Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Inceldom would be recognized as a serious disease based on older, formal scientific definitions of the word

Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,131
"The most defended model of disease in the 20th century was Boorse’s. According to this model, a disease corresponds to a dysfunction—alteration of natural functions resulting in reduced life expectancy and/or reproductive expectations (supposedly a value-free concept), emphasizing the importance of a dysfunction (biological or psychological) for the existence of a disease (12, 13, 14)."

:blackpill: Let me paraphrase this:
REDUCED REPRODUCTIVE EXPECTATIONS QUALIFY YOU AS DISEASED
This applies both to your physical self and your mental self

"Later, Wakefield agrees with Boorse’s dysfunction concept, arguing that these mechanisms may be physical or mental (12): “mental processes play important species-typical roles in human survival and reproduction, there is no reason to doubt that mental processes were naturally selected and have natural functions as Darwin himself often emphasized” "

:feelsmage: This is also why homosexuality was considered a mental illness:
behaving in a way that stops you from reproducing makes you DISEASED by that definition.
A broad definition that makes sense if your consider how important reproduction is for the survival of animal species.

Reproduction is essential to our survival, jfl at people who act like it's no big deal when scientists think something is seriously wrong with you when you can't bree
d.

"Boorse's Bio Statistical Theory (BST), equates health with normal species functioning, which is the statistically typical contribution of a sub-system to the organism's overall goals: survival and reproduction."

This definition isn't used anymore today because of "homophobia", I'm not joking.

Interesting read on the subject


@soymonkcel @cvh1991 @D3X @FastBananaCEO @BPJ
 
I'm diseased and the cure is a loli.
 
You're wrong. The society is diseased and we are just a symptom of the terrible disease. Already hypergamy, sexual liberation and promotion of breeding based on looks lowered the average IQ and made birth rates below replacement levels. The only way for the west to continue existing is by artificially pumping it's corpse with the new blood of niggers, chinks , spics, arabs and other brown people.

But what happens when modernized Africa and other 3rd or 2nd world countries eventually reach the same low birth rates? Already their westernized women have 1 or two children in their 30's instead of 4 by 30. African countries which used to have 8 children per woman now have 3.
 
Glowies pls
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

@LOLI BREEDING @JosefMengelecel @Zensfy @Draestyn
 
They would fry our brain while we would scream "I CANT BREED"

mel gibson braveheart GIF
 
Nature is cold
 
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

@LOLI BREEDING @JosefMengelecel @Zensfy @Draestyn
People like this aren’t any better than IT. I want a young virgin foid as I didn’t have one when I was younger and I don’t want to have my first time with some roastie with a double digit body count who wouldn’t give two fucks I exist, he’s the type of person to say betabuxxing sluts or dating escorts is the exact same thing.
 
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

@LOLI BREEDING @JosefMengelecel @Zensfy @Draestyn
normies are insanely cucked. imagine lusting for a bitch who's getting her brains fucked out by chad at the moment :feelskek:
 
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

@LOLI BREEDING @JosefMengelecel @Zensfy @Draestyn
Jfl. I would much rather have a loli to suck me off. Much better to fuck a loli than a used up roastie. Too many agecucks on here
 
Yeah they changed the definition to accomodate homos and trannies.

We're the collateral damage of degeneracy coddling.
 
Jfl. I would much rather have a loli to suck me off. Much better to fuck a loli than a used up roastie. Too many agecucks on here
I definitely agree that the mainstream is far far too knee jerk reactionary when it comes to young women having sex.

For example, a woman is a child then experiences puberty where sexual characteristics develop, puberty finishes out then they have a window of maybe 10 years or so before pretty noticeable decline starts (many would maybe fairly argue it starts sooner).

If you look historically women were being married off and having sex/kids far earlier than they are today.

Seems to me that once a woman is mostly through puberty/has bled and what have you they’re more than capable of fully experiencing sex and what have you without issue. It’s funny comparing “age of consent” depending on country, in Germany it’s 14 so long as the other person is <21 iirc and 16 otherwise whereas in the USA it’s 17 or 18 depending on state if I’m remembering correctly. Other countries differ as well ofc, but only men are persecuted or judged by society for having sex with a partner that’s “too young” compared to themselves.

