thespanishcel
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 13, 2018
- Posts
- 7,748
If you like communism so much move to Cuba or Venezuela, oh wait, that wasn't real communism innit kek
You can only say that because you never lived under communismI would much rather live in the Soviet Union than in America.
democracy leads to gynocracyWe live in sexual capitalism.
democracy failed
Yeah i dont believe in democracy or government. Its why im a libertarian. Too many people that vote for free shit and socialism(again benifits women, they will be taken of first). But the state will never support grown men especially outcasts. I dont know why this is a difficult concept to grasp.democracy leads to gynocracy
Brainlet level understanding of Political Economy. Did not read.Yes incel goyim, let the government centralise the means of power and reproduction so you too may enjoy the scraps they are kind enough to give you. Worked so well in the past am I right?
"Read 'Illiterate Polish Faggot'"I hate collectivism. I won't share anything.
Imagine caring about society.
And you can be anticapitalist without being a red faggot. Read Kaczynski.
Sexual communism and economic communism are two different things.
I’m a sexual communist
Based. I’m unironically a Stalinist. He’s second on the leaderboard for high score behind mao, who is not coincidentally also a StalinistI'm a fascist with economically left socialist tendencies, more and more I identify with Stalinism.
[However, I also hate Jews where I sympathize with Hitler. Stalin in his later life had a problem with them as well.]
View attachment 668259
They both got shit done and created a peasant army of workers along with soldiers raising up the lower ranking men, I also fucking hate the bourgeois with a passion, not even Hitler in Mein Kampf ironically liked them either separate from Mao and Stalin. The bourgeois belong in hard labor camps along with other groups. Also, Pol Pot did nothing wrong.Based. I’m unironically a Stalinist. He’s second on the leaderboard for high score behind mao, who is not coincidentally also a Stalinist
Check out my recent call to action post, it touches on how we can create a better system. I touched on a lot of your ideas in a more traditional way. Please let me know what you think?I may write out a more detailed post tomorrow as I’m going to sleep rn but I’ll say this. Right off the bat, it is possible to be a communist in one domain and an ancap in another. To give an example to prove my point, on the tiny scale, a family, everyone is a communist. No toddler works for their meal or for the roof over their head. And ancaps have families, thus they are simultaneously communist and ancap, just in different domains.
In the strict spirit of the ideology, no the state shouldn’t be the owner of all foids and then equally distribute access to them among all the men. I suppose that is one brute force way of improving the sexual market, but another that I think is sort of a lower-resistance and less revolutionary way of accomplishing the same goal is to simply forbid women from working (and necessarily from voting, since they can just vote for work), totally ban dating apps (as these things are functionally high efficiency eugenics platforms and functionally exponentially increase the size of the dating pool and thus a foids selectiveness), MAYBE ban makeup and other forms of genefrauding, give women special privileges if they are married and overall just incentivize marriage in general. It isn’t actually necessary to legally turn them into a commodity. Basically just quantify the entire complex system of the sexual market (which the blackpillosphere has already done and dating website blogs have accidentally done), figure out which sliders do what, to what degree do they modify x behavior and try to craft a system by changing the rules and constants of the game such that it approximates the results we want with the minimum amount of change and maintenance. An ENORMOUS one is the fact that in the modern world, the ONLY sexual currency for men is looks. Money doesn’t mean shit anymore since foids are no longer dependent on men for resources.. So we have less leverage in this enormous departure from the way things have been since time immemorial. Start from there.
An unfortunate side effect of all the things I proposed above is that foids would actually probabaly be happier under such a system. As much as I’d like to see them suffer, I’m sure they’d enjoy getting taken care of, not having to work, not needing to keep 50 cats and not requiring a cocktail of pharmaceuticals to get through the day.
Daily reminder that the position of women in a society, the range of decisions they make, their actions, all that is only made possible with the consent of men. Feminism exists because men have allowed to exist. A paradigm in which foids can make 50k a week selling bottled up farts and pictures of their feet exists because men allow it to exist. If all men collectively decided tomorrow morning that women ought to be property, then they will become property that very day. And there is nothing they can do about it. So it’s not so much the foids I blame, it’s men. They are like matter, children, NPCs, etc.. Only influenced by external forces, no agency in deciding their own movement, etc. and we fucked up in setting retarded physical laws for them to obey. Analogous to how a military ultimately has veto power over all the things that occur in its state’s jurisdiction, men have absolute veto power over the lifestyle and decisions of women.
Anyways, the problem isn’t foids, it’s the modern world and all the man made bullshit that gives women an enormous edge in the sexual market, and artificially gives them the power they otherwise would not have to do anything they want without fear of consequences. Female power always derives from men. Yeah, they are eugenics automatons by nature, and nothing can be done about that, but its negative effects on us can be minimized.
