Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Inceldom would be recognized as a serious disease based on older, formal scientific definitions of the word

Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,279
Online
124d 8h 49m
"The most defended model of disease in the 20th century was Boorse’s. According to this model, a disease corresponds to a dysfunction—alteration of natural functions resulting in reduced life expectancy and/or reproductive expectations (supposedly a value-free concept), emphasizing the importance of a dysfunction (biological or psychological) for the existence of a disease (12, 13, 14)."

:blackpill: Let me paraphrase this:
REDUCED REPRODUCTIVE EXPECTATIONS QUALIFY YOU AS DISEASED
This applies both to your physical self and your mental self

"Later, Wakefield agrees with Boorse’s dysfunction concept, arguing that these mechanisms may be physical or mental (12): “mental processes play important species-typical roles in human survival and reproduction, there is no reason to doubt that mental processes were naturally selected and have natural functions as Darwin himself often emphasized” "

:feelsmage: This is also why homosexuality was considered a mental illness:
behaving in a way that stops you from reproducing makes you DISEASED by that definition.
A broad definition that makes sense if your consider how important reproduction is for the survival of animal species.

Reproduction is essential to our survival, jfl at people who act like it's no big deal when scientists think something is seriously wrong with you when you can't bree
d.

"Boorse's Bio Statistical Theory (BST), equates health with normal species functioning, which is the statistically typical contribution of a sub-system to the organism's overall goals: survival and reproduction."

This definition isn't used anymore today because of "homophobia", I'm not joking.

Interesting read on the subject


soymonkcel @soymonkcel cvh1991 @cvh1991 D3X @D3X FastBananaCEO @FastBananaCEO BPJ @BPJ
 
Khaplain40KKK

Khaplain40KKK

RunningFromFemoids
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 3, 2021
Posts
446
Online
3d 1h 8m
I'm diseased and the cure is a loli.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,279
Online
124d 8h 49m
Khaplain40KKK said:
I'm diseased and the cure is a loli.
Glowies pls
 
Deleted member 33893

Deleted member 33893

Self-banned
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Posts
1,602
Online
26d 6h 28m
You're wrong. The society is diseased and we are just a symptom of the terrible disease. Already hypergamy, sexual liberation and promotion of breeding based on looks lowered the average IQ and made birth rates below replacement levels. The only way for the west to continue existing is by artificially pumping it's corpse with the new blood of niggers, chinks , spics, arabs and other brown people.

But what happens when modernized Africa and other 3rd or 2nd world countries eventually reach the same low birth rates? Already their westernized women have 1 or two children in their 30's instead of 4 by 30. African countries which used to have 8 children per woman now have 3.
 
F

foosballcel

Banned
-
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Posts
1,188
Online
18d 16h 22m
Gymcelled said:
Glowies pls
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

LOLI BREEDING @LOLI BREEDING JosefMengelecel @JosefMengelecel Zensfy @Zensfy D @Draestyn
 
Mecoja

Mecoja

fuck society
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 28, 2020
Posts
8,867
Online
102d 12h 40m
They would fry our brain while we would scream "I CANT BREED"

 
Loner94

Loner94

Admiral
★★★★
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Posts
2,807
Online
48d 6h 15m
Nature is cold
 
D

Deleted member 34972

VX
-
Joined
Jun 1, 2021
Posts
11,075
Online
23d 16h 22m
foosballcel said:
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

LOLI BREEDING @LOLI BREEDING JosefMengelecel @JosefMengelecel Zensfy @Zensfy D @Draestyn
People like this aren’t any better than IT. I want a young virgin foid as I didn’t have one when I was younger and I don’t want to have my first time with some roastie with a double digit body count who wouldn’t give two fucks I exist, he’s the type of person to say betabuxxing sluts or dating escorts is the exact same thing.
 
