Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum
Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.
BS. According to some testimonies, what was the final straw for the formation of the god-fearing Taleban movement ("students of Islam") was an incident in Southern Afghanistan where 2 warlords had a fight over who gets to sodomize a boy. Obviously the Afghan warlords had began as anticommunist guerillas/ghuerilla group leaders in 1980s. Taleban tried to eradicate Bacha bazi from mid-1990s on, as Islam explicitly prohibits any homosexual acts.
My dad saw some fucked up shit when he was there in the 2000s, evidently some of our soldiers lynched a local religious leader because he was trying to sell little boys as prostitutes to the soldiers.
way it was interpreted when the Islamic world was at It's highest, when it destroyed empires much more powerful than the muslim nation, when social cohesion was unparallaled, the way the Prophet himself and his Companions interpreted it.
So a civilization when it still permitted slavery was at its highest stage? Now that it doesn't have official slavery any more (remnants of it in many Islamic countries remaining tho, esp. in Mauritania) is WORSE than this supa dupa civlization once was in year 1300 or sth?
Sad; not funny: sad. Imagine this: a muslim cleric who'd eagerly denounce the West for its so-called same-sex marriage between consenting adults would sell defenceless boys as sex slaves to fanatically religious soldiers. Sigh...
If the most modern nations in the world tried to defeat Islam, why are people openly practicing it in those western countries, again all this sounds like are common Muslim fallacies based on a dogmatic religion that can't even comprehend itself.
Because the "Islam" that is allowed to be practiced in the West is the one that doesn't pose any threat, that is deformed to be subdued and pacifist. Otherwise you'd see terrorist attacks every weekend until even leftists were supporting deportations. Relevant Western think tanks work to keep it that way, like Rand Corporation; scholars that deviate from the mainstream are imprisoned and their works censured, hell, you can get at least 5 years in jail simply for having a PDF of the weekly Naba news magazine found on your computer, it happened before.
If Islam cannot define itself and the only cope is "nobody is actually following the Quran" then it shouldn't exist itself and its splinter groups are evidence of its flaws.
Islam defines itself perfectly. People either choose not to accept the truth or are ignorant of it, when so much information is censored and misconstrued, and most people calling themselves muslims aren't actually following Islam, not all. Splinter groups exist in every religion, philosophy or ideology, it doesn't necessarily devalue the original thought
Who defines that? Are you a Muslim Pope or sth.? High Sunni religious figures would declaares Shiias ain't real Muslims; highest Shiia ayatollahs conversely would declare Sunnis ain't real Muslims.
The core teachings, however, of both 2 main branches of Islam are similar.
So a civilization when it still permitted slavery was at its highest stage? Now that it doesn't have official slavery any more (remnants of it in many Islamic countries remaining tho, esp. in Mauritania) is WORSE than this supa dupa civlization once was in year 1300 or sth?
So a civilization when it still permitted slavery was at its highest stage? Now that it doesn't have official slavery any more (remnants of it in many Islamic countries remaining tho, esp. in Mauritania) is WORSE than this supa dupa civlization once was in year 1300 or sth?
Islamic slavery was nothing like the barbaric and dehumanizing Western practice of slavery, though. Slaves in the Muslim world even ended up to be in high military and political positions, often having a better life than the average free person. Not to mention the precepts regarding freeing slaves, not abusing them unnecessarily, etc
Sad; not funny: sad. Imagine this: a muslim cleric who'd eagerly denounce the West for its so-called same-sex marriage between consenting adults would sell defenceless boys as sex slaves to fanatically religious soldiers. Sigh...
A "sodomite muslim cleric" or a "sodomite islamic soldier" would both be oxymoronic statements; unrepentant, periodic practice or ideological allowance of something that clearly goes against the Shariah nullifies one's Islam, i.e that person becomes a disbeliever. Companions of Muhammad used to burn sodomites to death
Who defines that? Are you a Muslim Pope or sth.? High Sunni religious figures would declaares Shiias ain't real Muslims; highest Shiia ayatollahs conversely would declare Sunnis ain't real Muslims.
The core teachings, however, of both 2 main branches of Islam are similar.
High sunni religious figures base their excommunication on the Quran and verifiable Hadith sources with a solid chain of narration, Shi'ites even claim the Quran may be corrupted (which contradicts with parts of the Quran itself).
