I propose political action to establish the Sexual Gratification as a Human Right

[Abyayala]

1. Hello people, I want to express my admiration and deep respect to the insights and discoveries you have made. In years of investigation I have never seen nobody who was capable of give a consistent explaination for the sexual segregation. Your insight based on biotope is the most lucid discovery I have ever seen in the last years. It is unbelievable and unacceptable that the academy, sociology and anthropology faculties have never not mention this. I just cannot explain myself how this approach has been hidden.



2. I am a professional philosopher and I have written a book proposing the access to sexual gratification must be stated as a human right, as the right to get free education or health service. Sex is a right associated to the right of living and the free development of the personality. This is the only logical result of the ideas of Spinoza, Epicuro Aristipo of Cyrene and the Eudemonist philosopy. Society must offer free education, on the same track of ideas, society must give the conditions for sexual gratification for all. Period. That is my proposal, so, my question is, what do you guys think about this idea?

3. I have written this thesis as the main conclusion of my book called: Refutando Amarna Miller: debunking the ideas a particular female porn Star because if you ask her, she considers that some kinds of men consume porn as a free decision, it is their free will that lead them to abandon with resignation any attempts to have a real sexual life and renounce to any sexual contact, it is their free will that makes them prefer porn instead of real sex. Porn has no responsibility on that. So she states that if certain kind of people consume porn as the only way to have a sexual life, as a replacement for the real thing it is because they deserve not to have sex, since they have not taken responsibility of their sex appeal. OK? She considers that access to sex is an individual matter and each man has to take responsibility of his access to sexual joy without help of the society. As a result, the only responsable of being deprived of sex is you, each the individual, none else, due to the fact that having sex depends exclusively on your fee will. According to Amarna Miller, If any person is not able to get laid it is not because his biotope or racial features, definitely no, but because has the wrong attitude, the wrong free will and he deserves his lack of sexual gratification,so any person who has no sex is because is not a well adapted individual, and his sexual abstinence is his only responsibility. Therefore, she totally denies the existence of men who have been constrained to sexual abstinence against their will due to social causes or social segregation. OK? I enjoy to contradict each word she says, and my proposal is to target the industrial pornography and accuse it as a parasite that uses sexual segragation to get consumers ( I call them Porncels), and in addition, I consider it is time to fight for establishing sexual joy as one of the most important humans rights. Please tell me what you think.

 

[Swiswis]

Bro, you're turning society into a giga brothel

 

[mviper]

I fear that the same strategies that have worked for women and other parasitical classes that have latched on to victimology won't work for us.

The real blackpill is that there is no such thing as human rights, they only exist in the minds foids and slaves. The universe doesn't care about your rights, and never will. Once you cast off the shackles of human rights, you are free to destroy those who believe they are protected by them.

 

[Abyayala]

Bro, you're turning society into a giga brothel

Swiswis Thank you very much, I appreciate you comment, because it is true from a certain viewpoint, yes. But look: my proposal comes from the Acient Roman way to see life. Sex was a right for every roman. My ideas come from the reading of Epicuro and Aristipo, who stated that felicity, pleasure and peace are the ultimate goal of society and life. When a man is denied to acces to sexual joy it is a crime from society. So I have worked hard to follow the steps of those philosophers in my book. It is more: that porn "actress" named Amarna Miller —using one of her speech representants— told me exactly the same you did.But in her case the intention was different, I told her that: it is really hipocrite from her to criticise that idea, becasue she happily lives already in a giga brothel called "idustrial porn" paid by society , so she is the last person to critizise something that she already enjoys already, thanks to millions of men who have been deprived of sex and are coerced to consume porn. She calls it a "work" and by saying so she eludes the true about porn: a way to justify the sexual repression of millions of men by giving a live of sexual privilege to a few models.

I fear that the same strategies that have worked for women and other parasitical classes that have latched on to victimology won't work for us.

The real blackpill is that there is no such thing as human rights, they only exist in the minds foids and slaves. The universe doesn't care about your rights, and never will. Once you cast off the shackles of human rights, you are free to destroy those who believe they are protected by them.

mviper yes, thank you for your reply, I respect your comment. Baruch Spinoza would have said the same you did: the only Right in Nature is the striving to persevere in existence as much as your power can go. Sexual gratification is a very important part of the strive to persevere in the existence, therefore any ways of fight to conquer it are legitame, any: Even the brutal force might be a way —as you suggested. Nevertheless, mviper, it is not the only one: Political action is another of the ways of fighting to conquer it: brutal force plus political action might not be combined? Thank you

 

[NoMoreSlaving]

this would never work because incels have no power to change anything in society

 

[Abyayala]

this would never work because incels have no power to change anything in society

NoMoreSlaving thank you for your reply, maybe it is true but, did you know that Isaac Newton, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Spinoza, Plato, Diogenes, Zenon de Cites, and much more great men, were men deprived from sex against their will? Let me tell you something about Spinoza, he destroyed and changed the world as it was before him. He kicked the ass of all the jews and judaism and they are still whipping for what he did to them. So...

