Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Is protecting your girlfriend simping or mate protection?

Is protecting your girlfriend simping or mate protection?


  • Total voters
    51
Dr. Autismo

Dr. Autismo

British Incel
-
Joined
Dec 22, 2023
Posts
27,505
Online time
1d 12h
I think it kinda is simping, but it also depends on the circumstance.

If you protect her from something that's entirely her fault, then yes it's simping.
Same with dying for her, like pushing her out the way of gunfire, but getting shot yourself.

But if she's getting harassed by some dumb nigger or touchy jeet, than it's not.
If you let her get fucked by either of those two, or another man in general, then it is simping, and cucked.

But yeah, just asking because I want to improve my character writing
 
if u fuck every single day then mate protection i guess
 
Dunno, it's kinda right thing to do. Chivalry yada yada. But it's kinda need to be done to a good loving loyal girl. Protecting some whore kinda cuckef. Also, chads won't protect any girl, because they always can find another.
 
if she really likes you and ready to get pregnant from you then it's mate protection, if you're just some lame oofy doofy she is using to get free food and pay her rent then it's not really a mate protection.
 
Mate protection assuming the foid is actually into the guy, especially if she has children with him.
If the guy is already a cuck and the foid isn't really that into him and he's just an emotional tampon or walking wallet then it's simping.
 
It's simping no matter the circumstance. You're putting yourself in harms way for a foid and by definition that's the pinnacle of simping. So, what if you died while protecting your 'gf'? She will then go on to forget about you and quadruple her bodycount.
 
.
If you let her get fucked by either of those two, or another man in general, then it is simping, and cucked.
I'm sure these scenarios are extremely common where you live. White women are dying to cuck their white bfs by fucking niggers and pajeets.
 
if she really likes you and ready to get pregnant from you then it's mate protection, if you're just some lame oofy doofy she is using to get free food and pay her rent then it's not really a mate protection.
This basically sums it up
 
It's simping no matter the circumstance. You're putting yourself in harms way for a foid and by definition that's the pinnacle of simping. So, what if you died while protecting your 'gf'? She will then go on to forget about you and quadruple her bodycount.
It's not simping to protect your wife if she has had your offspring, as biological creatures procreating is our main goal in life, what is cucked is fucking over your offspring and giving them a worse chance at survival because you are too much of a pussy to put yourself in harms way.
 
Simping and whiteknighting. What dangers do foids face that they need protection from? None.
 
It's simping no matter the circumstance. You're putting yourself in harms way for a foid and by definition that's the pinnacle of simping. So, what if you died while protecting your 'gf'? She will then go on to forget about you and quadruple her bodycount.
ultimate cuck behaviour.

"I will die for my girlfriend so she can keep getting railed by chads" :soy:
 
I'm sure these scenarios are extremely common where you live. White women are dying to cuck their white bfs by fucking niggers and pajeets.
Probably, you can't spell cUcK without the UK
 
It's not simping to protect your wife if she has had your offspring, as biological creatures procreating is our main goal in life, what is cucked is fucking over your offspring and giving them a worse chance at survival because you are too much of a pussy to put yourself in harms way.
No, it's still simping. Nobody in their right mind is dying for someone else. Your wife already served her purpose by popping out your offspring and breastfeeding them, she's useless after that. You sound like a redpiller conservacuck saying 'you're a muh pussy for not protecting your wifeuu'.
 
No, it's still simping. Nobody in their right mind is dying for someone else. Your wife already served her purpose by popping out your offspring and breastfeeding them, she's useless after that. You sound like a redpiller conservacuck saying 'you're a muh pussy for not protecting your wifeuu'.
As much as it is popular to hate on women on this forum kids are still better off in two parent households with a father and a mother, letting your kids mother die is an objectively bad thing for your kids. Plus I don't think she will respect you if you let people go around attacking her which is honestly understandable.
There is no point in arguing with people like you though because you will always just pick the most edgy anti-female answer no matter how illogical what you are saying is. Which is fine I really don't care cope however you see fit but I just find this to be a really stupid discussion.
 
