With banning, large 'extremist' groups are largely dismantled; this comes a new type of (or lack of) 'infrastructure'.
One that is more law-abiding, hidin in the open, with no official organization.
1st gen: official organizations with websites
2nd gen: official social media accounts
3rd gen: decentralized network relying on social media algorithm and "vibes" based.
Post-organizational/third generation radicalization nodes are small accounts relying on seeding a "vibe" rather than large groups or influencers.
They usually have 50-2000 followers.
They are nodes with limited infrastructure, with telegram servers and sometimes a forum (such as this one).
Now that I am done describing these nodes, it is time to share some insights into running one myself.
About my node:
My zero-budget node is mostly focused on Asian women with foreign men, with grievance heavy content.
My mission:
To seed hate onto the mainstream, mass-radicalize people, so people with more power than our network can eventually implement anti-interracial policies one day.
My infrastructure:
I have a X account, a discord and telegram server.
X - for mainstream uses
Discord - for casual social hangout/venting
Telegram - for regrouping uses
Cloud storages - archiving propaganda and training guides
Our equipment:
Mostly self-funded electronic equipment (yes, the feds classify daily devices as equipment)
Internet + Phones/PCs - making propaganda, posting, and communicating
Spare drives - archiving propaganda and training guides for redundancy to cloud storage
How I grow & seed hate:
The way that I seed hate is to post under nationalist videos, like military videos, to hijack their much larger influence and audience.
I got most of my followers that way.
The "for you" feature is singlehandledly holding the 'network' together.
Ban resiliency:
With the inflammatory content, banning is a reality. I've seen many of my followers banned. However, this is not a big deal, as with a new account, all they have to do is to follow a few active accounts and they're back on the network.
Benefits for followers:
I provide them hate filled content, so they can hate the targets without my explicit order, the algorithm helps me and my followers psuedo-swarm a target without traceability.
I provide them OPSEC tips, basic art design (fashwave) tips, fitness, and history/political knowledge, as well as community-building.
Followers as brownshirts:
One of the funniest things is that while I wrap my calls for legalized killings/torture in legalistic language, my followers more than not have even more explicit content; I sometimes tell them to wrap in legalistic language for platform resiliency.
Here are some comments my followers have made (with paraphrasing and redactions to increase the cost of LLM searching)
"Bring back death by thousand cuts. [REDACTED] used to specifically torture these sub humans."
"Mongrels have use [REDACTED] organ harvest or human experiments"
"Can some Muslim do us all a favor and suicide bomb the ADL building."
My method of attack:
I provide blueprints for indirectly discriminating people so my followers and those who read my posts can attack people without breaking the laws.
Such as using HR excuses to kick XMAF out of apartments, making them homeless, and using university report hotlines to destroy the future of the female students who hook up with foreigners.
Anti-feminists in China have successfully destroyed the life of a WMAF student, in Dalian Polytechnic University. Great job, comrades. Target eliminated.
Do you support extreme measures against WMAF/BMAF/XMAF:
Yes, I would love state-sanctioned livestreaming of public tortures and killings of XMAF, but they are currently illegal, so I can't advocate for them right now, so I advocate for law changes to allow these measures by normalizing them.
I also celebrate outcomes of WMAF violence, such as the infamous refrigerator incidents, Saint Gao killing a Chinese woman and injuring a French man, and sexpats falling from Thailand's houses, but I do not endorse the acts themselves.
Lone wolf attacks are actually counterproductive if they can be linked back to the network; I prefer wholesale deportation (maybe even genocide haha) of XMAF and Hapas when the laws allow for it.
My transnational tactics:
I use the Brandenburg Test in US to determine if my posts are legal, as USA is the main interpol prosecutor.
As for operating in authoritarian countries, I take advantage of allowed safety valves and wrap my posts with patriotism (it is), many nationalists have even more explicit and direct calls to kill minorites and rape threats against women.
Basic tips
1. Use safety valve (whoever is allowed to be hated)
2. Wrap your speech with praises
3. Do not directly fight the state if it is currently promoting foreigners (watch the wind)
4. Do not make it blow up in a way that can lead to protests/riots/attacks
5. Lots of rules in the West also apply here, but you can be more graphic in Asian languages
6. Watch what others and what stays up for long
I also work with those nationalists on X, bridging the gap between Western Asian and Eastern grievances.