This is one of those areas where the mainstream/society has an apparent double standard for men VS women. If a 14 year old boy has sex with an older woman frankly nobody gives a shit and this is the correct response — because it’s not a big deal, the kid had sex because he wanted to, cool.

But when you reverse the same situation suddenly it’s “Reeeeee man takes advantage of woman! She doesn’t know better! Pedophile!”

Such fucking irrational bullshit it’s like people don’t think.

Virgins and young women are appealing to men for a variety of reasons — they’re more attractive and will stay attractive for a longer duration vs older women and they may be young enough that they haven’t had their capacity to pair bond decimated yet. A lower amount of sexual partners means statistically your odds of not getting divorced are better and also they can’t be comparing you sexually to their other hundred partners so they’re not going to be unsatisfied in the sense that they constantly pine for ex-Chad cock, that sort of thing.

Women always call this “male insecurity” but i think insecurity implies there’s no real threat to be assessed and that they’re saying men are deluded and “just lack confidence bro”. In reality those concerns are entirely valid and relevant to men everywhere but women gaslight as usual to maintain or gain advantage as they always do.

It’s also interesting to consider how historically in some contexts if a lad impressed a woman’s father or family and demonstrated he was an honorable person with similar values that would make for a good husband and a good addition to their family that arranged marriage could actually help with respect to certain things. That no longer matters in the modern context though, when women are the choosers they will always pick giga-Chad thundercock every time the future be damned and what kind of person the man is be damned etc. There are valid pros to systems of arranged marriage and their are cons too — you may not end up marrying the woman that would’ve been your first choice and women hate the notion because they want to ride the cock carousel and marry based on feelings for Chad only — women understand the massive advantage they have and they want to wield it to the detriment of men because what to they care about men?
 
Last edited:
Women always call this “male insecurity” but i think insecurity implies there’s no real threat to be assessed and that they’re saying men are deluded and “just lack confidence bro”. In reality those concerns are entirely valid and relevant to men everywhere but women gaslight as usual to maintain or gain advantage as they always do.
"male insecurity" is such bullshit. The reason one might feel uncertain about a certain situation is because there are risks involved. Your mind is giving you a warning signal because if you proceed, you could pay the price.

So you have two options:
1. Avoid the roastie, you get shamed for being an insecure male
2. Marry the roastie, and likely end up in a dead bedroom marriage or divorce, and after it happens, at best, people say "sorry", and at worst, people say "you should've known better". Either way you lose big time
 
"male insecurity" is such bullshit. The reason one might feel uncertain about a certain situation is because there are risks involved. Your mind is giving you a warning signal because if you proceed, you could pay the price.

So you have two options:
1. Avoid the roastie, you get shamed for being an insecure male
2. Marry the roastie, and likely end up in a dead bedroom marriage or divorce, and after it happens, at best, people say "sorry", and at worst, people say "you should've known better". Either way you lose big time
Indeed, well put mate
 
"The most defended model of disease in the 20th century was Boorse’s. According to this model, a disease corresponds to a dysfunction—alteration of natural functions resulting in reduced life expectancy and/or reproductive expectations (supposedly a value-free concept), emphasizing the importance of a dysfunction (biological or psychological) for the existence of a disease (12, 13, 14)."

:blackpill: Let me paraphrase this:
REDUCED REPRODUCTIVE EXPECTATIONS QUALIFY YOU AS DISEASED
This applies both to your physical self and your mental self

"Later, Wakefield agrees with Boorse’s dysfunction concept, arguing that these mechanisms may be physical or mental (12): “mental processes play important species-typical roles in human survival and reproduction, there is no reason to doubt that mental processes were naturally selected and have natural functions as Darwin himself often emphasized” "

:feelsmage: This is also why homosexuality was considered a mental illness:
behaving in a way that stops you from reproducing makes you DISEASED by that definition.
A broad definition that makes sense if your consider how important reproduction is for the survival of animal species.

Reproduction is essential to our survival, jfl at people who act like it's no big deal when scientists think something is seriously wrong with you when you can't bree
d.

