Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel Imam describes the sufferings of Chads and Stacies in the eternal flames of HELL (very powerful)

Fontaine

Fontaine

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Posts
5,417


Skip to 28:50 if you're busy
 
Last edited:
is something similar mentioned in the bible?
 
Good to know they will pay.
 
JFL @ religion cope.
 
is something similar mentioned in the bible?
The Bible mentions a Hell several times for unrepentant sinners. It's usually described as a lake of fire, where there is much "weeping and gnashing of the teeth", and out of which there is no escape.
JFL @ religion cope.
You're arrogant. You have no way of knowing if a God exists or not. It's all about probabilities, not certainties.
 
religion is cope
You have no way of knowing. Billions of people disagree. Thousands of kings, emperors, philosophers and scientists disagree.
 
Anti cope applied to all claims of cope.

Chad and stacy will pay
 
I don't want to be cast into the fires, Dadtaine : (
 
Can you give us a summary of the speech? I'm not listening 50 minutes to the imam rn.
 
Muslims are anti human. They trash everywhere they go, and destroy the lands. Death to them, and all their children. These inbred preachers need swift justice.
 
If only it were true.
 
The video made me laugh, Islam rivals Tolkien in its rendition of an epic fictitious fantasy battle between the cosmic forces of good and evil.

There is clearly no moral objective weaved into the structure of our universe. Nature is quite transparently and unapologetically amoral, and we (humans) fit right into it just perfectly.
 
Did you just put me on the NSA watch list by clicking on that?
 
LOL anyone who don't prophet that Muhamad is the prophet of god and Jesus isn't the son of god will be punished like that according to Islam.

So it's over for atheists and christians and people from every other religion according to the Coran, chad or not.

(I'm not a muslim )
You have no way of knowing. Billions of people disagree. Thousands of kings, emperors, philosophers and scientists disagree.

The bluepill may be true then, following the same logic.

Also those people believe in gods with mutually exclusive requirements and possessive envious gods condemning believers in alternative gods to hell (or even beliefs. For instance "Jesus is the son of god" = being an atheist in Islam , there is a specific verse condemning those who believe in the trinity to hell )

Proof :

  • Those who say, "God is the Messiah, son of Mary," have defied God. The Messiah himself said; "Children of Israel, worship God, my Lord and your Lord." If anyone associates others with God, God will forbid him from the Garden, and Hell will be his home. No one will help such evildoers. Those people who say that God is the third of three are defying [the truth]: there is only One God. If they persist in what they are saying, a painful punishment will afflict those of them who persist. Why do they not turn to God and ask his forgiveness, when God is most forgiving, most merciful? The Messiah, son of Mary, was only a messenger; other messengers had come and gone before him; his mother was a virtuous woman; both ate food. See how clear We make these signs for them; see how deluded they are.
    — Qur'an, sura 5 (Al-Ma'ida), ayat 72-75[4]
  • “Surely, disbelievers are those who said: ‘Allah is the third of the three (in a Trinity).’ But there is no llaah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilaah (God -Allah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall on the disbelievers among them”

    [al-Maa’idah 5:73].
  • And when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah ?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen.
    — Qur'an, sura 5 (Al-Ma'ida), ayat 116[5]
Furthermore, verses 19:88-93, 23:91, and 112:1-4 are relevant to the doctrine of "Trinity":

  • They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous! At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin, that they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious. For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son. Not one of the beings in the heavens and the earth but must come to (Allah) Most Gracious as a servant.
    — Qur'an, sura 19 (Maryam (sura)), ayat 88-93[6]


So you can't use the retarded "olol it's still the abrahamic god" according to the Coran.
 
Last edited:
if religion is true incels are going to hell as well
 
He didn’t say “Chad” or “Stacy” so it doesn’t count. Clickbait thread.
 
Muslims are such copers lmao
 
You're copin nigga. Although I'd like to know the rationale behind why a prophet would name fornication a sin. Is it because it could lead to pregnancy and birth of an unwanted child in ancient times?
 
You're copin nigga. Although I'd like to know the rationale behind why a prophet would name fornication a sin. Is it because it could lead to pregnancy and birth of an unwanted child in ancient times?
Most likely several reasons. The reason you have cited, but also increased social tension and jealousy between men and women, are likely.
 