Or you can just let this all play out to it’s inevitable conclusion. The retarded foid entrepreneurs are hard at work obsoleting themselves by trying to invent artificial wombs in the name of equality.. Idk maybe just stand aside and let them do that and watch them go extinct.
Edit: I forgot to add another idea that I always mention when these types of threads come up that would definitely help our plight. Incentivize having daughters or just run a govt breeding program somewhere that produces girls nonstop. Imagine if there were 2+ girls for every 1 guy. Foid value would plummet and we would become the prizes. Ofc there is the issue of every guy having to raise more daughters than sons but eh, whatever, its a better price to pay. And if they’re all following a read life trajectory, which they will without careers and the option to whore around, then it wouldn’t be so bad to have a daughter.
same. they can get fucked.I also fucking hate the bourgeois with a passion
the urbanites fucking deserved it man. i wish we could have a revolution in america and purge all the fucking urb*nitesAlso, Pol Pot did nothing wrong.
WesternersMost of you have no idea what Communism actually means. It isn't MUH STATE CONTROL OF THE ECONOMY.
Westerners
funny how it seems like everybody who actually knows what marxism is turns out to be a marxist.Mostly. Look, I'll go into it further here:
Marxism discussion
This “alienation” (to use a term which will be comprehensible to the philosophers) can, of course, only be abolished given two practical premises. For it to become an “intolerable” power, i.e. a power against which men make a revolution, it must necessarily have rendered the great mass of...incels.is
Basically, Communism is just what happens after capitalism collapses. Capitalism has a problem: the rate of profit tends to fall year on year. As it does so, capitalists have to take property from workers - live in pod eat bug isn't Communism itself, but it is indicative of the tendency of capitalism to abolish itself within itself, the self-abolition of capitalism. This process, over generations, produces a "property less mass" of workers who must consequently strip property from the capitalist class. That's how this works. It isn't MUH NATIONALIZATION; it's armed working class revolution, followed by the seizure and social operations of the means of production.
Dont explain communism to a dweller of an ex-soviet state, i know much about this stuff, but - this is one of the most boring subjectaries to discuss, ima sorry for thatMostly. Look, I'll go into it further here:
Marxism discussion
This “alienation” (to use a term which will be comprehensible to the philosophers) can, of course, only be abolished given two practical premises. For it to become an “intolerable” power, i.e. a power against which men make a revolution, it must necessarily have rendered the great mass of...incels.is
Basically, Communism is just what happens after capitalism collapses. Capitalism has a problem: the rate of profit tends to fall year on year. As it does so, capitalists have to take property from workers - live in pod eat bug isn't Communism itself, but it is indicative of the tendency of capitalism to abolish itself within itself, the self-abolition of capitalism. This process, over generations, produces a "property less mass" of workers who must consequently strip property from the capitalist class. That's how this works. It isn't MUH NATIONALIZATION; it's armed working class revolution, followed by the seizure and social operations of the means of production.
Ppl getting hyperfixation on dis shit, as you can seefunny how it seems like everybody who actually knows what marxism is turns out to be a marxist.
he sounds based as fuck. but mogs me for having friendsI was friends with a guy, who knew everything about left-wing politics, and he actually is smart and high iq only in this
Other subjects of life - nah i dunno i dunno about this i dunno about that want to hear how much left wing politics is better than what we have now for the 1488th time?????
This “alienation” (to use a term which will be comprehensible to the philosophers) can, of course, only be abolished given two practical premises. For it to become an “intolerable” power, i.e. a power against which men make a revolution, it must necessarily have rendered the great mass of humanity “propertyless,” and produced, at the same time, the contradiction of an existing world of wealth and culture, both of which conditions presuppose a great increase in productive power, a high degree of its development
He is hyperfixated on one thing, and this is badhe sounds based as fuck. but mogs me for having friends
Marxism, however, signifies neither more nor less than the destruction of capitalism. Even as a scientific discipline it offers nothing to the bourgeoisie. And yet, as an alternative to the discredited bourgeois social theory, it may serve the latter by providing it with some ideas useful for its rejuvenation. After all, one learns from the opposition. Moreover, in its apparently “realized” form in the “socialist countries,” Marxism points to practical solutions that may also be useful in the mixed economies, such as a further increase of stabilizing governmental regulations. An income and wage policy, for instance, comes quite close to the analogous arrangements in centrally controlled economic systems. Finally, in view of the absence of revolutionary movements, the academic type of Marxian inquiry is risk-free, inasmuch as it is restricted to the world of ideas. Strange as it may seem, it is the lack of such movements in a period of social turmoil that turns Marxism into a marketable commodity and a cultural phenomenon attesting to the tolerance and democratic fairness of bourgeois society.
