Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel I May Be Moving to Canada

  • Thread starter Deleted member 43188
  • Start date
"Canada" is cucked and a fake "country" (British colony).

Why would you choose British monarchism and Communism over Capitalist Freedom?
America has been run out of Israel since pre-WW2 but keep coping freedomfag
 
America has been run out of Israel since pre-WW2 but keep coping freedomfag
At this point, is there any place on Earth yet that hasn't been Jewed?
 
First of all, while police brutality is a problem and there are officers who are racist, I don't think that's the main concern for black folks. This isn't the pre-1960s anymore.

What kills blacks the most are black-on-black violence and hard drugs.

Businesses are people's livelihoods. If they get burned down or looted, how is the owner of thay business going to bring it back up after losing their money and their shops being vandalized?

They have nothing to do with the problem. And again, many of those business owners are minorities themselves.

Now you're admitting that we have a democracy that works.

I still don't think people should get vaxxed against our will.

True, but just like that Congress chose not to find him guilty.

Al Capone was a criminal. Sure, all these politicians try to dish out propaganda and calling the opposition out anyways.

It's always gonna happen. Will Biden do anything to stop police brutality or stop gang violence?
>What kills blacks the most are black-on-black violence and hard drugs.

Well that's another problem, and I think we need to address that too. But regardless, black people's distrust of authority and establishment figures is part of the reason of why they go down that past. Reforming the police so they feel more comfortable with civil authority will be a major help in getting black people to integrate with larger society.

>Businesses are people's livelihoods. If they get burned down or looted, how is the owner of thay business going to bring it back up after losing their money and their shops being vandalized?

It's horrible, but as I said, it's a tradeoff. At least they're not dead, at least they weren't choked to death like George Floyd. I'd rather their businesses not burn but I think it was a worth it to get the much needed reform.

>Now you're admitting that we have a democracy that works.

I never denied that. I think we have a democracy, but it's under threat from Republicans... we have to maintain our democracy through vigilance and refusing to underestimate hostile fascist forces.

>True, but just like that Congress chose not to find him guilty.

Well yeah it was the Republican Party in the Senate, they had him cleared. Very strong conflict of interest there

>Al Capone was a criminal. Sure, all these politicians try to dish out propaganda and calling the opposition out anyways.

The point is Trump played the Al Capone game, where he incited the insurrection without technically inciting it.

>It's always gonna happen. Will Biden do anything to stop police brutality or stop gang violence?

No but he's Progressive enough to allow reform and will maybe take an active role in the process. It's better than a Conservative or reactionary who is actively working to fight progress.
 
My consulting firm has offices in Canada, so I may be going there. Apparently I don't fit in with the "office culture :soy:" and they're looking for a reason to get rid of me despite the fact that I'm extremely nice and kind to everyone, they don't like me. Instead of firing me which is time consuming and the associated litigation risk, they may just transfer me to Canada. My office is the most sterotypical rich NY douchebag office in existence, a bunch of hot fratboys and sorority stacies flirting and giggling while I do all the real work, so I hate it here, I'm hoping Canada will be a lot better.

Anyway, Canada seems like a much better place for incels. I know it's run by a feminist nutjob but in many ways I think Canada is far more pro-incel than the United States. Here are my reasoning:

1) Americans are HOTTER than Canadians. All the hot Canadians move to the U.S for school and work. If you're a high-tier Chad or Stacy in Canada, you're moving to LA or NY. If you guys ever come to New York, you'll see what I mean, it's like a model fashion show on Monday mornings. Hot people EVERYWHERE. It's not that New Yorkers are naturally hot, it's that hot people from all over the place come to NY, and Canada is so close that it's not hard for them to wind up here. I've also noticed in Canadian media that the hot characters are never actually that hot compared to American shows. The Stacy in a Canadian show would often be a Becky in an American show, and the Chads in Canadian TV are just above-average Brad dudes from American shows. It's clear that moving to Canada will push my SMV up a few points, I will still be an ugly male, but at least i won't be a hideous monster in comparison to these angelic beauties.

2) Colder weather....girls won't be as revealing. This drives me so crazy. NY isn't that bad because it's up North, but during the summer girls where very scantily clad clothing. It drives me crazy because I know it's only for Chad and it arouses me so much, it's like they are teasing me, mocking me for my inferiority.

3) Nicer people.... not much more has to be said. Even if the girls are still hypergamous, at least i won't be as explicitly shit on as I am here. People are so rude in America, at least in Canada there's a layer of politeness so I won't be constantly reminded by how shitty I am

4) Gun control... I am terrified of guns. Thankfully New York has more restrictive gun policies but honestly it's not enough. Some idiot could buy a gun from a Texas gunshow and cross State Lines. Even though that's illegal, it barely seems to be enforced. Look at Kyle Rittenhouse, a 17 year old who crossed state lines with an AR-15 and murdered two people yet got off scot-free on every charge. I would feel 1000x safer if I lived somewhere like Canada where guns were totally kept off the market except under very particular circumstances, and after the latest Texas shooting, the Prime Minister declared a freeze on all handgun sales, and is soon to push for stronger legislation against gun ownership.

5) Mandatory Vaccinations. I have shitty genetics, and shitty genetics tends to come in a package. I have a compromised immune system. Covid-19 for me is especially dangerous. I thank God everyday that NY had a mandatory vaccination policy for passports and whatnot because I know that the vast majority of people here are vaccinated. There are a few demographics that have lower vaccination rates and ngl I tend to stay away from the more often. Even though the vax pass is dropped, far more people got the vaccine because there's nothing to do without it. I would love to live in Canada that has even higher vaccination rates, and I wouldn't feel scared taking the plane there because everybody on Canadian airlines or on planes entering Canada must be fully vaccinated.

