Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

In reality we've opened the door for larpers and trolls to thrive here by romanticizing inceldom

Mulattocel

Mulattocel

Admiral
★★★
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Posts
2,770
I think we are all plagued by this idea of romanticizing or attaching some sort of narcissistic value to our situation. Really i view this as some sort of coping mechanism by our brains to take a type of sick enjoyment from our shitty lives. We have created these false perceptions that our suffering and looks is so much worse than everyone else's that we almost take pride in the fact that we are "a true incel unlike everyone else". In reality the majority of us most likely fall in the same net of sexual unattractiveness. We are short (5'4 to 5'8) but not midgets (under 5'2}. We are "subhuman" but almost none of us are actually deformed we have ugly noses or facial asymmetry but still fall somewhere on the 3 to 5 out of 10 ratings on the looks scale. However, we narcissistically over exaggerate our situation because we get some sort of weird validation in the idea that we are true incels amongst all the fakecels. Its all just a form of narcissism and romanticizing being undesirable.

It makes perfect sense than why so many larp and troll here. Think about how narcissistic and sadistic humans by nature are. We will do anything to be different from the rest and try and make our plights more significant than the rest because in our minds our problems are all that matter. Its become an overblown and overexaggerated ego contest to determine who is the "actual incels" and who are the fakecels. In a way we destroyed our own forum and opened the door to the larpers and trolls we despise so much by over exaggerating our actual unattractiveness in such a way that most now see it as an edgy "fun" contest that is not to be taken that seriously because we are just posting le edgy content. A mix bewteen actual unattractive and detrimental facial and body traits and half assed attempts to over exaggerate non detrimental things like only being 5'11 and not 6' in a never ending contest to prove "true inceldom"

The larpers are here because we continue this cartoonish culture that very insignificant traits like being a hair under 6' can qualify inceldom at the same time nothing under complete facial deformities can qaulify inceldom if you're a little on the taller side so nobody seems to actually know what true inceldom is because we all seem to be over exaggerating, egocentric larpers romanticizing inceldom to the point nobody can take it seriously anymore because larpers takes are impossible to differentiate from actual inceldom discussion.

We killed our own culture :feelscry:
 
I think we are all plagued by this idea of romanticizing or attaching some sort of narcissistic value to our situation. Really i view this as some sort of coping mechanism by our brains to take a type of sick enjoyment from our shitty lives. We have created these false perceptions that our suffering and looks is so much worse than everyone else's that we almost take pride in the fact that we are "a true incel unlike everyone else". In reality the majority of us most likely fall in the same net of sexual unattractiveness. We are short (5'4 to 5'8) but not midgets (under 5'2}. We are "subhuman" but almost none of us are actually deformed we have ugly noses or facial asymmetry but still fall somewhere on the 3 to 5 out of 10 ratings on the looks scale. However, we narcissistically over exaggerate our situation because we get some sort of weird validation in the idea that we are true incels amongst all the fakecels. Its all just a form of narcissism and romanticizing being undesirable.
Big cope, this is chads.is with 6-7/10 tallfags. :horror:
 
But if we aren't that bad looking, then our detractors were right. We've got it no worse than the normies and we simply lack the skills to handle it.
 
Big cope, this is chads.is with 6-7/10 tallfags. :horror:
Yes, you’re right it is but we invited them here with our never ending attempts to minimize some and over exaggerate and romanticize others. We couldn’t make a good enough definition on who should be posting here and rather made it a never-ending contest so now we have illogical camps and fakecels in every corner. There are 6’2 fakecels larping here but there are also very attractive 5’8 fakecels posting here because of the over exaggerated pills
But if we aren't that bad looking, then our detractors were right. We've got it no worse than the normies and we simply lack the skills to handle it.
They can both be true. There are some here that really aren’t that bad looking and shouldn’t be here but there are also many legit Incels here. Over exaggeration and ego have made it possible to know who is who that’s the problem
 
