Brown people say my ancestors were evil, I say they were right. Brown people say I must pay reparations, I say they must leave.

They spit on our history, they discriminate against us while praising the foreigner, they are making a mockery of our civilization.
Screenshot 2025 12 24 13 10 11 13 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2026 01 02 22 49 19 54 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 11 29 14 57 32 40 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 04 24 13 33 27 06 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 09 22 16 31 28 68 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 11 30 09 06 58 11 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
1746646046860c
Screenshot 2025 06 16 13 07 57 34 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb2
Screenshot 2025 06 11 06 19 47 03 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 06 30 00 20 23 63 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb
Screenshot 2025 07 01 20 10 43 47 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb


Tldr: the appeal to fascism is that there is no alternative. You are taking your own side. They hate me and want to take away my "white privilege" (of not being murdered and robbed by them) so I will defend myself. It is becoming increasingly hard for young white men to stay apolitical or indifferent when confronted with rising anti white hostility and race riots/looting/teen takeovers. Marxism lost its appeal to me when all its ideals about "race doesn't exist" didn't function for me in real life where race very much did exist.
 
>The other user mentioned how jews are perpetrating white genocide
>I posited how can jews be responsible when they are a second class minority
>The other user pointed out that whites were a minority in colonial regions yet they committed genocide
>I counter argued that's like comparing apples and oranges. This would be equivalent if jews were openly in power and openly killing whites.

Here's the context you absolute lying disingenous faggot little reading comprehensionlet troon. This is why memeographics from /pol/ work on you so well. You absolutely REFUSE to read like a typical brainlet.
so a user says jews are killing whites and then you say that's not true even though it is and you say but if that did it happen it would be nice yea your not helping your case nigger. also you went from saying how you never said anything about killing whites to oh that was taken out of context yea your a lying piece of shit also what's up with all the other things you said. like how you said you look like a supermodel Chad but are a mentalcell. all your political views align with reddit you cuck for example saying whites are evil communism is good immigration is good like you cant make this shit up. :feelskek:
you speak like a redditor said it would be nice if jews killed all the whites said futanari porn isnt gay and also has stated that you look like jordan barrett but is a metalcel.
 
I will TRY to engage with you without arguments or insults to make an understanding.

I will start with Marxism instead of fascism because this is where I began. My political journey began as a Marxist Leninist anti revisionist (after lots of indoctrination from watching YouTubers like Hakim, finnish Bolshevik, badempenada, exc) and I used to be a theorycel who read Marx and engels but more so Lenin and Stalin. I would say Marxism was appealing because:
A. It was extremely structured and claimed to have an exact single truth to everything. Anything falling outside of it was either a capitalist dogma or revisionism that existed to try and subvert the proletariat and stop us from advancing ourselves. (Clear boundaries against things like worship of the individual, identity politics, exc)
B. It had a logically appealing base from its dialectical materialism, it's thinking was very deterministic which is easy for people to understand
C. It offered a "revolutionary" change that people are very desperate for. The general feeling of heritage Americans is that we are living in a crumbling empire where everything is slowly getting worse, the youth are moving father away from center politics (Republicans and Democrats), everyone can tell SOMETHING is terribly wrong.

And then there is the reason I left it. Despite all the "logical" arguments I had made myself against fascists and nationalist online, there was no real life basis for them, all personal experience proved the opposite as if I had been indoctrinated into a lie. There was no comradery to be found with the people I was defending. The fascist would say "black people are violent and hate us", I would say "no they aren't, the bourgeoise are using inter-class conflict to keep us divided while they are the ones robbing you of your own labor!" But then the niggers would be like "yeah fuck yo bitch ass crakkkas we gon enslave yo yt asses".

I think most significant was my experience during highschool while I had been a Marxist. I went to a minority white school which I think most people would imagine would make me "anti racist" and such, my parents are also extremely pro BLM so it wasn't "taught" racism like the liberals say. But despite this I came out of highschool far different at the end.

The Hispanic kids would wave their own flags around the halls as proud nationalists, many of them couldn't speak English at all, some would bring knives to school and threaten people, and worst of all they were not keeping their hatred of white people (or me) hidden.