6) Universal Healthcare. I won't have to worry about going bankrupt if I get some disease that my shitty immune system can't fight against. I am not the most healthy person, my family has a lot of preexisting conditions. I would love for a universal healthcare system to ensure I won't go bankrupt because a few rich assholes don't want their taxes to go up a few % points. Canada is far more socialist in the sense that rich Chad assholes actually have to pay for their fellow citizens

7) Less corruption: Americans have lost faith in their institutions. No one trusts the cops in America, no one trusts the medical community, no one trusts the scientists, no one trusts the government. As irrational as I believe a lot of these thoughts are, largely peddled by fearmongers in the alternative media, it doesn't create a very stable society for people to be so distrustful of their institutions. In Canada, people generally trust the government and established authorities. This is why during the Trucker Protest Trudeau was able to enact the emergency act, effectively declaring martial law, seizing bank accounts of protesters, and launching federal investigators to track them down. People aren't worried about some Alex Jones tier 1984 Grey State conspiracy in Canada, they see the government as a tool at their disposal, and as citizens of a democracy they feel empowered to discuss how this tool can be used to keep us safe. That's the society I want to live in, not one where any policy solution is treated as a U.N conspiracy run by Bill Gates to sterilize everyone. If you still haven't figured out how this relates to inceldom, it's obvious. The more corrupt and less grounded in institutional procedures a society is, the more that social sway and likability becomes a determinant to your success. Caroll Quigley wrote about this in his discussions about the Pakistani-Peruvian axis.... societies built on corruption and nepotism over established formal institutions will inevitably benefit those with more social dominance as opposed to formal authority.... i.e the CHADS
high IQ tbh. I would move to cucknada as well if the tech salaries weren't utter shit and housing was cheaper. But ignoring those 2 things, Canada does mog. Better in almost every other way.
 
high IQ tbh. I would move to cucknada as well if the tech salaries weren't utter shit and housing was cheaper. But ignoring those 2 things, Canada does mog. Better in almost every other way.
Tech salaries are very very high in Ontario.
 
>What kills blacks the most are black-on-black violence and hard drugs.

Well that's another problem, and I think we need to address that too. But regardless, black people's distrust of authority and establishment figures is part of the reason of why they go down that past. Reforming the police so they feel more comfortable with civil authority will be a major help in getting black people to integrate with larger society.
Yeah, but the police isn't their main problem.

Also, police abuse their authority not just on black people.

Remember Daniel Shaver? But yet when he died, no body went out and protested and looted shit.
>Businesses are people's livelihoods. If they get burned down or looted, how is the owner of thay business going to bring it back up after losing their money and their shops being vandalized?

It's horrible, but as I said, it's a tradeoff. At least they're not dead, at least they weren't choked to death like George Floyd. I'd rather their businesses not burn but I think it was a worth it to get the much needed reform.
So? For the death of one man? Again, the police involved in the incident were convicted and George Floyd wasn't a saint either (he was high on drugs and was convicted in the past for robbery).
>Now you're admitting that we have a democracy that works.

I never denied that. I think we have a democracy, but it's under threat from Republicans... we have to maintain our democracy through vigilance and refusing to underestimate hostile fascist forces.
Maybe we should stop identifying with political parties and trying to identify with labels, and start making sure if those politicians really follow through with their words.

Politics isn't black and white, there are various issues that goes across ideologies and just because you believe in one thing and disagree with the other doesn't mean the the party you identify with is always against you.

Fuck if they're Democrat or Republican? That don't mean shit if it's all just cronyism instead of upholding what they truly believe even if it goes against their party.
>True, but just like that Congress chose not to find him guilty.

Well yeah it was the Republican Party in the Senate, they had him cleared. Very strong conflict of interest there
Yes. But not because of ideology, they're just labels the give themselves to try to get votes certain facets of people.
>Al Capone was a criminal. Sure, all these politicians try to dish out propaganda and calling the opposition out anyways.

The point is Trump played the Al Capone game, where he incited the insurrection without technically inciting it.
Okay. Al Capone was still a criminal because he had direct control over his minions and told them what to do.
>It's always gonna happen. Will Biden do anything to stop police brutality or stop gang violence?

No but he's Progressive enough to allow reform and will maybe take an active role in the process. It's better than a Conservative or reactionary who is actively working to fight progress.
Biden ain't gonna do shit. So if another George Floyd situation happens, are they all gonna blame it on Biden not doing shit this time?
 
Oh but you can still afford rent and food and alcohol and stuff. You don't need anything more than that.
my goal is to speed run retirement for that reason I have to stick to USA. I will jump ship when I have enough to retire likely to Portugal or some anglo country.
 
Yeah, but the police isn't their main problem.

Also, police abuse their authority not just on black people.

Remember Daniel Shaver? But yet when he died, no body went out and protested and looted shit.

So? For the death of one man? Again, the police involved in the incident were convicted and George Floyd wasn't a saint either (he was high on drugs and was convicted in the past for robbery).

Maybe we should stop identifying with political parties and trying to identify with labels, and start making sure if those politicians really follow through with their words.

Politics isn't black and white, there are various issues that goes across ideologies and just because you believe in one thing and disagree with the other doesn't mean the the party you identify with is always against you.

Fuck if they're Democrat or Republican? That don't mean shit if it's all just cronyism instead of upholding what they truly believe even if it goes against their party.

Yes. But not because of ideology, they're just labels the give themselves to try to get votes certain facets of people.

Okay. Al Capone was still a criminal because he had direct control over his minions and told them what to do.

Biden ain't gonna do shit. So if another George Floyd situation happens, are they all gonna blame it on Biden not doing shit this time?
>Remember Daniel Shaver? But yet when he died, no body went out and protested and looted shit.

Police brutality disproportionately affects black folks. There's anecdotes surrounding whites being abused, but overall it's white cops abusing black people. This has been known about for years and is a reason why black people have to teach their kids to avoid cops unless they absolutely have to rely on them.

