Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Is Chad getting rarer

I think by definition Chad should be very rare, I have never seen any Chad irl as far as I can remember, quite alot of Chadlites though.
 
I think by definition Chad should be very rare, I have never seen any Chad irl as far as I can remember, quite alot of Chadlites though.
It’s possible the “chads” I remember from highschool were just chadlite and my memory is failing me
 
Chad Genes are already randomized, there’s never been a huge influx of Chads anywhere in human history, look at most Chad’s family members, most are average or even ugly looking.
 
I feel like twink Chads are much more common nowadays, especially in eastern Europe. 20 years ago we had a bunch of hyper masculine ogres, but every other teenager nowadays has a chiseled face and broccoli haircut.
 
I'm not sure about this point actually. So far, everything I've seen on the link between looks and fertility points to better-looking people tending to have more children, just as they have more sex and relationships.
In Western countries fertility rates are lower among the rich than the poor, and we know that income and looks have a positive correlation (partly due to the halo effect and "beauty premium," partly because of inheritance and the traditional correlation between looks and social class). Also, something like 16% of US births to at least one white parent in the year 2015 were of mixed children (59.44% of births to at least one white parent, 9.24% of these births being of a mixed child) and I think you've already seen the data showing that whites who racemix trend fatter, lower IQ, more mentally ill, and generally more dysgenic. So I would assume that, even controlling for race, normies (4-6/10) are having the most kids, with attractive people having less and sub-5s having the least.

Anecdotally, it seems like Chads and Stacies tend to ride the hedonic treadmill until it kills them, while buxxers, oofy-doofies, and beckies/sub-5 foids are the ones who end up reproducing in LTRs
 
I feel like I see Chads everywhere all of the time, nothing has changed in my area. but what foids deem a "Chad" is getting harder to meet the standards of.
 
So I would assume that, even controlling for race, normies (4-6/10) are having the most kids, with attractive people having less and sub-5s having the least.
I'd agree with this.

Btw, I found this while looking for data on this topic, thoughts:feelsjuice:?

figure1-101-w640.png


 
Brad Pitt is a Chad (not a gigachad). How many of these guys do you think you'll encounter in your lifetime? Maybe one in 80 years of existence on this planet.
 

Similar threads

VλREN
Replies
20
Views
602
goyim next door
goyim next door
CursedMutantSoul
Replies
14
Views
1K
Carter…
Carter…
FarangInDaNang
Replies
5
Views
889
UriBelmont
UriBelmont
SalveMatteo
Replies
20
Views
2K
DjentlemanDuke
DjentlemanDuke

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top