He is coping hard
 
He speaks with the experience of a millenia. Islam already went through a major decline and never fully recovered.

http://www.isegoria.net/2014/07/the-arab-decline/

In the first half of the ninth century, Baghdad enjoyed its High Noon as the greatest and the richest city in the world. In 861, however, the reigning Khalif (caliph), Mutawakkil, was murdered by his Turkish mercenaries, who set up a military dictatorship, which lasted for some thirty years. During this period the empire fell apart, the various dominions and provinces each assuming virtual independence and seeking its own interests. Baghdad, lately the capital of a vast empire, found its authority limited to Iraq alone.

The works of the contemporary historians of Baghdad in the early tenth century are still available. They deeply deplored the degeneracy of the times in which they lived, emphasising particularly the indifference to religion, the increasing materialism and the laxity of sexual morals. They lamented also the corruption of the officials of the government and the fact that politicians always seemed to amass large fortunes while they were in office.

The historians commented bitterly on the extraordinary influence acquired by popular singers over young people, resulting in a decline in sexual morality. The ‘pop’ singers of Baghdad accompanied their erotic songs on the lute, an instrument resembling the modern guitar. In the second half of the tenth century, as a result, much obscene sexual language came increasingly into use, such as would not have been tolerated in an earlier age. Several khalifs issued orders banning ‘pop’ singers from the capital, but within a few years they always returned.

An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded.

Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed.


If there is any solace to be had, it is knowing that in the end, the natural order of our present era will be restored although many with incel genetics will likely be culled in the process.
 
If you believe it, it becomes true

I just can't take religion seriously no matter how hard I try. There's always a part of me that knows it's bullshit on a subconscience level.

Only way I would indulge any religion is as a ascension strategy. Religionmaxxing to find me a pious foid but besides that there is no point.
 
its time to muslimaxxx
 
I just can't take religion seriously no matter how hard I try. There's always a part of me that knows it's bullshit on a subconscience level.
You're not the only one. Imagine for a moment that perhaps God doesn't take religion seriously either.
 
It would be nice if this was true. Sadly foids and chads will meet absolutely no fate different to our own: non-existence. They will become worm food like us, no better, no worse.

Chaos reigns.
 
You're not the only one. Imagine for a moment that perhaps God doesn't take religion seriously either.

Yeah cause he doesn't exist that's why.
 
Yeah cause he doesn't exist that's why.
That is a bluepill reaction you've been indoctrinated with by the same social planners that have foisted feminism and the sexual revolution upon us all. The God of the Christian Bible may be dead in most of the West, but The All of existence is still here as it always has been.
 
That is a bluepill reaction you've been indoctrinated with by the same social planners that have foisted feminism and the sexual revolution upon us all. The God of the Christian Bible may be dead in most of the West, but The All of existence is still here as it always has been.

How can you know with such certainty? I'm not entirely against religion either. I would prefer a theocracy to keep females in check and if men actually got a fair shot but I still would know its mostly nonsense.
 
How can you know with such certainty? I'm not entirely against religion either. I would prefer a theocracy to keep females in check and if men actually got a fair shot but I still would know its mostly nonsense.

What is life? How do you define it? Some scientists, at least those not bounded by the dogma of orthodoxy, classify life in the abstract as physical processes wherein information gains causal efficacy over the substrate it is instantiated in. For example, see Terrence Deacon's book Incomplete Nature, or the paper The Algorithmic Origins of Life from NASA researchers. Information is immaterial, the same informational content can be represented in a multitude of physical substrates. In what ways is an algorithmic process different from the notions of a soul?

But what is a physical substrate? Matter? Atoms? Atoms don't really exist in the way most people think of them. Quantum mechanics shows us that. Everything is amplitude flows of energy across a configuration space. We're embedded within an alien world we can barely comprehend. At the extreme, the entire universe can be described by a single quantum wave function. In this sense, everything is information. Information is the neutral monism that underlies everything. The "soul" of the Universe, if you will. See the Mathematical or computational Universe hypotheses.

Yudkowsky (not that I care much about his circle anymore), had this to say:

The Shaper of Life is not itself a creature. Evolution is bodiless, like the Judeo-Christian deity. Omnipresent in Nature, immanent in the fall of every leaf. Vast as a star system. Billions of years old. Itself unmade, arising naturally from the structure of physics. Doesn't that all sound like something that might have been said about God?

