Soy "Incels have higher external locus of control"

[Atavistic Autist]

View: https://twitter.com/datepsych/status/1712376523766759828


This is an example of how the field of psychology is rooted in hyper-individualistic Western philosophy. You are considered to not be thinking properly if you believe that having permanent handicaps such as being ugly, short, and/or autistic can permanently impede your life.

It's fitting that the same hyper-individualistic soyciety we live in that creates many more losers than it does winners also spurns those losers who understand precisely why they've lost in life, and encourages them to blame themselves instead.

After all, the whole field of psychotherapy (particularly CBT) is predicated on the notion of blaming yourself and "correcting" pessimistic and thus "wrong" thoughts, replacing those thoughts with oblivious optimism that's based in nothing. So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Nice find, saved.

 

[SoycuckGodOfReddit]

The LoC thing is retarded lmao

Imagine academics pontificating about an 'external locus of control' when even their hero Karl Marx was explicit that larger historical and social forces shape men's experiences

Most people aren't elites, and can't do that much individually about the social system. So their lives are primarily lived in a system set up by economic forces 'beyond their control.' That's just an obvious fact, not a question of attribution

It just comes across as an academic spin on the lazy moralizing about how people should take the blame for their own suffering, which has been used by most ruling classes in order to discourage dissent. That kind of thing is just moralizing, it falls apart if it's taken to be an objective analysis of anything. Apparently academics are too busy tut-tutting at incels, and don't wish to admit the absurdity of their own statements

 

[hollowcel]

why would i ever blame myself for romantic failings when the entirety of modern society is artificial in the first place. if there is a recession in an economy the people affected will rightfully blame it and not themselves.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

The LoC thing is retarded lmao

Imagine academics pontificating about an 'external locus of control' when even their hero Karl Marx was explicit that larger historical and social forces shape men's experiences

Most people aren't elites, and can't do that much individually about the social system. So their lives are primarily lived in a system set up by economic forces 'beyond their control.' That's just an obvious fact, not a question of attribution

It just comes across as an academic spin on the lazy moralizing about how people should take the blame for their own suffering, which has been used by most ruling classes in order to discourage dissent. That kind of thing is just moralizing, it falls apart if it's taken to be an objective analysis of anything. Apparently academics are too busy tut-tutting at incels, and don't wish to admit the absurdity of their own statements

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

View: https://twitter.com/datepsych/status/1712376523766759828


This is an example of how the field of psychology is rooted in hyper-individualistic Western philosophy. You are considered to not be thinking properly if you believe that having permanent handicaps such as being ugly, short, and/or autistic can permanently impede your life.

It's fitting that the same hyper-individualistic soyciety we live in that creates many more losers than it does winners also spurns those losers who understand precisely why they've lost in life, and encourages them to blame themselves instead.

After all, the whole field of psychotherapy (particularly CBT) is predicated on the notion of blaming yourself and "correcting" pessimistic and thus "wrong" thoughts, replacing those thoughts with oblivious optimism that's based in nothing. So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

Too bad the individualism doesn’t extend to individual genes.

 

[soul contre tous]

After all, the whole field of psychotherapy (particularly CBT) is predicated on the notion of blaming yourself and "correcting" pessimistic and thus "wrong" thoughts, replacing those thoughts with oblivious optimism that's based in nothing. So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

Pessimism as a philosophy is pretty much the only solution to the blackpill.
Once you have seen the truth you can't cope your way out of it, so any "positive framing" falls flat.
I don't see how CBT (Coping Bullshit Therapy) can help me in any way without just gaslighting me into mental slavery and futile sisyphean tasks.
The only people that would profit from me "trying harder" and "finding my own hero's journey" would be normies and femoids.

 

[fastnbulbous]

Psychologists are evil and want to gaslight sub 5s that it's all their fault if they were dealt a bad hand in life

 

[PSYGNOSIS-OWL]

Pessimism, as a philosophy is pretty much the only solution to the blackpill.
Once you have seen the truth you can't cope your way out of it.

