Infanticide makes no sense.

[Deleted member 21883]

They say it was to hide their having sex and becoming pregnant from parents. How do these foids hide their pregnancy from their parents in the first place? Most of them don't exactly wear burkas. Their parents don't notice their huge stomachs? If they have already given birth then why kill the infant? It is out already. So the fear of birth angle makes no sense either. The only thing that makes sense is if they are away by themselves for some reason for months or the parents of the foid are blind or confined to bed. Even then, why kill it instead of leaving it somewhere where it will be found or sticking it with a doctor's office or babysitters?

 

[Deleted member 19546]

Women are toddlers, they are irrational and destructive hence they need to be disciplined.

 

[epillepsy]

It was worth it in her mind to kill her child instead of getting grounded by her parents.

 

[tinted_vision]

let's just say that women aren't particularly intelligent creatures

 

[Emba]

let's just say that women aren't particularly intelligent creatures

 

[epillepsy]

let's just say that women aren't particularly intelligent creatures

this was an act of evil, not just stupidity.
she put her infant in the freezer to die, specifically so that it would suffer an excruciating death by hypothermia.
yes, she killed her child in order to avoid getting in trouble, but she also wanted to indulge her cruel streak at the same time, killing two birds with one stone.

 

[Speedloader]

Women are toddlers, they are irrational and destructive hence they need to be disciplined.

 

[Deleted member 19971]

Panicked irrational brains in action

 

[Deleted member 19756]

Many Neolithic groups routinely resorted to infanticide in order to control their numbers so that their lands could support them. Joseph Birdsell believed that infanticide rates in prehistoric times were between 15% and 50% of the total number of births,[7] while Laila Williamson estimated a lower rate ranging from 15% to 20%.[1]:66 Both anthropologists believed that these high rates of infanticide persisted until the development of agriculture during the Neolithic Revolution.[8]:19 Comparative anthropologists have calculated that 50% of female newborn babies were killed by their parents during the Paleolithic era.[9] From the infants hominid skulls (e.g. Taung child skull) that had been traumatized, has been proposed cannibalism by Raymond A. Dart.[10] The children were not necessarily actively killed, but neglect and intentional malnourishment may also have occurred, as proposed by Vicente Lull as an explanation for an apparent surplus of men and the below average height of women in prehistoric Menorca.[11]