LOLI BREEDING

LOLI BREEDING

when your life is not your own
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 4, 2019
Posts
6,127
Online
166d 21h 27m
foosballcel said:
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

LOLI BREEDING @LOLI BREEDING JosefMengelecel @JosefMengelecel Zensfy @Zensfy D @Draestyn
normies are insanely cucked. imagine lusting for a bitch who's getting her brains fucked out by chad at the moment :feelskek:
 
JosefMengelecel

JosefMengelecel

Proud advocate of räpe, incest, and pedophilia
-
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Posts
10,434
Online
135d 22h 53m
foosballcel said:
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

LOLI BREEDING @LOLI BREEDING JosefMengelecel @JosefMengelecel Zensfy @Zensfy D @Draestyn
Jfl. I would much rather have a loli to suck me off. Much better to fuck a loli than a used up roastie. Too many agecucks on here
 
S

SuperPerfectCel

Captain
★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
1,731
Online
27d 8h 59m
Yeah they changed the definition to accomodate homos and trannies.

We're the collateral damage of degeneracy coddling.
 
Zensfy

Zensfy

5'9"
-
Joined
Feb 14, 2021
Posts
2,416
Online
24d 16h 21m
foosballcel said:
that's a genuine post though

as an incel, you're inexperienced, how you suppose to pair bond with a blown out roastie. normies struggle to pair bond with non virgins, so what makes you think an incel has any chance?

meanwhile a teen virgin would allow you to feel like you're getting something you missed out on earlier

LOLI BREEDING @LOLI BREEDING JosefMengelecel @JosefMengelecel Zensfy @Zensfy D @Draestyn
Jfl bro just ignore moralfags like that, they literally aren’t any better than the queer niggers from IT. Imagine identifying as an incel and caring about what someone wants to experience with an underage foid, and even go as far as to virtue signal about it:soy::lul:
 
cvh1991

cvh1991

Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Posts
1,027
Online
4d 18h 40m
JosefMengelecel said:
Jfl. I would much rather have a loli to suck me off. Much better to fuck a loli than a used up roastie. Too many agecucks on here
I definitely agree that the mainstream is far far too knee jerk reactionary when it comes to young women having sex.

For example, a woman is a child then experiences puberty where sexual characteristics develop, puberty finishes out then they have a window of maybe 10 years or so before pretty noticeable decline starts (many would maybe fairly argue it starts sooner).

If you look historically women were being married off and having sex/kids far earlier than they are today.

Seems to me that once a woman is mostly through puberty/has bled and what have you they’re more than capable of fully experiencing sex and what have you without issue. It’s funny comparing “age of consent” depending on country, in Germany it’s 14 so long as the other person is <21 iirc and 16 otherwise whereas in the USA it’s 17 or 18 depending on state if I’m remembering correctly. Other countries differ as well ofc, but only men are persecuted or judged by society for having sex with a partner that’s “too young” compared to themselves.

This is one of those areas where the mainstream/society has an apparent double standard for men VS women. If a 14 year old boy has sex with an older woman frankly nobody gives a shit and this is the correct response — because it’s not a big deal, the kid had sex because he wanted to, cool.

But when you reverse the same situation suddenly it’s “Reeeeee man takes advantage of woman! She doesn’t know better! Pedophile!”

Such fucking irrational bullshit it’s like people don’t think.

Virgins and young women are appealing to men for a variety of reasons — they’re more attractive and will stay attractive for a longer duration vs older women and they may be young enough that they haven’t had their capacity to pair bond decimated yet. A lower amount of sexual partners means statistically your odds of not getting divorced are better and also they can’t be comparing you sexually to their other hundred partners so they’re not going to be unsatisfied in the sense that they constantly pine for ex-Chad cock, that sort of thing.

Women always call this “male insecurity” but i think insecurity implies there’s no real threat to be assessed and that they’re saying men are deluded and “just lack confidence bro”. In reality those concerns are entirely valid and relevant to men everywhere but women gaslight as usual to maintain or gain advantage as they always do.

