Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL I thought this was a joke at first

Yes, It even extends to animals as well... Reading about spiders and birds who even have different chromosomes determining their sex and their dynamics are not so different. Birds cheat and cuck their partners all the time. Many males birds die virgins (there's that one species this community knows of where 90%+ die virgins). Even though male spiders are often 1/10th their partners size, she'll only pick the largest among them. A millimeter of the spiders chitin exoskeleton makes him an incel who'll die alone, just like us and our millimeters of bone in our face :lul:
Fuck thats überbrutal
Over for birdcels
 
View attachment 1664775

@Sloth the stats you need for your asian GF
Galatea v3.0.8 standards for 2028:
-you
Galatea cute

 
That's how sexual dinamics work. If you check ancient times is as ropefuel
that is not how sexual dynamics work. that is how gynocracy works, with infinite state gibs and rights and protection for femroaches bankrolled by appropriated inkler money
 
that is not how sexual dynamics work. that is how gynocracy works, with infinite state gibs and rights and protection for femroaches bankrolled by appropriated inkler money
Over if you think a strict Christian monogamia was how the first humans behaved in a natural state
Women are selective, read about monkeys or birds like the brocel above explained
 
Over if you think a strict Christian monogamia was how the first humans behaved in a natural state
Women are selective, read about monkeys or birds like the brocel above explained
did you not understand what I said? w*men are propped up by the state. thankfully, we're not birds so the femroach can't fly away when you're trying to hold it down :feelsdevil: holes needed men to not fucking die and in any case, they could be given a bit of a grape :feelzez: do I look like a fucking christcuck to you, greycel? :feelsUgh:
 
did you not understand what I said? w*men are propped up by the state. thankfully, we're not birds so the femroach can't fly away when you're trying to hold it down :feelsdevil: holes needed men to not fucking die and in any case, they could be given a bit of a grape :feelzez: do I look like a fucking christcuck to you, greycel? :feelsUgh:
Nah I agree with you then but as I said foids are that way by nature it's in their dna
 
Shallow, delusional noodlewhore
 
Even though male spiders are often 1/10th their partners size, she'll only pick the largest among them. A millimeter of the spiders chitin exoskeleton makes him an incel who'll die alone
Good spiders shouldn’t have kids

Fuck em
 
Good spiders shouldn’t have kids

Fuck em
Doesn't change the spider population unfortunately, the female simply mates with spiderchads. 80-90% of male spiders are born into a world where from birth, they can't fulfill their only purpose and they don't even know it. Though they're blessed by lacking sentience at least :feelscry:
 
The funniest part is that if a guy fulfilled all of those (something only like 0.01% of the population could) but was ugly, she'd still reject him.
 
did you not understand what I said?
Nah I agree with you then but as I said foids are that way by nature it's in their dna
You don't agree at all. Taking by force and being stronger than women is in man's nature, but as the nigga said, it's the gynocentric modern social system that determines behaviour. Appealing to nature to explain modern female behaviour is ludicrous.
how the first humans behaved in a natural state
Women are selective
We have these issues because we live in an unnatural state. If you can't comprehend this after three replies it's over for your IQ. Where did you get these femdom fantasy ideas that women controlled men in ancient times? Oldest recorded histories clearly contradict this, as well as modern primitives. The rape of the sabine women, Vikings, warbrides, women as property. Nigga...
 
You don't agree at all. Taking by force and being stronger than women is in man's nature, but as the nigga said, it's the gynocentric modern social system that determines behaviour. Appealing to nature to explain modern female behaviour is ludicrous.

