News Incels.is Rule Announcement: Expansion of the Anti-Pedophilia Policy

[PPEcel]

Rule Changes



The following rules will not be applied ex post facto, but the Moderation Team may take prior posts into account in a holistic assessment of a member's willingness to participate in our community in good faith.

Effective May 1st, 2022:

1. The "no sexualization of minors" policy is hereby expanded and now prohibits:

• Statements by a member implying or stating that they personally find prepubescent minors attractive (current rule); AND
• Statements by a member arguing that attraction to prepubescent minors is normal or even desirable;
• MAP advocacy* and MAP-specific talking points, for example:
  • Statements by a member arguing that prepubescent minors enjoy sexual activity with adults;
  • Statements by a member arguing that pedophiles will one day be liberated in a utopian society that accommodates their desires.

*MAP advocacy will not be taken to include a general discussion of child sexual exploitation from a political or legal perspective (e.g. a critique of Redditors' hypocrisy with respect to Dr. Pizza, or a critique of the criminal justice system in general), if minors are not being sexualized.

The Moderation Team declines to specify a bright-line age rule to prevent potential violators from engaging in a race to the bottom by cherry-picking and sexualizing images of children undergoing early or delayed puberty.

2. The Moderation Team will adopt enhanced penalties for users who:

• Explicitly state they personally find prepubescent minors attractive.
• Violate any aforementioned rules in a particularly egregious manner (e.g. promoting or defending sadomasochism and incest involving prepubescent minors, or any sexual activity involving male prepubescent minors).

Under this system, violators may be permanently banned even on a first offense.

3. The anti-proselytization statute will be targeted toward users, especially graycels, who spend an unnatural and disproportionate amount of time defending or promoting pedophilia.

 

[Caesercel]

Inb4 agecuck

 

[InMinecraft]

first

 

[Caesercel]

first

No

 

[InMinecraft]

No

like cringe comments on yt

 

[PPEcel]

like cringe comments on yt

ovr

 

[InMinecraft]

ovr

we're entitled to 10/10 giga-stacy pussy bro

 

[kjd]

Does this apply to prepubescent anime girl?

 

[LeFrenchCel]

ok

 

[Indari]

legal's me

 

[AnotherInsertCel1]

Lets see how well the mods will be at enforcing any rules.

 

[Emba]

Make the word nigger illegal next bros

 

[METALMILITA88]

Make the word nigger illegal next bros

And kike too since this is now a woke Reddit forum .

 

[Emba]

And kike too since this is now a woke Reddit forum .

Good idea!

 

[METALMILITA88]

I have to ask @CCPcel @Caesercel was this rule expanded as a response to my recent post?

 

[Fat Link]

LOL @ “woke Reddit forum”.

Stormfront and probably every other white racialist forum out there likely bans any and all actual to suspected pedo shit on site so purging our own community of this mental illness/legal liability is far from going woke.

Infact it’s the woke tards that are gradually now pushing for the normalization of pedophelia.

 

[METALMILITA88]

LOL @ “woke Reddit forum”.

Stormfront and probably every other white racialist forum out there likely bans any and all actual to suspected pedo shit on site so purging our own community of this mental illness/legal liability is far from going woke.

Infact it’s the woke tards that are gradually now pushing for the normalization of pedophelia.

SF are traditionalists and foid lovers. This isn’t an actual argument. You guys just want to flex your muscle after I exposed agecucks.

 

[JestER]

Define "prepubescent"

 

[watcher]

Define "prepubescent"

Too young to have tits, hips, etc.

 

[lemon21]

Thanks mod team for putting pedos in their place, there's thousands of forums to talk about pedo stuff. No need to drag it here.

 

[ilieknothing]

Elon Musk should buy this website

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Statements by a member arguing that attraction to prepubescent minors is normal or even desirable;

Pathetic.

Why are Republicans incapable of understanding that pedophilia does not equal child molestation?

The word "natural" can be defined as "Being in accordance with or determined by nature." Nature is further defined as "The basic or inherent features of something."

Pedophilia is "natural" in the sense that pedophiles have an inherent, biological attraction to children. It is apart of their nature. It was determined for them. It is much the same as an adult being attracted to another adult of similar age. The only exception for pedophiles is that they are attracted to people of different age.

Understandably, this is difficult for someone with a different nature to understand. But pedophilia is neither right nor wrong - It is just their biology. Personal morals have nothing to do with facts.

As for the belief that pedophiles are all vile criminals, that is false. Child molestation is a crime involving a sexual act on a child. There are many, many pedophiles who choose not to harm children despite their attraction to them. They clearly understand that children are not capable of consenting or forming meaningful bonds. So they repress their urges and live productive lives.

Such people are not monsters. They have an attraction which they know would cause issues if acted on.

What's important to understand is that pedophilia, as a sexual attraction, is not a mental chain which forces all pedophiles to think only of making love to children. Pedophiles should be commended for not harming children.

 

[JestER]

Too young to have tits, hips, etc.

Fair enough, I'm not attracted to foids without those things

 

[InMinecraft]

Elon Musk should buy this website

this makes me laugh so hard

 

[Escthectrler]

Goddammit

 

[METALMILITA88]

Thanks mod team for putting pedos in their place, there's thousands of forums to talk about pedo stuff. No need to drag it here.

@Ray thoughts on this ingrate?

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Pathetic.