It’s also interesting to consider how historically in some contexts if a lad impressed a woman’s father or family and demonstrated he was an honorable person with similar values that would make for a good husband and a good addition to their family that arranged marriage could actually help with respect to certain things. That no longer matters in the modern context though, when women are the choosers they will always pick giga-Chad thundercock every time the future be damned and what kind of person the man is be damned etc. There are valid pros to systems of arranged marriage and their are cons too — you may not end up marrying the woman that would’ve been your first choice and women hate the notion because they want to ride the cock carousel and marry based on feelings for Chad only — women understand the massive advantage they have and they want to wield it to the detriment of men because what to they care about men?
 
Last edited:
F

foosballcel

Banned
-
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Posts
1,188
Online
18d 16h 22m
cvh1991 said:
Women always call this “male insecurity” but i think insecurity implies there’s no real threat to be assessed and that they’re saying men are deluded and “just lack confidence bro”. In reality those concerns are entirely valid and relevant to men everywhere but women gaslight as usual to maintain or gain advantage as they always do.
"male insecurity" is such bullshit. The reason one might feel uncertain about a certain situation is because there are risks involved. Your mind is giving you a warning signal because if you proceed, you could pay the price.

So you have two options:
1. Avoid the roastie, you get shamed for being an insecure male
2. Marry the roastie, and likely end up in a dead bedroom marriage or divorce, and after it happens, at best, people say "sorry", and at worst, people say "you should've known better". Either way you lose big time
 
cvh1991

cvh1991

Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Posts
1,027
Online
4d 18h 40m
foosballcel said:
"male insecurity" is such bullshit. The reason one might feel uncertain about a certain situation is because there are risks involved. Your mind is giving you a warning signal because if you proceed, you could pay the price.

So you have two options:
1. Avoid the roastie, you get shamed for being an insecure male
2. Marry the roastie, and likely end up in a dead bedroom marriage or divorce, and after it happens, at best, people say "sorry", and at worst, people say "you should've known better". Either way you lose big time
Indeed, well put mate
 
Ika-Sama

Ika-Sama

Suffering from Brain Damage
★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
4,382
Online
91d 16h 55m
I love Jews!
 
soymonkcel

soymonkcel

Trying to reach longevity escape velocity.
★★★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Posts
3,822
Online
31d 3h 48m
Gymcelled said:
"The most defended model of disease in the 20th century was Boorse’s. According to this model, a disease corresponds to a dysfunction—alteration of natural functions resulting in reduced life expectancy and/or reproductive expectations (supposedly a value-free concept), emphasizing the importance of a dysfunction (biological or psychological) for the existence of a disease (12, 13, 14)."

:blackpill: Let me paraphrase this:
REDUCED REPRODUCTIVE EXPECTATIONS QUALIFY YOU AS DISEASED
This applies both to your physical self and your mental self

"Later, Wakefield agrees with Boorse’s dysfunction concept, arguing that these mechanisms may be physical or mental (12): “mental processes play important species-typical roles in human survival and reproduction, there is no reason to doubt that mental processes were naturally selected and have natural functions as Darwin himself often emphasized” "

:feelsmage: This is also why homosexuality was considered a mental illness:
behaving in a way that stops you from reproducing makes you DISEASED by that definition.
A broad definition that makes sense if your consider how important reproduction is for the survival of animal species.

Reproduction is essential to our survival, jfl at people who act like it's no big deal when scientists think something is seriously wrong with you when you can't bree
d.

"Boorse's Bio Statistical Theory (BST), equates health with normal species functioning, which is the statistically typical contribution of a sub-system to the organism's overall goals: survival and reproduction."

This definition isn't used anymore today because of "homophobia", I'm not joking.

Interesting read on the subject


soymonkcel @soymonkcel cvh1991 @cvh1991 D3X @D3X FastBananaCEO @FastBananaCEO BPJ @BPJ
Yet women that want impregnation but can't find a partner (JFL :feelshaha:) are considered disabled (according to the WHO) in order to be eligible for subsidized artificial insemination in the U.K., if I'm not mistaken. Also, the definition includes somehow gays... so it's not homophobic like Boorse's definition of disease/disability, ofc! But women got it easy: they have reproductive autonomy... How does "the rights of all individuals to have a family, and that includes single men" apply to us?

