Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill IQ does matter and you can only ascend with your IQmatch

Have you swallowed the IQmatch pill?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • No

    Votes: 17 63.0%
  • Awooooooooooo!

    Votes: 3 11.1%

  • Total voters
    27
sneed (not chuck)

sneed (not chuck)

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Posts
2,493
This has been a hard blackpill for me to swallow. It is often said that women don't care about intelligence. But they do, at least subconsciously. Studies have shown that spouses have closer IQ levels than siblings. We inevitably settle with our IQmatch.

1676448701411


Couples obviously aren't giving each other IQ tests, so how is this occurring? Are women excellent judges of personality, character, and intelligence? Fuck no! It appears our lives are a direct indication of our IQ. Factors such as our occupation, income, and education level are pretty accurate indicators of your IQ. No Jewish or racist conspiracy is holding you back. If your racial group is overall lacking in these departments globally, perhaps it's time to consider that your race might be shit.

1676448980061


So it turns out judging people by their education levels and social factors gives you a pretty accurate indication of their IQ. Accurate enough for couples to have IQs that correlate closer than the IQs of biological siblings.

What is the incel meant to do with this information? Consider the fact that your life may be indicating to the world that you're STUPID. If you got no degrees and no income, you've pretty much cut yourself off from all triple-digit IQ women unless you're Chad and can attract through brute sex appeal alone.

 
It seems for marriage people choose the most similar person to themselves, their religion and ethnic background its almost always the same, I noticed many married couples even looks like each other, hell sometimes even their pet looks like them.
 
If ye are so smart then why you are on inky stinky forum, creme de la creme? Awesome find, man.

More down-to-earth approach would be like that: if you can think rationally, write articles, make something from scratch - you cant really connect with some not-giving-a-fuck person who just watches tiktok 24/7

At least something-smart + ugly - congradulations! You will never be a wom.. you will never find a woman! Or, maybe you will, but you are going to hate her, and she is going to hate you back. You arent meeting her looks standard, she doesn't meet your smart-ish standards..

Shit is ridiculous, as you can see
 
It seems for marriage people choose the most similar person to themselves, their religion and ethnic background its almost always the same, I noticed many married couples even looks like each other, hell sometimes even their pet looks like them.
Correct too, actually

and if you are something 'unique' in a good or bad way... Going down then
 
If ye are so smart then why you are on inky stinky forum, creme de la creme? Awesome find, man.

More down-to-earth approach would be like that: if you can think rationally, write articles, make something from scratch - you cant really connect with some not-giving-a-fuck person who just watches tiktok 24/7

At least something-smart + ugly - congradulations! You will never be a wom.. you will never find a woman! Or, maybe you will, but you are going to hate her, and she is going to hate you back. You arent meeting her looks standard, she doesn't meet your smart-ish standards..

Shit is ridiculous, as you can see
sounds like someone hasnt swallowed the IQmatch pill yet
 
i am attracted to high iq women. i would rather die a virgin than have a low iq stacey
 
I have no IQ match.
 
Last edited:
This has been a hard blackpill for me to swallow. It is often said that women don't care about intelligence. But they do, at least subconsciously. Studies have shown that spouses have closer IQ levels than siblings. We inevitably settle with our IQmatch.

View attachment 707936

Couples obviously aren't giving each other IQ tests, so how is this occurring? Are women excellent judges of personality, character, and intelligence? Fuck no! It appears our lives are a direct indication of our IQ. Factors such as our occupation, income, and education level are pretty accurate indicators of your IQ. No Jewish or racist conspiracy is holding you back. If your racial group is overall lacking in these departments globally, perhaps it's time to consider that your race might be shit.

View attachment 707938

So it turns out judging people by their education levels and social factors gives you a pretty accurate indication of their IQ. Accurate enough for couples to have IQs that correlate closer than the IQs of biological siblings.

What is the incel meant to do with this information? Consider the fact that your life may be indicating to the world that you're STUPID. If you got no degrees and no income, you've pretty much cut yourself off from all triple-digit IQ women unless you're Chad and can attract through brute sex appeal alone.

iqpill is underestimated on this site
 
This is garbage since even if you have failed occupationally and educationally you can still get a girlfriend if you are normie tier, through online dating, sure you might not be attracting high IQ women or gold-diggers but so what? Also, looks play an important role in both educational success, mainly due to discrimination causing mental illness and lowering drive and earnings, attractive people earn more than ugly people even excluding everything else. None of this is relavent if you are sub5, education and earnings mean nothing when it comes to women, these days you can't even betabux.
 
Cope. Its all in your dynamic or what would normies call chemistry. If you are attracted to her and she knows her role as wife and mother regardless of IQ you will have a happy marriage.
 