They would blurt out they hated white people during class in front of teachers and there'd be nothing but agreement. Even some fat Mexican I used to give my school lunch to (since I never wanted it) said they hated us to my face. The teachers would spout a bunch of anti white bullshit about how we commit most the crime, we are terrorist and shooters, we never invented baths and had to be shown how by niggers, exc.

The worst case was one where a teacher even made a graph on the board showing "racism" with white people at the top and then pointed at me and said "you are part of the problem". I remember that class being notable because despite the fact I did all the homework for one of the lazy Mexican kids in that class, he ended up stealing money from me.

At one point (this was when I was still a leftist) I was the only person brought into the principles office by a Jew and a Indian and called a Nazi during a debacle over jokes the class was making despite the fact the Mexican students blatantly talked about gassing Jews in front of the teachers, nothing happened to them.

In the end I basically found that all non-whites seemed to have at best a resentment for white people including me despite the fact I had not done anything to them, they were very threatening, rude, and had called me out for my race before

On top of this the ideas I had about race not being real was proven false in practice because, despite the fact I never studied and went to the exact same classes as everyone else and did all the same things, they continuously scored far lower than me on all the tests (excluding one Asian, of course.)

There was as well a point where some Mexican threatened to jump and rape me with his group, I think that was the beginning of a tipping point when I realized "these people shouldn't even be here according to my ancestors laws, I've been nothing but nice, and they want to kill me?"

The journey towards the right mainly began on twitter and discord (jfl) where I interacted with like-minded people and got into arguments. The fact it is usually rabid anti whites or just foreigners who hold contempt for us arguing against white nationalist who are defending us made things very clear, it is us vs the people who hate us (which seemed to be everywhere in real life, despite leftoids claiming "that only exist online!").

When I go into the comments of a post and it's all either black people defending antiwhite atrocity or murder like Austin Metcalf, or white people calling it evil, the side to take is very predetermined.

The actual transition out of Marxism wasn't immediate of course, it began with me reading Kims book on nationalism (how you innately love and identify with your own people), then karl otto paetel (a explicit ethno nationalist), even strasser (who was more of a egalitarian nationalist than a racialist). But once I read Dugins book and made a Twitter account it was basically clear what side I stood on from there. I am on the side of young white men against the rabid anti white niggers and rioters, the brown foreigners who want to claim my country and resources for themselves, the feminist and queers who supported Kill all men bullshit, and everyone else who attacks me for my existence.

It's easy to say "race isn't real" "just don't identify as white" but that logic doesn't work outside the Internet. In real life your uniform is the color of your skin, people mostly stick to their own and take their own side. Brown people argue in favor of brown people, black people argue in favor of black people, and finally when I was introduced to white nationalist I was shown white people who argued in favor of white people, something I had been severely lacking in and it was weighing on me.

My entire life I was told by my classmates, teachers, education books, and media that "white people caused everything bad" "white people are evil and violent" "white people are school shooters and Nazis" "white people are weak and weirdos" and so of course, when stood in front of a large community of people who said "it's okay to be white", as a white man who had been insulted myself, should I slap their hand away?

Marxist arguments were very abstract while "fascist" arguments were very personally probable and connectable to my own life. When a fascist says that Jews run everything, I began to relate because I would notice this myself. I'd be watching some Netflix or other modern show, it would have a scene where "evil white men" are killed by a fat black woman, id Google who made it, and it was a team of Jews. This repeated with every single movie, show, media article, exc I didn't like until I found that it was basically Jews producing everything that I hated about modern media

I remember a specific laughable moment when I was arguing with a Marxist about transgenderism being Jewish, they pulled out an article in defense of transgenderism and said "bet you think this was made by a Jew, huh?" Claiming it was not and then I googled it and the man behind it was in fact Jewish, causing them to crash out and get mad at me for something I hadn't even thought of checking before they mentioned it.

In essence Marxism is the ideology of read dogma from books, while fascism is the ideology of lived experience. Marxism says that race doesn't exist, real life says that blacks and Mexicans hate you for your race. Marxism says that borders and nations don't exist, real life says that Mexicans claim my land belongs to their nation and it should be annexed back with me kicked out. Marxism claims Jews are just like everyone else and antisemitism is wrong, real life says that every single movement and organization I hate is directly ran or funded by Jews once I look up the names on Wikipedia or otherwise.

