Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

I hate libertarianism

Regenerator

Regenerator

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Posts
33,227
iu



Basically their entire ideology. These retards can't seem to understand that somethings are just naturally bad regardless if the state opposes it. Libertariantards see the world in black & white where (state = bad & freedom =good) If libertariantards had their way we'd all be junkies eating slop all day while turd worlders & femoids continue the death of the west.

"I just want married gay Indians to be allowed to protect their cocaine with guns:soy:"


iu
 
It's biggest form of pseudo individualism, if you're individualistic you wouldn't care about politics cope and care only about yourself not muh freedumbs for everyone
 
It's biggest form of pseudo individualism, if you're individualistic you wouldn't care about politics cope and care only about yourself not muh freedumbs for everyone


Individualism is only pushed on White people.
 
They are even more retarded than communists.
 
Even if it we were in an Aryan hyperborean heaven it would still be cucked

“Self-ownership” = Allows the rich to blame the victim (the poor) for their plight, instead of conditions.
“Non-aggression principle” = Prevents the poor from regaining their rights through violence
“Free market” = Allows the rich to claim that it’s your own fault that you’re poor, even though it’s impossible to lift yourself out of poverty through honest means
“Smaller government! Less regulations!” = Allows the rich to squeeze even more money out of you without having to worry about the consequences (e.g no need to safely dispose of toxic waste, just dump into rivers)

I could go on and on about this but the long and short of it is that libertarianism is all about keeping all the power in the hands of the people who already have it, and making it impossible for the plebeians to get ahead in life; while somehow tricking the plebs into thinking it benefits them as well.

End goal of libertarianism is creating a heartless society where everyone only thinks about themselves, while the elites laugh at us in their ivory towers, thinking of how to exploit us even further @LeFrenchCel @AsiaCel
 
I hate liberalism, but not because "muh joooooos made it!!!"
 
Even if it we were in an Aryan hyperborean heaven it would still be cucked

“Self-ownership” = Allows the rich to blame the victim (the poor) for their plight, instead of conditions.
“Non-aggression principle” = Prevents the poor from regaining their rights through violence
“Free market” = Allows the rich to claim that it’s your own fault that you’re poor, even though it’s impossible to lift yourself out of poverty through honest means
“Smaller government! Less regulations!” = Allows the rich to squeeze even more money out of you without having to worry about the consequences (e.g no need to safely dispose of toxic waste, just dump into rivers)

I could go on and on about this but the long and short of it is that libertarianism is all about keeping all the power in the hands of the people who already have it, and making it impossible for the plebeians to get ahead in life; while somehow tricking the plebs into thinking it benefits them as well.

End goal of libertarianism is creating a heartless society where everyone only thinks about themselves, while the elites laugh at us in their ivory towers, thinking of how to exploit us even further @LeFrenchCel @AsiaCel
What aryan hyperborean heaven you are talking about, aren't you somali black nigger? Cuckold shit lmao
 
What aryan hyperborean heaven you are talking about, aren't you somali black nigger? Cuckold shit lmao
I’m saying the libertarianism is cucked even if “turd worlders” weren’t a thing and if it was Pro-white, which was OP’s biggest complaint
 
Even if it we were in an Aryan hyperborean heaven it would still be cucked

“Self-ownership” = Allows the rich to blame the victim (the poor) for their plight, instead of conditions.
“Non-aggression principle” = Prevents the poor from regaining their rights through violence
“Free market” = Allows the rich to claim that it’s your own fault that you’re poor, even though it’s impossible to lift yourself out of poverty through honest means
“Smaller government! Less regulations!” = Allows the rich to squeeze even more money out of you without having to worry about the consequences (e.g no need to safely dispose of toxic waste, just dump into rivers)

I could go on and on about this but the long and short of it is that libertarianism is all about keeping all the power in the hands of the people who already have it, and making it impossible for the plebeians to get ahead in life; while somehow tricking the plebs into thinking it benefits them as well.

End goal of libertarianism is creating a heartless society where everyone only thinks about themselves, while the elites laugh at us in their ivory towers, thinking of how to exploit us even further @LeFrenchCel @AsiaCel
In an libertarian dystopia. Every femoid would be on OnlyFans exploiting simps while big pharma would continue to profit off of MRNA vaccines:feelsclown:
 
In a libertarian dystopia. Every femoid would be on OnlyFans exploiting simps while big pharma would continue to profit off of MRNA vaccines:feelsclown:
Exactly. There are countless ways to harm someone without using direct means
Muhh guns won’t save you from the government
 
Exactly. There are countless ways to harm someone without using direct means
Muhh guns won’t save you from the government



The cities would be full of drugs, alcohol, & pollution as well under a libertarian dystopia. Would be an utter shithole.
 
Even if it we were in an Aryan hyperborean heaven it would still be cucked

“Self-ownership” = Allows the rich to blame the victim (the poor) for their plight, instead of conditions.
“Non-aggression principle” = Prevents the poor from regaining their rights through violence
“Free market” = Allows the rich to claim that it’s your own fault that you’re poor, even though it’s impossible to lift yourself out of poverty through honest means
“Smaller government! Less regulations!” = Allows the rich to squeeze even more money out of you without having to worry about the consequences (e.g no need to safely dispose of toxic waste, just dump into rivers)

I could go on and on about this but the long and short of it is that libertarianism is all about keeping all the power in the hands of the people who already have it, and making it impossible for the plebeians to get ahead in life; while somehow tricking the plebs into thinking it benefits them as well.

End goal of libertarianism is creating a heartless society where everyone only thinks about themselves, while the elites laugh at us in their ivory towers, thinking of how to exploit us even further @LeFrenchCel @AsiaCel
you're off the mark a bit, the elite don't want a small government
this is going to sound weird but bear with me on this, libertarianism is not the ideology of the elite

libertarianism is in fact the ideology of the petit-bourgeoisie; it cannot manifest into the real world as the petit bourgeoisie are not a strong class. they get fucked over hard by the government; taxes, regulations, this and that restriction.

the state, in truth, is the tool of the monopolists. when a big business fails, guess what happens? bailouts.
regulations have the happy effect of making entry into the market harder for newcomers.
 
regulations have the happy effect of making entry into the market harder for newcomers.
you know that dumbass raw milk shit

it started because people found out that Lord Rothschild lobbied the government to mandate pasteurized milk

if you aren't schizo its clear he did such a thing to push out the competition and consolidate more wealth rather than to turn the goys soy or some silly shit like that
 
Last edited:
you're off the mark a bit, the elite don't want a small government
this is going to sound weird but bear with me on this, libertarianism is not the ideology of the elite

libertarianism is in fact the ideology of the petit-bourgeoisie; it cannot manifest into the real world as the petit bourgeoisie are not a strong class. they get fucked over hard by the government; taxes, regulations, this and that restriction.

the state, in truth, is the tool of the monopolists. when a big business fails, guess what happens? bailouts.
regulations have the happy effect of making entry into the market harder for newcomers.
True, I suppose this is the revealed preference of our plutocratic overloads, based on the fact the West is the way it is right now.
 
you're off the mark a bit, the elite don't want a small government
this is going to sound weird but bear with me on this, libertarianism is not the ideology of the elite

libertarianism is in fact the ideology of the petit-bourgeoisie; it cannot manifest into the real world as the petit bourgeoisie are not a strong class. they get fucked over hard by the government; taxes, regulations, this and that restriction.

the state, in truth, is the tool of the monopolists. when a big business fails, guess what happens? bailouts.
regulations have the happy effect of making entry into the market harder for newcomers.
https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe4b6d9a9-3939-435d-beab-c2edc7f2dbd4_1280x720.jpeg
 
Even if it we were in an Aryan hyperborean heaven it would still be cucked

“Self-ownership” = Allows the rich to blame the victim (the poor) for their plight, instead of conditions.
“Non-aggression principle” = Prevents the poor from regaining their rights through violence
“Free market” = Allows the rich to claim that it’s your own fault that you’re poor, even though it’s impossible to lift yourself out of poverty through honest means
“Smaller government! Less regulations!” = Allows the rich to squeeze even more money out of you without having to worry about the consequences (e.g no need to safely dispose of toxic waste, just dump into rivers)

I could go on and on about this but the long and short of it is that libertarianism is all about keeping all the power in the hands of the people who already have it, and making it impossible for the plebeians to get ahead in life; while somehow tricking the plebs into thinking it benefits them as well.