Usually i see smart girls dating retarded guys
 
I have no IQ match.

When I took the 123test version a few years ago, I scored 135. My score on Queendom prior to that was 115-120.

...

1647527473748-png.1594052


snap-png.669601


working_memory-png.686043


1669746925616-png.681438


Off-Topic Logic Game
Unintelligent_Anon
Png

Join Date: 2016-02-24
Post Count: 361
#185501144Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:07 PM CDT
Greetings, Off-Topic. On this particular occasion, I have decided to have an entertaining discussion with all of you by composing a simple game based on logical-reasoning. Firstly, while utilizing mathematics, we have objective statements such as "x = 5" Those particular type of statements are properly known as "predicates", given that they equate to either the Boolean values of true and/or false. within the above premise, it merely defines the quantity that variable 'x' represents. Therefore, it is "true" predicate. Although I used "x = 5", we could use symbolic notation such as this: E(x) = 5 Where uppercase "E" refers to the word "Equal", and the input variable 'x' receives the quantity described on the opposite side of the "=" operand. --------------------------------------- Recognizing the above objective explanation, the goal of the game is rather basic: to derive logical expressions to be interpreted by other users. I have devised a minimal list of logical symbols below: "-->" - The logical "if-then" operator. "If certain cookies are delicious, then some grapes are bluish"(Note that the premise predicate and the conclusion predicate do not necessarily need to be related. They merely need to have an obtainable Boolean value. '~' - The logical "NOT" operator. It merely negates "true"/"false" Boolean predicates into the opposite Boolean value. ~"I decided to traverse the area" becomes "I decided not to traverse the area." "^" - The logical AND operator. "(1+1 = 2) ^ (2 + 2 = 4) --> (5 + 5) == 10", which is true, given that "1 + 1 = 2 ^ 2 + 2 = 4" are both (true ^ true) respectively. Disregarding all of the other logical operators for the current moment, this is a sample expression that I have devised below: Suppose that we have variables 'a' and 'b': a = 100 b = 50 Firstly, let us define a predicate to determine whether the first value is a factor of the second value: R(a,b) = (a % b) This will retrieve the remainder of the division operation "a/b", using the difference between 'a' and 'b' as a referent. Likewise, R(b,a) would also retrieve the remainder of the division operation "b/a", using the difference between 'b' and 'a' as a referent. If I had an expression such as this: (R(a,b) = 0) ^ (R(b,a) = 0) It would be an expected case of a true/false pair. This is due to the mere fact that the (100 % 50) does not have a remainder, whereas (50/100) does indeed have a remainder of fifty itself. Hopefully the above descriptions provides a rather wholesome and otherwise precise discussion involving mathematical logic.

Unintelligent_Anon
Png

Join Date: 2016-02-24
Post Count: 361
#185349753Monday, March 14, 2016 8:24 PM CDT
Ah, you would like a simple "Algebra" problem, yes? Alright here we go: Suppose that I have a set I containing all of the positive "odd" integers I = {n | n > 0 ^ n % 2 = 1} The first rule of addition is this: n + (n + 1) --> (n (n + 1) - n ) V (n > (n + 1) --> n - (n + 1)) The above states to subtract the lesser integer from the greater integer depending on the position of the quantities. This essentially eliminates the commutative property of addition, and by extension, multiplication. Due to this, "I" is a mathematical group. It has the addition binary operation available.
Unintelligent_Anon
Png

Join Date: 2016-02-24
Post Count: 361
#185355832Monday, March 14, 2016 9:54 PM CDT
"Due to this, "I" is a mathematical group. It has the addition binary operation available" A significant flaw in my logic was previously disregarded. Set "I" does not have an "identity element." Consequently, it is impossible for the given set to properly fulfill the definition of a mathematical group. Thus, I will modify the original set criteria in the form (n >= 0), which is "n is greater than or equivalent to zero." That will introduce a valid identity element.

storage-png.668110


Re: Poll: Are U Good At Maths?
Subjective_Anon
Png

Join Date: 2016-03-08
Post Count: 157
#200236802Monday, October 17, 2016 1:58 PM CDT
You should define "Maths." There are Geometric Maths, Algebraic Maths, et cetera. Also, the person who stated that "You should learn proper spelling and grammar before studying Maths" is an imbecile who should learn the definition of Ad-Hominem.
 
How the fuck am I supposed to ascend if my IQ range is only 0.5% of the population
 
Finally, we use population frequency to allay further myths.

