Blackpill "In Tight Money Times, Parents Favor Daughters Over Sons"

[PhineasSpear]

https://www.rutgers.edu/news/tight-money-times-parents-favor-daughters-over-sons

When a family finds itself in tough economic times, parents are likely to be more financially generous to a daughter than to a son. And the reason has to do with something parents often tell their adult children – they really want grandchildren.

But why would that translate into girls getting a larger inheritance and other financial benefits than their brothers when times are tough? The reason, Durante explains, is that statistically daughters are more likely to produce grandchildren than sons. Far more men than women go through life without ever procreating, and in tough times the number of men who never find a mate increases, so favoring the daughter becomes a safer bet for the parents that they will get at least one grandchild.\

The extraordinary aspect of this calculation is that parents don’t deliberately make it, Durante says. Rather, subtle cues that resources are becoming scarce lead parents to unwittingly, and instinctually, favor girls – whose procreative powers have been proven over thousands of years of human history.

Time after time during the research – on which Durante collaborated with colleagues at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management, where she formerly taught – study participants showed a tendency to dedicate more assets to daughters than sons during hard economic times. They did that despite saying they love and treat both children equally. Where they perceived the economy as healthier, girls and boys got the same.

“There has not been a great deal of consumer research on how parents decide what to buy for their children,” she says. “Understanding factors that influence parental spending could have a significant impact for marketers in terms of sales planning and forecasting. The research suggests that when the economy is down, people may spend more on products for girls over boys.”

Gentlemen, I present you the "oppressed" gender.

 

[TrueMFincel]

rape all of them, ALL (nice thread tho)

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

This is brutal, but to be expected.

 

[PhineasSpear]

rape all of them, ALL (nice thread tho)

Thanks

This is brutal, but to be expected.

Indeed.

 

[Grodd]

What a fucking joke foids still claim they're oppressed too

This is brutal, but to be expected.

 

[rcnfive]

life on tutorial mode

 

[SmhChan]

These studies should be taken with a grain of salt. While there’s some truth to it, historically, sons have always been preferred over daughters for inheritance. Historically, parents spent money and resources on their sons’ education because an employed man is socially expected to take care of his parents in old age. In contrast, a daughter fucks off after getting married. Not to mention, no age-cuckery, so a son would eventually find a woman to mate with.
These studies are indoctrinations to prolong the female supremacy. They do so with tenuous biological connections. If modern parents really cared about having grandkids, they wouldn’t let their daughters whore around.

Edit: Due to China's one child policy, Chinese parents aborted daughters in favor of sons so they could be taken care of in old age. The 21st is a huge anomaly. Society bends over backwards to accommodate foids in every single possible way. You cannot analyze the human history through the modern lens like this. In the past, foids were often used as glorified wombs, not worshipped because they could give birth.

 

[Sub5failure]

Chinese parents aborted daughters in favor of sons

Came to say this. Chinks are extremely based in this regard