Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

I reject the Law Of Identity as Proof for itself

  • Thread starter latinocelhispanicel
  • Start date
latinocelhispanicel

latinocelhispanicel

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 15, 2023
Posts
1,201
No, I'm not trolling. I'm being serious

why is 2 = 2?
because 2 itself is 2?
Yeah sorry, that 'proof' doesn't cut it for me.

that's just one of the couple of things that get taken for granted in the world and I will not settle for not having an explanation for it.

why is A = A?
why is A itself A?
why can't it be any other thing?


I have my ideas on where to start proving this statement but before I explore and document my journey here I want to hear from you guys first about where you think one should start looking.(*Please append your racial admixture in terms of percentage(s) in your response, as I converged on evidence that there are underlying cognitive styles that dictate how one experiences experience itself that fundamentally differ between the three major races: Mongoloid, Caucasoid, and Negroid... with every science thereafter being an attempt to obfuscate the truth as I believe they got it right the first time. While I won't discard other opinions, I prefer my "-oid"'s opinion because I believe we are arbiters of reality.)
 
This train of thought is absurd and leads nowhere.
 
This train of thought is absurd and leads nowhere.
(*Please append your racial admixture in terms of percentage(s) in your response, as I converged on evidence that there are underlying cognitive styles that dictate how one experiences experience itself that fundamentally differ between the three major races: Mongoloid, Caucasoid, and Negroid... with every science thereafter being an attempt to obfuscate the truth as I believe they got it right the first time. While I won't discard other opinions, I prefer my "-oid"'s opinion because I believe we are arbiters of reality.)
that's a low iq response btw
 
what is the implications of this
 
If every single scientific law and mathematical law is based on the laws of logic, and the law of identity is one of the laws of logic, you denying it is illogical and you saying where is the proof doesn't make it wrong or disproven, its a law not a theory you cant disprove a law smartass.
 
what is the implications of this
i've actually given this quite a bit of thought, if I make substantial strides even in the investigation of the nature of this, a greater understanding of one of the things that are taken for granted in the western world will ensue.
 
If every single scientific law and mathematical law is based on the laws of logic, and the law of identity is one of the laws of logic, you denying it is illogical and you saying where is the proof doesn't make it wrong or disproven, its a law not a theory you cant disprove a law smartass.
I have every right to question it just like dumb niggas like you would
 
Go read your 9th grade math book
full offense but no change has ever been made by conservatives like you
Caucasoids like you like to say "muh we were creators and inventors and sheeeit" to asians and pride yourselves in being a race that inherentlry pursues intellectual endeavors for their own sake (because muh high in trait openness to experience), while in the same breath chastising the political left for pursuing intellectual endeavors for their own sake (because they are the real trait openness to experience, while you conservatives score lower on that). Truth is, you take pride in something you are not, one of the very people you chastise are the people you look up to. dumbasses.

I have more than given this one thought, cogservatard
 
What is the example of a thing not being itself?
 
A = A is an absurd statement
 
full offense but no change has ever been made by conservatives like you
Caucasoids like you like to say "muh we were creators and inventors and sheeeit" to asians and pride yourselves in being a race that inherentlry pursues intellectual endeavors for their own sake (because muh high in trait openness to experience), while in the same breath chastising the political left for pursuing intellectual endeavors for their own sake (because they are the real trait openness to experience, while you conservatives score lower on that). Truth is, you take pride in something you are not, one of the very people you chastise are the people you look up to. dumbasses.

I have more than given this one thought, cogservatard
What the fuck does this have to do with anything, idgaf chink go be illogical.
 
The law of identity does make sense naturally. However the numbers in itself could mean anything, those are just symbols and we give meaning to them. So technically even 2 + 2 = 1 could be true if you give it a particular meaning
 
The law of identity does make sense naturally. However the numbers in itself could mean anything, those are just symbols and we give meaning to them. So technically even 2 + 2 = 1 could be true if you give it a particular meaning
I'm not playing with semantics, I'm rigidly, mechanically, and autistically intrested in proving the law of identity or at least seeking out the proof. Idk why this adam nigga thinks i'm debunking it, i'm literally wanting to prove it. i want a proof, that's all. i literally said it itself is not a proof good enough for me, as the west takes that for granted.
 
We schizomaxxing with this one boyos!
 
No, I'm not trolling. I'm being serious

why is 2 = 2?
because 2 itself is 2?
Yeah sorry, that 'proof' doesn't cut it for me.

that's just one of the couple of things that get taken for granted in the world and I will not settle for not having an explanation for it.

why is A = A?
why is A itself A?
why can't it be any other thing?