 

[feelsbadman32]

sex is a basic need in maslows hierarchy of needs, this is well known

 

[VeganIcon]

Where are you from (born/currently residing)? Your English is poor but your respect for others opinions is commendable.

 

[Dungcel]

Hi Reddit

 

[Abyayala]

VeganIcon. English is not my mother language yes it is true. The irony is that I teach english for a living (yeah lol). I was born in Peru. I have inca blood, south native american roots, (cholo) from my mother lineage and italian from my father's. My cousins look like italian guys and I look like a cholo LOL. I am very proud of my native american blood, my name Abyayala is the real name of America before the jewish and spanish invasion. I studied political sicence in Colombia and I am a philosopher, so I must show respect for other's opinions since each one has a piece of truth. (Spinoza: «from the perspective of Nature [or God] all ideas are correct». On the other hand, I must show respect to this community because besides Shopenhauer nobody has been able to provide a theory about sexual apartheit, sexual segregation and sexual deprivement showing consistent scientific insights as you have done. Your theory deserves to be taken more serioulsy. My interpretation is not to assume this with resignation but to fight with honor, no matter what. (This attitude is based on Spinoza's and Epicuro's vision about human sufferance: we can be happy no matter how much they try to take away from us, being happy is the best way to insult our enemies) . This is my voice of support: Gentlemen, we are being killed on the shores, so let us go inland and be killed.

sex is a basic need in maslows hierarchy of needs, this is well known

feelsbadman32, Well I appreciate what you say I did not know about Maslow's theory. I will use it to boost my book in order to support the idea of sex a human right and the constrained deprivement of sex as a crimen against human dignity

Hi Reddit

Yes sir. I know it is tue. I do not critise the way each one deals with their sufferance: videogames or hentai, it is Ok, I respect that. But changing a little bit the viewpoint, let me share this: each time anyone watches industral porn [porn performed by real humans, by real people, in flesh I am not talking about drawings or heintai ] he must ask to himself: am I supporting another man, (probably a jew for example James Deen) to have the sexual life I have been denied? each time I watch porn I am paying an alien to enjoy what I should be enjoying and to live what I should be living, I am becoming complicit of my own dehumanization". To use a more expressive language: each porn actor is stealing you, —somehow—, the chance to be with those women he is having sex with, you are paying him for legitimating your ruin". No more. If everyone goes deeply into this meditation very soon industrial porn will collapse. Society gives people porn to justify the deprivement of sex in real life. I say so with all due respect to all who consume it it because they are determined to do it due to some causes, but that is my batle, porn is the woros enemy against sexual freedom. I tell my little brother: never watch porn, —go for the real sex— demand it as you right, because if you finf your comfort zone watching porn, as a man, you are paying an elite of sexual performers for living the sexual gratification they want to deny to you. Fight against them. Rome and Greece gave people real sex to not porn, because they knew sex is a human fundamental need to be satisfied and they believed sex is as important as the need for food or housing. Thank you.

 

[Abyayala]

Respected Dungcel I had many mistakes in english, let me correct them:
Yes sir. I know it is true. I do not criticize the way each one deals with their sufferance: video games or hentai, it is Ok, I respect that. But changing a little bit the viewpoint, let me share this: each time anyone watches industrial porn performed by real humans, by real people, in flesh, [I am not talking about drawings or heintai ] he must ask to himself: am I supporting another man, (probably a jew such as James Deen) to have the sexual life I have been denied? each time I watch porn I am paying an alien to enjoy what I should be enjoying and to live what I should be living, I am becoming complicit of my own dehumanization".

.Let me use a more expressive language Dungcel : each porn "actor" is stealing you all, the people, —somehow—, the right to have sex because it is creating the illusion sex is something for another dimension, an extravagant privilege only reserved for "gods" and porn "actors", ( platonization of sex) people are paying each porn actor for legitimizing their own sexual ruin". No more. If everyone goes deeply into this meditation industrial porn will soon collapse. Society gives people porn to legitimize the deprivation of sex in real life.


I say so with all due respect to all who consume it because they are determined to do it due to some causes, but that is my battle: porn is the worst enemy against sexual freedom. I tell my little brother:do not watch porn, —go for the real sex— demand it as you right, because if you find your comfort zone watching porn, as a man, you will be paying an élite of sexual performers for living some sexual gratification they want to deny to you. Fight against them, do not admire them, despise them, you are sexually more powerful than what they pretend to be. They are sex stealers because they enjoy sex for bragging about it in a video, to humiliate those who have been rejected for having sex, and not only that: they make the people addicted to their stuff so they steal their money pretending to run a business. They also support certain male sexual biotypes and races to supress others. Have you seen any short height vietnamise guy as a porn star?
Rome and Greece did not give people porn but real sex, even prostitution was subsidised by those societies because they knew sex is a human fundamental need that must be guaranteed: Native American Nations, Greeks and Romans believed sex is as important as the need for food or housing, we should remember them. Thank you, I really appreciate your comment.