 

[lemon21]

@Ray thoughts on this ingrate?

Dude curb your pedoness, from what i've seen you can talk about girls aged 15+ that's enough right? Like it really should be

 

[Zogpilled]

I wonder what will be banned next.

 

[METALMILITA88]

Dude curb your pedoness, from what i've seen you can talk about girls aged 15+ that's enough right? Like it really should be

No dude mods are from America and a minor is less than age 18 that’s not enough

 

[METALMILITA88]

I wouldn't expect anything more from an anime bastard

True

Intellau also made based posts here what do you think about that?

 

[lemon21]

No dude mods are from America and a minor is less than age 18 that’s not enough

@Fat Link @CCPcel modcels can you elaborate?

 

[Alone75]

Great news from today the pedocels and annoying edgy anime loving teens will have to STFU or be banned. They make incels look worse, some are IT spies and do it on purpose also I'm sure.

 

[METALMILITA88]

@Fat Link @CCPcel modcels can you elaborate?

I just elaborated it for you. In America a minor is someone less than 18. PERIOD. EXCLAMATION POINT!

 

[lemon21]

I just elaborated it for you. In America a minor is someone less than 18. PERIOD. EXCLAMATION POINT!

America is not the world my friend

 

[METALMILITA88]

America is not the world my friend

You idiot didn’t you just hear me say that that’s where the mods are from so that’s what they consider a minor?

 

[lemon21]

You idiot didn’t you just hear me say that that’s where the mods are from so that’s what they consider a minor?

i didnt

 

[METALMILITA88]

i didnt

Now you did. So do you now think we right to complain about this or not?

 

[lemon21]

Now you did. So do you now think we right to complain about this or not?

I'm kinda torn, but maybe you have a point

 

[sub8male]

1. The "no sexualization of minors" policy is hereby expanded and now prohibits:

• Statements by a member implying or stating that they personally find prepubescent minors attractive (current rule); AND
• Statements by a member arguing that attraction to prepubescent minors is normal or even desirable;
• MAP advocacy* and MAP-specific talking points, for example:
  • Statements by a member arguing that prepubescent minors enjoy sexual activity with adults;
  • Statements by a member arguing that pedophiles will one day be liberated in a utopian society that accommodates their desires.

*MAP advocacy will not be taken to include a general discussion of child sexual exploitation from a political or legal perspective (e.g. a critique of Redditors' hypocrisy with respect to Dr. Pizza, or a critique of the criminal justice system in general), if minors are not being sexualized.

The Moderation Team declines to specify a bright-line age rule to prevent potential violators from engaging in a race to the bottom by cherry-picking and sexualizing images of children undergoing early or delayed puberty.

Is talking about traditionalist societies where marriage occurs shortly after puberty an example of such a utopian society that discussion of is forbidden?

Define "prepubescent"

I have to ask @CCPcel @Caesercel was this rule expanded as a response to my recent post?

This feels like a can of worms about to be unleashed since MAP is technically minor attracted (anything under 18), but that movement got hijacked by literal pedos. (Those who prefer those before puberty).

SF are traditionalists and foid lovers. This isn’t an actual argument. You guys just want to flex your muscle after I exposed agecucks.

 

[i_want_emo_gf]

Over for pedocels

 

[InMinecraft]

Over for pedocels

 

[i_want_emo_gf]

Does this apply to all minors or just prepubescent ones?

 

[PPEcel]

Does this apply to all minors or just prepubescent ones?

The text is clear.

 

[Toxic_Manbabby]

LOL @ “woke Reddit forum”.

Stormfront and probably every other white racialist forum out there likely bans any and all actual to suspected pedo shit on site so purging our own community of this mental illness/legal liability is far from going woke.

Infact it’s the woke tards that are gradually now pushing for the normalization of pedophelia.

Yeah, it's totally the "Don't say gay" bill, go.. I mean guys!

 

[ThisLifeKillsMe]

LOL @ “woke Reddit forum”.

Stormfront and probably every other white racialist forum out there likely bans any and all actual to suspected pedo shit on site so purging our own community of this mental illness/legal liability is far from going woke.

Infact it’s the woke tards that are gradually now pushing for the normalization of pedophelia.

"Stormfront and probably every other white racialist forum out there likely allows women, so we now allow women too."

 

[Deleted member 41729]

Does this apply to all minors or just prepubescent ones?

The text is clear.

@i_want_emo_gf I made a thread a few weeks ago and there was never a clear conclusion reached, over various definitions of what constitutes a pedophile, because according to normies pedophilia is under 18, and according to some scientific authority a pedophile can like pubescent foids who are not full grown. Then of course the original definition when it was originally invented, is anything prepubescent. So these new rules definitely are not 100% clear cut.

If you have heard of the term "hebephilia" and call hebephilic desires a form of "pedophilia" is that intellectual dishonesty?

@PPEcel constantly calls people pedos when talking about pubescent females, and he isn't some random normie on the street who has never heard of hebephilia, he knows what it is, but refuses to use it out of his resentment for adults who wanna have sex with pubescent minors. He isn't the only...

incels.is

@Wizard32 thoughts on my post as well as the entire new rules update?

 

[PPEcel]

Yeah, it's totally the "Don't say gay" bill, go.. I mean guys!

 

[Toxic_Manbabby]

 

[AutisticMonstrosity]

MAP

What is that?

Not related to this, but name changes are now a thing?