An article that was posted in another thread, and it’s not the first time I’ve seen stories like this. I think it’s fair to say that if the biological sex roles were reversed, the killer would have received the worst possible sentence, a lifetime of imprisonment or capital punishment:
www.dailymail.co.uk
A woman is never entirely responsible for what she does, because it’s so obvious that the behaviors of women are always influenced by some sort of external force, and it's so obvious that women are victims of these external forces that influence their decisions --- At least it’s what seems to be the basis for merciful treatment of female offenders in the justice system. Apparently women are less capable of making independent, rational choices compared to men, thus they cannot be held entirely accountable for their own behavior, especially while under the influence of psychedelics. Whereas men are always accountable for their own behavior, as men are much more capable of making independent, rational choices compared to women, even while under the influence of psychedelics
In the eyes of the justice system, females of all ages are naturally less competent than men in respect of their ability to make independent decisions, and are more vulnerable to influence by external forces. This is why females (including adult females) are always victims to some degree when involved in crime or misconduct, even when the female is the perpetrator or an accomplice of the perpetrator. In the justice system, an offender under the age of 18 will normally receive a lesser punishment than an offender over the age of 18 for the same offence, due to the ostensible ignorance and intellectual immaturity associated with people under age 18. Likewise an adult female offender is much more likely to receive a lesser punishment than an adult male offender for the same offence, due to some naturally-occurring impairment in the adult female’s ability to make coherent decisions while under influence (or not under influence) of some narcotic or other external objects, and her higher vulnerability to being “manipulated” and “controlled” by external objects
Basically it can be summarized like this: Women are no different to underage children in respect of their capacity to reach a decision through externally uninfluenced, coherent thoughts. Like babies, women are emotionally volatile creatures with a lesser ability to make independent, coherent choices and thus like a toddler they are treated when involved in criminal activity. But preferably, accountability always traces back to some prior cause. If it’s hardly the toddler’s fault for shooting that stranger in a public zone, then investigators will determine that accountability lies in who enabled the toddler to access a firearm, which is normally parents or older family members. In the same manner, if it’s hardly that woman’s fault for stabbing her boyfriend to death, we as rational inquirers should ask who enabled this woman to have access to lethal tools (e.g., knives), and hold them accountable for enabling the woman to access these lethal tools in the first place
A child is normally deemed incompetent or not responsible enough to be unsupervised while in possession of lethal tools like knives and firearms, which is why age restrictions exist for legal access to lethal tools, and is also why children who commit a crime with these tools always receive lesser punishment than adults who commit the same crime with these tools. As adult women are similar to children in respect of emotional stability and their ability to make choices through self-controlled, coherent thoughts, we should ask: Why are there no gender / sex restrictions for legal access to lethal tools? Why has society collectively enabled the more rationally incompetent, emotionally volatile sex to have unsupervised access to lethal tools, while aware of the possibility that people of the less competent, more unstable sex can use these tools to injure or kill other people? As women are the less rational, more unstable sex, this matter ought to be taken up with not women, but the men who make the rules
(Original thread that posted article linked below)
incels.is
Killer who stabbed lover 100x handed 100 hours of community service
Bryn Spejcher, from Thousand Oaks, California, was given an astonishingly low sentence after doctors ruled the tragedy was '100 percent' caused by cannabis-induced psychosis.
A woman is never entirely responsible for what she does, because it’s so obvious that the behaviors of women are always influenced by some sort of external force, and it's so obvious that women are victims of these external forces that influence their decisions --- At least it’s what seems to be the basis for merciful treatment of female offenders in the justice system. Apparently women are less capable of making independent, rational choices compared to men, thus they cannot be held entirely accountable for their own behavior, especially while under the influence of psychedelics. Whereas men are always accountable for their own behavior, as men are much more capable of making independent, rational choices compared to women, even while under the influence of psychedelics
In the eyes of the justice system, females of all ages are naturally less competent than men in respect of their ability to make independent decisions, and are more vulnerable to influence by external forces. This is why females (including adult females) are always victims to some degree when involved in crime or misconduct, even when the female is the perpetrator or an accomplice of the perpetrator. In the justice system, an offender under the age of 18 will normally receive a lesser punishment than an offender over the age of 18 for the same offence, due to the ostensible ignorance and intellectual immaturity associated with people under age 18. Likewise an adult female offender is much more likely to receive a lesser punishment than an adult male offender for the same offence, due to some naturally-occurring impairment in the adult female’s ability to make coherent decisions while under influence (or not under influence) of some narcotic or other external objects, and her higher vulnerability to being “manipulated” and “controlled” by external objects
Basically it can be summarized like this: Women are no different to underage children in respect of their capacity to reach a decision through externally uninfluenced, coherent thoughts. Like babies, women are emotionally volatile creatures with a lesser ability to make independent, coherent choices and thus like a toddler they are treated when involved in criminal activity. But preferably, accountability always traces back to some prior cause. If it’s hardly the toddler’s fault for shooting that stranger in a public zone, then investigators will determine that accountability lies in who enabled the toddler to access a firearm, which is normally parents or older family members. In the same manner, if it’s hardly that woman’s fault for stabbing her boyfriend to death, we as rational inquirers should ask who enabled this woman to have access to lethal tools (e.g., knives), and hold them accountable for enabling the woman to access these lethal tools in the first place
A child is normally deemed incompetent or not responsible enough to be unsupervised while in possession of lethal tools like knives and firearms, which is why age restrictions exist for legal access to lethal tools, and is also why children who commit a crime with these tools always receive lesser punishment than adults who commit the same crime with these tools. As adult women are similar to children in respect of emotional stability and their ability to make choices through self-controlled, coherent thoughts, we should ask: Why are there no gender / sex restrictions for legal access to lethal tools? Why has society collectively enabled the more rationally incompetent, emotionally volatile sex to have unsupervised access to lethal tools, while aware of the possibility that people of the less competent, more unstable sex can use these tools to injure or kill other people? As women are the less rational, more unstable sex, this matter ought to be taken up with not women, but the men who make the rules
(Original thread that posted article linked below)
Foid kills oofy doofy bf and gets 100 hrs community service
https://www.reddit.com/r/NoahGetTheBoat/s/xqP25dKVhj
incels.is
Last edited:
