ideally I dont want to be chad. Id prefer if women were attracted to my subhuman self
It's not shallow because its rooted in how we function as humans. It's how our species survives. It's not just based on nothing
because of this
You came into a thread about would u rather be a chad or have women be attracted to yourself
You shat all over the '''realism''' of a hypothetical
Your defense for why is 'bu bu im right it could never happen'
So? It's a fucking hypothetical.
I literally couldn't put this in simpler terms. You walked into a hypothetical and went ermm couldnt happen.
When pressed, you said 'I don't actually know which is the more normie opinion'. I do, it's yours, his is about not accepting the idea that he should change his face to fit what other people want if the other choice is to change what they want, which is based as fuck.
Yours is 'its human nature therefore is not shallow'
Not only that, he didn't call your reply a normie he called YOU a normie for the way you were acting and as a buzz word for low quality 2025 user. And he was right
so was I.
Last edited:
derailed another thread
It's because its so far away from realism that everything changes and everyone would have a different scenarios in their mind. If he was calling me normie for thinking too deeply about the scenario I don't think that's true but it makes more sense you're rightbecause of this
You came into a thread about would u rather be a chad or have women be attracted to yourself
You shat all over the '''realism''' of a hypothetical
Your defense for why is 'bu bu im right it could never happen'
So? It's a fucking hypothetical.
I literally couldn't put this in simpler terms. You walked into a hypothetical and went ermm couldnt happen.
Your explanation for why is babies first blackpill
Not only that, he didn't call your reply a normie he called YOU a normie for the way you were acting. And he was right
no he called you a normie for parping on about how it's human nature bro. it's not that it's a bluepilled opinion it's that it's a low quality contribution based on your admitted inability to go with the hypothetical.
it's literally just a reddit tier reply to come in and say 'i dont believe that would be possible' and the fact you don't seem to have any idea what I mean by this shows he was right
But that doesnt seem to be true since he first replied saying yes it is shallow to think that looks matter and I explained to him why it isnt to which he replied that im a normie
Look at the other comment I made just now. It wasnt even based on his scenario. He replied to my explanation to why it isn't shallow
holy shit you dumb teenager fucking read
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
you refused to go along with the hypothetical because erm actually im from reddit and thats not possibruu
normie tier reply
look at why i made that reply... jfl
[IMG alt="blackpillednigga"]https://data.incels.is/avatars/m/40/40150.jpg?1750379820[/IMG]
blackpillednigga
Luminary
★★★★★JoinedJan 9, 2022Posts12,773
sounds like you're justifying foid and soyciety behavior. fuck that
Quote Reply
Report
[IMG alt="lnceI"]https://data.incels.is/avatars/m/80/80025.jpg?1751400793[/IMG]
lnceI
Veteran
★★★★★JoinedJul 1, 2025Posts1,220
It's simply how we are are designed to be
i wasnt talking about the hypothetical scenario there at all
and its a normie thing to parp on about
You literally can't even fucking understand my point you're just going wahhhhhhhhhh but im right im right
you were being a petulant redditor and got called a normie for doing it.
the entire thing is based on questioning the 'heckin realism' of a hypothetical...
If you can't respond to this and instead just insist on but im riiiight
then I'll just stop
buddy what the fuck are you talking about? youre claiming i was dismissing his hypothetical scenario there while i was just explaining to him why i dont think looks mattering is shallow.. wtfand its a normie thing to parp on about
You literally can't even fucking understand my point you're just going wahhhhhhhhhh but im right im right
you were being a petulant redditor and got called a normie for doing it.
If you can't respond to this and instead just insist on but im riiiight
you were and have been for the last hour. his response to you was 'sounds like ur defending foids' then 'fuck off normie 2025cel bring back truecels'
explaining why you think the thing that makes you believe it's unrealistic doesn't mean you aren't questioning the realism of the hypothetical. I can quite literally quote about EIGHT fucking replies from your ass saying 'its an unrealistic hypothetical because everthing would need to change'
stop being obtuse
yes but not in that reply
you brought it up by saying
"no he isn't
it literally did go over your head jfl. That's not what his post is about at all. He's saying if he could change the way people think or change his face, he'd change the way people think. It's not even relevant that looks matter = shallow. That's the reality HE IS MAKING THE HYPOTHETICAL ABOUT you idiot."
im not denying that. im simply saying thats not what the first 2 comments were about
I can't BELIEVE I haven't won this argument yet. This guy is wrong on all counts. It's a testimony to the sheer voracity of the modern person in their inability to accept that they were wrong. I fucking hate people.
You got called a normie because you shared a normie opinion (its just human nature brooo)
You got called a normie because you did so off the back of a reddit tier insistence that 'hypotheticals be at least believable'
You got called a normie because your replies reeked of being one
He was right to call you one
Because INSISTENCE on 'its just human nature bro' is a fucking normie ass thing to derail the thread over.
You got called a normie because you shared a normie opinion (its just human nature brooo)
You got called a normie because you did so off the back of a reddit tier insistence that 'hypotheticals be at least believable'
You got called a normie because your replies reeked of being one
He was right to call you one
Because INSISTENCE on 'its just human nature bro' is a fucking normie ass thing to derail the thread over.
you denied the fact that he said looks mattering is shallow and thought i was talking about the scenario for some reason. why are you not replying to the comment i made?
no i didn't. I said he said you're a normie in reply to your general actions.
no he isn't
it literally did go over your head jfl. That's not what his post is about at all. He's saying if he could change the way people think or change his face, he'd change the way people think. It's not even relevant that looks matter = shallow. That's the reality HE IS MAKING THE HYPOTHETICAL ABOUT you idiot."
you're hyper focusing on the fact you said 'its not shallow to care about looks' before he called you a normie. I never disputed that he said that. I said he called you it because of your normie insistence on 'its human nature bro' at the start, and your general activity in the thread. I stand by that.
I couldn't be more right about this;
this is literally a reply that reads 'you are a normie. fuck off.'
And you're sitting here like 'bu bu 2 replies earlier he said that it's shallow to care about looks
that's not why he called you a normie. He called you a normie because you made a soy ass post about muh its human nature in his thread about a hypothetical that you 'don't accept because it's not realistic enough'
Like a redditor
this is literally a reply that reads 'you are a normie. fuck off.'
And you're sitting here like 'bu bu 2 replies earlier he said that it's shallow to care about looks
that's not why he called you a normie. He called you a normie because you made a soy ass post about muh its human nature in his thread about a hypothetical that you 'don't accept because it's not realistic enough'
Like a redditor
jfl. just here to egoboost like everyone else i seem to get into an argument withi literally highlighted the part where you did tho.. in message below
no he isn't
You said it in relation to the hypothetical scenario, which i wasnt talking about in the comment he called me a normie for
fine I did, my apologies. I can admit when I am wrong.
It changes nothing. I still stand by this;
I couldn't be more right about this;
View attachment 1484657
this is literally a reply that reads 'you are a normie. fuck off.'
And you're sitting here like 'bu bu 2 replies earlier he said that it's shallow to care about looks
that's not why he called you a normie. He called you a normie because you made a soy ass post about muh its human nature in his thread about a hypothetical that you 'don't accept because it's not realistic enough'
Like a redditor
Yes becasue he made a soy ass post saying that "believing that looks matter=shallow"I couldn't be more right about this;
View attachment 1484657
this is literally a reply that reads 'you are a normie. fuck off.'
And you're sitting here like 'bu bu 2 replies earlier he said that it's shallow to care about looks
that's not why he called you a normie. He called you a normie because you made a soy ass post about muh its human nature in his thread about a hypothetical that you 'don't accept because it's not realistic enough'
Like a redditor
no your entire point was 'its human nature, this hypothetical can't happen'
it's also not that soy, and nowhere near as bad as derailing a thread because you insist on 'human minds dont work that way' in a hypothetical
alright then finally ffs. so hopefully we can now leave this discussion here. if i understood you right you are saying i was acting like a normie for bringing up human nature in this thread which doesnt relate to it and i called him a normie for saying that
or i guess not then..
no.. it wasnt. it was explaining to him why believing that looks matter isnt shallow
Yes obviously
still haven't replied to this:
You're just trying to shift it onto 'who is right about whether its shallow'. That's not the point. He didn't call you a normie because you disagreed with him about that, but because of your activity in the thread. Do you disagree?
You're just trying to shift it onto 'who is right about whether its shallow'. That's not the point. He didn't call you a normie because you disagreed with him about that, but because of your activity in the thread. Do you disagree?
as i said in earlier replies its not shallow because its rooted in human nature and how we function as a species. its not just random
i replied it in an earlier post here
No.. I dont agree that he said it for that reason, but i agree that you think im soy for that
women never even had a choice in who they mated with until 50 years ago
Doesn't change the fact it's shallow
to me it clearly seems like he called me a normie for those 2 replies i made, not for them being in this specific thread. only option here is to agree to disagree becasue we cant ask him which one of us is right now due to you defending him against me so he would be biased
shallow
/ˈʃaləʊ/
adjective
- 1.
of little depth.
"serve the noodles in a shallow bowl" - 2.
not exhibiting, requiring, or capable of serious thought.
"a shallow analysis of contemporary society"
really? alright then
You need a third opinion?
only he can say what the reasoning of it is because hes the one who said it
4 hours waisted for no purpose. brutal
Judging someone off their looks is shallow strange you disagree with thatshallow
/ˈʃaləʊ/
adjective
- 1.
of little depth.
"serve the noodles in a shallow bowl"
- 2.
not exhibiting, requiring, or capable of serious thought.
"a shallow analysis of contemporary society"
really? alright then
Shallow but just the way humans unfortunately operate
More so the way foids operate
wouldnt you say that looks being so impactful on health and strenght of humans doesnt make it shallow? if you were attracted to a 130cm extremely subhuman ugly foid while we lived in the wild youd make a subhuman short child who couldnt hunt and survive
But all humans operate on it. even you. if there are foids you find unattractive and then ones you dont it means you care about it
We live in 2025 there really isn't a need for that anymore, Humans but more so foids sexual selection hasn't evolved past primitive times.
today we dont do that obviously but it still impacts your safety and health in other ways. men still have to fight and kill eachother in extreme scenarios and he wouldnt survive
Men are way less judgemental and shallow when it comes to looks than foids.
we still live on earth tho. youd need to have humans that dont use their instincts and dont try to one up eachother for their benefit for it to not matter
Similar threads
erenyeager
Users who are viewing this thread