 

[The End]

This will never happen. Women are in control of sex right now; more than ever before. And women hate ugly men.

 

[Abyayala]

This will never happen. Women are in control of sex right now; more than ever before. And women hate ugly men.

Hello The End, yes it is true, well said: currently.

The platonic or ideal models of beauty imposed by the Judaism and the christians are the ones who dominate the scenario right now yes, but, there is not any objective beauty or ugliness (Spinoza Ethics ), it depends on who wins the military war in history.

May I please give you my local example to consider? look: if the white spanish men had been rejected by force from America, if they had not been able to invade Peru, if the native american Inca people had won the military confrontation against the Spaniards, I can guarantee you that women would prefer the beauty of the native men of their own race, they did so during 20thousand years. Native women found ugly the first white blond men, ugly as hell, ugly pale faced guys, they said. But the native indians did not win the war, they lost the military confrontation, and that is the reason the beauty of the Spaniard and English men is now considered " superior", if the native nations had won the war the model of masculine beauty would be more like the face of Geronimo the Apache, but not the face of a white english man. During the Inca times no man was deprived from sex and wife, it never happened, no matter his height or his jaw shape, nobody was deprived from sex in native America, actually, since very young age native americans had sex and women considered their men very attractive, now the same men are considered ugly cholos: because they lost the military confrontation. Yes of course, women always prefered certain guys ( the warriors) more than others (the peasants) ok, but none was deprived of love or sex, no one.

Let me tell you some opinion: the war continues and you never know what may happen. This civilization including its models of beauty is not indestructible. Did you know that many or most of the chinese women —currently— do not find tall and white men really attractive? Not even Brand Pitt, why is that? Because China was never invaded by the white jew-christianity —and never will—, they protect themselves from the mass media form our society with its models of beauty. As a result, they love their own men, their race, their biotope, and yes, they definitely find beauty in short chinese men more than many white anglosaxons or italians, think about it sir, I say so with all due respect to you.

 

[Zaetheus]

Too long eyes are tired I need a TLDR

 

[Abyayala]

Zaetheus thank you. Yes, this is the classic problem that we spanish speakers have talking to english speakers: we speak or write too much in comparison to you. I will try to summarize: if the native nations all over the world had won the wars against the white christians the model of masculine beauty would be more like the face of Geronimo the Apache, but not the face of any white english man. For example: During the Inca times no man was deprived from sex and wife, it never happened, no matter his height or his jaw shape, nobody was deprived from sex in native America, actually, since very young age all native americans had sex and women considered their men very attractive, now the same men are considered ugly "cholos" and spaniards are considered "handsome": because they lost the military confrontation. Yes of course, women always used to prefer certain young guys ( the warriors) more than others (the peasants) ok, but none was deprived of love or sex, no one. Thank you Zaetheus.

 

[The End]

Hello The End, yes it is true, well said: currently.

The platonic or ideal models of beauty imposed by the Judaism and the christians are the ones who dominate the scenario right now yes, but, there is not any objective beauty or ugliness (Spinoza Ethics ), it depends on who wins the military war in history.

May I please give you my local example to consider? look: if the white spanish men had been rejected by force from America, if they had not been able to invade Peru, if the native american Inca people had won the military confrontation against the Spaniards, I can guarantee you that women would prefer the beauty of the native men of their own race, they did so during 20thousand years. Native women found ugly the first white blond men, ugly as hell, ugly pale faced guys, they said. But the native indians did not win the war, they lost the military confrontation, and that is the reason the beauty of the Spaniard and English men is now considered " superior", if the native nations had won the war the model of masculine beauty would be more like the face of Geronimo the Apache, but not the face of a white english man. During the Inca times no man was deprived from sex and wife, it never happened, no matter his height or his jaw shape, nobody was deprived from sex in native America, actually, since very young age native americans had sex and women considered their men very attractive, now the same men are considered ugly cholos: because they lost the military confrontation. Yes of course, women always prefered certain guys ( the warriors) more than others (the peasants) ok, but none was deprived of love or sex, no one.

Let me tell you some opinion: the war continues and you never know what may happen. This civilization including its models of beauty is not indestructible. Did you know that many or most of the chinese women —currently— do not find tall and white men really attractive? Not even Brand Pitt, why is that? Because China was never invaded by the white jew-christianity —and never will—, they protect themselves from the mass media form our society with its models of beauty. As a result, they love their own men, their race, their biotope, and yes, they definitely find beauty in short chinese men more than many white anglosaxons or italians, think about it sir, I say so with all due respect to you.