In large part it is white people being fed up with the hypocrisy, disrespect, and disenfranchisement. We do not believe that we are obligated to give up our inheritance to a foreign tribe that wants to take it from us just because "we are all proletariats!", they do not hold the generosity and tolerance for us that we are expected to give to them.

I can very clearly see what is happening in the world just like you can, though you do not care because you are not white and expect us to surrender without struggle. White people are around 5% of the earth, we are becoming a minority in all of our own countries and cities, our death rate has exceeded our birth rate, and non-whites are increasingly in charge of our politics, we are in essence being conquered whether you call it that or not. White nationalism is just visual learning.

I was told that Hitler was the most evil man to exist, that he was the devil and so to be good was to be the opposite of him, and that Americas war against Hitler was the only good war we ever fought. But where has it left white people?
View attachment 1665087View attachment 1665089View attachment 1665090View attachment 1665083View attachment 1665091

We are now hated minorities in our own country. The people around us do not look or talk like us, they tell us they hate us and want to take over, they say we are the evil enemy and what is wrong with society, and their misbehavior and crime is destroying all the trust and safety we have in our civilization.

So what was the alternative?
View attachment 1665092View attachment 1665093View attachment 1665095View attachment 1665096
The paths laying before young white man is to either accept your defeat, that you are the villain that must be purged, and that it is fat brown people's right to take your country from you. Or to accept your inheritance. America was a white country made by white men for white men, not for all the people who hate us, and our forefathers explicitly stated this. I'm sure you've seen the popular lines like "you either believe what your ancestors said about Jews or what the Jews say about your ancestors!" And this applies to race as a whole. Brown people say America belongs to them, our founding fathers say it belongs to me. Brown people say my ancestors were evil, I say they were right. Brown people say I must pay reparations, I say they must leave.

They spit on our history, they discriminate against us while praising the foreigner, they are making a mockery of our civilization.
View attachment 1665099View attachment 1665100View attachment 1665101View attachment 1665102View attachment 1665103View attachment 1665104View attachment 1665106View attachment 1665107View attachment 1665108View attachment 1665109View attachment 1665110

Tldr: the appeal to fascism is that there is no alternative. You are taking your own side. They hate me and want to take away my "white privilege" (of not being murdered and robbed by them) so I will defend myself. It is becoming increasingly hard for young white men to stay apolitical or indifferent when confronted with rising anti white hostility and race riots/looting/teen takeovers. Marxism lost its appeal to me when all its ideals about "race doesn't exist" didn't function for me in real life where race very much did exist.
holy truth bomb wonder what libtard ceasercuck is gona say to this now.
 
nazism mogs communism. national socialism actually benefits its people and is against jews meanwhile communism was founded by jews and they used it to kill millions of whites.
 
Btw I was referring to fascism as a concept itself. I don't think a country needs to deal with outside races to adopt fascist thought. Italy was mostly Italian and still became fascist. So the appeal outside of American context clearly goes beyond apprehension of niggers or immigrants.

And then there is the reason I left it. Despite all the "logical" arguments I had made myself against fascists and nationalist online, there was no real life basis for them, all personal experience proved the opposite as if I had been indoctrinated into a lie.
Interesting. Contrarily, the reason certain aspects of Marxism appeal to me is because I can see those things play out in real life. Especially in my line of work where I directly witness construction workers building stuff on shithole tier wages and the contractors making bank off of it, that too funded by public money. I observed that this difference in Capital position is directly owed to their class backgrounds. Without these observations, dialectical materialism would've just remained another obscure Hegelian theory.

There are many other things. Like before even knowing Marx I had reasoned that feminism and inceldom is caused by economic and material conditions of modern industry. I saw society change before my own eyes. In 20 years things went from "sex before marriage is shameful and evil" to "live in relationships are ok". I reasoned that this shift is a direct result of having women in education and workplace. And to see someone professing the same materialism in Marx made it appealing as a theory of reality.

The Hispanic kids would wave their own flags around the halls as proud nationalists, many of them couldn't speak English at all, some would bring knives to school and threaten people, and worst of all they were not keeping their hatred of white people (or me) hidden.

Without divulging too much I can say that this reminds me of certain rhetoric about a certain "minority" where I live. How they place their ideology on a higher priority than their nation. And how that ideology explicitly wants to kill people like me. I still believe that certain aspects of this are true.