~This is the essential Truth.

The LoC thing is retarded lmao

Imagine academics pontificating about an 'external locus of control' when even their hero Karl Marx was explicit that larger historical and social forces shape men's experiences

Most people aren't elites, and can't do that much individually about the social system. So their lives are primarily lived in a system set up by economic forces 'beyond their control.' That's just an obvious fact, not a question of attribution

It just comes across as an academic spin on the lazy moralizing about how people should take the blame for their own suffering, which has been used by most ruling classes in order to discourage dissent. That kind of thing is just moralizing, it falls apart if it's taken to be an objective analysis of anything. Apparently academics are too busy tut-tutting at incels, and don't wish to admit the absurdity of their own statements

A so called "profession" made in the delight of the same suffering, that inhabits it´s patients.
~And in most cases, it´s always a whore doing the talking.

 

[SocialzERo]

Psychology is all about gaslighting yourself into being "normal/healthy" and that is being irrational and driven by emotions. I believe that many normies are able to see how unfair life is but they tend to ignore it for the sake of muh their mental health. Depressed people are more rational but pay a big price for it and that is being miserable.

It's been proven thousands of times that most of your life outcomes depend on factors out of your control like looks, intelligence, neurotypicalness, family status, etc. The concept of free will itself seems like a cope because how you act in certain situations and what you believe is determined by your neurotransmitters and brain structure.

 

[Rabbi Schneerson]

entirety of modern society is artificial

 

[Rabbi Schneerson]

your life outcomes depend on factors out of your control like looks, intelligence, neurotypicalness, family status, etc.

 

[Stupid Clown]

That guy is a massive retard. He used a twitter poll as a "study."

 

[wojaktard]

View: https://twitter.com/datepsych/status/1712376523766759828


This is an example of how the field of psychology is rooted in hyper-individualistic Western philosophy. You are considered to not be thinking properly if you believe that having permanent handicaps such as being ugly, short, and/or autistic can permanently impede your life.

It's fitting that the same hyper-individualistic soyciety we live in that creates many more losers than it does winners also spurns those losers who understand precisely why they've lost in life, and encourages them to blame themselves instead.

After all, the whole field of psychotherapy (particularly CBT) is predicated on the notion of blaming yourself and "correcting" pessimistic and thus "wrong" thoughts, replacing those thoughts with oblivious optimism that's based in nothing. So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

Whole field is fucked over. Popularized by fucking capitalism so rich Chad's can fuck over everyone with "gO tO THerApY" lmao

Also saw this in a YouTube comment the other day.
> As a therapist, thank you for questioning how pop evolutionary psychology goes down a dark and cynical path. And excessive external locus of control

Max cope these therapists have lmfao

 

[Mainländer]

How can getting into a relationship WITH SOMEONE ELSE not rely on external factors? Even a rape would rely on external factors to some extent, good Lord.

Have all fields become a joke or what?

 

[Truecelcel]

View: https://twitter.com/datepsych/status/1712376523766759828


This is an example of how the field of psychology is rooted in hyper-individualistic Western philosophy. You are considered to not be thinking properly if you believe that having permanent handicaps such as being ugly, short, and/or autistic can permanently impede your life.

It's fitting that the same hyper-individualistic soyciety we live in that creates many more losers than it does winners also spurns those losers who understand precisely why they've lost in life, and encourages them to blame themselves instead.

