kibbutz would be cool srs
If you're pro-capitalism and libertarian; you're not pro-incel!
Every single US billionaire from George Soros to Donald Trump should be put into a Siberian Gulag.
Cope. Both Hitler and Stalin would have exterminated you.
What lulz did you ever seen the men in key roles of USSR and NS Germany?
They were almost all ugly as fuck, just look at crippled manlet Goebbels, at Himmler who looked like a ricecel, at Goering who when arrived to power was not a Chad anymore but an unattractive fat man, at Hitler himself.
Liberal, Capitalists mainstream considers Nationalism as the biggest threat. Socialism, Communism is de-facto supported by Capitalists and Liberals. USA supported Soviet Union in 1941-1945 period. Wall street supported financially bolshevik Revolution in Soviet Union, Ford Motor Company invested there in 1920's, just like Coca-Cola and Pepsico were selling Socialist licence right for their products (in 1970's and 1980's). Western Capitalists massively invested in Communist China, since 1978 and they are doing it, on Cuba, in North Korea.
None complains about Marxism, but about Nationalism-Corporatism. Because Marxism/Communism/Socialism = Liberalism/Liberal Democracy/Capitalism. Generally speaking Eastern European example is the decisive proof. I see no difference between Socialism and Capitalism and Communism/Liberal Democracy. Both systems are equally stupid and degenerated.
Simple question, what is wrong in Nationalism and Corporatism? For me, they are the most rational social-political and naturally economic systems, one can imagine. They stand in complete opposition to Capitalism and Communism, which are de facto, two sides of the same coin.
I see plenty of negatives in Liberalism, Capitalism, Internationalism, Democracy, Socialism, Marxism, Communism. Of course, classical Liberalism and Greek Democracy, Ordoliberal Capitalism is far better than Socialism, Communism, but why Liberalism, Democracy and Capitalism are still, under Marxist influence?
Although, I am sceptic towards future, because young people do not understand, that alternative to Democracy is Corporatism. Only 7% of young Europeans, claim that "Christian values" (read, Corporatism) are these which bind European continent. If not Corporatism, then what? Liberalism? Communism? Or maybe National Socialism? As long, as people in Europe, won't return to its Corporatist roots, not only these related to Bible, but also and maybe first and foremost to Greek Philosophy and Roman Law, Europe will be lost and in permanent state of decay. I accept that, everyone gets, what one deserves.
None complains about Marxism, but about Nationalism-Corporatism. Because Marxism/Communism/Socialism = Liberalism/Liberal Democracy/Capitalism. Generally speaking Eastern European example is the decisive proof. I see no difference between Socialism and Capitalism and Communism/Liberal Democracy. Both systems are equally stupid and degenerated.
Simple question, what is wrong in Nationalism and Corporatism? For me, they are the most rational social-political and naturally economic systems, one can imagine. They stand in complete opposition to Capitalism and Communism, which are de facto, two sides of the same coin.
I see plenty of negatives in Liberalism, Capitalism, Internationalism, Democracy, Socialism, Marxism, Communism. Of course, classical Liberalism and Greek Democracy, Ordoliberal Capitalism is far better than Socialism, Communism, but why Liberalism, Democracy and Capitalism are still, under Marxist influence?
Although, I am sceptic towards future, because young people do not understand, that alternative to Democracy is Corporatism. Only 7% of young Europeans, claim that "Christian values" (read, Corporatism) are these which bind European continent. If not Corporatism, then what? Liberalism? Communism? Or maybe National Socialism? As long, as people in Europe, won't return to its Corporatist roots, not only these related to Bible, but also and maybe first and foremost to Greek Philosophy and Roman Law, Europe will be lost and in permanent state of decay. I accept that, everyone gets, what one deserves.
W
> Right-wing socialism is the incel ideology; national socialism, strasserism, nazbolism, and even fascism.
Unironically supporting failed ideologies, meh.
Unironically supporting failed ideologies, meh.
I support UBI. I think it will be necessary in the near future. If that makes me socialist so be it.