Now I'm not much of a nationalist myself so I don't mind them placing their beliefs above their nation. It's just that their beliefs are pure shit.
. The teachers would spout a bunch of anti white bullshit about how we commit most the crime, we are terrorist and shooters, we never invented baths and had to be shown how by niggers, exc.

The worst case was one where a teacher even made a graph on the board showing "racism" with white people at the top and then pointed at me and said "you are part of the problem

That's just a ground for suspension if not termination.

In the end I basically found that all non-whites seemed to have at best a resentment for white people including me despite the fact I had not done anything to them, they were very threatening, rude, and had called me out for my race before

I can see where this is coming from assuming that the racism you faced was as bad as you describe.

But how does perpetuating the cycle help in any of this? Your very existence as a chud gives fuel to these people to point out and say that they were right all along. Shouldn't you not be doing what they did? Not saying that you are personally responsible for their behaviour, which was clearly wrong. But you are responsible for yourself.

It's easy to say "race isn't real" "just don't identify as white" but that logic doesn't work outside the Internet. In real life your uniform is the color of your skin, people mostly stick to their own and take their own side. Brown people argue in favor of brown people, black people argue in favor of black people, and finally when I was introduced to white nationalist I was shown white people who argued in favor of white people, something I had been severely lacking in and it was weighing on me.

It's true that people usually advocate for their own groups. But instead of taking these group's existence as a reality at face value one can ask exactly how did they come to be. How did people in USA get divided into black/white/latino. What difference in history and social circumstances really seperates them. These things matter. If I was a child of slave ancestors whose family got basic rights as recent as 1960s, it's reasonable to think that I'd stick with with people who are in similar situation.

Tribalism is easy, introspection is harder. The question is not wheather people of same race stick for each other or not. The question is if they are sticking together for a just cause. Are black people coming together to protest against racially charged police brutality a just cause? Are white people coming together to declare a white nation and deport everyone else a just cause?
In essence Marxism is the ideology of read dogma from books, while fascism is the ideology of lived experience. Marxism says that race doesn't exist, real life says that blacks and Mexicans hate you for your race. Marxism says that borders and nations don't exist, real life says that Mexicans claim my land belongs to their nation and it should be annexed back with me kicked out. Marxism claims Jews are just like everyone else and antisemitism is wrong, real life says that every single movement and organization I hate is directly ran or funded by Jews once I look up the names on Wikipedia or otherwise

Uhhh. Most of this has nothing to do with actual Marxism. And you seemed to be confused in terms. Nobody claims that race doesn't exist or nations/borders don't exist. Though some people do claim that these things SHOULDN'T exist. And I tend to agree. I would prefer to live in a world where a white kid doesn't get harrassed by his teacher and peers or a black kid doesn't get kicked out of school just for their race. Pointing out that bad things are a part of our reality and just claiming that this is how things are solves nothing.
can very clearly see what is happening in the world just like you can, though you do not care because you are not white and expect us to surrender without struggle. White people are around 5% of the earth, we are becoming a minority in all of our own countries and cities, our death rate has exceeded our birth rate, and non-whites are increasingly in charge of our politics, we are in essence being conquered whether you call it that or not. White nationalism is just visual learning

This is a fault of no one in particular and white nationalism doesn't even solve this.


The paths laying before young white man is to either accept your defeat, that you are the villain that must be purged, and that it is fat brown people's right to take your country from you. Or to accept your inheritance. America was a white country made by white men for white men, not for all the people who hate us, and our forefathers explicitly stated this. I'm sure you've seen the popular lines like "you either believe what your ancestors said about Jews or what the Jews say about your ancestors!" And this applies to race as a whole. Brown people say America belongs to them, our founding fathers say it belongs to me. Brown people say my ancestors were evil, I say they were right. Brown people say I must pay reparations, I say they must leave.

They spit on our history, they discriminate against us while praising the foreigner, they are making a mockery of our civilization.
I actually would've stood by this logic if each nation was fully self sufficient. Which is not true and especially in case of USA which is directly responsible for many of the wars and systems of poverty that lead to mass immigration/refugee crises in the first place. There is no ancestral inheritance to be found in that 7 dollar minimum wage that so many Mexicans flood towards.
 