>So? For the death of one man? Again, the police involved in the incident were convicted and George Floyd wasn't a saint either (he was high on drugs and was convicted in the past for robbery).

BLM wasn't about justice for Flloyd, Floyd was merely a symbolic representation of the brutality blacks experience at the hands of police. It's good those men were convicted, but unfortunately many times the offenders are not convicted... the movement was about making sure that doesn't happen again.

>Politics isn't black and white, there are various issues that goes across ideologies and just because you believe in one thing and disagree with the other doesn't mean the the party you identify with is always against you.

Except the Republicans are very clearly a fascist political movement. They recognize the changing Demographics in America, they see how they're dying amongst the eligible voters... and that's why their strategy is about voter suppression and demagogy. They use voter ID laws to restrict black folks, gerrymandering to tilt elections, and recently they have been attempting insurrections to seize power (i.e January 6). The plan under Trump was to stack the courts so they could get away with openly discarding democracy. Trump has talked about opening up libel laws so he could "sue the media" if they say something he doesn't like, his loyalist judges would back him up and assist him in a lawfare crusade against independent journalism.

> Yes. But not because of ideology, they're just labels the give themselves to try to get votes certain facets of people.

It's because the Republican Party is a monarchy now with Trump as the king. It's no longer an independent wing of our political system, a facet of thinkers, it's a hivemind of Trump loyalists.

>Okay. Al Capone was still a criminal because he had direct control over his minions and told them what to do.

I mean it's only a matter of degree. Trump was pretty clearly controlling the people who went to the Capitol Building the same way Al Capone sent people out to do his bidding. Obviously they weren't on his payroll but Trump was the one giving marching orders.

>Biden ain't gonna do shit. So if another George Floyd situation happens, are they all gonna blame it on Biden not doing shit this time?

Biden would be far more likely to push for and advocate for police reform. Trump went full damage control and sent federal agents after the protesters. A totally undemocratic move. He suggested shooting the protesters in the legs.
 
>Remember Daniel Shaver? But yet when he died, no body went out and protested and looted shit.

Police brutality disproportionately affects black folks. There's anecdotes surrounding whites being abused, but overall it's white cops abusing black people. This has been known about for years and is a reason why black people have to teach their kids to avoid cops unless they absolutely have to rely on them.
Police brutality isn't their biggest problem.

Yes, they are racist cops but that's on the individual officers and not the police as a whole. I agree that the police has become too militarized and they view themselves sometimes as above normal citizens in abusing their power.
>So? For the death of one man? Again, the police involved in the incident were convicted and George Floyd wasn't a saint either (he was high on drugs and was convicted in the past for robbery).

BLM wasn't about justice for Flloyd, Floyd was merely a symbolic representation of the brutality blacks experience at the hands of police. It's good those men were convicted, but unfortunately many times the offenders are not convicted... the movement was about making sure that doesn't happen again.
I'm not against expressing the issue and protesting. That still doesn't excuse the looting, but I know not everyone protesting were criminals.

The rioters weren't stealing to "make a point", they used the unrest as an excuse to do what they did for their own selfish reasons.
>Politics isn't black and white, there are various issues that goes across ideologies and just because you believe in one thing and disagree with the other doesn't mean the the party you identify with is always against you.

Except the Republicans are very clearly a fascist political movement. They recognize the changing Demographics in America, they see how they're dying amongst the eligible voters... and that's why their strategy is about voter suppression and demagogy. They use voter ID laws to restrict black folks, gerrymandering to tilt elections, and recently they have been attempting insurrections to seize power (i.e January 6). The plan under Trump was to stack the courts so they could get away with openly discarding democracy. Trump has talked about opening up libel laws so he could "sue the media" if they say something he doesn't like, his loyalist judges would back him up and assist him in a lawfare crusade against independent journalism.
The Democrats are just as bad, convincing people to follow a certain doctrine and hate the other.

This is why I don't follow political parties and consume mainstream media. Idgaf about Trump or Biden.
> Yes. But not because of ideology, they're just labels the give themselves to try to get votes certain facets of people.

It's because the Republican Party is a monarchy now with Trump as the king. It's no longer an independent wing of our political system, a facet of thinkers, it's a hivemind of Trump loyalists.
Trump doesn't represent all Republicans. There are Republicans who didn't like him and in my POV Trump says what he said to get people with a certain mindset to vote for him, just like the Democrats they say what they say to get people with a certain mindset to vote for them.

People can believe in things that can go on both sides and belong in neither.
>Okay. Al Capone was still a criminal because he had direct control over his minions and told them what to do.

I mean it's only a matter of degree. Trump was pretty clearly controlling the people who went to the Capitol Building the same way Al Capone sent people out to do his bidding. Obviously they weren't on his payroll but Trump was the one giving marching orders.
Yeah, like I said he convinces people who follow a certain mindset to support him.
>Biden ain't gonna do shit. So if another George Floyd situation happens, are they all gonna blame it on Biden not doing shit this time?

Biden would be far more likely to push for and advocate for police reform. Trump went full damage control and sent federal agents after the protesters. A totally undemocratic move. He suggested shooting the protesters in the legs.
He ain't gonna do shit.

Even when Obama was president you still had high-profile incidents like Trevor Martin and Michael Brown.
 
I live here. Can’t afford house, lower wages, been waiting months to meet with a surgeon for something. Also many people don’t have a family doctor and are on a huge wait list. Most of the money going into healthcare isn’t going to doctors or research or better tech, it’s going to administration jfl. That’s why hospitals here are overwhelmed every flu season :feelskek:
 
I live here. Can’t afford house, lower wages, been waiting months to meet with a surgeon for something. Also many people don’t have a family doctor and are on a huge wait list. Most of the money going into healthcare isn’t going to doctors or research or better tech, it’s going to administration jfl. That’s why hospitals here are overwhelmed every flu season :feelskek:
Aren't you also a spic living up there, jfl?
 