Um... I may be mistaken, but I thought science has proven that beauty is mostly objective. Any back-up on this?

 

[Chileancel]

Male sexual satisfaction goes against gynocentrism. That's your main issue. A vagina is so valuable to society that making men miserable is a small price to pay in regards to keep women happy. The one who has the womb makes the rules and women see their sexual freedom as non-negotiable when it comes to the physical qualities of their options. If you recall history and the inclusion of marriage, the game was even because women were restricted. When poligamy (the natural state of the homo sapiens) was the rule on the ancient times, many died incel, but in the modern world, the only way to make men cooperate with society is assuring a wife, a house and kids. Disrupting this balance will create chaos and apostasy, but the left and feminist are too delusional to see this. Im not saying women shold be sex slaves, sex and reproduction are part of the same but can be mutually exclusive,what I'm saying that if non-incels want to protect a world where roads get to be build, resources to be harvested, economies to be productive... you have to keep men somewhat content with this basic notion. Soon it won't be a small minority of men deprived from this, but the number will keep rising until it's too late.

 

[Abyayala]

Chileancel eres de Chile, hermano? Yo se que los Peruanos y chilenos no siempe nos entendimos en el pasado, pero: Tu comentario esta genial! excelente. Admiro a tus Mapu-Sche. "La gente de la tierra". Mientras ellos mantuvieron al español derrotado y frustrado al otro lado del Biobio las mujeres nativas prefirieron a los hombres nativos. Y sobre lo que dices: Exacto, si las cosas siguen asi los hombres sexualmente insatisfechos serán millones , de hecho ya lo son, pero la verguenza es grande para confesarlo. Amigo, yo no lo llamo mundo moderno, es el mundo creado por el judaísmo y el cristianismo seculares ese es el enemigo ideológico. Una vez se derrumbe la mitología judía-cristiana hay una via para acabar con este problema. Créeme.

Are you from Chile, brother? I know that Peruvians and chileans do not always understand each other in the past but: Your comment is great! excellent: Remember the Mapu-Sche people from Chile? While they kept the spaniards defeated and frustrated on the other side of the river Biobío, the native women preferred the native men beauty. And on the other hand, I do not call this " the modern world" but the world created by the secular Judaism and Christianity that is our ideological enemy. Once the Jewish-Christian mythology collapses there will be a way to end this problem. Trust me

Finally. Exactly, if things keep going this way, the numeber of sexually deprived men will raise to millions, in fact they are already millions, but the shame is great for them to confess.

Um... I may be mistaken, but I thought science has proven that beauty is mostly objective. Any back-up on this?

The End, yes, this is almost inevitable: the difference between an "ugly" guy and a "handsome" guy is just a few milimeters of eyeled and bone shape but, wait, hold on, it is true but do not jump into conclusions: it is because the "ugly" guys face does not match the platonic model imposed by the white-jew christianity after their military and economical victories upon all the rest of the native nations all over the world.

2) If the native nations had defeated the white man the model of beauty would be the masculine face of those nations: Geronimo's face would be considered handosme, the face of a black tribe man, the face and height of the vietnamise would be considered better than the brad pit's face, the face of the australian native men would be considered more handsome than the face of Clooney: the white man would be considered ugly. Trust me, history defines the beauty, the war defines the beauty, but the war is not over.
3) A few milimeters of eyelid, and the chiseled jaw of the white man would made him man ugly. He would be whipping because his chiseled jaw is ugly and he whised to have a round shape similar to the face of a vietnamise or a native australian guy. The model of beauty is never objective, the reason of beauty is always is the military or economical confrontation which defines who will be considered "ugly" and who will be considered "handsome".
4) In our world dominated by the secular judaism it is hollywood who defines who is handomse, The End, Hollywood is the enemy.
There is not any objective beauty (Spinoza apendix book) . if your face does not match the model imposed by hollywood you might be over, but look, it is not because yoiu are objectivelky ugly. No you are not ugly, you just do not match the model imposed by the secular jews in hollywood ( Spielberg, the Golden Meyer's) and jews have imposed to the world the white men beauty to hide their own ugly jew face behind the face of the whites because they always lived surrounded by germans, they wanted to look like germans.

5) After that, a few milimeters of bone or eyeled will define your sexual destiny not because you are objectively ugly but because your face does not match for just a few milimeters the model of beauty that was imposed by force and manipulation.
6) So you are not objectively ugly, your mind must not state something that denies your own being (Spinoza Ethics, conatus)
Thank you Mister The End

 

[MaxZM98]

i agree, but society has a fundamental distain for ugly single men. it'll never happen unless we can somehow have a beta uprising. also, this porn star is retarded. people are incel because of female hypergamy and their inherently evil nature. it is so insulting to suggest that my loneliness and depression is caused by me not using my free will. what does she want me to do, rape people??