But how does perpetuating the cycle help in any of this? Your very existence as a chud gives fuel to these people to point out and say that they were right all along. Shouldn't you not be doing what they did? Not saying that you are personally responsible for their behaviour, which was clearly wrong. But you are responsible for yourself.
Well first of all no matter how I behave, they will be themselves. If I was a BLM supporter it would be no different than if I supported TND, because I was a BLM supporter back then actually......jfl

Like the saying goes, we can either protect our civilization and be called racist, or give up our civilization and be called racist. I know what I choose.

On top of this I would not say there is anything wrong with my beliefs, nor cruel about them, nor even unfair. I simply believe in reciprocation. "We hate those who hate us." As I've heard.

I do not want whites to murder blacks or Mexicans for no reason, but we DO need law and order in the country. If a black man murders a white child, he should be given death penalty. If black people go out in the streets and loot and riot, they should all be arrested and put away.

There are a few solutions i would be willing to accept for America but none of them go as the left would like which is in essence white death.
We can either

A. Segregate the races so that they have their own land, in their own cities, with their own courts, own police, own prisons. Almost like how the USSR had local administrations for ethnic groups and even had sharia courts for the Muslims so they wouldn't feel imperialized. If this was the solution then blacks couldn't complain about white privilege, and whites wouldn't have to deal with black crime. On top of that we would have racial sovereignty to live amongst our own kind.

B. A legally colorblind America would only be fine if it meant
1. Illegalizing racism INCLUDING anti white speech to the point of deporting anyone who propagates it to separate areas (the left will not accept anti whiteness as racism however)
2. Allow freedom of association, so people can by their own choice have one race only neighborhoods and only serve their own race there if they so choose (RTTL is attempting some of this right now but the ADL+SPLC and media are attacking them and it was only possible through legal loopholes, it's a large scale improbability because of current "civil rights" laws)
3. Do not allow the ethnic replacement of heritage white and black Americans with immigrants for the purpose of cheap labor OR leftist voting bloc, America should stay American and not be replaced. Things would only get worse for heritage Americans should we allow tens of millions of illegals with no love for our nation to continue flooding in. Immigration moratorium and mass deportations are needed. And no, I don't believe sending foreigners to live with other foreigners is cruel, and if it is that only speaks to how bad foreigners must be to live around.

However I far prefer the first solution of segregation as it would just be a lot simpler. I do not believe in TND because I just don't care about blacks like that, I just don't want them to be a problem for us.

Are black people coming together to protest against racially charged police brutality a just cause? Are white people coming together to declare a white nation and deport everyone else a just cause?
The issue is that the "white cops are killing black people for no reason like the KKK!!!!!" myth is bullshit. White cops are not more likely to shoot black people than white people, in fact black cops are actually more likely to shoot white people than black people. There's actually far more white people killed by cops every year than black people, despite the fact blacks make up over 70% of gun violence in a lot of cities. And a lot of the far right movement isn't even in advocacy for a total remigration of non-whites, we just want to separate so we don't want to deal with all their bullshit like crime or white hatred. If they dislike us so much they should actually be joyous for us to not need to live by each other and to rule ourselves.
Screenshot 2026 02 04 00 21 31 02 1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f9
Screenshot 2026 02 04 00 19 44 21 1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f9
Screenshot 2026 01 16 15 20 45 07 1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f92
Screenshot 2026 01 18 07 59 13 39 0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb

Uhhh. Most of this has nothing to do with actual Marxism.
Anti white nationalism, anti American nationalism, anti borders existing, exc is all Marxism. Marxist end goal is for a global world with no borders, which would in my eyes mean certain death for white people as our countries are overran with third world savages wielding machetes who outnumber us ten to one.


This is a fault of no one in particular and white nationalism doesn't even solve this.
Yes actually white nationalism solves foreigner muslims running London and having English people arrested for carrying their own flag while Muslims are allowed to murder children and walk free simply by saying "no, you can't."
 
Both Fascism and Communism are epic tbh. Everyone loves Totalitarianism, Patriotism and collectivism.
Communism puts internationalism above patriotism. Lenin wanted Russia to lose the First World War. He literally wrote joyful articles about how Russia began to retreat in 1915 after losing at Tannenberg. Secondly, Lenin received money from the Germans, who wanted to free up the Eastern Front of the First World War to defeat the French with the remaining free troops.
Secondly, communists do not have nationalism. Their interests are purely class-based. Therefore, communists could sponsor communist parties in other countries, even when their own people were starving. Thirdly, Lenin said that he was willing to accept the extermination of 90% of Russia's population if the remaining 10% could live to see communism.
@Caesercel
 
Last edited:
Maybe because fascism never took root where I live I just don't get it. But here's a post I saw on 4chan and I wonder if this is it.