I have my ideas on where to start proving this statement but before I explore and document my journey here I want to hear from you guys first about where you think one should start looking.(*Please append your racial admixture in terms of percentage(s) in your response, as I converged on evidence that there are underlying cognitive styles that dictate how one experiences experience itself that fundamentally differ between the three major races: Mongoloid, Caucasoid, and Negroid... with every science thereafter being an attempt to obfuscate the truth as I believe they got it right the first time. While I won't discard other opinions, I prefer my "-oid"'s opinion because I believe we are arbiters of reality.)
What in the actual fuck are you talking about?
 
The law of identity does make sense naturally. However the numbers in itself could mean anything, those are just symbols and we give meaning to them. So technically even 2 + 2 = 1 could be true if you give it a particular meaning
This thread is stupid
 
You can always take the anti foundationalist approach or accept an infinite regress of underlying first principles.
 
What in the actual fuck are you talking about?
He’s talking like that one retarded female on the whatever podcast that tried to argue 2+2 doesn’t always equal 4
 
I gotta try to find that clip now and attach it here
again, you fucking retard. i'm not debunking it, I'm seareching for the proof rather than take the law of identity for granted, dipshit
 
that's a low iq response btw
No, it's not low. Because we are talking about essence, and it is not distorted from itself, essence precedes existence. Idiocy actually arises from you questioning something obvious, the essence has value in itself.


You cause confusion for yourself by being an existentialist.
 
No, it's not low. Because we are talking about essence, and it is not distorted from itself, essence precedes existence. Idiocy actually arises from you questioning something obvious, the essence has value in itself.


You cause confusion for yourself by being an existentialist.
I beg to differ, existentialism has precedence over essence
 
again, you fucking retard. i'm not debunking it, I'm seareching for the proof rather than take the law of identity for granted, dipshit
IMG 4534
 
I beg to differ, existentialism has precedence over essence
:feelskek: :feelskek:


That said, it didn't get anywhere. Note its contradiction.

The factors that led him to be what he is, of course. But who are you in the face of this power that is the essence, stop being an idiot.

I am a professor of philosophy, theology and geopolitics. You have no cohesion with yourself, because alone you walk in a pit full of lying shit.


You wanted an answer about the obvious, and it was given, if you disagree, it doesn't matter, the answer is right, because it is well founded. It is what it is. While yours is existentialism.Ah, know that existentialism in the contemporary world gave rise to liberalism. Go graduate.

But coming from an idiot with a foid photo, probably a cuckold, I don't expect anything, his essence as an idiot is always the same, fascinating hahaha :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman:
 
DISCLAIMER: This idiot is a possible soy fagot
@Fat Link
 
I am a professor of philosophy, theology and geopolitics.
are you really? because philosophy professors tend to give weight to even what might seem the absurdist thoughts because they know everything has potential to carry enough weight to be taken seriously. That's the heart of this past: I, like Hegel, am interested in proving the law of identity. I do agree to some extent that it's an empty tautology.
 
are you really? because philosophy professors tend to give weight to even what might seem the absurdist thoughts because they know everything has potential to carry enough weight to be taken seriously. That's the heart of this past: I, like Hegel, am interested in proving the law of identity. I do agree to some extent that it's an empty tautology.

Stereotypical, doesn't know what he's talking about.

:feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman: :feelstastyman:

Even in his words he uses stereotypes :feelsjuice: :feelsjuice:
 
Please append your racial admixture in terms of percentage(s) in your response, as I converged on evidence that there are underlying cognitive styles that dictate how one experiences experience itself that fundamentally differ between the three major races: Mongoloid, Caucasoid, and Negroid... with every science thereafter being an attempt to obfuscate the truth as I believe they got it right the first time. While I won't discard other opinions, I prefer my "-oid"'s opinion because I believe we are arbiters of reality.
Que
 
2 is 2 by definition
"is" means equality
unless you have some other way of projecting a definition onto the word "is" then the law of identity as we defined it holds and it is literally impossible to contradict it.
 
This thread reminds me of those people in high school who always said, "getting good grades doesn't make you smart".While watching Rick and Morty smoking weed and making retarded statements like OP at the lunch table thinking they're some kind of intellectual.
 
As @lowz1r mentions, the law of identity is perhaps best thought of as a defining property of identicality. If I define 2 to be 1+1, and you ask me to prove that 2 is indeed 1+1, what am I to say but "by definition"?

t. quadroon
 
There are a lot of stupid users on this forum and this part of it really brings them out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top