Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion institution of marriage a cure of inceldom?

Over 9000

Over 9000

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Mar 23, 2023
Posts
383
institution of marriage : if two individuals wish to engage in sexual relations, they should commit to a lifelong partnership. Society should penalize those who do not honor this commitment.

Marriage can be seen as a potential solution to inceldom. If engaging in sexual activity outside of marriage were to be prohibited, it would limit the options available. For instance, if there are ten highly desirable individuals (chads) in a city, only ten women would have the opportunity to be with them. As a result, the remaining individuals would be compelled to marry less desirable partners if they were not able to secure a relationship with a desirable individual in time.
 
Last edited:
You can't enforce that though. To enforce it you'd need to monitor people's actions 24/7 which is not only a logistical nightmare but it also raises other ethical concerns.
 
Thats what feminists think anyway
 
institution of marriage : if two individuals wish to engage in sexual relations, they should commit to a lifelong partnership. Society should penalize those who do not honor this commitment.

Marriage can be seen as a potential solution to inceldom. If engaging in sexual activity outside of marriage were to be prohibited, it would limit the options available. For instance, if there are ten highly desirable individuals (chads) in a city, only ten women would have the opportunity to be with them. As a result, the remaining individuals would be compelled to marry less desirable partners if they were not able to secure a relationship with a desirable individual in time.

I don’t know why you @‘d me, but I’m convinced the institution of marriage was a post-agricultural revolution development to incentivize women to select for men who were more intelligent / could produce more food, which slowly developed into a solidified hierarchy / caste system, to promote stability in child-reering, and to minimize disease spread via sex.

Women’s sexual instincts don’t care for any of this as their instincts are pre-agricultural revolution and they only select for a small portion of men that are genetically / physically dominant / can beat down predators, they are the same as polygamous ape species like chimps and gorillas.

Human religion / social narratives always beat down female sexual instinct / gaslit men and women into thinking that females aren’t sexual but more emotional / social in order to propel monogamy.

It’s such a strong lie that even in the light of the total destruction of the family unit / society / marriage, normies and weak people still can’t handle the truth, that there is no “love”, there is no “magical journey” with monogamy, and most women hate / resent their husbands emotionally but stick with them because society compels them to.

In this life, unless you’re Chad, you’ll never be desired truly. You might eventually find a woman who fakes desire because you might meet certain social criterion and get approval from others, but you’ll never truly be desired the way Chad is.

Chad is the lucky genetically physically strong man that tingles vaginas, regardless of how socially useful they are.
 
I don’t know why you @‘d me, but I’m convinced the institution of marriage was a post-agricultural revolution development to incentivize women to select for men who were more intelligent / could produce more food, which slowly developed into a solidified hierarchy / caste system, to promote stability in child-reering, and to minimize disease spread via sex.

Women’s sexual instincts don’t care for any of this as their instincts are pre-agricultural revolution and they only select for a small portion of men that are genetically / physically dominant / can beat down predators, they are the same as polygamous ape species like chimps and gorillas.

Human religion / social narratives always beat down female sexual instinct / gaslit men and women into thinking that females aren’t sexual but more emotional / social in order to propel monogamy.

It’s such a strong lie that even in the light of the total destruction of the family unit / society / marriage, normies and weak people still can’t handle the truth, that there is no “love”, there is no “magical journey” with monogamy, and most women hate / resent their husbands emotionally but stick with them because society compels them to.

In this life, unless you’re Chad, you’ll never be desired truly. You might eventually find a woman who fakes desire because you might meet certain social criterion and get approval from others, but you’ll never truly be desired the way Chad is.

Chad is the lucky genetically physically strong man that tingles vaginas, regardless of how socially useful they are.
tldr:institution of marriage was created to propel society and foids were brainwahed into this monogamy BS which is complete contradictory to their nature because it benifits societal progress and they will deep down never love you because all of this narrative is based on a lie?
 
Last edited:
tldr:institution of marriage was created to propel society and foids were brainwahed into this monogamy BS which is complete contradictory to their nature because it benifits societal progress and they will deep down never love you because all of this narrative is based on a lie?
Yes
 

Similar threads

river_flow
Replies
17
Views
447
runforrest
runforrest
I
Replies
55
Views
3K
faded
faded

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top