Last edited:
We couldn’t make a good enough definition on who should be posting here
This will never be possible because of the wildly different standards around the world. A 6'0" man will probably slay in parts of the world with malnourished populations but will be nothing special in a developed western country. Similarly, an average looking white man will slay in Asia because of white fever, but will have a relatively harder time in a majority white country. So it's impossible to have standardised parameters for inceldom
 
This tendency of infighting to see who's more trucel will preclude our movement from being more than just small internet forums tbh

On the other hand it's completely understandable and justified for one to hate those who are more (genetically) privileged than him
 
The reason why nobody can agree on what true inceldom is, is because females have a checklist and will disqualify you for x OR y OR z.

It's not about missing all of the desirable traits. It's about missing ANY of them under this ruthless system of gynocentrism we live under.

Females want:
-Good-looking
-Tall
-NT

Bare minimum to even be considered.
 
Last edited:
yeah trolls and larpers find logical reasons to troll bro just make posts pretending to not get trolls bro
 
Why does not one ever consider the possibility that the reason we may be experiencing a major surge in users is because the problem of inceldom is affecting more and more people? In the 1980's approximately 85% of people in high school had gfs, and eventually over 90% would lose their virginities. But now we have over 50% of high schoolers never having a gf and a 33% virginity rate among those under 30. Even for those who are not incel, they are feeling the squeeze of the brutal dating market. Everyone except those at the very top are having less sex. It is not a loss that more people are joining, it is a victory of the ideas we have presented.
:blackpill:
 
The reason why nobody can agree on what true inceldom is, is because females have a checklist and will disqualify you for x OR y OR z.

It's not about missing all of the desirable traits. It's about missing ANY of them under this ruthless system of gynocentrism we live under.

Females want:
-Good-looking
-Tall
-NT

Bare minimum to even be considered.
High IQ post
 
Why does not one ever consider the possibility that the reason we may be experiencing a major surge in users is because the problem of inceldom is affecting more and more people? In the 1980's approximately 85% of people in high school had gfs, and eventually over 90% would lose their virginities. But now we have over 50% of high schoolers never having a gf and a 33% virginity rate among those under 30. Even for those who are not incel, they are feeling the squeeze of the brutal dating market. Everyone except those at the very top are having less sex. It is not a loss that more people are joining, it is a victory of the ideas we have presented.
Good post (except I think the 33% is incel percentage not necessarily virgin).

Incel is such a serious symptom today so why not guys like me here? Tbh it's very natural.
 
Why does not one ever consider the possibility that the reason we may be experiencing a major surge in users is because the problem of inceldom is affecting more and more people? In the 1980's approximately 85% of people in high school had gfs, and eventually over 90% would lose their virginities. But now we have over 50% of high schoolers never having a gf and a 33% virginity rate among those under 30. Even for those who are not incel, they are feeling the squeeze of the brutal dating market. Everyone except those at the very top are having less sex. It is not a loss that more people are joining, it is a victory of the ideas we have presented.
 
Speak for yourself, I haven't romanticized shit.
 
Very good observation, OP
 
This is immediately obvious considering no one here accepts valid improvement advice just because some stupid carpets also give them with platitudes like "God Lives Here" or "Drink Water" or, in this case, "Looks Aren't Everything".
Fellow humans, civilization won't change because a bunch of existentialist brats fold their arms and sulk in Neverland. Nothing Ever Happens by Rache Platten is a song that describes really what most of people here need:
 

Similar threads

Fancy Alcoholic
Replies
25
Views
700
The Enforcer
The Enforcer
Efiliste
Replies
23
Views
668
Efiliste
Efiliste
Norville Wood
Replies
15
Views
703
Julaybib
Julaybib
SlayerSlayer
Replies
16
Views
642
Rassisten
Rassisten
NeverEvenBegan
Replies
30
Views
953
NeverEvenBegan
NeverEvenBegan

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top