 

[Abyayala]

MaxZM98. How are you? Yes dear sir, they do not want you to rape but to watch their porn:
The whole porn industry is totally against any kind o human who becomes temporary or long term involuntarily celibate, because the philosophy of the pornographic industry is exactly the same Jew-christian vision of the world which understands all events based only on the belief of the Free Will ( which is a judean superstition, a magic force that goes against the cause-effect principle) as a result, according to the jewish mental structure of the Porn industruy you mister MaxZM98 and all people who might become in the future involuntary celibate are the only individual responsible of that situation, due to: ( amana Miller's and James Deen's statements)
1) lack of self-responsability,
2) Lack of management, (hygienics, training etc)
3) lack of some reason faculties,
4)and lack of strong Will. Period. Not negotiable, not transactional. That is what the porn industry thinks. As a consequence I have written against this porn ideology.
I have investigated for years their statements tand that is what they really mean to say. Everyone who consumes pornography must be grateful with this club of generous people who accept the hard work to brag about their sexual pleasures in videos for people who do nothing to help themselves and prefer to watch videos instead of having real sex, because they have made this decision of being deprived from sex, they want to stay celibate because they are lazy and «consider themselves» ugly and inferior. Porn industry is not responsible for their misery but is out there to help those miserables. This is mister MaxZM98 the ideology of porn.

On the other hand, people who have an active sexual live watch porn because of an adult free healthy decision ( James Deen's words) it is their free will to do it. (Free will is the judean-christian weapon they have) No influences are manipulated upon none to constrain people to consume porn. Porn is freedom. This is a happy world except for those people who do not take responsibility of their actions like men who are not able to get laid and other species who are subhuman to the eyes of the porn industry. That is what Amarna Miller, James Deen's and other members of the porno industry (Sasha Grey) think. ( they enjoy an abundant sexual life due to the fact that they are merely parasites of the poeple who have been determined by society to be deprived form sex) That is what I denounce, I denounce them because thinking like that is totally inhuman nad goes against the principle of cause and effect.
But as I said, the jewish superstition of the Free Will as the cult to the individuality is the only weapon they have, if you destroy that weapon they become powerless, nothing. That is why I work Spinoza's- Budist thinking and Epicuro's because they demolished the idea of free will. As a consequence Sir, the sexual gratification must be established as a Human Right, and provided accordingly by the society for the people Thank you, Sir

 

[Chileancel]

Porn actors/actresses are not the brightest people out there.

 

[Lord Byron]

All of this sounds so complicated and long. Can anyone condense the key idea down to two sentences or less for me?

 

[Abyayala]

Porn actors/actresses are not the brightest people out there.

Chileancel Yes sir, and, porn model and producers are the real enemy against people who have ever been constrained against their will to be deprived from sex. For example: How can we tolerate the existence of a fictitional individual like «James Deen» who has sex with uncountable number of women (using the money of the sexually repressed men) to brag about it in his videos, while there are thousands of men deprived from sex? How can we tolerate that ? Such kinds of individual are raping the whole humanity and depriving others from sex. We would say about them like Catón said about Carthago: Delenda est Carthago yes, Delenda est Carthago

 

[lastchancel]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP


this better

 

[Abyayala]

Lord Byron, yes sir I will summarize in 5 lines tomorrow for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP


this better

Mister lastchancel I appeciate your post, thanks a lot, but could you please be son kind to tell us where exactly is located Sexual Gratification as a Civil Right on the list of the programm you sent to us? We do not see it clearly stated on the list. Thank you, sir

 

[leftyincel]

i agree, but society has a fundamental distain for ugly single men. it'll never happen unless we can somehow have a beta uprising

A "beta uprising" won't work. I'm not just saying that to virtue signal. Terrorism or violence is extremely ineffective.

Sex has been made a human right in Switzerland and a couple other countries, but usually only extends to parapalegics. Not because they can't move, but because no one is attracted to them enough to go to their house and fuck them. It is entirely possible for subsidized prostitution to exist in the United States like Switzerland and be expanded to include mental disorders, but prostitution would have to be legalized first. That's the first step.

 

[Abyayala]

A "beta uprising" won't work. I'm not just saying that to virtue signal. Terrorism or violence is extremely ineffective.