In what sense is China communist?
Especially the bourgeois urbanites.same. they can get fucked.
the urbanites fucking deserved it man. i wish we could have a revolution in america and purge all the fucking urb*nites
Capitalism is definitely collapsing in the U.S.Mostly. Look, I'll go into it further here:
Marxism discussion
This “alienation” (to use a term which will be comprehensible to the philosophers) can, of course, only be abolished given two practical premises. For it to become an “intolerable” power, i.e. a power against which men make a revolution, it must necessarily have rendered the great mass of...incels.is
Basically, Communism is just what happens after capitalism collapses. Capitalism has a problem: the rate of profit tends to fall year on year. As it does so, capitalists have to take property from workers - live in pod eat bug isn't Communism itself, but it is indicative of the tendency of capitalism to abolish itself within itself, the self-abolition of capitalism. This process, over generations, produces a "property less mass" of workers who must consequently strip property from the capitalist class. That's how this works. It isn't MUH NATIONALIZATION; it's armed working class revolution, followed by the seizure and social operations of the means of production. It also isn't a process anyone directs consciously, or even one that is capable of being directed consciously.
And most Marxists don't realize 18th century Karl Marx in all reality was racist and sexist as fuck.funny how it seems like everybody who actually knows what marxism is turns out to be a marxist.
Pol Pot is the most based of all leaders imoThey both got shit done and created a peasant army of workers along with soldiers raising up the lower ranking men, I also fucking hate the bourgeois with a passion, not even Hitler in Mein Kampf ironically liked them either separate from Mao and Stalin. The bourgeois belong in hard labor camps along with other groups. Also, Pol Pot did nothing wrong.
Totally an underrated historical political leader, was a guy who knew that in order to make an omelette you have to break quite a few eggs.Pol Pot is the most based of all leaders imo
The WEF aren't communists, they're corporate technological transhumanist neoliberal fascists. They're basically financial corporate fascists and illiterate cuckservatives are stupid for calling them communists. They're capitalists who want a wage slave driven rentier economy.Line goes down
Capitalists take property to make up for it
Facts on BlackRock Buying Houses | BlackRock
BlackRock is an active investor in the U.S. real estate market. However, buying houses or competing with individuals to purchase homes is simply not what we do.www.blackrock.com
You won't own anything
Propertyless mass is created
Propertyless mass must revolt, but to revolt they have to do so on an internationalist class basis. In revolting, they learn to survive collectively without the need for money.
This is Marxism in a nutshell.
Male lead and driven communism is the only way to go. Communism plus nationalism as well, Trotskyite scum get the bullet or ice pick to the head.Communism would only work if women didn't exist.
Wokeism is neoliberal in nature, not communist. There is no wokeism inside North Korea.DURRRR WOKEISM IS CULTURAL MARXISM THE ELITES ARE ALL COMMIES you say. You say that because you're uneducated.
Paul Mattick, Left-Communist:
Hint: Wokeism is a eau to divide the working class, making the issues of poor minorities appear solvable within capitalism whike attacking workers of the ethnic majority.
Hypergamy is a zero sum game, capitalism is a zero sum economic system. In order to have a strong male movement to counteract against western feminism you need collectivism. Extreme rugged individualism is flawed.I hate collectivism. I won't share anything.
Imagine caring about society.
And you can be anticapitalist without being a red faggot. Read Kaczynski.
I’m a sexual communist
Left != Liberal, why there is so many people who believes in otherwiseWokeism is neoliberal in nature, not communist. There is no wokeism inside North Korea.
Which is why some manner of fascism is necessary with communism to force people to work together.Communism won't work because humans (nature in general) are egoistic
Because they're a bunch of illiterate retards who only get their thinking from propaganda television, radio, and talking heads.Left != Liberal, why there is so many people who believes in otherwise
Hah, you got that rightBecause they're a bunch of illiterate retards who only get their thinking from propaganda television, radio, and talking heads.
If I was in charge of a male driven communist movement with a nice segment of nationalism mixed with it my saying would go from a chicken in every pot towards a single pussy for every single cock. That would be a part of my pogrom starting out.I’m a sexual communist
View attachment 668355
He took everything away from you.
You could have had a functioning Japanese communist state if not for this nazi.
View attachment 668356
He took it all away in 1 strike... The cute commie cat girls... All gone... Erased.
Bastard
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60Oihz09eBo&ab_channel=TheGamingBird
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGdd5Jc3ZU8&ab_channel=Ingen