We have these issues because we live in an unnatural state. If you can't comprehend this after three replies it's over for your IQ. Where did you get these femdom fantasy ideas that women controlled men in ancient times? Oldest recorded histories clearly contradict this, as well as modern primitives. The rape of the sabine women, Vikings, warbrides, women as property. Nigga...
you are retarded. do you think the prime jb was alone in nature for you to rape? she was protected the chad and before that the father, as a matter of fact the community. yes rape happened but you had to have the strenght to commit it, so muh low inhib 5´5 socially rejected incel wouldnt stand a chance. we would be the ones killed and our women (the women of the tribe) raped.
what we are living in some aspects is indeed the return to the natural state, the liberalization of sexual mechanics wich means as its attested:
DNA studies, especially of the Y chromosome (passed only from father to son), show that during many periods of prehistory only a very small fraction of men reproduced, while many more women did. In simple terms: the human population grew, but male genetic diversity collapsed.


What does this mean?


  • There was a strong reproductive imbalance: a few men had children with multiple women, while many men had no descendants at all.
  • This fits with highly hierarchical societies, where certain leaders, warriors, or dominant clans controlled access to mates.
  • It doesn’t mean humans lived in a peaceful, “natural” harmony — rather, competition was intense and often violent, and reproduction was very unevenly distributed.

It was similar in non abrahamic faith guided societies. its when you install a system when you can only have a wife and adultery is punished by death penalty when you kinda balance things out, but its artificial
(my english is bad if something is not clear I will explain)
 
Last edited:
you are retarded. do you think the prime jb was alone in nature for you to rape? she was protected the chad and before that the father, as a matter of fact the community. yes rape happened but you had to have the strenght to commit it, so muh low inhib 5´5 socially rejected incel wouldnt stand a chance. we would be the ones killed and our women (the women of the tribe) raped.
what we are living in some aspects is indeed the return to the natural state, the liberalization of sexual mechanics wich means as its attested:


It was similar in non abrahamic faith guided societies. its when you install a system when you can only have a wife and adultery is punished by death penalty when you kinda balance things out, but its artificial
(my english is bad if something is not clear I will explain)
You call me retarded, dismissing me without even addressing my critiques. You then start making new claims. Have you ever engaged in an argument before? Then you paste the conclusion of a study you clearly don't understand, you just say Y chromosones "show that" without explaining why. There's more to critique but until you respond to my initial critiques this discussion is over. You are low IQ or something worse, and spread gynocentric ideas. Your English isn't the problem.
 
Last edited:
You call me retarded, dismissing me without even addressing my critiques. You then start making new claims. Have you ever engaged in an argument before? Then you paste the conclusion of a study you clearly don't understand, you just say Y chromosones "show that" without explaining why. There's more to critique but until you respond to my initial critiques this discussion is over. You are low IQ or an infiltrator trying to spread gynocentric ideas.
yep im building my position and the study its a fact, also you can see it in history where the aristocrats had most of the young women, all facts that you can easily check.
aking by force and being stronger than women is in man's nature
already answered it

it's the gynocentric modern social system that determines behaviour.
(powerful) men choosing in the past vs women choosing now (your "gynocentric social system") generates the same results since women will choose the men with better genetics aka the powerful men (twinks might be the exception). Thus, I agree letting women choose or have power in society is unnatural, however the results are the same.

We have these issues because we live in an unnatural state
No, as I already explained.

If you can't comprehend this after three replies it's over for your IQ.
Ad hominem

Where did you get these femdom fantasy ideas that women controlled men in ancient times?
straw man fallacy

Oldest recorded histories clearly contradict this, as well as modern primitives. The rape of the sabine women, Vikings, warbrides, women as property.
I didnt say the opposite. but the rape of sabine women is one of the worst examples you can choose JFL, do you know the whole thing?
 
Did you notice her demands target all sorts of metrics except age? Interesting.
Or she just forgot.
 
(powerful) men choosing in the past vs women choosing now (your "gynocentric social system") generates the same results since women will choose the men with better genetics aka the powerful men (twinks might be the exception). Thus, I agree letting women choose or have power in society is unnatural, however the results are the same
Focusing on this specific response is vital. You've gone from claiming women selected men, therefore it's always been like this, to... Powerful men used to choose the women that liked them anyway? The vital critique is this, you have conceded your prior claim, and tried to smuggle your gynocentric belief that women's preference always align with social structures into a new claim.