And yet the Maker has no mind, as well as no body. In some ways, its handiwork is incredibly poor design by human standards. It is internally divided. Most of all, it isn't nice.

In a way, Darwin discovered God—a God that failed to match the preconceptions of theology, and so passed unheralded. If Darwin had discovered that life was created by an intelligent agent—a bodiless mind that loves us, and will smite us with lightning if we dare say otherwise—people would have said "My gosh! That's God!"


What Yudkowsky failed to realize, or perhaps simply admit, is that God--the Universe--does have a mind. In fact, it has many minds. You, I and everyone else here. After all, we are a part of this world and inseparable from it, are we not? And so back to your question, how can I know with certainty? The Universe is here, isn't it? We're a part of the Universe. We're alive. Therefore the Universe is alive. What is the difference between the Universe and God? There isn't any.

This is what Buddhists and other Eastern religions, to a degree, understand. It's not a matter of belief or faith. Once you reach satori, everything is lucid.
 
Negative IQ cope
 
You know our consciousness and understanding is just a form of negative entropy?

1. ZEO modifies dramatically the formulation of NMP since U-matrix acts between zero energy states and can be regarded as a collection of orthonormal M-matrices, which generalize the ordinary S-matrix and define what might be called a complex square root of density matrix so that kind of a square root of thermodynamics at single particle level justifying also p-adic mass calculations based on p-adic thermodynamics is in question. 2. The hierarchy of Planck constants labelling a hierarchy of quantum criticalities is a further new element having important implications for conciousness and biology. 3. Hyper-finite factors of type II1 represent an additional technical complication requiring separate treatment of NMP taking into account finite measurement resolution realized in terms of inclusions of these factors. NMP has wide range of important implications. 1. In particular, one must give up the standard view about second law and replace it with NMP taking into account the hierarchy of CDs assigned with ZEO and dark matter hierarchy labelled by the values of Planck constants, as well as the effects due to NE. The breaking of second law in standard sense is expected to take place and be crucial for the understanding of evolution. 2. Self hierarchy having the hierarchy of CDs as imbedding space correlate leads naturally to a description of the contents of consciousness analogous to thermodynamics except that the entropy is replaced with negentropy. 1. Introduction 5 3. In the case of living matter NMP allows to understand the origin of metabolism. NMP demands that self generates somehow negentropy: otherwise a state function reduction to tjhe opposite boundary of CD takes place and means death and re-incarnation of self. Metabolism as gathering of nutrients, which by definition carry NE is the manner to avoid this fate. This leads to a vision about the role of NE in the generation of sensory qualia and a connection with metabolism. Metabolites would carry NE and each metabolite would correspond to a particular qualia (not only energy but also other quantum numbers would correspond to metabolites). That primary qualia would be associated with nutrient flow is not actually surprising! 4. NE leads to a vision about cognition. Negentropically entangled state consisting of a superposition of pairs can be interpreted as a conscious abstraction or rule: negentropically entangled Schr¨odinger cat knows that it is better to keep the bottle closed. 5. NMP implies continual generation of NE. One might refer to this ever expanding universal library as “Akaschic records”. NE could be experienced directly during the repeated state function reductions to the passive boundary of CD - that is during the life cycle of sub-self defining the mental image. Another, less feasible option is that interaction free measurement is required to assign to NE conscious experience. As mentioned, qualia characterizing the metabolite carrying the NE could characterize this conscious experience. 6. A connection with fuzzy qubits and quantum groups with NE is highly suggestive. The implications are highly non-trivial also for quantum computation allowed by weak form of NMP since NE is by definition stable and lasts the lifetime of self in question
 
You know our consciousness and understanding is just a form of negative entropy?

Yes, exactly. Terrence Deacon describes it as orthograde (entropy-reversing) processes emerging from constraints imposed on lower-order contragrade (entropy-producing) processes, in the context of thermodynamic systems.
 
You have no way of knowing. Billions of people disagree. Thousands of kings, emperors, philosophers and scientists disagree.
Tall white men go to Naraka.
 
After this they'll say incels who fap to porn and escortcel will burn in the same hell where chads and stacies are in for their adultery
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top