End goal of libertarianism is creating a heartless society where everyone only thinks about themselves, while the elites laugh at us in their ivory towers, thinking of how to exploit us even further @LeFrenchCel @AsiaCel
Libertarianism is basically just ultracapitalism
 
Retard doesn't know the difference between "Liberalism" & "Libertarianism"
They both ultimately come from the same roots. They both are scummy ideologies that lead to similar results and similar amount of harm.
 
Libertarianism is basically just ultracapitalism
The only people who believe in it are the already rich and connected: they openly want unions completely destroyed, child labor to be back in full force, import a billion Indians to cut people’s wages with open borders, and destroy the nation state by making them no more than competing economic zones. They would kill off humanity if it meant they would make more profits in the short term.

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLaMughziZD/
 
>married gay indians
afd leader pajeeta wife
 
Libertarians thinks that the government is retarded and incapable of basic governance because they themselves are retarded and think that everyone else is like them.
 
I actually like Ayn Rand because she's against some things I'm also against like the idea of duty, hedonism, utilitarianism, and altruism. I do believe in the duty to reproduce, but I'm against the duty to die. I did make a thread against Objectivism though. I also like that she criticized lesbianism. I forgot to include that in the thread.

 
Last edited:
Ayn Rand was such a creative and unique thinker. Who else has said altruism is bad?
 
you hate lolbertarianism because you think it's "anti-white"?

I hate lolbertarianism because it's juvenile and closer to the elite's vision

we are not the same
 
Ayn Rand was such a creative and unique thinker. Who else has said altruism is bad?
shut up kike. ayn rand was a kikess foid globohomo philosopher. based on your posts you sound like one of the le heckin based alt-right pro-zion don movement
 
shut up kike. ayn rand was a kikess foid globohomo philosopher. based on your posts you sound like one of the le heckin based alt-right pro-zion don movement
You're literally a nigger according to your username.
 
When I was sixteen or so, right around when I first started to look into the black-pill, I still recall the first time I came across a real political YouTuber. His name was MentisWave, and he was a hard-core right-leaning libertarian. I watched his videos, and I think that was the first time I actually realized that I really didn't know anything about politics.

In general, it was the first time I realized that I was actually retarded. I feel like half of what he said made absolutely no sense to me, just because I didn't understand how deep politics really goes. I felt like the dude was way smarter than I—so I listened to a lot of what he said and thought it was correct.

Even still, I never could come around to finding Libertarianism as a whole to be something I agreed with—and it's not like it was from a lack of trying! I just couldn't find myself agreeing that allowing people at large to do whatever they want, would be in any way, shape, or form, a good idea. I had lived in California during this time, and I was being constantly pestered by the homeless drug addicts that surrounded my place, and often found myself fearing that one of these guys would come up and stab me.

In a libertarian society, these people would be free to do as they please and indulge themselves as much as they want. That alone broke my belief in hardcore Libertarianism. The idea of Libertarianism is fine in theory, but it just doesn't hold up for one core reason, at least as far as I'm concerned.

People making their own decisions is a bad idea, because, at large—people are retarded.

I don't think Libertarianism is completely devoid of anything good. I do find myself agreeing with some tenants of Libertarian thought, particularly in economics as it relates to capitalism. Like I think competition is a good thing and pushes business to be better and innovate. But the problem is that Libertarians take this idea too far and apply it to social aspects.

No, hiring jeets from India just because you don't want to pay someone native to this country is not a good idea, nor does it fuel any sort of healthy competition. And competition isn't good in all aspects. Such as the making of education a hypercompetitive hell where millions of foreign workers come in and work to become doctors, completely oversaturating the job market, leading to people who are actually passionate about the job to be discouraged from pursuing it—all so their parents can brag to other immigrant families.

I digress. Really, I'm still trying to formulate my thoughts on my exact stance in politics, and like I said, I'm not too bright, so maybe it's all for no real reason and nothing I say should be taken seriously.
 

Similar threads

autisticandugly
Replies
21
Views
1K
LOLI BREEDING
LOLI BREEDING
FarangInDaNang
Replies
12
Views
902
juice
juice
FoidsEnshittifyAll
Replies
20
Views
1K
FoidsEnshittifyAll
FoidsEnshittifyAll
AsiaCel
Replies
6
Views
1K
literallyretarded
literallyretarded

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top