Meanwhile, we, the collective with the lowest average income, poorest average mental health, highest suicide rate and lowest reproductive success, are still left rotting. We could use some cash. I guess we're just entitled :feelsseriously:

Very interesting finding, man :feelsokman:
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,279
Online
124d 8h 49m
soymonkcel said:
Meanwhile, we, the collective with the lowest average income, poorest average mental health, highest suicide rate and lowest reproductive success, are still left rotting. We could use some cash. I guess we're just entitled :feelsseriously:
We have it by far the worst yet people don't even acknowledge it ThoughtfulCel @ThoughtfulCel

BladingEagle said:
But what happens when modernized Africa and other 3rd or 2nd world countries eventually reach the same low birth rates? Already their westernized women have 1 or two children in their 30's instead of 4 by 30. African countries which used to have 8 children per woman now have 3.
Is that really happening? Last I checked countries like Nigeria are still having 8 kids per woman
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
20,053
Online
340d 17h 36m
Gymcelled said:
We have it by far the worst yet people don't even acknowledge it ThoughtfulCel @ThoughtfulCel


Is that really happening? Last I checked countries like Nigeria are still having 8 kids per woman
The only reason what we're going through isn't classified as a disease, nor being fixed is because we are men.

If women were going through the exact same thing we are, the government would give them monthly allowances.

Every single problem that's ignored is probably the result of it only affecting males
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,279
Online
124d 8h 49m
ThoughtfulCel said:
The only reason what we're going through isn't classified as a disease, nor being fixed is because we are men.

If women were going through the exact same thing we are, the government would give them monthly allowances.

Every single problem that's ignored is probably the result of it only affecting males
Same for balding. If it only happened to women you can be sure that it would be taken very seriously

Instead men are just mocked for it or told it's no big deal
 
Deleted member 33893

Deleted member 33893

Self-banned
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Posts
1,602
Online
26d 6h 28m
Gymcelled said:
Is that really happening? Last I checked countries like Nigeria are still having 8 kids per woman
Nigeria is a less developed African country than others but yes it is experiencing a slow but sure change.

"The current birth rate for Nigeria in 2021 is 36.855 births per 1000 people, a 1.11% decline from 2020. The birth rate for Nigeria in 2020 was 37.269 births per 1000 people, a 1.1% decline from 2019. The birth rate for Nigeria in 2019 was 37.684 births per 1000 people, a 1.09% decline from 2018."​


In 2022, the birth rate in Nigeria was estimated to reach 36.4 births per 1,000 people. ... By 2050, the birth rate was estimated to decline further, reaching approximately 27 births every 1,000 individuals. In 2020, Nigeria ranked 20th on the list of countries with the highest birth rate on the African continent​

 
Kaisercel

Kaisercel

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Posts
428
Online
8d 3h 59m
Based 20th century scientists vs soy 21st century "scientists"
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,279
Online
124d 8h 49m
Kaisercel said:
Based 20th century scientists vs soy 21st century "scientists"
The ones from back then would be concerned if you told them how lonely you were despite all your effort

The ones of today would either gaslight you, tell you it's not important or try to get you hooked on jew pills
 
Mentally lost cel

Mentally lost cel

Mythic
★★★
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Posts
4,718
Online
28d 1h 47m
BladingEagle said:
You're wrong. The society is diseased and we are just a symptom of the terrible disease. Already hypergamy, sexual liberation and promotion of breeding based on looks lowered the average IQ and made birth rates below replacement levels. The only way for the west to continue existing is by artificially pumping it's corpse with the new blood of niggers, chinks , spics, arabs and other brown people.

But what happens when modernized Africa and other 3rd or 2nd world countries eventually reach the same low birth rates? Already their westernized women have 1 or two children in their 30's instead of 4 by 30. African countries which used to have 8 children per woman now have 3.
This is the truth, not ops soyspeak
 
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top