Sex has been made a human right in Switzerland and a couple other countries, but usually only extends to parapalegics. Not because they can't move, but because no one is attracted to them enough to go to their house and fuck them. It is entirely possible for subsidized prostitution to exist in the United States like Switzerland and be expanded to include mental disorders, but prostitution would have to be legalized first. That's the first step.

leftyincel sir, your comment is brilliant in our opinion. Very professional. Yes we are studying the Swiss Law with a couple of lawyers friends of us from our university to see how to legimitate this Right in the USA and my Country Peru. We would appreciate any Incel or Incel simpathizer who works as a lawyer or legal expert to give us a hand. leftyincel Yes we can walk that first step

 

[Deleted member 5861]

The normie council has denied your request.

 

[leftyincel]

leftyincel sir, your comment is brilliant in our opinion. Very professional. Yes we are studying the Swiss Law with a couple of lawyers friends of us from our university to see how to legimitate this Right in the USA and my Country Peru. We would appreciate any Incel or Incel simpathizer who works as a lawyer or legal expert to give us a hand. leftyincel Yes we can walk that first step

It wasn't that smart, but thanks.
there's no lawyers on this forum, just a guess. There's probably multiple prostitution legalization groups out there. It would be funny for incels to join the Tumblerinas on this issue, would be funny to see their reaction, especially if we got someone particularly autistic to "help out".

If you want to do digital activism, Twitter might be the best place, but you'll need a few dozen people to trend something.
And yea a lawyer is a good idea.

 

[Abyayala]

Mister Creep, excuse me sir, what is the normie council, I know what is a Normalized Mind, or Normie, (a person who follows the maisntream of jew-christian secular set of mind) but the term of a —council of normies— is new to me, sir.( It sounds like a metaphor to talk about the common sense of the statu quo)

 

[Chileancel]

Chileancel eres de Chile, hermano? Yo se que los Peruanos y chilenos no siempe nos entendimos en el pasado, pero: Tu comentario esta genial! excelente. Admiro a tus Mapu-Sche. "La gente de la tierra". Mientras ellos mantuvieron al español derrotado y frustrado al otro lado del Biobio las mujeres nativas prefirieron a los hombres nativos. Y sobre lo que dices: Exacto, si las cosas siguen asi los hombres sexualmente insatisfechos serán millones , de hecho ya lo son, pero la verguenza es grande para confesarlo. Amigo, yo no lo llamo mundo moderno, es el mundo creado por el judaísmo y el cristianismo seculares ese es el enemigo ideológico. Una vez se derrumbe la mitología judía-cristiana hay una via para acabar con este problema. Créeme.

Are you from Chile, brother? I know that Peruvians and chileans do not always understand each other in the past but: Your comment is great! excellent: Remember the Mapu-Sche people from Chile? While they kept the spaniards defeated and frustrated on the other side of the river Biobío, the native women preferred the native men beauty. And on the other hand, I do not call this " the modern world" but the world created by the secular Judaism and Christianity that is our ideological enemy. Once the Jewish-Christian mythology collapses there will be a way to end this problem. Trust me

Finally. Exactly, if things keep going this way, the numeber of sexually deprived men will raise to millions, in fact they are already millions, but the shame is great for them to confess.

Yes, I am. I'm not concerned at all with nationalities; all incels are brothers to me. Although I don't like the Jewish elite, they are an ethnicity and not a full race. You may have something here that I've been wondering for some time. You also mentioned the native women preferring their own men. It could be that the actual predilection for Caucasic features comes from colonization and the expansion of the white race. People used to talk about the fact that beauty standards change, but that's not accurate. I actually argued once with a professor about how artists in the middle ages used "bigger" women as a sign of beauty, but I mentioned that their faces were still made symmetrical. Have you ever seen a black cherub? or a sculpture with all the defects we know so well here?
And I see myself as a victim of this romanticization of western culture. I feel that subconsciously look up to Nordic or caucasian features as more attractive even when presented in other races.

I think this looks better than this

and this

looks better than this

Remember we Latinos come from the mix between the native and the Spaniards, Portuguese and some French. While most races have distinctive features, I still think we prefer narrow noses and small lips, a defined eyelid and clearer skin.

Look at this woman, she's part Portuguese, Indigenous, Swiss, African and Japanese. Yet the predominant features we deem attractive are the European ones. As I said, I don't know if this is a consequence of colonialism or it's actually a Judeo-Christian phenomenon, as you say, but I know I'm not alone in this.

 

[Abyayala]

Hello fellas, I was away for a week and then incels.is was down! I was really determined to contact some of you somehow on the web, I am happy to find this alter energy domain, like terminator we are hard to die, what happened?? were we banned by the Israel or u.s.a governments? Wow

 

[Darth Incel]

Sounds good. But id be happy with a sex robot. i cant afford one.

 

[Deleted member 1410]

I fear that the same strategies that have worked for women and other parasitical classes that have latched on to victimology won't work for us.

The real blackpill is that there is no such thing as human rights, they only exist in the minds foids and slaves. The universe doesn't care about your rights, and never will. Once you cast off the shackles of human rights, you are free to destroy those who believe they are protected by them.

if that's undoubtedly true, I can violate a woman's rights if I please and if people complain they can tongue my asshole.

