Is Mamluk style governance a good idea for ethnics and blacks

[Pikacel]

In the past Egypt and Middle East used to be governed by Slavic, Turk and Circassian foreigners.

I think this is mogger for stability tbh. The stupid brown masses will see a leader with glowing white skin and feel compelled to obey him (ethnic white-worship). Whereas if a fellow ethnic tries to rule over them they’re like who tf does this bastard think he is and rebel. Also there’s no tribalist preference due to the government being completely alienated from the local culture

Maybe this is why colonialism worked so well. The alienation from tribalism aspect. In India the white colonial officers would kill Brahmins openly, they straight up did not give af about caste bs which made the people respect them.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

You're a nigger. Governance is not for you. You are best left alone in your ooga booga natural anarchy/tribalism.

 

[Pikacel]

You're a nigger. Governance is not for you. You are best left alone in your ooga booga natural anarchy/tribalism.

You are boring

 

[Rapemaxxer]

You are boring

Says the retarded negro cuck who posts the same slop about ethnics being savages and whiteys being angels every single fucking day.

 

[Pikacel]

Says the retarded negro cuck who posts the same slop about ethnics being savages and whiteys being angels every single fucking day.

Barely any of my threads are about that

 

[retributor]

In the past Egypt and Middle East used to be governed by Slavic, Turk and Circassian foreigners.

I think this is mogger for stability tbh. The stupid brown masses will see a leader with glowing white skin and feel compelled to obey him (ethnic white-worship). Whereas if a fellow ethnic tries to rule over them they’re like who tf does this bastard think he is and rebel. Also there’s no tribalist preference due to the government being completely alienated from the local culture

Maybe this is why colonialism worked so well. The alienation from tribalism aspect. In India the white colonial officers would kill Brahmins openly, they straight up did not give af about caste bs which made the people respect them.

self rule will almost always be better for the middle east, idk about india but, the current wars in the middle east are caused because of ethnic tensions created by rule of foreigners, with the rule of foreigners you stitch an entire region of different languages and cultures together which won't end well. colonialism only benefits the people being ruled when the people don't live to serve the colonialists, and at that point why would someone rule over others like equals when that brings their own people down.

 

[retributor]

egyptians also aren't undeveloped subhumans unable to form a civilization of their own, they managed to rebel against the ottoman empire because they basically governed themselves

 

[Pikacel]

self rule will almost always be better for the middle east, idk about india but, the current wars in the middle east are caused because of ethnic tensions created by rule of foreigners, with the rule of foreigners you stitch an entire region of different languages and cultures together which won't end well. colonialism only benefits the people being ruled when the people don't live to serve the colonialists, and at that point why would someone rule over others like equals when that brings their own people down.

egyptians also aren't undeveloped subhumans unable to form a civilization of their own, they managed to rebel against the ottoman empire because they basically governed themselves

Good points