Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Involuntary celibacy is not a new age phenomenon (Study from 1988)

Swagpilled

Swagpilled

swagpilled
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Posts
8,139
A study from 1988 compares living conditions of celibate/unmarried people born in 1946.
8.4% of the men and only 4.6% of the women aged 35 at the moment of the study never married, compared to 17.5% of men and 22.7% of women born in 1901.
1674777128872

note that women are married less due to the male casualties from the 1914-1918 war.

Even back then, the study finds that most of the people describes as "involuntarily single" are single due to outside factors like mental disabilities.
Among the singles, 14.6% of men and 21.5% of women had special education as children, which indicates physical or mental disabilities, yet 4 out of 5 of the people described as "handicapped" married at some point in life. Perhaps the people who didn't marry were more severely handicapped. This statistic also doesn't include those who became handicapped later on in life. Due to an injury or accident for example.
1674777619848

not really alot to take from this graph, except that special ed kids rarely ever married and women with low levels of education had an easier time getting married compared to men of the same education.


1674777977202

this grap shows the percentages of singles at 35 whose parents were also singe at 36. not really sure what to make of this graph.

The study also found that singles were more introverted according to the extraversion test Maudsley Personality Inventory, completed at age 16. The test did not indicate that singles are on average more neurotic than married people, instead married women tend to be more neurotic than single women.
1674778182097

The majority of men who were single were unskilled or not working. The rest was evenly spread across the different levels of social/working class.
It also shows that finding a partner in the same social and working class was pretty difficult.
1674778563915

Also note that pretty much none of the single women were unskilled or not working. Indicating that unskilled/not working women didn't have problems getting a partner.
The high amount of single, high education women may also be attributed to the fact that they prefer pursuing a career over a family.

And at last, 32.2% of single men were living alone and 48.5% were living with their parents.
Of the male singles living with their parents, 59% only had a single parent, though it's to be expected with the high male mortality rate at the time. 3 out of 4 were living with a lone mother.
26% of the men living with their parents were not in employment (NEETs).
In the special ed group 64% of men were living with their parents and 20% were in institutions (religious, hospitals, prison, etc.) leaving only 16% of handicapped men not living with their parents or in an institution.
1674778909693



Conclusion
An important minority of singles is handicapped.
Also celibates tend to be more introverted and have parents that married at older ages.
In general the outside factors play a big part in the celibacy state of a person, more than the personality itself.

tl;dr:
"This study, which uses life history data for a British cohort born in 1946, shows that an important minority are 'handicapped' and these adults are cared for primarily by their families, in particular by elderly parents. Celibates tend to be more introverted, ambitious and to have older marrying parents than their ever-married peers. Single women differ from single men. The women are more likely to be of higher ability, to be graduates and to be in high status occupations whilst single men are more likely to be members of the lowest social class or unemployed. The great majority of single people live either with their parents or on their own."


Full:
 
Nice autism bro?
 
Probably just mentally ill/disabled poorfags, tbh; inceldom for LTNs and below wasn't anything like it is now, some moral standards remaining and hypergamy not being so widespread with foids, but it's interesting to see the "femcel" foids have always been so through their own volition. :feelsclown:
 
It is also worthy of notice that in the Third Reich the subhumans creampied so much that their numerical mass was a 'threat' to the Nazi regime and they started a sterilisation and even euthanasia program to prevent all the Incels from breeding.

Was pre-war National Socialism a paradise for incels to ascend? I would argue yes!
Copy-of-neuRassenhygiene-1-.jpg

1674779781060
 
Ted K. was the first well-known incel. He’s dying of cancer in prison and still a virgin. If you’ve always been branded as a freak, it’s ovER.
 
It is also worthy of notice that in the Third Reich the subhumans creampied so much that their numerical mass was a 'threat' to the Nazi regime and they started a sterilisation and even euthanasia program to prevent all the Incels from breeding.

Was pre-war National Socialism a paradise for incels to ascend? I would argue yes!
Copy-of-neuRassenhygiene-1-.jpg

View attachment 700087
according to the study, during the second world war there was a "supply issue" with single women. meaning there were just literally no women left to breed.
 
1501578934-1501578934-9290.jpg

how though I mean look at him he mogs me into oblivion
"Personally, I never understood the appeal of a woman's backside, except perhaps that of a negro." - Ted

There was also a quote of him saying he found it very difficult to interact with women but I can't find it right now. He was rather autistic mentalcel/volcel than a real incel. True genius of our time anyway
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
9
Views
270
prajeet88
P
late20scel
Replies
5
Views
161
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
N
Replies
4
Views
299
Kaichee
Kaichee

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top