 

[mviper]

if that's undoubtedly true, I can violate a woman's rights if I please and if people complain they can tongue my asshole.

Well, the flip side of it is just as true as well. They can react and destroy you through any number of means. In the old days, they'd break you on the wheel, flay you alive, quarter you with horses or stone you outside the city gates.

What people don't understand is they're told rights exist an a guarantee. But there are no guarantees in the universe. Tomorrow a meteorite could drop on your house and kill you. What good were your rights? Did they protect you? Human civilization is just as much a force of nature as anything else for those capable of seeing it as such, it's merely operating at a higher order of complexity.

 

[mlcurrycel]

It may seem difficult to understand the realities of the blackpill. It may be hard to come to terms with how - and why - the world functions as it does. And even when you do, it is even harder to understand where to go next.

But there is one set of techniques which shines a clear light on the world we live in. A scientific and logical analysis of systems of limited resources - Marxism. When we undertake a Marxist analysis of the sexual economy, we immediately find its nuances explained and its realities presented for all to see.

The fundamental element of inequality is exploitation. In economic Marxism, exploitation occurs when a capitalist takes most of the value a worker's labor creates, leaving them barely enough to survive. In other words, the worker's surplus value is stolen from them. This is how capitalists make profits. Sometimes, the capitalists let some segments of workers keep more of their value, in order to bribe and pacify them.

In the sexual economy, there are two distinct classes of men - Chads...and everyone else. There is a group which keeps most women for itself - the Chad-Bourgeois - and a much larger group which, despite being responsible for maintaining global civilization with their labor so that Chad is free to take all he wants, is denied most women. These are the sexual proletariat.

The sexuality of women should be evenly spread among society, but it is not. Instead, it is commodified by sexual capitalism and given to Chad. The Chad-Bourgeoisie allow the sexual proletariat to have just as much pussy as they need to keep the human race alive through reproduction. But even here is it not fair; the proletariat get Chad's leftovers - only when the Chad-Bourgeois no longer want a woman does she go to settle down, marry, and reproduce with a non-Chad.

Now, I mentioned before that the economic bourgeois sometimes bribe workers by giving them more than they would otherwise. In the modern era, the Chad-Bourgeois are facing a world where the proletariat is no longer consigned to the feudal life of arranged marriages without any questions asked, and can see the reality of sexual inequality via media and their own insights. The Chad-Bourgeois responds by bribing the sexual proletariat - they, too, are now allowed to have sex before marriage, and perhaps fuck many women. These women are, of course, still the ones Chad doesn't want, but it bribes most of the world. Remember, this happened when the sexual free market, where women can now choose their partners without having to marry a non-Chad in the end, replaced the Feudal system of arranged marriage. This is sexual capitalism.

The people so bribed are normies. This is the main reason why normies are blind to the sexual capitalist system and lack revolutionary potential.

But the system is imperfect. Due to the female's nature, not all members of the proletariat can be bribed just by the Chad-Bourgeois allowing (pseudo) free sex for everyone. A group at the bottom is inevitability left out - incels.

As sexual feudalism shifted to sexual capitalism, a contradiction was exposed - the Contradiction of Sexual Capitalism is the existence of incels, and the conclusion of the capitalist stage of history must be the resolving of this contradiction. Due to how females are hardwired to be only attracted to Chads, incels always lose in a sexual free market. Many females would rather be single than marry an incel, and a result the incels become a class which doesn't even get marriage, much less any additional bribes. Due to their extreme condition, the incels become "blackpilled" and see the system as it is. The incels thus attain class consciousness.

The basic structure of the sexual world is that the Chad-Bourgeois take all the pussy they can, especially the desirable kind, while eventually passing their leftovers to the sexual proletariat as bribes and allowances. Among the latter group, those are who successfully bribed are normies, and those who become class conscious are incels.

So how do the Chad-Bourgeois manage to keep society under their control, even with incels attain class consciousness? In Marxism, the answer is the Base and superstructure. In a sexual capitalist society, all we know is shaped by the system of sexual economy we live in. Our culture, beliefs, and so on are bent to conform to and reinforce the Chad-Bourgeois narrative. In order to prevent the sexual proletariat from attaining class consciousness, the Chad-Bourgouse use culture to create a false consciousness for them to live in instead.

The key to understanding this is to understand that truth is relative to one's class. Comrade Lenin explained this with his concept of partiinost, party truth. What is "true" depends on your class, truth for one class may be falsehood for another. Thus, what class's "truth" you're listening to is very important.

