Theory Implicit vs explicit privilege

[WastedPotential]

I had this showerthought earlier.


Introduction
Nowadays liberals and leftists will try to give women as many rights to make them as 'equal' to men as possible.
What they don't understand is that this is an undertaking of false equivalence, because Men and women have different roles in a society. (Both through nature AND nurture).


Hypergamy
Let me explain; A woman nowadays gets way less shit for cheating/monkey branching than she would back in the day. Why? because feminists and liberals have been pushing for getting rid of slut-shaming and the idea that 'oh well if men aren't as criticized for cheating, then women should be shamed for it as little as men are'.
And I agree, men have indeed even throughout history gotten less shit than women for cheating on their partner. Nowadays it's about the same ofcourse but I digress.

The thing is, women getting more shit for cheating is not a problem, it's a feature. The reason loyalty is more of a quality in a woman than in a man, is because the average woman throughout time and culture simply has more options than the average man. Everybody implicitly knows this. Feminists and liberals however will pretend a mate value doesn't exist however.


Implicit vs Explicit Privilege
So what you see nowadays with women not being shamed as much for cheating is the monkey-branching behaviour we all know and hate. Women do it, because they can.
They always could, it's just that there are way less consequences nowadays for it. Female hypergamous behaviour is what I like to call an implicit privilege.

So what is an explicit privilege? I like to think of it as something that you can more easily put into law. Say the right to vote or own property. For a while women (Although most lower-class men too until around the same time women could too) did not have those rights. In return however they had implicit privileges such as a virtual safety net. They had no obligation to find a job and work for a wage. All they had to was find a working man and even then she had the option if she wanted to be a good housewife or not, by doing her fair share of the work in a relationship by choosing whether to do the housework and provide the man with sex. (Again implicit privileges, because the government isn't going to demand the woman to do these things).


Chadfishing Story
The most triggering part ofcourse is that foids and normies refuse to acknowledge any of this. The other day I was chadfishing, chatting up a foid, it was going alright, but throughout the interaction she kept asking me if I was fake etc.
And it's so infuriating to think that just because of my looks she's chad only basically.

But then again, just confirms chad only ofcourse because she never was interested in my pErsOnality in the first place. Anyway i'm going off track. My point is that at the end when I revealed to her, and this ALWAYS Happens with foids that I chadfish and it makes me fucking furious. Is that they have the audacity to feel like it's unfair that they can't get chad. I told her 'you'll find chad eventually if you swipe enough' and she ignored it, but then she's like 'why do you feel self-pity' Like bitch I just told u, you can swipe 50 times and u'll find chad guaranteed (she was a solid 7.5/10 btw). meanwhile i'm over here perma 0 matches with a swipe bot activated 24/7 . And I'm supposed to feel bad for you? I'm not allowed to feel sad about MY situation? FUCKING NECK IT FOID. 0 Empathy. 0 acknowledgement. I really need to stop chadfishing, most triggering shit ever. I swear

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

High IQ.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Good post — I will also add that the problem with feminists and liberals is that their conception of egalitarianism is childish and one-dimensional; they lack the comprehension necessary to acknowledge the reality that equality isn't necessarily symmetrical in all facets; rather, it is about each sex fulfilling the duties to which they have been assigned—primarily by nature, but also by society. They also focus only on areas in which men hold some privilege (men who are often among the top percentage of the populace), and they attempt to paint women as oppressed through that fallacious focus, and that leads to further gynocentrism and policies which privilege women more—on top of the inherent privileges they already possess.

How can one label their agenda as a fight for egalitarianism when it serves the sole purpose of benefiting women, and disadvantaging men? The truth is, a more patriarchal society is unironically more egalitarian, because it attempts to even the playing field between men and women.

 

[WastedPotential]

Good post — I will also add that the problem with feminists and liberals is that their conception of egalitarianism is childish and one-dimensional; they lack the comprehension necessary to acknowledge the reality that equality isn't necessarily symmetrical in all facets; rather, it is about each sex fulfilling the duties to which they have been assigned—primarily by nature, but also by society. They also focus only on areas in which men hold some privilege (men who are often among the top percentage of the populace), and they attempt to paint women as oppressed through that fallacious focus, and that leads to further gynocentrism and policies which privilege women more—on top of the inherent privileges they already possess.

How can one label their agenda as a fight for egalitarianism when it serves the sole purpose of benefiting women, and disadvantaging men? The truth is, a more patriarchal society is unironically more egalitarian, because it attempts to even the playing field between men and women.

