RageFuel If someone had sex once a year, is he considered an "incel"?

[mistersinister]

If someone had sex once a year, is he considered an "incel"?

 

[HighTGymcel]

No he isn't

 

[bigantennaemay1]

No, that's a failed normie. There's a world of difference between knowing what it's like to fuck and having the experiences, however infrequent, and being completely and utterly denied your humanity for your entire existence.

 

[JestER]

No you retard, is there something you want to share with us?

 

[bigantennaemay1]

Also, make the votes public. Whoever voted 'yes' is a fakecel infiltrator who probably gets fucked once a year.

 

[1337hikki]

If it's unpaid then no

 

[Vitarius]

It seems unfair to say, for example, that someone who had sex once 20 years ago is not an incel. I feel then that a sexhaver can be an incel given a certain amount of time of celibacy.

 

[satou]

Of course not.

 

[BraincelsRefugee]

You should know the answer by now.

 

[decembrist_kirillov]

fucking state of it

 

[partycat]

No
If it's unpaid and raw dog ending with a cream pie (krempee), then he is a failed normie, a low-tier normie and/or a betabuxxer
If it's paid then he is an escortcel as most escorts make you wear a condom and condom sex is not real sex. Real sex is when you go in raw dog and cream pie (krempee)

 

[ItsOver4cel]

No, that's a failed normie

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

@Lux, thoughts?

 

[ChadFUXXbetaBUXX]

if he's escortmaxxing yes otherwise no

 

[RuudVanNistelrooy]

No if its a paid sex. I know a normie who is on a dry spell for 2 years, if we are too liberal we would considered him as incel.

 

[Autistic Uggo]

if he's escortmaxxing yes otherwise no

 

[Lonely4Ever]

Low Tier Normie or "Near-cel", but not an Incel because he at least gets some pussy.

 

[bigantennaemay1]

It seems unfair to say, for example, that someone who had sex once 20 years ago is not an incel. I feel then that a sexhaver can be an incel given a certain amount of time of celibacy.

It's completely fair. They had the experience, they lived the full human condition, and they have the memory to cherish. We have had none of that. We are not in the same boat.

 

[turbosperg]

The usual academic definition for "incel" is someone who fails to obtain sex despite trying for 6 months.

The 6 months may be considered arbitrary, but some time frame must be chosen, it is not realistic to accept someone as "incel" if he's been trying for a couple days; also it makes no sense to wait until he's 100 years old ("life begins at 80 bro" ).

That said, I think many responders to this thread here are confusing "incel" with "permavirgin". A guy may be an incel without being a permavirgin (r/FA30plus is full of guys who had sex once or twice in HS or college, and are now sexless for several years). He may also be a permavirgin without being an incel (e.g.: a volcel like Tesla or Newton, a monk, priest, sadhu, fakir, ascetic etc.)

A problem with the 6-month time is that if those 6-months fall with the winter in its middle, in a very northern place where people don't socialize outside much (e.g. Siberia, Canada, Finland etc.) the situation is very different from 6 months with summer in the middle, which is when there are open-air festivals, and people are more open to seeking partners for sex and relationships.

I would consider a guy who tries for 1 year without any success a fellow incel IF he's graduated from college or older than 23. There is no way I would consider a 17 yo guy still in HS an "incel" because life can change a lot once in the following years (college experience, travel, alcohol, moving out, road trips, open-air festivals, etc. are verbotten for a 17 yo HS kid, but not for a young adult).

It's only after a person "settles" into the routine of adult life that the 1 year time frame should start to count.

 

[Deathcrush]

It seems unfair to say, for example, that someone who had sex once 20 years ago is not an incel. I feel then that a sexhaver can be an incel given a certain amount of time of celibacy.