For example, let's take the Chad-Bourgeois idea of "confidence." Confidence is an intentionally vague idea to explain Chad's sexual success as anything besides winning the genetic lottery. It is said that someone - anyone - with "confidence" can also live like Chad does. For the Chad-Bourgoise, this is true. All a Chad has to do is be willing step outside or set up an online dating profile and they will get all the pussy they want. However, for the rest of the world, this is not the case. By enforcing the idea of confidence instead of genetic luck, Chad yet again bribes the sexual proletariat - bribes them with hope. The idea of confidence explains structural inequality as personal failure - in the same way the capitalist tells the exploited worker that he, too, would be rich if he only worked harder, so does the Chad tell the sexual proletariat that they could have sex if they were only just a little more confident. In this way, the sexual proletariat are blamed for their own oppression - their celibacy is a result of their own moral failings, because they were not "confident" enough. The Chad-Bourgeois present themselves as having earned the pussy they inherent, while the rest of the world deserves to live without. Confidence is just one example of how sexual capitalism distorts culture and creates false narratives to keep people blind.

Normies love false narratives because they are bribed. A normie, who may have even had sex, believes that his success in the past means the confidence narrative and so on is true - he can truly be a Chad, if he works hard enough! Thus the normies convince themselves Chad's world is not only fair but desirable, because they too might have a chance of being chad.

Normies are deceived to varying degrees.

A regular normie has had their bribe a few times and doesn't bother to think about the realities of exploitation and the sexual economy. These normies can be blackpilled with evidence, but most of them just double down on the false consciousness due to their hope that they can be a Chad.

A beta is a normie who is faced with the reality of sexual inequality. He may be an orbiter, hanging around women in the hope he'll get sex. He may be a nice guy, who is nice to women for the same reason. He may be cucked, whereby he shares a single woman with other men so that he can at least get laid. Though he may deny it, he is painfully aware of these material and sexual realities.

A white knight has come against a blackpill before, and it scared them. They swing the other way - they actively try and spread Chad's narrative and enforce it, because they are trying convince themselves. There is great overlap between white knights and Betas, as the latter often exhibit white knight behavior. Many Betas turn into white knights when confronted with the black pill.

All normies have one thing in common - they do not want to accept the reality of the blackpill because they want to continue to believe they can be Chad. Another element is that they enjoy Chad's narrative when it suits them - regarding incels. They don't like to remember that Chad is sexually more successful then them because he is just better....but that's not so bad if it means that they are better than incels in turn, since they at least "earned" some sex and incels could not! In economic capitalism, the reality of economic status defined by class is ignored in favor of an individualist, democratic narrative, and sexual capitalism works the same way. The realities of incels and the Chad-Bourgeois are overlooked in favor of the lie that it's all about individual action, that any individual can work his way to the top of the sexual marketplace through hard work and imaginary concepts like "confidence."

By the methods described above, the Chad-Bourgeois extract all of the surplus value - in this context, surplus pussy - from the workers/sexual proletariat for themselves, and maintain the system through bribing normies and creating false consciousness. But here's where it gets really interesting - the immortal science of historical materialism explains even more than this.

Everyone knows that even among Chads there is a hierarchy - a racial hierarchy, with white Chad at the top. In the 1960s, Comrade Mao Zedong developed Marxist-Leninist-Maoism to explain the differences between the first world and the third world. Maoism reveals the first world exploits the third world through imperialism, and sets up a global class hierarchy of sorts. This economic hierarchy in turn ties into a sexual hierarchy - one where the imperialist white Chads are above the colonized Chads. A critique of imperialism explains the racial Chad hierarchy - which, of course, filters down into the sexual proletariat as well.

Following this trend, we can see the close interconnection between looks (Chad privilege) and economic success. Females like money and power...and it seems Chad ends up with those as well.

We all know that studies have proven Chads are much more likely to succeed in economic sphere. They are given quality jobs and often end up in very social, very prestigious positions like executive officers. But this shows us that wealth comes second. Poor Chads still dominate the sexual proletariat, and their poverty, on average, never lasts long. In other words, sexual inequality comes before economic inequality, and due to how intertwined they are, it means that economic inequality is a consequence of sexual inequality due to society's constant preference for Chad. Sexual inequality predates economic capitalism, feudalism, even primitive tribalism - sexual inequality is the original and eternal form of hierarchy, it is harbinger of all other inequalities in other areas.

Thus, the Revolutionary and Immortal Science of Marxist-Rodgerism is born. We see that the fundamental conflict is between the well endowed Chad-Bourgeoisie and the sexual proletariat, and that all other conflicts ultimately derive from this great inequality. We see that the Chad-Bourgeois manipulates culture and society to further its narratives and worldview to maintain this power structure. Finally, we must conclude that the only way forward for humanity is to dismantle the system of sexual capitalism so that sex can be distributed fairly to all members of society.

Incels of the world, rise up! You have nothing to lose but your chains!