Blackpill Insecurity makes it so that there is no choice but to self improve. And that is a good thing.

[Pinpoint]

Why? cause hating the contrast brings pain, and you want to evade the pain in order to feel normal.
Being positive with everything, feeling positive with everything is not conducive to progress.
If you feel positive about any state you're in, then you don't have any painful, high need incentive to go into issues.
Somewhere down the line there is always discomfort hta makaes you quit.
To love much is hard.
To high hate is easy.
We are an egotistical species, and more negative stimulus comes our way.
To love and stay positive is hard, and not efficient, not a wellspring.
Hate works better.
Love and keeping positivity takes willpower and just subdued you. Where in the other hand hate can flow through you.
Being generally positive can deflect crippling society which I advocate.
But self hate creates a bigger drive.
Self love without competence and careful management just doesn't cut anything.

 

[Ritalincel]

>And why that's a good thing

 

[tulasdanslos]

Cringe and bluepilled, do you think great historical figures were insecure? Lenin and Stalin were low inhib criminals, Trump cheats on his wife openly and never gives a fuck.
Security is a measure of your genetic worth, if this is high, then you will be secure you can do anything, because you actually can.

 

[acnescarcel]

lol

 

[Pinpoint]

Cringe and bluepilled, do you think great historical figures were insecure? Lenin and Stalin were low inhib criminals, Trump cheats on his wife openly and never gives a fuck.
Security is a measure of your genetic worth, if this is high, then you will be secure you can do anything, because you actually can.

Reductionist.
The implication that being confident = success is like saying that because you're human you will be the dominant animal wherever you go. Not necessarily true. We're the dominant species but it is a logical fallacy to assume all humans are dominant.
Or that all successful people are not insecure.
Plenty of insecure people have ventured on.
I think it's cope for you all to say that genes come in packages, and being dominarchic in a traditional idea of the sense always wins.
Napoleon, Stalin were both insecure individuals. That's how they held on to power you fucking retard lol. Look up Sergey Kirkov who Stalin killed becuase he was blonde, popular, and people liked him.
Trump is insecure too. Always talking about how big his hands are and shit.
Always trying to ensure his power is there.
Being insecure about losing power isn't always pacifying fear. It just becomes a compounded sense.
Do you even know that insecurity
Security is relative.
You can have someone of high genetic worth but they can be insecure becuase of what the security of hteir world is dependent upon.
There are priests, or kings, or rich men who worry far much more about their wealth or status than their looks.
Especially when they get older and they aren't good looking.
This forum can be so fucking reductionist.
You all have such a narrow understanding of the framework of physics and psychology.
This place is a self delusional bloodpill. I think you all are trying to rule out any potential positives so you can cope, and validate your anxieties.

 

[Herodion_Catriona]

When it comes to the very small fraction of people who have been hyper successful like precedents and dictators, you are discounting chance in your assessment of how those people got to were they are/were.
Its odd that one would bring up Trump to prove that successful people are secure. Why not Justin Trudeau, or Theresa May?

 

[Pinpoint]

When it comes to the very small fraction of people who have been hyper successful like precedents and dictators, you are discounting chance in your assessment of how those people got to were they are/were.
Its odd that one would bring up Trump to prove that successful people are secure. Why not Justin Trudeau, or Theresa May?

didn't understand this dude.

 

[Oblivion]

not really, most people cope with their insecurities through drugs/alcohol, escapism, aggression towards others, sui, etc. very few people actually have the time, money and motivation to "Self-improve"

 

[Pinpoint]

not really, most people cope with their insecurities through drugs/alcohol, escapism, aggression towards others, sui, etc. very few people actually have the time, money and motivation to "Self-improve"

Maybe, but that's why perfectionism is there. Perfectionism is the only thing that can be done.
It forces you to take action now. Sometimes it makes people self-collapse rather than self-improve. But they are the weak.

The reason that people do alcohol and smoking is because mankind is irritable, everyone wants to be cool and make the most irritable people see the person who is smoking or drinking as valuable, and it builds their ego. It's peer pressure, with a primal incentive.
Most people who are coping on drugs and alochol who peer pressure the person who is considering it to try it as well are just stricken with insecurity from feeling inferior.