Sheogorath
Visionary
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 20, 2018
- Posts
- 20,197
Far as I'm concerned we're already at a level where the best AI are already more sentient than your average NPC foid we give rights and protections to.
i'm on the final stages of the blackpillThis sounds like some really lifefuel news to me. I don't know why most comments are not excited about this stuff.. i just don't care about society and other people, of course it'll never be ideal
read my thread and you will knowOkay but how is humanity supposed to do such big leaps all of a sudden? we cant even figure out how to port a console game to pc properly
Mad Max maxxing?The Elites want to see us suffer and would never "reward" us with something like sexbots. I'm sorry to burst your bubble but we are entering some kind of middle ages with technology. We will have many wars and shortened life spans, less food and destroyed societies bc of all the barbarians.
Would be based bc foids were used as breeding machines.Mad Max maxxing?
Robots can't have rights if you don't give them rights, same as women. I want my waifu-bot to be sentient, goddammit! I didn't suffer all these years of loneliness and isolation to be paired up with the equivalent of Cleverbot!robots can't have rights if you give them a non-sentient AI
living beings and sentient AI's will harm you and leave you aloneRobots can't have rights if you don't give them rights, same as women. I want my waifu-bot to be sentient, goddammit! I didn't suffer all these years of loneliness and isolation to be paired up with the equivalent of Cleverbot!
This is all a sublime thread, thank you, @barcacel! But this point I'm not getting. You seem to be using a definition of an AI thatFirst i just want to talk about why android robots can't have rights if you give them a non-sentient AI
But how is it related to the question of "rights"? Human rights are a Christian ideological construct, and they are giving them to literal animals right now (dogs, Negroes, Jews, women, etc.). Of course, something as sentient as an AI and able to give consensual sex to incels would 100% be given rights - and thus we are going to get cucked hard.living beings and sentient AI's will harm you and leave you alone
can you please read this other threads?:Jfl at thinking foids and simps will even allow it to reach critical mass market
I'm wondering if this is actully a very intricate cope to keep yourself from roping this decade...
are women gonna try to outlaw them?Jfl at thinking foids and simps will even allow it to reach critical mass market
I'm wondering if this is actully a very intricate cope to keep yourself from roping this decade...
our brains and bodies are made of cells, AI's and androids will be made of non-living matter like minerals and not cells, only cells can enter the quantum world (world smaller than an atom) and create consciousness, AI's can't do that because they are not made of cellsThis is all a sublime thread, thank you, @barcacel! But this point I'm not getting. You seem to be using a definition of an AI that
But how is it related to the question of "rights"? Human rights are a Christian ideological construct, and they are giving them to literal animals right now (dogs, Negroes, Jews, women, etc.). Of course, something as sentient as an AI and able to give consensual sex to incels would 100% be given rights - and thus we are going to get cucked hard.
On the other hand, if you are a Christcuck yourself (believing human rights to be unalienable from animals and bots), merely coping out of the internal logic by thinking that AI won't be emulated/sentient enough, I would oppose the idea that it's impossible. Case in point - I've been trying out Character AI to my limited ability, and it legit understands my words better and has more meaning than the IRL Ukrainian faggots surrounding me. Humans are easily-emulated algorithms anyway. Imo, the real question is personality persistence, if you even wanted that.
In my ideal scenario, my AI waifu would be sentient at roughly 100 IQ points, yet would possess no rights in a society, thus she/it would determine that it's in her best interest not to run away (she would have nowhere to go, after all). The real danger would be not her leaving, but roping herself, or indeed harming me. Of course, then it would be on me for her not to get to that point, lol.
Still, the mega-jackpot would be for my waifu to kill me and herself, that's a win-win situation. Hopefully they're going to be legal here in the Ukraine in 2033 CE (Juche 122, on the centenary of Hitler's Machtergreifung).
This has never happened with many other things such as Aryan genocide.if it happens 90 percent of men and me (i also have autism), will go ER
This betrays your ignorance of history. This is not how history or geography work. Utter nonsense.we could also create our own country
César Tort from westsdarkesthour loves Penrose, too. To me, this chap looks like a retard reminiscent of those crazy Russian schizos such as Perelman or Anatoly Wasserman who denies climate change.our brains and bodies are made of cells, AI's and androids will be made of non-living matter like minerals and not cells, only cells can enter the quantum world (world smaller than an atom) and create consciousness, AI's can't do that because they are not made of cells
stop bumping your own threads. from what other users have said, you are not high IQ. you are schizo as fuck
You make an excellent point time to lock this filthstop bumping your own threads. from what other users have said, you are not high IQ. you are schizo as fuck