Thanks. I'm glad about it myself, I have a house there inherited from my grandfather. So it will be much better for me than in the city, among other things, I will live there alone and I think to some extent for a while to be alone will be useful.That sounds great tbh, I hope it's nice and peaceful
I used to live in a city with a population of 80,000-100,000. Now I'm moving to a village with a population of about 1,000.
Thanks, brocel
villages usually have disgusting cattle smell and dungs everywhere
Yes, but I'll have a house there with Gas heating, water, electricity, a home toilet, and a sauna in the yard. Mobile internet is also available.
There are literally no young people there, and the main population consists of Soviet Boomers, 55-60+ pensioners, and various types of alcoholics.
disadvantage of such places is that everyone knows each other, so if people don't like you, everyone knows. In big cities most people you came across would never see you again so you don't care much.
Yes, but there are also no young foids or young people here, so you don't feel as much mental pressure as an incel.
I want to try living in the countryside for one year, and then decide whether to stay in the city or the countryside.
This is quite possible, considering that the electronic register of draft notices has been activated, and now you cannot leave Russia if you are on this electronic list and the military registration and enlistment office has decided that you are to be mobilized.
A very good decision.
Thank you, I also think that one year in this mode will be useful.
You've noticed correctly that there are no migrants in the villages either.
Finally normal people.
, Hope it helps you bro, getting away from the noise of the city is always wonderful for me
Muslim invasion is really bad here.
Me too. I think we humans were never made to live in big cities. Although I lived in a small town with a population of 80,000, it was still difficult for me to cope with the fact that people were everywhere and I couldn't hide from them. In fact, most people lived in villages of 1,000 to 3,000 people until the 18th century.
Thank you. I'll definitely take a photo when I get settled in.Muslim invasion is really bad here.
I have an old friend who lives in a village.
There, you can still venture out on the streets in the evenings.
I wish you good luck and that you find balm for your soul there.
I agree, I don't think humans were meant to ever live in such massive cites or even some of the smaller ones there are today, little towns and villages of 500-3,000 people to me is the most optimal for humans it gives everyone enough space and still has some community unlike today, were its just people running around like headless chickens 24/7 in massive sprawling cites with no place to sit alone for once
living in village is worse because everyone knows each other and people would rat you out faster in village. In the city you can stay inside and it would be hard for them to find you especially if you don't live in places where you're registered. Some dudes in Donetsk survived mobilization in 2022-2023 that way.
The industrial revolution was a disaster for humanity, as Ted Kaczynski said. Cities grew because former peasants were forced to commute to work in factories and stay there. In a city, you can't trust anyone because you don't feel comfortable psychologically. You're constantly stressed by the presence of strangers.
You're welcome!
Yes, but again, it's much easier to catch mobics in the city. If there's a mobilization in the village, the police will have to travel 60 kilometers to my village, which is definitely more difficult than just going outside in a metropolitan area or catching a bunch of guys.
Thank youSounds nice, good luck in the countryside br0
I couldn't agree more, cities are nothing more than a tool used by the elites as another form of control
I took these photos 5 years ago, when I was visiting my grandfather after graduating from high school.
It's mostly unremarkable, and nothing has changed since the collapse of the USSR. Time here remains in the 1980s.
A very small rural village, or countryside.
In fact, the only thing that connects this village to civilization is a couple of grocery stores, and that's about it, along with the church. There used to be a school here, but it was closed two years ago.
What do Slovak villages look like? Did time stop there in the 1980s after the collapse of communism? I know that rural areas across Eastern Europe were actively dying out and degrading after the collapse of communism.
I'm also considering buying a moonshine still for my home, so I can produce alcohol in any quantity I want. In the USSR, alcohol was considered an unofficial currency in rural areas, but was this also the case in Czechoslovakia?
Good idea bro
Yeah you're correct. That depends on the type of area you're in though, if it's an upper class one I bet these dudes rarely ever visit those, cause they don't want to bother high income people
People do often mention that feeling of time not moving in the villages, but of course, I'd say that depends on the size of it and how many people are leaving. You will find modern appliances in most homes though, I'd say, especially those of younger people and families.
Yeah, in addition to people leaving abroad there's also a lot of internal migration from rural areas to cities and suburbs (suburbs near major cities in EE countries have actually been growing at a pretty staggering rate when you look at the stats). I wouldn't be surprised if something like 10-20% of those places in the entire region just flat out ceased to exist in the next couple of decades, at least.
No idea, but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
if i ever get the chance i would do the same. move to the countryside with no neighbors and just a calm lonely life