234


Senile plaques (SP) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) are the major histopathological changes that occur in Alzheimer's disease (AD). How these two different types of lesions are related to each other and to the dementia of AD is unknown. Recent studies lead to paradoxical conclusions: NFT and neuronal alterations such as synapse loss are much more closely related to the symptoms of dementia than are SP. However, mutations in the beta-amyloid protein of SP have been found in some patients with familial AD, suggesting that an abnormality in amyloid causes the development of SP, NFT and AD dementia. Examination of transgenic animals that produce amyloid precursor protein (APP), or altered forms of APP, may lead to the development of an animal model of AD, and ultimately to answers that link amyloid production to neuronal alterations, and cognitive impairments.

1669672654739

Many of the implicated genes are involved in neuronal function: DCC, APBA1, PRR7, ZFHX3, HCRTR1, NEGR1, MEF2C, SHANK3 and ATXN2L (see Supplementary Note for the GeneCards summaries).

In conclusion, we conducted a meta-analysis GWAS and GWGAS for intelligence, including 13 cohorts and 78,308 individuals. We confirmed three loci and 12 genes, and identified 15 novel genomic loci and 40 novel genes for intelligence. Pathway analysis demonstrated the involvement of genes regulating cell development. We showed genetic overlap with several neuropsychiatric and metabolic disorders. These findings provide starting points for understanding the molecular neurobiological mechanisms underlying intelligence, one of the most investigated traits in humans

rs11138902APBA1 intronic9q21.11ag0.545.494.12E-08+++++-++783071

PopulationGroupSample SizeRef AlleleAlt Allele

PopulationGroupSample SizeRef AlleleAlt Allele
TotalGlobal10618G=0.59314A=0.40686, T=0.00000
EuropeanSub8276G=0.5168A=0.4832, T=0.0000
AfricanSub1406G=0.9587A=0.0413, T=0.0000
African OthersSub54G=0.94A=0.06, T=0.00
African AmericanSub1352G=0.9593A=0.0407, T=0.0000
AsianSub46G=0.91A=0.09, T=0.00
East AsianSub32G=0.88A=0.12, T=0.00

236-png.711922


237-png.711923


238-png.711924


...

239-png.711925


 
Around average IQ here wish I learned way faster
 
Usually i see smart girls dating retarded guys
Yes on a big picture perspective, 70iq men will date 70 iq women. Poverty class. A lot of 120 iq girls will date 100 iq guys. Girls naturally hate ultra high iq guys. 140 iq girls will date maybe 110 iq guys at most. If the 120 iq guy gets a date it's probably with some 100 iq normie golddigger girl. The rare times high iq guy gets a high iq girl is if they are the same race and do something like college together but that is of course reserved for normies.

Usually if a high iq guy has to act retarded to interact with a girl because girls will have a visceral 'allergic' reaction to high iq guys. They are naturally repulsed by intelligence.

Natural selection at its finest. This is for the best, foids should waste their genetics on retards so that their dna can be erased from existence.

But this does create some interesting dynamics in terms of money though since high iq guys might become rich. Somehow these not so high iq girls end up marrying the ultra high iq guys and living comfortable rich lives.
 
Last edited:
Good looking people on average have higher IQs.
 
High IQ women are usually just lesbians.
 
Yeah, people usually get with others of the same socioeconomic background. A dumb person also can't relate to a smart person. Both parties hearing each other express themselves sound like they're speaking another language.
 
If ye are so smart then why you are on inky stinky forum, creme de la creme? Awesome find, man.

More down-to-earth approach would be like that: if you can think rationally, write articles, make something from scratch - you cant really connect with some not-giving-a-fuck person who just watches tiktok 24/7

At least something-smart + ugly - congradulations! You will never be a wom.. you will never find a woman! Or, maybe you will, but you are going to hate her, and she is going to hate you back. You arent meeting her looks standard, she doesn't meet your smart-ish standards..

Shit is ridiculous, as you can see
 
Anything to avoid the lookism pill I guess. Gonna make an oofy doofy post next?
 
New here how "racist" or "race realist" are you allowed to be around these parts? Like, is there a line you aren't supposed to cross and if so what is it.

And on the OP: Low IQ criminals are doing pretty well when it comes to getting laid / fathering children & IQ positively correlates with the chance of you staying virgin for life. So while for "getting a high class girl to marry me" a higher IQ is beneficial when it comes to "having sex / getting any kind of girl to love me" I'm not so sure what's optimal. And how much it matters compared to physical traits.

Another consideration: If the girl is choosing you mainly for your societal status (e.g. you are a professor with connections into higher society) it's kinda close to you just buying a hooker. Is the girl connecting with you & what's going on inside your mind or is she just using you as a pedestal to boost her own societal rank? This is relevant because most on here seem to desire a woman to love & appreciate them not just use or fuck them. Considering the IQ distribution of women is rather narrow I'm gonna bet against them being an equal partner in that area of your life rather than a passenger you have to carry along. Also, lower interest in things and abstractions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top