Aww you disagree. FUCK capitalism dude. It's in a dying stage anyway. There will be many more losers than winners when it's through. People don't need control and it's because of that control they have stupid ideas about inceldom. I'm a socialist in the sense that I support UBI and single payer like almost every other first world country.
I'm not pro feminist. So you can be socialist without supporting feminism bullshit. You like capitalism you better hope shit doesn't get ant worse for the majority. Maybe you lucked out and enjoy a high yield career and that's why. But not everyone does. And being 38 and kaie off twice I probably have more experience in the world. You want capitalism and control FUCK that noise. That shit gave birth to inceldom.
We can disagree. We have that freedom. That's important.
Last edited:
The very nature of the right is to have as less government influence as possible. Socialism and Comunism are at their core leftist ideallogy
M
I hope that all the countries in which exist sexual freedom are destroyed
that's nice faggot. nobody asked you.
just because the economics are leftist doesn't mean the social views are. you forget Third Positionism is a thing. plus capitalism hurts poorcels, but you're likely a rich jew and don't care.
I'm a Marxist-Leninist who became blackpilled and I beleieve Marxism-Rodgerism is the future. Incels are the sexual lumpenproletariat. Feminism is used to weaken men by the financial bourgeoisie and undercut their negotiating power, as well as wages in a society. Working for a factory owner or banker is cucked as you are financing their parasitism and giving them the power to statusmaxx and steal your women.
From each man according to his labour ability, to each man according to his sexual needs!
From each man according to his labour ability, to each man according to his sexual needs!
A
Feminism is part of the communist agenda, PCness is ideological communism.
If that's true then why did Marx kick out the feminist Victoria Woodhull from the International Working Man's Association?
Nonsense, capitalism supporters are the only pro-incels. It allows us to wealthmax
Any incel who has Hopes of moneymaxxing to atleast have something to show for there life is a libertarian.
High IQ post
A
there is no "incel-friendly" government, all the governments are ran by chads and normies and we're pretty much rejected on all sides. All this supporting the left or the right is just flat out normie worship. Normie governments don't even care about their own, they just exploit them.
Unironically supporting nazbol, my man!
SO are most corporations. That's why we need real education and democracy.
JFL at embracing inequality because you are a victim of inequality in another sector, isntead of fixing the underlying problems. Libertarian incels are edgy normies and should be send to gulag.
C
I'm pro leave me the fuck alone. That's my political views.
A
SO are most corporations. That's why we need real education and democracy.
JFL at embracing inequality because you are a victim of inequality in another sector. Libertarian incels are normies and should be send to gulag.
Democracy is just another con, what we need are small patriarchal, anarchist communities. Rather you agree with Unabomber or not, I don't agree with his actions, but as far as the system, he was spot on. I'd recommend reading his book.
C
High IQ
No this is a dead end. Patriarchy is just another form of inequality and results to exploitation (You can detest females, but you can't deny they are human beings and deserve the same rights). Small anarchist communities are not efficient because of a lack of vertical scaling and inability to adres global problems, but I agree to their core principles, which we have to apply on a national and later international level.
Last edited:
C
Real democracy as if it ever existed, is a government ran by sheep, think of all the bullshit laws people would pass, it would be think of the children this, think of the children that, pretty soon we all would be required by law to wear bubble wrap at all times.SO are most corporations. That's why we need real education and democracy.
JFL at embracing inequality because you are a victim of inequality in another sector, isntead of fixing the underlying problems. Libertarian incels are edgy normies and should be send to gulag.
That's why you educate people and use real delegates instead of representatives. Today's democracy is not really democratic in any way.
If it makes statistically sense and protects the rights of other people, why not. Freedom is no one-way.
But these utopian idealist discussions are senseless anyway. There are a lot of different ideas. The real problem is how we get to try them out.
Last edited:
C
Also high IQ
I support whatever political or economic system that allow me to NEET
Politics are all encompassing. Everytime you interact with humans it is politics. You are free to find some empty forest, good luck.
C
I don't think peolpe really can be educated
That's my goal, im also a part time Shamancel
Fuck capitalism and fuck comunism, national socialism is the answer for our needs.
I kinda agree.
Some can and if the others stfu, maybe we can reach some higher goals.
C
It's sad tbh. I've wasted a good part of my life trying to get people to see things differently.