The par about ritualistic fantasy theatre does make sense

View attachment 1665057

View attachment 1665058


View attachment 1665059
It’s more appealing when you’re third worlder

The appeal of expelling corrupt elements, uniting the disaffected people to regain national dignity and rebuild the economy after enduring financial and political humiliation is self-explanatory.

But rn West is too stable and comfortable for fascism to have strong appeal. Individualism mogs
 
Last edited:
we were greatly jew brain washed into thinking democracy is the best option.

we dont have a true democracy and what we do have is easily subverted. my appeal to facism is that if it were the right guy/ideals then it would not be easily subverted (by the jews)
 
Communism puts internationalism above patriotism.
I don't believe these two contradict eachother. One can be a patriot while also supporting other patriot movements. The DPRK, China and Cuba for example were all nationalists but supported and maintained good relations with other socialist nations in their fight against imperialism.

communists do not have nationalism. Their interests are purely class-based.
The DPRK, Romania, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, China, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Vietnam the list goes on.

Thirdly, Lenin said that he was willing to accept the extermination of 90% of Russia's population if the remaining 10% could live to see communism.
Maybe that was just hyperbole.
 
I don't believe these two contradict eachother. One can be a patriot while also supporting other patriot movements. The DPRK, China and Cuba for example were all nationalists but supported and maintained good relations with other socialist nations in their fight against imperialism.


The DPRK, Romania, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, China, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Vietnam the list goes on.


Maybe that was just hyperbole.
If Bulgaria and Romania had fascists, they would have deported the Gypsy to India.
 
Communism puts internationalism above patriotism. Lenin wanted Russia to lose the First World War. He literally wrote joyful articles about how Russia began to retreat in 1915 after losing at Tannenberg. Secondly, Lenin received money from the Germans, who wanted to free up the Eastern Front of the First World War to defeat the French with the remaining free troops.
Secondly, communists do not have nationalism. Their interests are purely class-based. Therefore, communists could sponsor communist parties in other countries, even when their own people were starving. Thirdly, Lenin said that he was willing to accept the extermination of 90% of Russia's population if the remaining 10% could live to see communism.
@Caesercel

Of these stories, I've heard the one with him celebrating Russia's losses in WW1. And daresay I kind of see the point. If my country had an imperialist autocratic monarch ruling over a system built for landed nobility then I'd, at the very least, not care about their wars as a peasent. Lenin of course wanted them to lose for his own revolutionary purposes. If the country does not belong to it's people to some extent atleast, then you are not really being loyal to your country. You are loyal to some overlord.

As for feeding and developing imperial peripheries, my mind cannot see it as anything other than commendable. In a zero sum game of limited resources it makes sense that for some people to get things others might have to share. If Lenin created a system which overtly benefitted Russians at the expense of every other conquered ethnicity then how are they any better than the imperialists, nationalists, fascists and Nazis they were trying to fight off? Nazis took it to it's logical conclusion and decided that slavs must die for Germans to have home and resources. If Lenin did the same for Russians it would be a betrayal of everything Communism stands for.

As I see it, internationalism is the conclusion but the world was not ready for it then and it's not ready even now. For all their talk of nationalism, the Baltic States were ultimately subsumed into the same EU economic structure. Except now they can pretend that each of those ethnicities have their own "sovereign" parliament.
 
Last edited:
Of these stories, I've heard the one with him celebrating Russia's losses in WW1. And daresay I kind of see the point. If my country had an imperialist autocratic monarch ruling over a system built for landed nobility then I'd, at the very least, not care about their wars as a peasent. Lenin of course wanted them to lose for his own revolutionary purposes. If the country does not belong to it's people to some extent atleast, then you are not really being loyal to your country. You are loyal to some overlord.