I'd like to critique your argument that "powerful men" choose - in ancient times, it was powerful Groups of men, and that included all types of men. There were still outcasts, but it was as a result of cowardice/male-male competition, but not looks/female sexual selection. It was not, as you claim, the same pairs whether chosen by men or women.

Certainly, the rape of the sabine women confirms this, and you allude to a flaw in it without addressing it.

Now that you're suddenly able to respond properly, I'll grant that you're not low IQ, but that was better than my hypothetical "something worse." That you're so defensive of women is alarming. I don't want to discuss this with you.
 
Last edited:
Focusing on this specific response is vital. You've gone from claiming women selected men, therefore it's always been like this, to... Powerful men used to choose the women that liked them anyway? The vital critique is this, you have conceded your prior claim, and tried to smuggle your gynocentric belief that women's preference always align with social structures into a new claim.

I'd like to critique your argument that "powerful men" choose - in ancient times, it was powerful Groups of men, and that included all types of men. There were still outcasts, but it was as a result of cowardice/male-male competition, but not looks/female sexual selection. It was not, as you claim, the same pairs whether chosen by men or women.

Certainly, the rape of the sabine women confirms this, and you allude to a flaw in it without addressing it.

Now that you're suddenly able to respond properly, I'll grant that you're not low IQ, but that was better than my hypothetical "something worse." That you're so defensive of women is alarming. I don't want to discuss this with you.
Was the "something worse" a mossad agent or a tranny?
 
>130+ iq
>can solve a quadratic equation
Jfl, a retard can derive the quadratic equation after being introduced to the problem :lul:
 
WTF is 'dark triad light?'
 
what episode does it die
 
Funny that she listed IQ first giving how foids are repulsed by intelligent men :feelsUgh:
 
Men: "I will be fine with any woman who is accepting, & loyal. Please see me as a human."

Women: *Dating Criteria*

And we're the problem?
 
Hey you stupid chink whore you don't get to have any standards with a fugly face like that
 
Funny that she listed IQ first giving how foids are repulsed by intelligent men :feelsUgh:
I think the reason for including that criteria is purely because she wants to present herself as being intelligent (she is implying "I want someone who matches my high intelligence"). Probably the same reason she namedropped recursion and quadratic equations (though, ironically, these are early high school level concepts). She wants to be seen as smart for knowing these "advanced" concepts.

Furthermore, she is probably far less intelligent than she believes herself to be. The people I've met throughout my schooling who have placed explicit emphasis on intelligence and have attempted to appear smart have typically been only of slightly above average intelligence.
 
Worst looking Asian women i've ever seen
 
The fact this ugly bitch can be this picky is utterly ridiculous
 
She has some stuff there that contradicts each other.
 
Probably a joke
 
She is sucking Chad cock while her looksmatch rotting on incel forums
 
you are retarded. do you think the prime jb was alone in nature for you to rape? she was protected the chad and before that the father, as a matter of fact the community. yes rape happened but you had to have the strenght to commit it, so muh low inhib 5´5 socially rejected incel wouldnt stand a chance. we would be the ones killed and our women (the women of the tribe) raped.
what we are living in some aspects is indeed the return to the natural state, the liberalization of sexual mechanics wich means as its attested:


It was similar in non abrahamic faith guided societies. its when you install a system when you can only have a wife and adultery is punished by death penalty when you kinda balance things out, but its artificial
(my english is bad if something is not clear I will explain)
5'5 was normal height in some areas in ancient times. Even the Scandinavians were only around 5'8.
 

Similar threads

Exalted Monarch
Replies
7
Views
531
UnluckyPrimate
UnluckyPrimate
randomBlud
Replies
30
Views
1K
Last2025cel
Last2025cel
esdeathlover
Replies
9
Views
533
trixiespitswap
trixiespitswap
Jigga1988
Replies
15
Views
572
Loner94
Loner94

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top