many say that ancient time was more based， I don't think so， in ancient times，you had to be lucky to survive childfood，there was danger from famine，pandemic，war，if you had mental illness，you might not have the ability to survive
Depends on the era and region. In Christian nations they had 1 man 1 wife policy. It depended more on Ur social and economic status than inceldom based on looks in ancient societies. Like even in shithole nations today u can betabux females who might die without food or sum and looks matter less
Their futures had much more potential than the stale, degenerate western culture we have today.
It’s a bell curve. Ancient times and modern times are shit and both terrible. In the middle was good, when whites had power and we had Christian monogamy combined with awesome modern technology. Then Jews and nonwhites ruined it ofc.
no more owning anything anymore, no more wife, no more family, no more KKK, and it’s all cuz of Jews and Afro-semites
no more owning anything anymore, no more wife, no more family, no more KKK, and it’s all cuz of Jews and Afro-semites
and most subhumans were put in circus and mentally ill or anyone suffering from anything would be put into institution.
Not “incel “ fate though, all people’s fates were like that, including Chad and Stacy
Yes
F
This is true. There were zero copes
Agreed. Ancient era pre civilization was the strongest Man who could BTFO every other man get a harem or females followed by anyone with higher social status and money or land in the ancient agricultural societies. Incels had it the best in Christian eras where everyone could have 1 wife and society was somewhat sane
If you do survive there's less male competition cause they're all dead
The copes are getting better VR. Sex robots etc. Before we know it we can cope so fucking hard that we can even function normally.
hunter gatherer tribes are egalitarian and mostly monogamy，humans are naturally mostly monogamy with a bit polygamy
F
so? dying when young is better than growing up incel
Not true https://www.google.com/amp/s/psmag.com/.amp/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
Monogamy started being a thing after religion, before that 1 in every 17 man got to reproduce
you totally misrepresented the research，first， this 1:17 ratio only occured during a period， before and after that period it was not the case，especially during hunter gatherer period human society was very egalitarian
second， the genetic analysis can only tell us how many men left their genetic markers until today， but not how many percent had reproduced，maybe their descendants diminished during history，for example，go back to 10000 years ago， only a few men left their Y chromosome till today，but that does not represent other men had not reproduced
I was about to post this
Neolithic revolution fucked us over
It's very cruel that we survive longer as incels in the modern age actually, dying as a child instead would have been merciful.
Yes, especially if ur a coomer
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