And in no way the core teachings are similar, the very base of the Islamic creed (Oneness of God, with no partner or near-equivalent in His attributes) is fundamentally denied in Shi'ism, they deify their Imams so they can warp the word of God (the Quran) to their whims, based on their nonliteral interpretation
Yes the Arabs were nothing but some irrelevant desert tribes before Islam. Romans sometimes proxied them. Only divine intervention can explain how they suddenly became empire
No socio-economic factors can as well, Islam; a monotheistic religion emerged and united the scattered tribes of Arabia to overcome the oppression caused by two dying empires — Rome and Persia.
I'm not a religious person, but if I were I'd interpret the influx of Muslim savages into Europe, esp. Western Europe as Divine Punishment for the degenerate lifestyle of Euros, including (but not limited to) their rampant foid worship.
No socio-economic factors can as well, Islam; a monotheistic religion emerged and united the scattered tribes of Arabia to overcome the oppression caused by two dying empires — Rome and Persia.
Because the "Islam" that is allowed to be practiced in the West is the one that doesn't pose any threat, that is deformed to be subdued and pacifist. Otherwise you'd see terrorist attacks every weekend until even leftists were supporting deportations. Relevant Western think tanks work to keep it that way, like Rand Corporation; scholars that deviate from the mainstream are imprisoned and their works censured, hell, you can get at least 5 years in jail simply for having a PDF of the weekly Naba news magazine found on your computer, it happened before.
Islam defines itself perfectly. People either choose not to accept the truth or are ignorant of it, when so much information is censored and misconstrued, and most people calling themselves muslims aren't actually following Islam, not all. Splinter groups exist in every religion, philosophy or ideology, it doesn't necessarily devalue the original thought
But yet in most Islamic countries western religions are not allowed, or are heavily taxed, not allowing for churches to be built or even repaired when damage is done to them.
Even if Muhammad was alive today Islam would still be in turmoil, its a shit idea that can and will never, and has never either. The argument that it worked during when Muhammad was alive is false aswell, the rapid expansion of Islam was because of murder and forced conversions.
Yes, the French conquered algeria, Morocco, thereafter participated in desmembering the most pious mudslime Ottoman empire and subdued (and educated) Syria, whilst the Brits got Iraq. I wonder whether the all-powerful allah was having a nap back then for a while, even the Syrian and Iraqi Baathi regime ("The Socialist Party of Arab Rebirth") was influenced by French-educated left-leaning intellectuals such as this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Aflaq
If Islam was so awesome, why did mudslime Africa tier countries need to copy and adapt Western ideas?!
Islamic slavery was nothing like the barbaric and dehumanizing Western practice of slavery, though. Slaves in the Muslim world even ended up to be in high military and political positions, often having a better life than the average free person
Yes, the French conquered algeria, Morocco, thereafter participated in desmembering the most pious mudslime Ottoman empire and subdued (and educated) Syria, whilst the Brits got Iraq. I wonder whether the all-powerful allah was having a nap back then for a while, even the Syrian and Iraqi Baathi regime ("The Socialist Party of Arab Rebirth") was influenced by French-educated left-leaning intellectuals such as this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Aflaq
If Islam was so awesome, why did mudslime Africa tier countries need to copy and adapt Western ideas?!
Yes, but Nasserism-Baathism only won in certain countries where Ottoman influence was strong: Iraq, Egypt, Syria, and Yemen. In countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, this was nowhere near the case, and even in Oman, there was a civil war in which monarchist supporters defeated local arab socialists.
In a sense, the Ottoman Empire was quite soft, I would even say too soft, in terms of Islam. It's no surprise that the Arabs who didn't live under the Ottomans started a religious movement to purify Islam from all the Turkish and Persian non-Islamic traditions and superstitions. This movement was known as Wahhabism. Interestingly, the Arab countries that were under Ottoman control fell to secular socialist regimes, while the Arab countries that were not under Ottoman control remained stable.
Iran is the leading country for gender reassignment surgeries right after Thailand. It's basically a troon factory, Iran is the only Muslim-majority country where such surgeries are not only legal but actively supported by the state, including financial aid, legal recognition of the new gender on documents, and protections against some forms of discrimination post-surgery. In recent years, Iran has even promoted itself as a medical tourism destination for transgender procedures to attract foreign patients and generate revenue, offering low costs (around $3,000–$7,000 per surgery) compared to Western countries (1). but why ? The primary reason stems from a 1987 fatwa (Islamic legal ruling) issued by Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, which permitted sex reassignment surgery as a treatment for what is officially classified as "gender identity disorder". This shouldn't be confused with homosexuality itself, homosexuality is seen as a choice or deviation from divine norms, not an innate condition requiring medical intervention. However transgender identity (GID) is treated as a real medical and psychological issue, basically, a mismatch where someone's soul (or inner true self) is one gender, but their body is the opposite.