"Boorse's Bio Statistical Theory (BST), equates health with normal species functioning, which is the statistically typical contribution of a sub-system to the organism's overall goals: survival and reproduction."

This definition isn't used anymore today because of "homophobia", I'm not joking.

Interesting read on the subject


@soymonkcel @cvh1991 @D3X @FastBananaCEO @BPJ
Yet women that want impregnation but can't find a partner (JFL :feelshaha:) are considered disabled (according to the WHO) in order to be eligible for subsidized artificial insemination in the U.K., if I'm not mistaken. Also, the definition includes somehow gays... so it's not homophobic like Boorse's definition of disease/disability, ofc! But women got it easy: they have reproductive autonomy... How does "the rights of all individuals to have a family, and that includes single men" apply to us?

Meanwhile, we, the collective with the lowest average income, poorest average mental health, highest suicide rate and lowest reproductive success, are still left rotting. We could use some cash. I guess we're just entitled :feelsseriously:

Very interesting finding, man :feelsokman:
 
Meanwhile, we, the collective with the lowest average income, poorest average mental health, highest suicide rate and lowest reproductive success, are still left rotting. We could use some cash. I guess we're just entitled :feelsseriously:
We have it by far the worst yet people don't even acknowledge it @ThoughtfulCel

But what happens when modernized Africa and other 3rd or 2nd world countries eventually reach the same low birth rates? Already their westernized women have 1 or two children in their 30's instead of 4 by 30. African countries which used to have 8 children per woman now have 3.
Is that really happening? Last I checked countries like Nigeria are still having 8 kids per woman
 
We have it by far the worst yet people don't even acknowledge it @ThoughtfulCel


Is that really happening? Last I checked countries like Nigeria are still having 8 kids per woman
The only reason what we're going through isn't classified as a disease, nor being fixed is because we are men.

If women were going through the exact same thing we are, the government would give them monthly allowances.

Every single problem that's ignored is probably the result of it only affecting males
 
The only reason what we're going through isn't classified as a disease, nor being fixed is because we are men.

If women were going through the exact same thing we are, the government would give them monthly allowances.

Every single problem that's ignored is probably the result of it only affecting males
Same for balding. If it only happened to women you can be sure that it would be taken very seriously

Instead men are just mocked for it or told it's no big deal
 
Is that really happening? Last I checked countries like Nigeria are still having 8 kids per woman
Nigeria is a less developed African country than others but yes it is experiencing a slow but sure change.

"The current birth rate for Nigeria in 2021 is 36.855 births per 1000 people, a 1.11% decline from 2020. The birth rate for Nigeria in 2020 was 37.269 births per 1000 people, a 1.1% decline from 2019. The birth rate for Nigeria in 2019 was 37.684 births per 1000 people, a 1.09% decline from 2018."​


In 2022, the birth rate in Nigeria was estimated to reach 36.4 births per 1,000 people. ... By 2050, the birth rate was estimated to decline further, reaching approximately 27 births every 1,000 individuals. In 2020, Nigeria ranked 20th on the list of countries with the highest birth rate on the African continent​

 
Based 20th century scientists vs soy 21st century "scientists"
 
Based 20th century scientists vs soy 21st century "scientists"
The ones from back then would be concerned if you told them how lonely you were despite all your effort

The ones of today would either gaslight you, tell you it's not important or try to get you hooked on jew pills
 
You're wrong. The society is diseased and we are just a symptom of the terrible disease. Already hypergamy, sexual liberation and promotion of breeding based on looks lowered the average IQ and made birth rates below replacement levels. The only way for the west to continue existing is by artificially pumping it's corpse with the new blood of niggers, chinks , spics, arabs and other brown people.

But what happens when modernized Africa and other 3rd or 2nd world countries eventually reach the same low birth rates? Already their westernized women have 1 or two children in their 30's instead of 4 by 30. African countries which used to have 8 children per woman now have 3.
This is the truth, not ops soyspeak
 

Similar threads

Buried Alive 2.0
Replies
13
Views
443
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
DarkStarDown
Replies
64
Views
3K
DarkStarDown
DarkStarDown
Jud Pottah
Replies
4
Views
341
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top