After all, the whole field of psychotherapy (particularly CBT) is predicated on the notion of blaming yourself and "correcting" pessimistic and thus "wrong" thoughts, replacing those thoughts with oblivious optimism that's based in nothing. So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

Apparently we look like this

 

[AsiaCel]

The LoC thing is retarded lmao

Imagine academics pontificating about an 'external locus of control' when even their hero Karl Marx was explicit that larger historical and social forces shape men's experiences

Most people aren't elites, and can't do that much individually about the social system. So their lives are primarily lived in a system set up by economic forces 'beyond their control.' That's just an obvious fact, not a question of attribution

It just comes across as an academic spin on the lazy moralizing about how people should take the blame for their own suffering, which has been used by most ruling classes in order to discourage dissent. That kind of thing is just moralizing, it falls apart if it's taken to be an objective analysis of anything. Apparently academics are too busy tut-tutting at incels, and don't wish to admit the absurdity of their own statements

 

[MillionBashStream97]

So are we just calling black people stupid babies here, when they talk about racism?
Because it involves, things not in your control. Is everything they say regarding the topic, invalid or not worth taking it seriously?...

Cool, I guess. Just goes to show that the most racist people you will meet, don't say "ape" or "nigger".

This standard doesn't apply to us though, because they don't consider bullying, abuse, and getting alienated from society, issues (Except when they do, plenty of times, but not when Incels are the topic)

"about how incels navigate (or rather don't navigate)"

We did, once upon a time.

What would you call a bear that keeps walking into the same bear trap? You would call him a retarded bear, right?

 

[based_meme]

This is an example of how the field of psychology is rooted in hyper-individualistic Western philosophy. You are considered to not be thinking properly if you believe that having permanent handicaps such as being ugly, short, and/or autistic can permanently impede your life.

It's fitting that the same hyper-individualistic soyciety we live in that creates many more losers than it does winners also spurns those losers who understand precisely why they've lost in life, and encourages them to blame themselves instead.

After all, the whole field of psychotherapy (particularly CBT) is predicated on the notion of blaming yourself and "correcting" pessimistic and thus "wrong" thoughts, replacing those thoughts with oblivious optimism that's based in nothing. So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

The LoC thing is retarded lmao

Imagine academics pontificating about an 'external locus of control' when even their hero Karl Marx was explicit that larger historical and social forces shape men's experiences

Most people aren't elites, and can't do that much individually about the social system. So their lives are primarily lived in a system set up by economic forces 'beyond their control.' That's just an obvious fact, not a question of attribution

It just comes across as an academic spin on the lazy moralizing about how people should take the blame for their own suffering, which has been used by most ruling classes in order to discourage dissent. That kind of thing is just moralizing, it falls apart if it's taken to be an objective analysis of anything. Apparently academics are too busy tut-tutting at incels, and don't wish to admit the absurdity of their own statements

GOD, I love this forum.

 

[JudeoBiden]

After all, the whole field of psychotherapy (particularly CBT) is predicated on the notion of blaming yourself and "correcting" pessimistic and thus "wrong" thoughts, replacing those thoughts with oblivious optimism that's based in nothing. So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

It is entirely externally decided whether you date. There isn't much you can do internally. Just about every other aspect of your life allows you more control over it than this one. This is just midwit word magic, they accuse the bad people of whatever ivory tower lab coat jargon, then pat themselves on the back for not mispronouncing it.

 

[M3llow3lectrician]

So this is pretty much financially motivated tbh

Of course he was talking Forbes lol.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

He's molding his research to suit his narrative. It's bullshit because of this:

Imagine academics pontificating about an 'external locus of control' when even their hero Karl Marx was explicit that larger historical and social forces shape men's experiences

Most people aren't elites, and can't do that much individually about the social system. So their lives are primarily lived in a system set up by economic forces 'beyond their control.' That's just an obvious fact, not a question of attribution

I don't get how they can deny the entire effect of the current dating culture.

You won't ever see research about how blacks commit most crimes or the privileges women have. It doesn't suit their narrative.

I used to believe and like science, but it's all been corrupted. It can't be trusted any more than CNN or The Guardian.

 

[SmhChan]

That guy gives me 'manwhore' vibe who likes twerking for foids. He also claimed with his 'study' that foids don't overrate themselves.

On another note, it seems men's struggles in dating are being exploited by a lot of normie grifters to make a living. We're like fucking lab rats.