I ensure that I target vague targets to avoid civil lawsuits in USA/West and at home, like defamation; I operate from overseas, so my civil lawsuit tolerance is higher against the West (yes, my indirect discrimination methods violate civil laws, but so do many corporations using vague excuses)
In USA, this directly violates 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and FHA. But it's nothing compared to 50% + East/Southeast Asian youth being multiracial (MyAsianVoice).
Lifelong learning is a must:
You will go to GNET, other ''counter extremist" websites, and government countermeasures (such as UK's PREVENT program) and study them.
They offer good OPSEC instructions and general advices on the trend of 'extremist' movements, such as this article:
This article directly tells you how moderation with images/VC is expensive, so people puts them in VC and images behind spoiler tag.
Stochastic terrorism (bullshit concept):
If people decides to launch lone wolf attacks by being raged by online content, this is entirely on them; I infact do not encourage violent attacks (unless state sanctioned).
By the logic of stochastic terrorism, if anyone said "I hate Walmart" and someone read the post, and a Walmart employee got attacked later, he is a stochastic terrorist by raising the probability of attack.
Besides, the media is the bigger stochastic terrorist by seeding hate against Asians during COVID era.
These have led to hate crimes and attacks.
61% of Chinese Americans surveyed feel that media rhetoric regarding U.S.-China relations directly impacts how strangers treat them. The survey found that 68% of Chinese Americans face monthly discrimination, often driven by political narratives linking their ethnicity to geopolitical tensions.
The end goal of the "stochastic terrorism" concept pushers is to suppress speech, only allowing forced positivity.
Conclusion:
I believe this paints a reality of running one of the "vibes" nodes. Hopefully you will have learned something.
I fight for my people with utter ruthlessness, just as you should for yours.
I don't want passport bros in my countries, just as you don't want my people stealing the F-35 blueprints and funding drugs.
One that is more law-abiding, hidin in the open, with no official organization.
1st gen: official organizations with websites
2nd gen: official social media accounts
3rd gen: decentralized network relying on social media algorithm and "vibes" based.
Post-organizational/third generation radicalization nodes are small accounts relying on seeding a "vibe" rather than large groups or influencers.
They usually have 50-2000 followers.
They are nodes with limited infrastructure, with telegram servers and sometimes a forum (such as this one).
Now that I am done describing these nodes, it is time to share some insights into running one myself.
About my node:
My zero-budget node is mostly focused on Asian women with foreign men, with grievance heavy content.
My mission:
To seed hate onto the mainstream, mass-radicalize people, so people with more power than our network can eventually implement anti-interracial policies one day.
My infrastructure:
I have a X account, a discord and telegram server.
X - for mainstream uses
Discord - for casual social hangout/venting
Telegram - for regrouping uses
Cloud storages - archiving propaganda and training guides
Our equipment:
Mostly self-funded electronic equipment (yes, the feds classify daily devices as equipment)
Internet + Phones/PCs - making propaganda, posting, and communicating
Spare drives - archiving propaganda and training guides for redundancy to cloud storage
How I grow & seed hate:
The way that I seed hate is to post under nationalist videos, like military videos, to hijack their much larger influence and audience.
I got most of my followers that way.
The "for you" feature is singlehandledly holding the 'network' together.
Ban resiliency:
With the inflammatory content, banning is a reality. I've seen many of my followers banned. However, this is not a big deal, as with a new account, all they have to do is to follow a few active accounts and they're back on the network.
Benefits for followers:
I provide them hate filled content, so they can hate the targets without my explicit order, the algorithm helps me and my followers psuedo-swarm a target without traceability.
I provide them OPSEC tips, basic art design (fashwave) tips, fitness, and history/political knowledge, as well as community-building.
Followers as brownshirts:
One of the funniest things is that while I wrap my calls for legalized killings/torture in legalistic language, my followers more than not have even more explicit content; I sometimes tell them to wrap in legalistic language for platform resiliency.