According to the fatwa gender-affirming surgery is allowed (and even religiously okay) because doctors can change the body to match the soul. The idea is simple: the soul matters more than the flesh/body, so fixing the body to fit the soul is permitted when medical experts confirm it.
To put it even more simply,
Transgender = soul and body don't match —> surgery can correct the body (allowed).
Homosexuality = forbidden behavior —> not treated as a soul-body issue or curable through surgery (Punishable offence under Sharia)
What caused Khomeini to issue it in the first place ? In Tahrir al-Wasilah (written around 1964–1965 during Khomeini's exile and published in the late 1960s), he permitted corrective surgery for intersex individuals (khuntha or hermaphrodites) with physical ambiguity in their genitalia, allowing the body to align with one determined gender. This did not initially apply to transgender people without such physical intersex traits.
Physical ambiguity in this context refers to ambiguous external genitalia, meaning the newborn's visible sex organs (genitals) do not clearly appear as typically male or typically female. This makes it difficult or impossible to assign a binary sex (male or female) based on physical appearance alone at birth.
After the revolution, there was a troon named Maryam Khatoon Molkara (born 1950, assigned male at birth), a transgender woman and advocate. She began writing letters to Khomeini in the 1970s (while he was in exile) explaining her lifelong feeling of being a woman trapped in a man's body. After the revolution, she endured persecution like job loss, forced male hormone injections, and psychiatric institutionalization. She lobbied clerics and eventually secured a dramatic personal meeting with Khomeini around 1986–1987.
Here's a JFL moment: Molkara strikingly arrived at Khomeini's home dressed in a man's suit (to gain entry), carrying the Quran for protection. Guards beat her severely, suspecting she might be armed (due to her hormone-developed breasts under binding). She revealed her physical state, and Khomeini's brother intervened. During the brief meeting (about half an hour), Khomeini consulted three trusted doctors about her case and was so moved by her story and medical advice, he issued a handwritten fatwa authorizing her surgery and, by extension, permitting it for others.
This ruling declared the procedure permissible (halal) under Shia Islamic law through scholarly reasoning (ijtihad) when advised by competent doctors, treating it as a medical correction rather than a sinful alteration of God's creation.
Abstract. Sex-change surgery has been practiced through a medico-judicial process in Iran based on Ayatollah Khomeini's Islamic juristic legal opinion (fatwa), which he issued just a few years after the Islamic revolution, in 1982. According to the Iranian legal system, judges can refer to the...
WoW, JFL, this is amazing!
The Iranian regime is even more gay and low-IQ then i thought
They should be bombed in the name of FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ASAP.
WoW, JFL, this is amazing!
The Iranian regime is even more gay and low-IQ then i thought
They should be bombed in the name of FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ASAP.
They're not low IQ, quite the opposite actually. For instance, in the recent protests they cut the internet off but however Jewlon Musk kept starlink activated to help the protestors or Mossad inside Iran. Which backfired since Iran tracked all the people using starlink and caught all the 800 mossad agents and ring leaders who were organizing the protests, who are now being executed.
The fact that they're still functioning under such terrible sanctions is evident to the fact that they're on higher IQ side among the browns.
As for their troonic sympathy, it was because of Khomeini and his work is very interesting about metaphysical gnosis.
They're not low IQ, quite the opposite actually. For instance, in the recent protests they cut the internet off but however Jewlon Musk's kept starlink activated to help the protestors or Mossad inside Iran. Which backfired since Iran tracked all the people using starlink and caught all the 800 mossad agents and ring leaders who were organizing the protests, who are now being executed.
The fact that they're still functioning under such terrible sanctions is evident to the fact that they're on higher IQ side among the browns.
As for their troonic sympathy, it was because of Khomeini and his work is very interesting about metaphysical gnosis.
Over for Zionistcels
Please make Iran gay again. Donny needs to divert attention from Epstein files and Iranian people don't really need all this oil (they love being poor). Additionally, Blackrock see a lot of potential for investments.
If Islam's God called Allah exists, he must be evil. Because the Holy Quran persistently emphasizes that Allah is all-powerful. Whence the obvious evil in the world then? Why does the almighty Allah permit it? Why does he let Afghan warlords and muslim clerics sell boys into sex slavery for pederastic soldiers?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.