JFL I have sex with incels and then discard them. I get off on it.
100% LARP
P
If this is true these "incels" will become bluepilled normies for the next decade of their lives, despite continuing to live lives of solitide.
Make it a hundred.
None of them are true trues. Michael Cera is a normalish height, white, has hair, and looks relatively normal. He has a very feminine face and bodytype, but he could be like a 4.5 if he gymcelled. I will say, Cera looks like he probably has a microcock (although I can’t know for sure) and he’s probably mutilated, so I’ll give him true status on that alone.
Jonah Hill’s biggest failos are being short and being a fat piece of shit. He can fix one of those things. If he wasn’t fat, he might be like a 3/10. He’s definitely the most true of the 3. Also, he’s a Joo, so confirmed mutilated, and I think it’s confirmed that he’s got a small cock.
A 4/10 isn’t true status, holy fuck. Even 3/10’s can find life partners/bottom-tier women. 2.5/10 and below is when it’s completely over.
You’re being pedantic.
Yes, he’s a good example. I’m just saying the guy looks like he has leprosy. Genuinely disgusting to look at.
Bluepill nonsense. Hypergamy means it’s over for anyone sub 6 realistically if non NT and sub 5 aka below MTN so about 30% of men.
>If non NT
Okay, most people are NT. That’s the whole point. You’re assuming something that only affects a minority of men.
>30% of men are sub-5
Wtf? What exactly is a 5/10 if not a dead average normie dude? 50% of men are sub-5 or below. That’s why it’s 5/10. Do you really think 50% of men are true status? There’s no data that supports that whatsoever. Sure, normies have very mediocre sex lives, but that’s still not true status.
Roughly 30% of young men are completely sexless, which means 3/10s and below. Realistically, some of them might ascend through betabux or whatnot in the future, which sucks, but still disqualifies true status. So realistically, 2.5/10s (or roughly 25% of men) will be true status forever, possibly less.
Most men will have some, albeit mediocre, hererosexual experience at some point in their life. You have to be far below average to not even achieve this.
What? Normies are 1 in 2 and LTNs are 1 in 3.
>If non NT
Okay, most people are NT. That’s the whole point. You’re assuming something that only affects a minority of men.
>30% of men are sub-5
Wtf? What exactly is a 5/10 if not a dead average normie dude? 50% of men are sub-5 or below. That’s why it’s 5/10. Do you really think 50% of men are true status? There’s no data that supports that whatsoever. Sure, normies have very mediocre sex lives, but that’s still not true status.
No 3/10s are bottom 5%
2.5/10 is like bottom 1%
ok ur ratings are off and Mclovin’s facial structure isn’t common as 30%
M
It’s probably a guy, 99% of Reddit is dudes.
What exactly does the 10 point scale represent if not percentiles? A 9/10 means 90th percentile. A 10/10 is 99.9th percentile. A 3/10 is 30th percentile.
I would feel comfortable saying McLovin is 30th percentile, possibly higher. He’s like 40th percentile in height, not overweight, white, has a visible chin, a normal hairline, etc. He’s not attractive, but 20th percentile and below are usually pretty revolting, or at least really short. McLovin is a below-average normie.
I’m also going off USA standards. Most men in the USA are overweight. 30% of men in the US are obese.
Last edited:
That’s not how it works
No he’s not
I would feel comfortable saying McLovin is 30th percentile, possibly higher.
That’s not how the rating scale works
Although that is true there are some obese people who mog mclovin because they’re tall and carry their weight better
Then how does it work?
If you even go in a Wal-Mart, you’ll instantly see creatures uglier than McLovin. Also, he’s white, which gives him an edge over most ethnics, and most ethnics are also shorter than him.
I just gave you a variety of characteristics he possesses that many men don’t. If McLovin is below 30th percentile, then what would he become if he were bald? Shorter? Chinless? Fat? Eventually he’s gotta be like -20th percentile or something.
About 60% of men in the USA are taller than McLovin. So 40% are as tall or shorter. Of that 40%, 30% are obese (like 70% are overweight, but we’ll ignore them). That means 12% of men are both shorter than him and obese.
How tall does one have to be to offset obesity? Because McLovin is 5’8”. I don’t think he’s getting mogged by a 5’10” obese dude. I don’t even think a 6’0” obese dude would mog him. Obesity is a massive failo. I think being a massive, 6’2”+ obese fuck would mog McLovin, but we’re talking about 5% of the obese population.
You won't cause it's prob a dude
Refer to the PSL rating article on incel wiki
Ok but those are bottom 1%
He is chinless and he’s pretty short. Look at his midface ffs look at how long it is and how recessed his jaw is
Ok
Ur talking about morbidly obese than standard obese
Noted.
The bottom 1% is literally disabled.
He’s not chinless since you can see his chin, and he’s like 5’7” at the shortest.
Standard obese still looks pretty fucking bad.
Nope Bottom 0.1%. 1 in 100 people are not disabled lmfao
It’s visibly recessed and 5’7 is manlet
Depends
Yeah, not an incel if she's not repulsed by him
I don’t want emotional attachment to a foid anyway I just want to get the fuck and leave emotional attachment = emotional manipulation games
If I was the person in that LARP I would be happy not sad jfl she’d be doing me a favour
May be a LARP,
but half of the normies who claim "aT LeAsT i'M nOt aN iNcEL" are stupid faggots who got lucky to fuck a foid once in a lifetime and don't even know if they'll ever get to repeat the experience --- and most won't, until they get "settled" at age 37 by a single mom of 3 looking for some dupe to divorce-rape and take his house plus alimony & child-support.
These one-fuck-per-lifetime incels-in-denial are the most fanatical kind of normie shitting on incels. Your more typical "one-month-girlfriend-each-other-year" normie don't even think much of incels.
but half of the normies who claim "aT LeAsT i'M nOt aN iNcEL" are stupid faggots who got lucky to fuck a foid once in a lifetime and don't even know if they'll ever get to repeat the experience --- and most won't, until they get "settled" at age 37 by a single mom of 3 looking for some dupe to divorce-rape and take his house plus alimony & child-support.
These one-fuck-per-lifetime incels-in-denial are the most fanatical kind of normie shitting on incels. Your more typical "one-month-girlfriend-each-other-year" normie don't even think much of incels.
Last edited:
Where is this foid? I rape foids and then discard them. I get off on it.
Down Syndrome alone is 1 in 700, let alone all other disabilities.
Yes, but there’s guys out there with no visible chin whatsoever.
It’s also taller than half of men worldwide. It’s short, no doubt, but there’s plenty of men even shorter.
Obesity is the difference between Chris Pratt being a sex symbol and being a mid-tier normie.
That’s 0.3% and the most common
Bottom 0.5% JFL. It’s abnormal to have a noticeably recessed chin
Only america matters in this context and he’s 5’7 as a white guy. Completely different to being 5’7 and ethnicIt’s also taller than half of men worldwide. It’s short, no doubt, but there’s plenty of men even shorter.
Still proves my point
Similar threads
Hypocrisy
Progressive women only acknowledge sex differences when it convenient for their worldview.
- Snhook
- Inceldom Discussion
Copexodius Maximus
Users who are viewing this thread
