Serious In modern western society, a distinction should be made between the rape of chaste women and promiscuous sluts.

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

A chaste woman is either a virgin, a married woman who's only partner in her life has been her husband or a remarried widow. In each of these instances, no fornication took place.

I define the promiscuous slut as a woman who's had sexual relations with more than partner in her life safe for remarried widows as mentioned above.
I'm lenient on premarital sex only if it's done with her one and only lifepartner.

Moving on the topic of rape; a distinction should be made on the severity of punishment depending on whether the victim falls in one of either categories.

The chaste woman can be considered to have been truly traumatized in case of rape, because she has been sullied and bereft of her dignity she was taught to uphold.

The promiscuous slut has no dignity or principles to speak of in the first place. It can barely be considered human because it immediately acts on lust like a wild beast without considering the consequences. Such a creature ought best to pursue a career of prostitution, considering it has no value as a mother or wife. It's not much different from a sexual object. The most it loses when being raped is a couple of minutes. What is one dick more after having been penetrated by various others?

A rapist who's raped a woman in the first category must receive a heavy punishment. Chaste women should be protected from being dirtied at all costs for they are the (future) wifes of moral men. So the death penalty is fitting.

A rapist who's raped a woman in the second category must pay a fine to the raped slut. A slut is not much different from a prostitute -except that she gives her cunt out for free to various men which could be considered as even worse than prostitution- so why not at least pay her to keep things fair and treat her for the whore she is?​

 

[Deleted member 11015]

controversial, but a small fine to said whore as you suggested is a fair punishment.

 

[StormlitAqua]

I can go with this. Like you, I'll even be lenient on the premarital sex for a single partner, assuming they will get married. It shouldn't be this way, but you have to make compromises I guess.

I'd venture to say that if we adopted the societal model regarding women's chastity that you describe in this post, there would be at least 50% less incels in the worst. I guarantee I would not be. The whole reason the number of incels has skyrocketed in the past 10 or 15 years is due to the exponential climb of hypergamy, which limits the number of men that will be selected for sex, without limiting the women.

If we instead only punished people for raping the chaste and virgins, it could solve the problem for nonreligiouscels and religiouscels alike. The religious ones get their chaste foids, and the nonreligious ones can force themselves upon the nonchaste, which under your model, is not rape.

 

[The End]

Even though I hate women, and want to agree with this, I am strongly against biasing the law against certain groups. Us ugly motherfuckers get enough shit as it is - imagine if we had no legal rights as well.


Oh. Well... yeah, this is why it's bad for different people to have different rights.

I do think rape should be more categorized by law; since we have crazy feminists saying they feel raped if someone looks at them too long. And girls who consented to have sex while drunk, but when they sober up think they were raped.

Those really have little to do with something like a group of guys dragging a bitch to the middle of the forest and taking turn gang-raping her. Hmm... Does anyone live close to a dense forest? ;-)

Ah forget it! As long as it makes women suffer, I have to vote yay!

 

[VisVoi]

You realise that this would lead to "virgin" females whoring around then claiming that she was raped in order to avoid social ostracization or legal punishment.

Happened to blacks in America in the early 1900s, white women would have consensual sex with blacks and then claim they were raped once they got caught.

White women love black men, you are coping if you think that any sex between the two is rape.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

You realise that this would lead to "virgin" females whoring around then claiming that she was raped in order to avoid social ostracization or legal punishment.

Happened to blacks in America in the early 1900s, white women would have consensual sex with blacks and then claim they were raped once they got caught.

White women love black men, you are coping if you think that any sex between the two is rape.

Any woman caught doing this should be heavily flogged and then crucified. That should act as a deterrent.

 

[VisVoi]

Any woman caught doing this should be heavily flogged and then crucified. That should act as a deterrent.

That would be good if it were actually possible. It's often difficult to differentiate between consensual sex and rape with actual evidence. Females would likely just end up giving themselves bruises (which is already common in DV cases) and call rape.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

That would be good if it were actually possible. It's often difficult to differentiate between consensual sex and rape with actual evidence. Females would likely just end up giving themselves bruises (which is already common in DV cases) and call rape.