Very true, libs and feminazis refuse to accept the asymmetry of men and women, it was never about egalitarianism as you said. It was all about total domination of the average man, putting men down to comparatively bring women up.

Propaganda has never been more powerful which is especially depressing, because that means soyciety will probably have this nightmare status quo for a long time.

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

Feminism was never about achieving equality from the onset. It's an undeniable fact that first wave feminists started off as proponents of eugenics against subhumans like us. They didn't even want certain groups of people to vote. These same people will say men are all violent rapists despite the fact feminism literally started off advocating for large scale culling and sterilization of large segments of society. It's pure projection because foids are the ones that want to exterminate or control sub 8 males. If the paradox of intolerance was applied to feminists they would be treated no differently than radical Islamists and Nazis.

 

[ThePornographer]

But then again, just confirms chad only ofcourse because she never was interested in my pErsOnality in the first place.

I had the same experience with chadfishing, they really do not care about your personnality, if you reveal your true face they act like you are the bad guy here, while women are actually fake all the time with makeup and filter ( and never do that, once she understand you are not the chad she is getting wet for, just leave, it's over i was stupid enough to do it many time but know i realize i could have been doxxed with a thread on X or whatever social media )

 

[WastedPotential]

I had the same experience with chadfishing, they really do not care about your personnality, if you reveal your true face they act like you are the bad guy here, while women are actually fake all the time with makeup and filter ( and never do that, once she understand you are not the chad she is getting wet for, just leave, it's over i was stupid enough to do it many time but know i realize i could have been doxxed with a thread on X or whatever social media )

Yup, nowadays foids are more suspicious too, it's rare u can make a foid driver hours to meet chad. Was funny when they did though

 

[WastedPotential]

Feminism was never about achieving equality from the onset. It's an undeniable fact that first wave feminists started off as proponents of eugenics against subhumans like us. They didn't even want certain groups of people to vote. These same people will say men are all violent rapists despite the fact feminism literally started off advocating for large scale culling and sterilization of large segments of society. It's pure projection because foids are the ones that want to exterminate or control sub 8 males. If the paradox of intolerance was applied to feminists they would be treated no differently than radical Islamists and Nazis.

Yes and as long w*men makeup 50% of the population (which biologically it basically always will) only a small minority of cucks/whiteknights who will support feminism is need and they will bring us further to a degenerate gynocentric society.

This is why whiteknights are the worst fucking traitors in the universe

 

[WastedPotential]

Good post — I will also add that the problem with feminists and liberals is that their conception of egalitarianism is childish and one-dimensional; they lack the comprehension necessary to acknowledge the reality that equality isn't necessarily symmetrical in all facets; rather, it is about each sex fulfilling the duties to which they have been assigned—primarily by nature, but also by society. They also focus only on areas in which men hold some privilege (men who are often among the top percentage of the populace), and they attempt to paint women as oppressed through that fallacious focus, and that leads to further gynocentrism and policies which privilege women more—on top of the inherent privileges they already possess.

How can one label their agenda as a fight for egalitarianism when it serves the sole purpose of benefiting women, and disadvantaging men? The truth is, a more patriarchal society is unironically more egalitarian, because it attempts to even the playing field between men and women.

BUt the trend for the next 100 years at least is that women can never be wrong and men are always at fault. it's fucking over

 

[femcelbreedingnig]

Chadfishes will bring you to dark places you never thought were possible as a man

High IQ.

They also focus only on areas in which men hold some privilege (men who are often among the top percentage of the populace), and they attempt to paint women as oppressed through that fallacious focus, and that leads to further gynocentrism

Imagine if we highlighted only one outward privileged aspect of a marginalized community, and then act like because of it, we can justify “punching up” and bringing them further down, so we can be more “”””equal”””” to them.

Very true, libs and feminazis refuse to accept the asymmetry of men and women, it was never about egalitarianism as you said. It was all about total domination of the average man, putting men down to comparatively bring women up.

Propaganda has never been more powerful which is especially depressing, because that means soyciety will probably have this nightmare status quo for a long time.

they also only focus on it from a Christian white male perspective, and regularly engage on historical revisionism on top of that. “Women didn’t get to vote most of human history, men did!” No, most PEOPLE didn’t get a say. Most people toiling at the jobs foids didn’t want to work at and selfless sacrificing themselves for their communities, families, partners were the superior gender.