As for feeding and developing imperial peripheries, my mind cannot see it as anything other than commendable. In a zero sum game of limited resources it makes sense that for some people to get things others might have to share. If Lenin created a system which overtly benefitted Russians at the expense of every other conquered ethnicity then how are they any better than the imperialists, nationalists, fascists and Nazis they were trying to fight off? Nazis took it to it's logical conclusion and decided that slavs must die for Germans to have home and resources. If Lenin did the same for Russians it would be a betrayal of everything Communism stands for.

As I see it, internationalism is the conclusion but the world was not ready for it then and it's not ready even now. For all their talk of nationalism, the Baltic States were ultimately subsumed into the same EU economic structure. Except now they can pretend that each of those ethnicities have their own "sovereign" parliament.
Yes, they changed the absolute monarchy to the absolute power of party bureaucrats, many of whom moved into noble houses and even continued to use servants. Lenin had a personal chef (Putin's grandfather), maids, and cleaners. Stalin had 15 mansions, each with a platoon (30 people) of guards, chefs, and servants.
The Poles have an anecdote. Under capitalism, man exploits man, but under communism, the opposite is true.......
 
Yes, they changed the absolute monarchy to the absolute power of party bureaucrats, many of whom moved into noble houses and even continued to use servants. Lenin had a personal chef (Putin's grandfather), maids, and cleaners. Stalin had 15 mansions, each with a platoon (30 people) of guards, chefs, and servants.
The Poles have an anecdote. Under capitalism, man exploits man, but under communism, the opposite is true.......

I wouldn't argue that SU was perfect or that it did not have exploitation through surplus value extraction. But I doubt their excesses were anywhere near as grotesque as those of the monarchs or even the Oligarchs that replaced them.
 
I wouldn't argue that SU was perfect or that it did not have exploitation through surplus value extraction. But I doubt their excesses were anywhere near as grotesque as those of the monarchs or even the Oligarchs that replaced them.
Yes, but at least under the monarchy, there was an honest, independent court that gave acquittals even to terrorists.
Under the monarchy of the tsars, it was easier to obtain weapons. The same revolvers were easily sold. The Bolsheviks disarmed the people in order to commit genocide. Why don't you tell us about collectivization? When cattle and tools were taken away from farmers, giving them to a common farm. Or about the fact that you could have been shot on someone else's denunciation, your neighbor, out of envy, I can say that you are a Polish or Japanese spy.
Well, if the empire was so terrible, why did hundreds of thousands of Germans from Europe migrate there to live there?
 
Yes, but at least under the monarchy, there was an honest, independent court that gave acquittals even to terrorists.
Under the monarchy of the tsars, it was easier to obtain weapons. The same revolvers were easily sold. The Bolsheviks disarmed the people in order to commit genocide. Why don't you tell us about collectivization? When cattle and tools were taken away from farmers, giving them to a common farm. Or about the fact that you could have been shot on someone else's denunciation, your neighbor, out of envy, I can say that you are a Polish or Japanese spy.
Well, if the empire was so terrible, why did hundreds of thousands of Germans from Europe migrate there to live there?

None of this is unique to SU. Secret police and famines were prevelant under the monarchy. Further SU is not just Stalin's regime. Though I can see aspects of why things turned out that way. The elites absolutely hate the idea of workers taking power through political party action and their were near constant attempts to sabotage any such movement.

Which is probably why elites love nationalism or fascism. That way the people can pledge their loyalty to some neboulous idea of a nation or an ethnic people, but irl they are really pledging their loyalty to a class system with some elites by default at the top.
 
Last edited:
None of this is unique to SU. Secret police and famines were prevelant under the monarchy.
The only thing that could be done under the tsars for insulting the monarch was exile to Siberia. This meant that you wouldn't be imprisoned, but rather sent to live in harsh climatic conditions. Solzhenitsyn was sentenced to eight years in the Gulag for calling Stalin a monkey.
 
Last edited:
The fascists were right about many things. They knew neither a 100% government-controlled economy nor a completely laissez-faire one would be possible (the smarter communists, like the Chinese ones, eventually settled for a fascist-like partially state-controlled economy). They knew national feelings would trump class feelings in WWI (contrary to what Marx predicted; communists, again, had to adjust, with Stalin stealing fascism's theory and adopting the idea the of third world / "proletarian nations").

They just lost military. Communists hate fascism more than anything because they had the moral victory by predicting everything right and forcing communists to adopt originally fascist things (although communists always steal from fascism without giving it any credit, of course).
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top