Of course a subhuman criminal would never be desired by women, so the aesthetic judgment is always present in this case, but if a woman had to pick a sociopathic Chad over a nice, law-abiding one, she would do that in a heartbeat because women love adrenaline. As such, a nice guy is unable to elicit the dopamine rush that women crave.
From an evolutionary perspective, women going after criminal men is advantageous because they do whatever it takes in order to protect their mates and descendants, whereas nice men are obedient and subordinate, pushed aside and told what to do by more dominant men.
But this represents a threat in a civilized society, where the maintenance of law and order must be a priority if that society is to survive. This is where the sexuality of women comes in and becomes a huge problem: when kept unchecked, women ignore and reject the decent men that keep the civilizational wheel spinning for men that are in constant opposition to what that civilization represents. Things start falling apart.
Women are captivated by exciting and sensational experiences created by men that have the guts to break the rules of society. Women read dark romance, true crime, Fifty Shades of Grey, Pride and Prejudice, Wuthering Heights, and erotic stories involving rapists and nonchalant men because the archetype of a rough, dangerous guy with a mysterious vibe is more seductive and enticing than something of a more orderly and systematic nature.
In other words, women are not sexually attracted to hardworking, law-abiding, and civilized men of society because they fail to press the button of emotional and primal responses that women's brains have.
Sociopathy in men indicates higher levels of testosterone and less inhibition. Sociopaths have a strong drive to change something in society that bothers them, even if means violence, and how is that not more attractive than passive, overly mature, and predictable men that are good citizens of society when this indicates obedience and niceness, something that women hate in men?
From an evolutionary perspective, women going after criminal men is advantageous because they do whatever it takes in order to protect their mates and descendants, whereas nice men are obedient and subordinate, pushed aside and told what to do by more dominant men.
But this represents a threat in a civilized society, where the maintenance of law and order must be a priority if that society is to survive. This is where the sexuality of women comes in and becomes a huge problem: when kept unchecked, women ignore and reject the decent men that keep the civilizational wheel spinning for men that are in constant opposition to what that civilization represents. Things start falling apart.
Women are captivated by exciting and sensational experiences created by men that have the guts to break the rules of society. Women read dark romance, true crime, Fifty Shades of Grey, Pride and Prejudice, Wuthering Heights, and erotic stories involving rapists and nonchalant men because the archetype of a rough, dangerous guy with a mysterious vibe is more seductive and enticing than something of a more orderly and systematic nature.
In other words, women are not sexually attracted to hardworking, law-abiding, and civilized men of society because they fail to press the button of emotional and primal responses that women's brains have.
Sociopathy in men indicates higher levels of testosterone and less inhibition. Sociopaths have a strong drive to change something in society that bothers them, even if means violence, and how is that not more attractive than passive, overly mature, and predictable men that are good citizens of society when this indicates obedience and niceness, something that women hate in men?