A
Well either you've got relative "inequality" which is actually more equal, just different, or you have "equality + chivalry" or you've got androgeny (I won't go into that because your not ready for it if you actually think governments are there to be your friend). People are biologically gynocentric (womb theory), patriarchy consciously makes the effort to even the playing field out by splitting advantages and disadvantages out equally to both genders, according to each gender's strengths and weaknesses. I'm talking of soft patriarchies, not hard, abusive patriarchies. Male authority is the price of male chivalry. Another black pill, as women were biologically a protected class, its in our DNA that men are the leaders who make the decisions, we evolved to put the needs of others before our own, because of womb theory, whereas women evolved to put their own needs first because of womb theory. Women are inherently hypergamous and will quickly sell out their own tribe to a conquering army of chads, plenty of examples that prove this too. Women are not evolved (in general) to have the capacities to be leaders. And even men are not good at leading large tribes, the larger the tribe gets, the smaller and less effectual the individual becomes.
I
Enjoy your childlessness tax cuck
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_on_childlessness
Women were not subject to this tax bye the way
>>you milk the cows
You would have at best one cow, the rest would belong to the collective farm.
>>3 hours pass, you're done with your labor for now and it's time to eat some breakfast
It's time to work at the collective farm
>>the usual; some bread with honey, porridge and coffee
Buckwheat or pearl barley.
Did you ever drink new milk? It smells shit even after boiling.
>>Hypergamy would not exist. Every women would need a man to provide.
No they needn't. Free education for their bastards, no payment for medicine (no medicine — no payments). No mortgage fee (barracks are free).
There were no pensions. There were no salaries. There were no passports (they were kept by the collective farm director, it was forbidden to leave the collective farm without his permission (the introduction of collective farms was the restoration of serfdom)). The purpose of all life is to grow food for local Chads' children.
Why do you think that in the USSR there were no incels? "Talons for women" never existed.But there were always existed single men, who were mockingly called " Bobyl' ".
USSR is the birthplace of the "Modern World". Suffrage and jobs for women. Lack of personal land (and even flats) for men (enjoy your commieblocks). Prohibition of prostitution and the permission of abortion, legalization of contraception etc.
Social state (in any form, no matter USSR or modern Sweden) is the virtual husband. It takes resources from low ranked men and distributes it between women (as like tribal leader).
>>b-b-but nazi bonzes were ugly
Already tired of reading it.
Igor Dodon and Alexandr Vouchich must be local moderators.
Following this logic Moldavia and Serbia are Incels' Paradise.
Last edited:
I disagree. The left/right spectrum isn't actually derived from that theme at all. It's all about an optimistic/naive versus a pessimistic/tragic idea of humanity, history and general view of nature and the world.
You honestly think a 19th century conservative like Bismarck was about dismantling the state?!
Last edited:
D
INCEL THRID POSITION GOVERNMENT WHEN?
What about any government where to have a wife is a human right and ban hypergamy
This is compatible with any government, communist, capitalist, or third position. But the thing is there needs to be some degree of authoritarianism to a degree.
HiIQ
A
We don't need oppression to fight oppression that is stupid, people can socially reinforce monogamy without the government sticking it's nose in the bedroom. Last thing we need is authoritarianism, nothing is more cucked than being a proud slave.
D
socially, but the thing is how?
in order for libertarian governments to work, there needs to be some degree of organization, otherwise it will not work
A
It's called slut shaming, it used to be practiced against both genders in patriarchal societies. It did fine for a good amount of time until the suffrage movement, which marked the beginning of "equality + chivalry" and feminism and all of that shit.
In a socially libertarian world, you can make women a tool of the free market. Men would be dominating in a libertarian/capitalist society.
Meh, I consider myself centre-right and nationalist. Capitalism makes for strong economies but some government intervention and spending is probably needed to make a society truly functional and work for the citizens.
D
this proves to anti capitalist right wingers that a capitalist society can still be traditional
Damn straight.
Im turbo national libertarian, i need weapons for beta uprising and weed. I think something like minarchism is ok, it works in russia because russia = always the best.
1 parsec high IQ post
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