What do you want? Making rape fully legal?

Foids are known to follow rules very strictly if there's a real risk of being put at real danger when neglected. In Western cucked society, women know they can easily get away with almost anything.

 

[DeepSea]

If all women remained virgins until marriage, there would be far fewer incels. Women ruin themselves by riding the cock carousel and also make themselves worthless and unavailable to those men who could otherwise have married them. Sluts deserve to be stigmatized as fallen women and excluded from the legal protections accorded to citizens. The concept of Infamia that existed in the Roman legal system should be brought back and adapted to modern times. In ancient Rome, actresses and whores were stripped of their legal rights because they led immoral lifestyles. Because the state refused to protect them, they had to constantly be on their guard and pay for bodyguards if they wanted to reduce the risk of being raped or murdered. For hundreds of years, the Infamia system deterred women from becoming promiscuous.

You realise that this would lead to "virgin" females whoring around then claiming that she was raped in order to avoid social ostracization or legal punishment.

No one should believe a woman who claims to have been raped if she can't provide any objective evidence. It's better to leave one guilty rapist unpunished than destroy the life of an innocent man. If there are no other witnesses, the woman should be disbelieved. Parents need to teach their daughters to avoid putting themselves into compromising situations and refrain from provoking men by dressing or behaving inappropriately.

 

[VisVoi]

What do you want? Making rape fully legal?

Foids are known to follow rules very strictly if there's a real risk of being put at real danger when neglected. In Western cucked society, women know they can easily get away with almost anything.

Happens all the time in modern day Turkey. Females falsely accuse a man of rape because they don't want to be seen as sluts, then a group of her male family members go and kick the shit out of the "rapits" (usually to death).

 

[Mickeyonacid]

Good proposition, a shame it will never be adopted

 

[Weston404]

Under Canadian law, if a woman is naked in public and she even has sex with a minor; if she complains that she doesn't consent, the minor can be charged for sexual assault and likely have his face plastered all over the media owned by the (((Bronfman))) families, though it's illegal for authorities and the media to publish information on a youth offender who is under 18.

 

[Evil Genius]

Good post

If a girl dressed like a whore and flaunts herself in public then males should be allowed to use her as a public commodity

 

[backyardslayer]

You realise that this would lead to "virgin" females whoring around then claiming that she was raped in order to avoid social ostracization or legal punishment.

Happened to blacks in America in the early 1900s, white women would have consensual sex with blacks and then claim they were raped once they got caught.

White women love black men, you are coping if you think that any sex between the two is rape.

Shitskin cope. Even today niggers are still raping about 25,000 White women per year.

 

[VisVoi]

Shitskin cope. Even today niggers are still raping about 25,000 White women per year.

It's not rape, white women crave BBC. They only claim that it's rape so that white betabux will still provide for them.

 

[backyardslayer]

It's not rape, white women crave BBC. They only claim that it's rape so that white betabux will still provide for them.

Obvious cucktear troll.

 

[VisVoi]

Obvious cucktear troll.

>May
>317 messages
Lmao piss off you runt.

 

[backyardslayer]

>May
>317 messages
Lmao piss off you runt.

>Nigger copper
>Posts 0 roof

JFL fucking subhuman shitskin.

 

[Fluorine's_Sin_20]

A chaste woman is either a virgin, a married woman who's only partner in her life has been her husband or a remarried widow. In each of these instances, no fornication took place.​

​

I define the promiscuous slut as a woman who's had sexual relations with more than partner in her life safe for remarried widows as mentioned above.​

I'm lenient on premarital sex only if it's done with her one and only lifepartner.​

​

Moving on the topic of rape; a distinction should be made on the severity of punishment depending on whether the victim falls in one of either categories.​

​

The chaste woman can be considered to have been truly traumatized in case of rape, because she has been sullied and bereft of her dignity she was taught to uphold.​