I was being sarcastic
Ok, but I won't be surprised if it still happens anyway.

Whites here are very concerned about not appearing racist, homophobic, sexist or politically incorrect
 
As much as it is popular to hate on women on this forum kids are still better off in two parent households with a father and a mother, letting your kids mother die is an objectively bad thing for your kids. Plus I don't think she will respect you if you let people go around attacking her which is honestly understandable.
There is no point in arguing with people like you though because you will always just pick the most edgy anti-female answer no matter how illogical what you are saying is. Which is fine I really don't care cope however you see fit but I just find this to be a really stupid discussion.
Letting yourself die to protect a foid will also have the same effect, but it's actually a way worse outcome to have a single mother household and be dead, retard. It's illogical to think otherwise. But, go ahead, die for your wife and roll around in your grave when you see your wife immediately move on without a second thought.
 
Letting yourself die to protect a foid will also have the same effect, but it's actually a way worse outcome to have a single mother household and be dead, retard. It's illogical to think otherwise. But, go ahead, die for your wife and roll around in your grave when you see your wife immediately move on without a second thought.
In a case where you know 100% it's you or her it's more debatable but letting your wife get harassed by niggers and pajeets and intervening it's definitely not simping. It's a cost risk analysis thing. Ideally as a man you would do your best to protect both yourself and your wife. If you want to construct a hypothetical where you know 100% if you intervene you will die but save your wife but if you don't you will survive but your wife will die it's definitely more debatable, but I don't think real life altercations are ever really that black and white.
Also notice I voted both, not just mate protection, so I've already conceded there are times when it is simping and times when it is mate protection... it's a case by case basis.
 
I think it kinda is simping, but it also depends on the circumstance.

If you protect her from something that's entirely her fault, then yes it's simping.
Same with dying for her, like pushing her out the way of gunfire, but getting shot yourself.

But if she's getting harassed by some dumb nigger or touchy jeet, than it's not.
If you let her get fucked by either of those two, or another man in general, then it is simping, and cucked.

But yeah, just asking because I want to improve my character writing
Imagine risking yourself because of a foid
 
Really depends on the context of the scenario she's being protected from. If from danger or harm, it's mate protection. If she acts like a bitch to some random people and starts a fight, and you're protecting that behavior, that is just simping.
 
If she really loves you, it's mate protection. If she's an ungrateful bitch, simp behavior.
 
Let's be honest everything they do is to look good to them they would eat shit to look like a good boyfriend sad losers someday I wanna see a man who has a gf nd "loves" her then goes off the rails so dumb
 
Basically simping
 
mate protection if she treats you right
 
It's not simping if you explore her warm holes every night.

Simp orbiter cucks never get to that step.
 
I think it kinda is simping, but it also depends on the circumstance.

If you protect her from something that's entirely her fault, then yes it's simping.
Same with dying for her, like pushing her out the way of gunfire, but getting shot yourself.

But if she's getting harassed by some dumb nigger or touchy jeet, than it's not.
If you let her get fucked by either of those two, or another man in general, then it is simping, and cucked.

But yeah, just asking because I want to improve my character writing
Nigga, you're right.
I see it the same way you do.
 
Simping is act of doing things for foids while getting nothing in return for it, If your protecting a women who loves you then you aren't simping.
 
Lmao, at least this one white knight is learning young what women are really like.
Right. Grown ass women act the same way in their abusive relationships. They desire it.
 
If you're fucking the female, it's only natural to protect her. But protecting random whores who wouldn't even jerk you off with gloves on if your life depended on it is gigacucked.
 

Similar threads

D. B. Gooner
Replies
4
Views
465
rapetorturekill
rapetorturekill
BallinCat43
Replies
23
Views
1K
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel
Mohamedömar
Replies
59
Views
984
Mohamedömar
Mohamedömar
P
Replies
39
Views
2K
aloocard
aloocard
T
Replies
16
Views
1K
The_word_made_flesh
T

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top