Police brutality isn't their biggest problem.

Yes, they are racist cops but that's on the individual officers and not the police as a whole. I agree that the police has become too militarized and they view themselves sometimes as above normal citizens in abusing their power.

I'm not against expressing the issue and protesting. That still doesn't excuse the looting, but I know not everyone protesting were criminals.

The rioters weren't stealing to "make a point", they used the unrest as an excuse to do what they did for their own selfish reasons.

The Democrats are just as bad, convincing people to follow a certain doctrine and hate the other.

This is why I don't follow political parties and consume mainstream media. Idgaf about Trump or Biden.

Trump doesn't represent all Republicans. There are Republicans who didn't like him and in my POV Trump says what he said to get people with a certain mindset to vote for him, just like the Democrats they say what they say to get people with a certain mindset to vote for them.

People can believe in things that can go on both sides and belong in neither.

Yeah, like I said he convinces people who follow a certain mindset to support him.

He ain't gonna do shit.

Even when Obama was president you still had high-profile incidents like Trevor Martin and Michael Brown.
>Yes, they are racist cops but that's on the individual officers and not the police as a whole. I agree that the police has become too militarized and they view themselves sometimes as above normal citizens in abusing their power.

I'm not opposed to police militarization in and of itself, although i agree for America it may be useful. What I'm against is the systemic racism within the police force that causes them to disproportionately target black Americans. If we had a militarized police force that targeted right-wing extremism, I would support that. This is why I have a lot of respect for the FBI and ATF. I think they've done very corrupt things in the past, but looking at what they've done lately, I think they've been very apt at keeping Americans safe. The FBI and ATF have taken down a lot of extremist organizations hell bent on political terrorism.

> The Democrats are just as bad, convincing people to follow a certain doctrine and hate the other.

If anything the Democrats haven't been doing that enough. They have been passive to the fascist attacks from the Republican party. There was not nearly enough push for the January 6th commission. Lawmakers who were behind that should have gone to jail. The whole movement should have been squashed, bank accounts should have been frozen. When Hitler engaged in his Beer Hall Putsch, he went to prison, and ten years later Hitler still took power and declared himself dictator. I'm worried that America is going down that same route. Democrat apathy will lead to Republican Fascist tyranny.

>This is why I don't follow political parties and consume mainstream media. Idgaf about Trump or Biden.

People love to bash mainstream news sources but they are arguably the most reliable places to get information. CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, etc... all paint certain narratives, but when they lie, they lie by omission, not by direct fact. They will portray the facts in a way that suits their interest, but they'll be facts nonetheless. Alternative media sources don't even bother to fact check, they just explicitly lie. And even if you find one or two lies from CNN or MSNBC, it pails in comparison to lies of the far-right. The far-right is built on perpetual lying and gaslighting, newspeak, and doublethink of its audience. What scares me is that Fox News, a mainstream source, is increasingly going down this path. There's been a few good people who resigned from Fox News over the January 6 conspiracy theories, which odes me a lot of respect for them, but as long as Tucker still has a voice, fascism has a grip on the masses.

>Trump doesn't represent all Republicans. There are Republicans who didn't like him and in my POV Trump says what he said to get people with a certain mindset to vote for him, just like the Democrats they say what they say to get people with a certain mindset to vote for them.

Yes, there's a few good Republicans like Adam Kinzinger and Mitt Romney, they are actually standing up for democracy. However, most of the party are Trump sycophants. They worship him like he's an American monarch. It's terrifying and could yield disastrous results for the country if too many powerful people get sucked into this cult.

>Yeah, like I said he convinces people who follow a certain mindset to support him.

Just like Trump

>Even when Obama was president you still had high-profile incidents like Trevor Martin and Michael Brown.

Obama actively supported steps to solve these issues, Trump actively supports and engenders what caused these issues. Trump encourages systemic racism, Obama took steps to mitigate it. That's the difference.
 
>Yes, they are racist cops but that's on the individual officers and not the police as a whole. I agree that the police has become too militarized and they view themselves sometimes as above normal citizens in abusing their power.

I'm not opposed to police militarization in and of itself, although i agree for America it may be useful. What I'm against is the systemic racism within the police force that causes them to disproportionately target black Americans. If we had a militarized police force that targeted right-wing extremism, I would support that. This is why I have a lot of respect for the FBI and ATF. I think they've done very corrupt things in the past, but looking at what they've done lately, I think they've been very apt at keeping Americans safe. The FBI and ATF have taken down a lot of extremist organizations hell bent on political terrorism.
I don't think the police should be militarize. If there was a situation that required such a level then the National Guard should be used.

But I don't think civilian peace officers should take the role of a military.
> The Democrats are just as bad, convincing people to follow a certain doctrine and hate the other.

If anything the Democrats haven't been doing that enough. They have been passive to the fascist attacks from the Republican party. There was not nearly enough push for the January 6th commission. Lawmakers who were behind that should have gone to jail. The whole movement should have been squashed, bank accounts should have been frozen. When Hitler engaged in his Beer Hall Putsch, he went to prison, and ten years later Hitler still took power and declared himself dictator. I'm worried that America is going down that same route. Democrat apathy will lead to Republican Fascist tyranny.
So trading one form of fascism with another. Fascism is fascism.

You agree with taking the rights away of one group of people who do one thing, but do you think the same should be done to rioters during the BLM protestors? I'm not talking about the protesters themselves but the vandalizes and the looters.

Should they be punished for breaching the peace and for insurrection? Yes. But that doesn't mean we should freeze their bank accounts.
>This is why I don't follow political parties and consume mainstream media. Idgaf about Trump or Biden.