​

The promiscuous slut has no dignity or principles to speak of in the first place. It can barely be considered human because it immediately acts on lust like a wild beast without considering the consequences. Such a creature ought best to pursue a career of prostitution, considering it has no value as a mother or wife. It's not much different from a sexual object. The most it loses when being raped is a couple of minutes. What is one dick more after having been penetrated by various others?​

​

A rapist who's raped a woman in the first category must receive a heavy punishment. Chaste women should be protected from being dirtied at all costs for they are the (future) wifes of moral men. So the death penalty is fitting.​

​

A rapist who's raped a woman in the second category must pay a fine to the raped slut. A slut is not much different from a prostitute -except that she gives her cunt out for free to various men which could be considered as even worse than prostitution- so why not at least pay her to keep things fair and treat her for the whore she is?​

how did you acquire ALL that information?
however all this female garbage reminds me of a story i heard, it is an old classic:
the white snake
the same story have been told MANY times; snow white is an VERY good example where the prooblem originate.
it is because woman grows envious of men and their freedom, their HUNGER for power is infinite, they suffer from a mental disease called: gluttony!
and they are FREAKIN Self-Righteous.
PS
WOMEN Are beautiful and i crave them, BUT no one Likes a strong and "Dominant" man, which can hold them on a leash.
- a woman should be a housewife! (NOT a buisness woman nor a slut)

 

[A10n3]

If all women remained virgins until marriage, there would be far fewer incels. Women ruin themselves by riding the cock carousel and also make themselves worthless and unavailable to those men who could otherwise have married them. Sluts deserve to be stigmatized as fallen women and excluded from the legal protections accorded to citizens. The concept of Infamia that existed in the Roman legal system should be brought back and adapted to modern times. In ancient Rome, actresses and whores were stripped of their legal rights because they led immoral lifestyles. Because the state refused to protect them, they had to constantly be on their guard and pay for bodyguards if they wanted to reduce the risk of being raped or murdered. For hundreds of years, the Infamia system deterred women from becoming promiscuous.




No one should believe a woman who claims to have been raped if she can't provide any objective evidence. It's better to leave one guilty rapist unpunished than destroy the life of an innocent man. If there are no other witnesses, the woman should be disbelieved. Parents need to teach their daughters to avoid putting themselves into compromising situations and refrain from provoking men by dressing or behaving inappropriately.

High IQ post and very interesting.
Were there any punishment in ancient Roma for men as well or was it only directed towards unfaithful foids?

 

[Akira]

Yaaa. Except testimony or evidence regarding a foids prior sexual experiences or slutty nature is 100% not admissible in a rape trial.

It used to be, but isn’t allowed anymore. I seriously doubt the legal system goes back to that. But nice try.

 

[VisVoi]

>Nigger copper
>Posts 0 roof

JFL fucking subhuman shitskin.

I get it, you're a rage-filled white boy who can't handle the fact that all of your white females crave BBC.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

Yaaa. Except testimony or evidence regarding a foids prior sexual experiences or slutty nature is 100% not admissible in a rape trial.

It used to be, but isn’t allowed anymore. I seriously doubt the legal system goes back to that. But nice try.

God, I hate self-rightous low IQ newfags so much. Kill yourself, faggot.

 

[Akira]

God, I hate self-rightous low IQ newfags so much. Kill yourself, faggot.

Not self righteous.
Not low IQ.
Not a faggot.
And never.


Have a nice day.

 

[backyardslayer]

the fact that all of your white females crave BBC.

Strong proof low IQ shitskin.

 

[DeepSea]

Were there any punishment in ancient Roma for men as well or was it only directed towards unfaithful foids?

Men who led ostensibly immoral lives such as pimps and entertainers were also stripped of their legal rights. But, interestingly, the Romans did not stigmatize the clients of prostitutes. They seem to have understood that female promiscuity is uniquely damaging to the social fabric.

 

[yeetbender.koala]

What do you want? Making rape fully legal?

Foids are known to follow rules very strictly if there's a real risk of being put at real danger when neglected. In Western cucked society, women know they can easily get away with almost anything.

theres no choice, foids will exploit anything to butcher and kill you