ThanostheGOAT
Officer
★★★
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2024
- Posts
- 798
I think by definition Chad should be very rare, I have never seen any Chad irl as far as I can remember, quite alot of Chadlites though.
It’s possible the “chads” I remember from highschool were just chadlite and my memory is failing meI think by definition Chad should be very rare, I have never seen any Chad irl as far as I can remember, quite alot of Chadlites though.
In Western countries fertility rates are lower among the rich than the poor, and we know that income and looks have a positive correlation (partly due to the halo effect and "beauty premium," partly because of inheritance and the traditional correlation between looks and social class). Also, something like 16% of US births to at least one white parent in the year 2015 were of mixed children (59.44% of births to at least one white parent, 9.24% of these births being of a mixed child) and I think you've already seen the data showing that whites who racemix trend fatter, lower IQ, more mentally ill, and generally more dysgenic. So I would assume that, even controlling for race, normies (4-6/10) are having the most kids, with attractive people having less and sub-5s having the least.I'm not sure about this point actually. So far, everything I've seen on the link between looks and fertility points to better-looking people tending to have more children, just as they have more sex and relationships.
Everyone mogas me when I’m outside
I'd agree with this.So I would assume that, even controlling for race, normies (4-6/10) are having the most kids, with attractive people having less and sub-5s having the least.