People love to bash mainstream news sources but they are arguably the most reliable places to get information. CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, etc... all paint certain narratives, but when they lie, they lie by omission, not by direct fact. They will portray the facts in a way that suits their interest, but they'll be facts nonetheless. Alternative media sources don't even bother to fact check, they just explicitly lie. And even if you find one or two lies from CNN or MSNBC, it pails in comparison to lies of the far-right. The far-right is built on perpetual lying and gaslighting, newspeak, and doublethink of its audience. What scares me is that Fox News, a mainstream source, is increasingly going down this path. There's been a few good people who resigned from Fox News over the January 6 conspiracy theories, which odes me a lot of respect for them, but as long as Tucker still has a voice, fascism has a grip on the masses.
You're just a follower for MSM dude. Yes, shit like InfoWars and a lot alt-media is bullshit also.

It's true that any kind of news twists things to try to get people to view issues in a certain way. Not saying that they're not useful but you have to be careful and not just stick to one source.
>Trump doesn't represent all Republicans. There are Republicans who didn't like him and in my POV Trump says what he said to get people with a certain mindset to vote for him, just like the Democrats they say what they say to get people with a certain mindset to vote for them.

Yes, there's a few good Republicans like Adam Kinzinger and Mitt Romney, they are actually standing up for democracy. However, most of the party are Trump sycophants. They worship him like he's an American monarch. It's terrifying and could yield disastrous results for the country if too many powerful people get sucked into this cult.
Again, don't follow political parties dude. They're all fucked.
>Yeah, like I said he convinces people who follow a certain mindset to support him.

Just like Trump
Just like any politician trying to get votes and support.
>Even when Obama was president you still had high-profile incidents like Trevor Martin and Michael Brown.

Obama actively supported steps to solve these issues, Trump actively supports and engenders what caused these issues. Trump encourages systemic racism, Obama took steps to mitigate it. That's the difference.
No, Obama didn't do shit. Tell me how exactly Obama stopped police brutality. I remember during his presidency there was the whole stop-and-frisk situation.

And what will Sleepy Joe do? He's too old an unfit to run the country anyway.
 
I don't think the police should be militarize. If there was a situation that required such a level then the National Guard should be used.

But I don't think civilian peace officers should take the role of a military.

So trading one form of fascism with another. Fascism is fascism.

You agree with taking the rights away of one group of people who do one thing, but do you think the same should be done to rioters during the BLM protestors? I'm not talking about the protesters themselves but the vandalizes and the looters.

Should they be punished for breaching the peace and for insurrection? Yes. But that doesn't mean we should freeze their bank accounts.

You're just a follower for MSM dude. Yes, shit like InfoWars and a lot alt-media is bullshit also.

It's true that any kind of news twists things to try to get people to view issues in a certain way. Not saying that they're not useful but you have to be careful and not just stick to one source.

Again, don't follow political parties dude. They're all fucked.

Just like any politician trying to get votes and support.

No, Obama didn't do shit. Tell me how exactly Obama stopped police brutality. I remember during his presidency there was the whole stop-and-frisk situation.

And what will Sleepy Joe do? He's too old an unfit to run the country anyway
>I don't think the police should be militarize. If there was a situation that required such a level then the National Guard should be used.

I actually agree here, I'd rather defund the police and have the FBI and federal police forces play a larger role. I feel they can be a lot more objective and clear and unbiased. The FBI is also more heavily monitored and engages with affirmative action a lot more, ensuring some level of diversity within its ranks. Many local police forces are filled to the brim with neo-nazis and far-right extremists.

>Should they be punished for breaching the peace and for insurrection? Yes. But that doesn't mean we should freeze their bank accounts.

Well this question is hard to answer. I do think that people who loot and burn businesses should be punished, you can't have crimes go unpunished. However, I do think in this instance they were doing it for a good cause. I don't think it should be legal for them to do what they did, but I would support efforts to bale them out and provide for their legal defense.

It's like, I don't think that violent rebellion should be legal, I think that protesters who turn violent should be punished; however, if in Nazi Germany, a violent Jewish resistance member was arrested and thrown in prison, I would deeply sympathize them despite being law breakers. So I do believe that violent protesters should be punished but in certain instances I highly sympathize. Fighting for black civil rights is one of those times.

>You're just a follower for MSM dude. Yes, shit like InfoWars and a lot alt-media is bullshit also It's true that any kind of news twists things to try to get people to view issues in a certain way. Not saying that they're not useful but you have to be careful and not just stick to one source.

That's why I don't just blindly accept it, I deeply think about everything before I solidify my opinion. I simply trust mainstream news sources more than I trust internet sources. Everybody gets their news from something or somewhere. No one can see the world through astral projection, and until we can we must accept information channels as an essential part of our life.

>Just like any politician trying to get votes and support.

Ok, then I am strongly opposed to the strategy that Trump is using to get votes, I believe he's playing on fear and populism. Biden is playing on reasonable solutions and trust in expert consensus. I will trust a politician that listens to the experts and seeks rational solutions rather than a populist playing the masses.

>No, Obama didn't do shit. Tell me how exactly Obama stopped police brutality. I remember during his presidency there was the whole stop-and-frisk situation.

A lot of those issues are handled at the local level so Obama didn't really have too much direct authority. One thing he did do that was huge was sign the ESG bill which gave investors tax breaks if they invested in companies that scored high enough on ESG scales. This also rewarded government agencies, including police departments, with additional funding.... if they followed ESG protocals. One of the ESG metrics was tackling systemic racism and ensuring equity amongst both internal group members and external constituents. This is why every big company has become so Progressive in the last 10 years and why every government department is now boasting about their ethnic diversity and how much they love Ukraine. I disagree with a lot when it comes to SJWs, I'm anti-gay for example... I'm a strong Catholic... but when it comes to racism I think it was a very good decision. Every government department has had to at the very least pretend to be BLM supporting anti-racist activists because they're worried about dropping in the ESG system, which would not exist if not for President Obama.
 
>I don't think the police should be militarize. If there was a situation that required such a level then the National Guard should be used.

I actually agree here, I'd rather defund the police and have the FBI and federal police forces play a larger role. I feel they can be a lot more objective and clear and unbiased. The FBI is also more heavily monitored and engages with affirmative action a lot more, ensuring some level of diversity within its ranks. Many local police forces are filled to the brim with neo-nazis and far-right extremists.
I still think the local police should handle minor situations though.
>Should they be punished for breaching the peace and for insurrection? Yes. But that doesn't mean we should freeze their bank accounts.

Well this question is hard to answer. I do think that people who loot and burn businesses should be punished, you can't have crimes go unpunished. However, I do think in this instance they were doing it for a good cause. I don't think it should be legal for them to do what they did, but I would support efforts to bale them out and provide for their legal defense.

It's like, I don't think that violent rebellion should be legal, I think that protesters who turn violent should be punished; however, if in Nazi Germany, a violent Jewish resistance member was arrested and thrown in prison, I would deeply sympathize them despite being law breakers. So I do believe that violent protesters should be punished but in certain instances I highly sympathize. Fighting for black civil rights is one of those times.
Well, when you mean by rebellion it is a different cause if say for example you directed your violence towards the police or the authorities who are under the control of the government, rather than vandalizing or looting property of private citizens.

Again, the people who were thieving weren't doing it because "#BlackLivesMatter", they were doing it for their own selfish gain and taking advantage of the situation.
>You're just a follower for MSM dude. Yes, shit like InfoWars and a lot alt-media is bullshit also It's true that any kind of news twists things to try to get people to view issues in a certain way. Not saying that they're not useful but you have to be careful and not just stick to one source.

That's why I don't just blindly accept it, I deeply think about everything before I solidify my opinion. I simply trust mainstream news sources more than I trust internet sources. Everybody gets their news from something or somewhere. No one can see the world through astral projection, and until we can we must accept information channels as an essential part of our life.
But yeah, I don't follow the news or what everyone is talking about. If everybody is talking about something on the Internet, I would already be hearing it elsewhere.
>Just like any politician trying to get votes and support.

Ok, then I am strongly opposed to the strategy that Trump is using to get votes, I believe he's playing on fear and populism. Biden is playing on reasonable solutions and trust in expert consensus. I will trust a politician that listens to the experts and seeks rational solutions rather than a populist playing the masses.
Every politician uses that strategy.

Everybody thinks that the party they're aligned with is always correct and the opposition are have a malicious intent to destroy everything.
>No, Obama didn't do shit. Tell me how exactly Obama stopped police brutality. I remember during his presidency there was the whole stop-and-frisk situation.

A lot of those issues are handled at the local level so Obama didn't really have too much direct authority. One thing he did do that was huge was sign the ESG bill which gave investors tax breaks if they invested in companies that scored high enough on ESG scales. This also rewarded government agencies, including police departments, with additional funding.... if they followed ESG protocals. One of the ESG metrics was tackling systemic racism and ensuring equity amongst both internal group members and external constituents. This is why every big company has become so Progressive in the last 10 years and why every government department is now boasting about their ethnic diversity and how much they love Ukraine. I disagree with a lot when it comes to SJWs, I'm anti-gay for example... I'm a strong Catholic... but when it comes to racism I think it was a very good decision. Every government department has had to at the very least pretend to be BLM supporting anti-racist activists because they're worried about dropping in the ESG system, which would not exist if not for President Obama.
I mean, this still would happen no matter who the president is or what party is in charge, you can't always be pointing the finger at them.
 
I still think the local police should handle minor situations though.

Well, when you mean by rebellion it is a different cause if say for example you directed your violence towards the police or the authorities who are under the control of the government, rather than vandalizing or looting property of private citizens.


But yeah, I don't follow the news or what everyone is talking about. If everybody is talking about something on the Internet, I would already be hearing it elsewhere.

Every politician uses that strategy.

Everybody thinks that the party they're aligned with is always correct and the opposition are have a malicious intent to destroy everything.

I mean, this still would happen no matter who the president is or what party is in charge, you can't always be pointing the finger at them.
>I still think the local police should handle minor situations though.

So do I, but if the situation is so minor then they definitely don't need as much funding. Many police forces are double and triple funded because they receive funding from multiple government branches. They buy up used military hardware and LARP as an invading army, it's terrible.

>Well, when you mean by rebellion it is a different cause if say for example you directed your violence towards the police or the authorities who are under the control of the government, rather than vandalizing or looting property of private citizens.

I support any form of activism that pushes the cause of civil rights.... with reasonable limits. I don't support terrorism but i think some societial destruction is ok if it brings about a more just world.

>Again, the people who were thieving weren't doing it because "#BlackLivesMatter", they were doing it for their own selfish gain and taking advantage of the situation.

Sure, some of them, but I think some truly cared. The ones who were just opportunist were terrible people, I agree

>Everybody thinks that the party they're aligned with is always correct and the opposition are have a malicious intent to destroy everything.

Well yeah, everyone thinks they're right. I think im right, you think you're right. I'm aware I could be wrong, but I don't think I am, otherwise I wouldn't hold my opinions.

>I mean, this still would happen no matter who the president is or what party is in charge, you can't always be pointing the finger at them.

Again, I know it can happen under any President, but at least under a Democratic President they will TRY to solve the problem, rather than actively make it worse.
 
>I still think the local police should handle minor situations though.

So do I, but if the situation is so minor then they definitely don't need as much funding. Many police forces are double and triple funded because they receive funding from multiple government branches. They buy up used military hardware and LARP as an invading army, it's terrible.
True, but you still have to make sure they do their jobs right in order to maintain the peace.
>Well, when you mean by rebellion it is a different cause if say for example you directed your violence towards the police or the authorities who are under the control of the government, rather than vandalizing or looting property of private citizens.

I support any form of activism that pushes the cause of civil rights.... with reasonable limits. I don't support terrorism but i think some societial destruction is ok if it brings about a more just world.
I prefer no destruction.

Sure, people have a right to protest but not to cause unnecessary vandalism.
>Again, the people who were thieving weren't doing it because "#BlackLivesMatter", they were doing it for their own selfish gain and taking advantage of the situation.

Sure, some of them, but I think some truly cared. The ones who were just opportunist were terrible people, I agree
Yep. But for whatever reason stealing is wrong.
>Everybody thinks that the party they're aligned with is always correct and the opposition are have a malicious intent to destroy everything.

Well yeah, everyone thinks they're right. I think im right, you think you're right. I'm aware I could be wrong, but I don't think I am, otherwise I wouldn't hold my opinions.
I think it's more important to come up with a common solution rather than divide each other by ideology.
>I mean, this still would happen no matter who the president is or what party is in charge, you can't always be pointing the finger at them.

Again, I know it can happen under any President, but at least under a Democratic President they will TRY to solve the problem, rather than actively make it worse.
Again, don't think about political parties. All of them are bad.
 
My consulting firm has offices in Canada, so I may be going there. Apparently I don't fit in with the "office culture :soy:" and they're looking for a reason to get rid of me despite the fact that I'm extremely nice and kind to everyone, they don't like me. Instead of firing me which is time consuming and the associated litigation risk, they may just transfer me to Canada. My office is the most sterotypical rich NY douchebag office in existence, a bunch of hot fratboys and sorority stacies flirting and giggling while I do all the real work, so I hate it here, I'm hoping Canada will be a lot better.

Anyway, Canada seems like a much better place for incels. I know it's run by a feminist nutjob but in many ways I think Canada is far more pro-incel than the United States. Here are my reasoning:

1) Americans are HOTTER than Canadians. All the hot Canadians move to the U.S for school and work. If you're a high-tier Chad or Stacy in Canada, you're moving to LA or NY. If you guys ever come to New York, you'll see what I mean, it's like a model fashion show on Monday mornings. Hot people EVERYWHERE. It's not that New Yorkers are naturally hot, it's that hot people from all over the place come to NY, and Canada is so close that it's not hard for them to wind up here. I've also noticed in Canadian media that the hot characters are never actually that hot compared to American shows. The Stacy in a Canadian show would often be a Becky in an American show, and the Chads in Canadian TV are just above-average Brad dudes from American shows. It's clear that moving to Canada will push my SMV up a few points, I will still be an ugly male, but at least i won't be a hideous monster in comparison to these angelic beauties.

2) Colder weather....girls won't be as revealing. This drives me so crazy. NY isn't that bad because it's up North, but during the summer girls where very scantily clad clothing. It drives me crazy because I know it's only for Chad and it arouses me so much, it's like they are teasing me, mocking me for my inferiority.

3) Nicer people.... not much more has to be said. Even if the girls are still hypergamous, at least i won't be as explicitly shit on as I am here. People are so rude in America, at least in Canada there's a layer of politeness so I won't be constantly reminded by how shitty I am

4) Gun control... I am terrified of guns. Thankfully New York has more restrictive gun policies but honestly it's not enough. Some idiot could buy a gun from a Texas gunshow and cross State Lines. Even though that's illegal, it barely seems to be enforced. Look at Kyle Rittenhouse, a 17 year old who crossed state lines with an AR-15 and murdered two people yet got off scot-free on every charge. I would feel 1000x safer if I lived somewhere like Canada where guns were totally kept off the market except under very particular circumstances, and after the latest Texas shooting, the Prime Minister declared a freeze on all handgun sales, and is soon to push for stronger legislation against gun ownership.

5) Mandatory Vaccinations. I have shitty genetics, and shitty genetics tends to come in a package. I have a compromised immune system. Covid-19 for me is especially dangerous. I thank God everyday that NY had a mandatory vaccination policy for passports and whatnot because I know that the vast majority of people here are vaccinated. There are a few demographics that have lower vaccination rates and ngl I tend to stay away from the more often. Even though the vax pass is dropped, far more people got the vaccine because there's nothing to do without it. I would love to live in Canada that has even higher vaccination rates, and I wouldn't feel scared taking the plane there because everybody on Canadian airlines or on planes entering Canada must be fully vaccinated.

6) Universal Healthcare. I won't have to worry about going bankrupt if I get some disease that my shitty immune system can't fight against. I am not the most healthy person, my family has a lot of preexisting conditions. I would love for a universal healthcare system to ensure I won't go bankrupt because a few rich assholes don't want their taxes to go up a few % points. Canada is far more socialist in the sense that rich Chad assholes actually have to pay for their fellow citizens

7) Less corruption: Americans have lost faith in their institutions. No one trusts the cops in America, no one trusts the medical community, no one trusts the scientists, no one trusts the government. As irrational as I believe a lot of these thoughts are, largely peddled by fearmongers in the alternative media, it doesn't create a very stable society for people to be so distrustful of their institutions. In Canada, people generally trust the government and established authorities. This is why during the Trucker Protest Trudeau was able to enact the emergency act, effectively declaring martial law, seizing bank accounts of protesters, and launching federal investigators to track them down. People aren't worried about some Alex Jones tier 1984 Grey State conspiracy in Canada, they see the government as a tool at their disposal, and as citizens of a democracy they feel empowered to discuss how this tool can be used to keep us safe. That's the society I want to live in, not one where any policy solution is treated as a U.N conspiracy run by Bill Gates to sterilize everyone. If you still haven't figured out how this relates to inceldom, it's obvious. The more corrupt and less grounded in institutional procedures a society is, the more that social sway and likability becomes a determinant to your success. Caroll Quigley wrote about this in his discussions about the Pakistani-Peruvian axis.... societies built on corruption and nepotism over established formal institutions will inevitably benefit those with more social dominance as opposed to formal authority.... i.e the CHADS
Based, I’m also considering leaving NYC for Canada. What is your job?
 
Based, I’m also considering leaving NYC for Canada. What is your job?
Are you gonna join your fellow Jew @Copexodius Maximus up there?

I heard escortcelling in "Canada" is worse tho.
 
Are you gonna join your fellow Jew @Copexodius Maximus up there?

I heard escortcelling in "Canada" is worse tho.
Possibly, and escortcelling isn’t that bad if you stay in major cities.
NYC escorts are very expensive :reeeeee:
 
Possibly, and escortcelling isn’t that bad if you stay in major cities.
NYC escorts are very expensive :reeeeee:
Still expensive in North America in general.

The foids over there are less hotter, more likely to be those liberal alt foids with tattoes and piercings everywhere, probably lesbian too.

Plus it's illegal to buy sex despite selling sex being legal in "Canada". But good luck paying for pussy with rainbowbuxx.
 
Still expensive in North America.

The foids over there are less hotter, more likely to be those liberal alt foids with tattoes and piercings everywhere, probably lesbian too.
I like foids with tatoos and piercings as long as they are not fat ugly dykes :feelsohh:
 
I like foids with tatoos and piercings as long as they are not fat ugly dykes :feelsohh:
They're still probably dykes.

Ask @Incel_Because_Short, he escorts there.
 
You live in the US? I thought you still lived in the DR.
I still live in the U.S. but I might be moving back to the DR sometime this summer.
 
Why would you move back to that shithole?
Less people to bother me over there. Better atmosphere. I'm going to a rural area there.

I'm stuck in my room all day and I live in the hood next to fags, it's not like it's any better.
 
The foids over there are less hotter, more likely to be those liberal alt foids with tattoes and piercings everywhere, probably lesbian too.
I would say not. Canada is whiter and skinnier, so the average woman is probably more attractive. It ranks higher on female attractiveness as well.
 

Attachments

  • main-1159.jpg
    main-1159.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 10
  • tumblr_opwibuQVxP1va88f5o1_1280.png
    tumblr_opwibuQVxP1va88f5o1_1280.png
    319.1 KB · Views: 8
Less people to bother me over there. Better atmosphere. I'm going to a rural area there.

I'm stuck in my room all day and I live in the hood next to fags, it's not like it's any better.
Also, why do you hate fellow Spics so badly? You seem really intelligent though.
 
I would say not. Canada is whiter and skinnier, so the average woman is probably more attractive. It ranks higher on female attractiveness as well.
"Canadians" have bad teeth due to too much Pepsi and descent from ugly Anglos.
Also, why do you hate fellow Spics so badly? You seem really intelligent though.
I just don't like to be around people in general. I also don't like being put inside a label and doing what everybody else does because that's what people in my label does.
 
Have fun in cuckland
 
True, but you still have to make sure they do their jobs right in order to maintain the peace.

I prefer no destruction.

Sure, people have a right to protest but not to cause unnecessary vandalism.

Yep. But for whatever reason stealing is wrong.

I think it's more important to come up with a common solution rather than divide each other by ideology.

Again, don't think about political parties. All of them are bad.
>True, but you still have to make sure they do their jobs right in order to maintain the peace.

True, it would require checks and balances

>Sure, people have a right to protest but not to cause unnecessary vandalism.

Ideally, I just really thought anything was necessary in order to solve the horrible anti-black violence.

>I think it's more important to come up with a common solution rather than divide each other by ideology.

So do I but i think Trump has to leave the political scene. We need more moderate Republicans. With Trump out of the picture things will clear up, they should put Trump in jail for the Jan 6 insurrection.
 
Nope, just got my undergrad and got hired.
Lucky, my parents are forcing me to studymaxx for the GRE and go to grad school :reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:
Was it difficult to get hired in financial consulting after only undergrad?
 
>True, but you still have to make sure they do their jobs right in order to maintain the peace.

True, it would require checks and balances
Yeah.
>Sure, people have a right to protest but not to cause unnecessary vandalism.

Ideally, I just really thought anything was necessary in order to solve the horrible anti-black violence.
People will always be racist and that goes with the police.

It's human nature to judge other people based on their appearance or "membership" into a group, and to treat people differently who aren't one of their own.
>I think it's more important to come up with a common solution rather than divide each other by ideology.

So do I but i think Trump has to leave the political scene. We need more moderate Republicans. With Trump out of the picture things will clear up, they should put Trump in jail for the Jan 6 insurrection.
Trump is already out, 'bout time people stopped talking to him.

Biden already is problematic due to his declining ability to reason and his cabinet instituting a Ministry of Truth.
 
Good luck maplecel
 
Are you gonna join your fellow Jew @Copexodius Maximus up there?

I heard escortcelling in "Canada" is worse tho.
Escortceling here makes it so only the male gets in trouble. Imagine if only drug users got in trouble and not drug sellers. This is just blatant sexism and hatred against ugly and socially retarded males.
 
White canadians mog white americans to oblivion.

This is because white americans are roughly 33% german, 30% irish whereas white canadians are mostly white anglos.
 

Similar threads

tehgymcel420
Replies
9
Views
184
tehgymcel420
tehgymcel420
SlayerSlayer
Replies
65
Views
1K
SmhChan
SmhChan
nazianime
Replies
7
Views
221
NoIdeaWhatToDo
NoIdeaWhatToDo
Void.
Replies
16
Views
559
supremegentleman98
supremegentleman98
RealSchizo
Replies
8
Views
183
Wizardmaxxer
Wizardmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top