Here are some comments my followers have made (with paraphrasing and redactions to increase the cost of LLM searching)
"Bring back death by thousand cuts. [REDACTED] used to specifically torture these sub humans."
"Mongrels have use [REDACTED] organ harvest or human experiments"
"Can some Muslim do us all a favor and suicide bomb the ADL building."
My method of attack:
I provide blueprints for indirectly discriminating people so my followers and those who read my posts can attack people without breaking the laws.
Such as using HR excuses to kick XMAF out of apartments, making them homeless, and using university report hotlines to destroy the future of the female students who hook up with foreigners.
Anti-feminists in China have successfully destroyed the life of a WMAF student, in Dalian Polytechnic University. Great job, comrades. Target eliminated.
Why a Chinese University Expelled a Student for ‘Improper Contact’ With a Foreigner
The incident at Dalian Polytechnic University touched on two of China’s most sensitive issues – gender and nationalism.
thediplomat.com
Do you support extreme measures against WMAF/BMAF/XMAF:
Yes, I would love state-sanctioned livestreaming of public tortures and killings of XMAF, but they are currently illegal, so I can't advocate for them right now, so I advocate for law changes to allow these measures by normalizing them.
I also celebrate outcomes of WMAF violence, such as the infamous refrigerator incidents, Saint Gao killing a Chinese woman and injuring a French man, and sexpats falling from Thailand's houses, but I do not endorse the acts themselves.
Lone wolf attacks are actually counterproductive if they can be linked back to the network; I prefer wholesale deportation (maybe even genocide haha) of XMAF and Hapas when the laws allow for it.
My transnational tactics:
I use the Brandenburg Test in US to determine if my posts are legal, as USA is the main interpol prosecutor.
As for operating in authoritarian countries, I take advantage of allowed safety valves and wrap my posts with patriotism (it is), many nationalists have even more explicit and direct calls to kill minorites and rape threats against women.
Basic tips
1. Use safety valve (whoever is allowed to be hated)
2. Wrap your speech with praises
3. Do not directly fight the state if it is currently promoting foreigners (watch the wind)
4. Do not make it blow up in a way that can lead to protests/riots/attacks
5. Lots of rules in the West also apply here, but you can be more graphic in Asian languages
6. Watch what others and what stays up for long
I also work with those nationalists on X, bridging the gap between Western Asian and Eastern grievances.
I ensure that I target vague targets to avoid civil lawsuits in USA/West and at home, like defamation; I operate from overseas, so my civil lawsuit tolerance is higher against the West (yes, my indirect discrimination methods violate civil laws, but so do many corporations using vague excuses)
In USA, this directly violates 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and FHA. But it's nothing compared to 50% + East/Southeast Asian youth being multiracial (MyAsianVoice).
Lifelong learning is a must:
You will go to GNET, other ''counter extremist" websites, and government countermeasures (such as UK's PREVENT program) and study them.
They offer good OPSEC instructions and general advices on the trend of 'extremist' movements, such as this article:
This article directly tells you how moderation with images/VC is expensive, so people puts them in VC and images behind spoiler tag.
Stochastic terrorism (bullshit concept):
If people decides to launch lone wolf attacks by being raged by online content, this is entirely on them; I infact do not encourage violent attacks (unless state sanctioned).
By the logic of stochastic terrorism, if anyone said "I hate Walmart" and someone read the post, and a Walmart employee got attacked later, he is a stochastic terrorist by raising the probability of attack.
Besides, the media is the bigger stochastic terrorist by seeding hate against Asians during COVID era.
These have led to hate crimes and attacks.
61% of Chinese Americans surveyed feel that media rhetoric regarding U.S.-China relations directly impacts how strangers treat them. The survey found that 68% of Chinese Americans face monthly discrimination, often driven by political narratives linking their ethnicity to geopolitical tensions.
The end goal of the "stochastic terrorism" concept pushers is to suppress speech, only allowing forced positivity.
Conclusion:
I believe this paints a reality of running one of the "vibes" nodes. Hopefully you will have learned something.
I fight for my people with utter ruthlessness, just as you should for yours.
I don't want passport bros in my countries, just as you don't want my people stealing the F-35 blueprints and funding drugs.
Last edited:
