Serious Indian nepotism vs Chinese secrecy

[AsiaCel]

I thought the topic is very interesting.

If I have to describe these methods, I would describe them as secretive or nepotist

When indians got hold of a company position, they would fire everyone and only hire fellow indians. Eventually that gives them bargaining power in the company, and with the blessing of the Jews, they get to be CEO.

Chinese method is radically different. They don't fire or replace anyone. Instead, they invest in the company or sometimes taking ownership of them. Hence they are more secretive because they don't care until you criticize China. They usually put on a foreign CEO so it is even more secretive.

 

[blackpillednigga]

as long as capitalism exists then jews, indians, and chinese can do anything they want. it is literally impossible for jews to inflitrate communist countries

 

[AsiaCel]

as long as capitalism exists then jews, indians, and chinese can do anything they want. it is literally impossible for jews to inflitrate communist countries

Jews does not need to infiltrate. In fact, they don't need direct control of anything. They can simply say, "our bank will tax you 15% more!" and everyone will listen.

 

[ReconElement]

I thought the topic is very interesting.

If I have to describe these methods, I would describe them as secretive or nepotist

When indians got hold of a company position, they would fire everyone and only hire fellow indians. Eventually that gives them bargaining power in the company, and with the blessing of the Jews, they get to be CEO.

Chinese method is radically different. They don't fire or replace anyone. Instead, they invest in the company or sometimes taking ownership of them. Hence they are more secretive because they don't care until you criticize China. They usually put on a foreign CEO so it is even more secretive.

The firing part is where I'm a bit sceptical not cos I think indians are any good but it probably appears to be a policy approved by the board even before the Indian CEO is in charge of things around, he kinda just presides over the replacement of labour demographics for cost cutting reasons. Chinese enterprise is driven by public money so they're not as mad and hungry for benefits for their holders unlike western corporations, China is after all in it's true sense a communist model.

 

[AsiaCel]

The firing part is where I'm a bit sceptical not cos I think indians are any good but it probably appears to be a policy approved by the board even before the Indian CEO is in charge of things around, he kinda just presides over the replacement of labour demographics for cost cutting reasons. Chinese enterprise is driven by public money so they're not as mad and hungry for benefits for their holders unlike western corporations, China is after all in it's true sense a communist model.

I'm talking about the "takeover" model for foregin companies. But yeah, you're right.