Advise: lots of text.
They talk about stoping the dangerous ideology of incels by shaming us, the militant incels, and by trying to gaslight (give CBT therapy) them.
What these academics don't understand Is that misoginy here doesn't strive from the same place that lets say traditionalist or redpillers. They see foids as dogs, an idiot creature that, with good guidance can be a good companion, they don't hate women, they just see them as inferior; we, in exchange, aren't that naive. Even if "foid" implies otherwise, we need to see these women as humans capable of decision so we can blame them for something.
Now, in something completly different. When russians were starving, they blame It on jews and killed them. Tutsis were masacred because hutus were marginalized. In both cases, It could be argued that the victim group didn't do anything deserving of hate.
In both cases, racial tensions were caused by the hard conditions of the marginalized group, and we are a marginalized group. Relationships (of friendship or love) are as neccesary as basic needs. There is a reason to live even if you are in a shithole, and that is connection.
Let's be honest, we don't have any will over our own lifes. It's not that we didn't try, but world just isn't fair an there have to be losers and here we are.
Graycels WILL fall here. Not because FoidSlayer69 said a convincing-Foucault-like argument about the world of relationships, but because graycels simply will fail againg and againg. Not amount of cope and gaslighting can bear with the crushing reality of loneliness.
So graycel will lurk here and become an incel. We will get his own interpretation of what the blackpill is. The therapist would try to dismount this "blackpill nonsense" but he or she will shock with the wall of the material reality of his patient.
At the end, we incels have existed since ever, but only internet have connected us. That's why it seems that we are a "growing menace" when we are just the usual losers.
They talk about stoping the dangerous ideology of incels by shaming us, the militant incels, and by trying to gaslight (give CBT therapy) them.
What these academics don't understand Is that misoginy here doesn't strive from the same place that lets say traditionalist or redpillers. They see foids as dogs, an idiot creature that, with good guidance can be a good companion, they don't hate women, they just see them as inferior; we, in exchange, aren't that naive. Even if "foid" implies otherwise, we need to see these women as humans capable of decision so we can blame them for something.
Now, in something completly different. When russians were starving, they blame It on jews and killed them. Tutsis were masacred because hutus were marginalized. In both cases, It could be argued that the victim group didn't do anything deserving of hate.
In both cases, racial tensions were caused by the hard conditions of the marginalized group, and we are a marginalized group. Relationships (of friendship or love) are as neccesary as basic needs. There is a reason to live even if you are in a shithole, and that is connection.
Let's be honest, we don't have any will over our own lifes. It's not that we didn't try, but world just isn't fair an there have to be losers and here we are.
Graycels WILL fall here. Not because FoidSlayer69 said a convincing-Foucault-like argument about the world of relationships, but because graycels simply will fail againg and againg. Not amount of cope and gaslighting can bear with the crushing reality of loneliness.
So graycel will lurk here and become an incel. We will get his own interpretation of what the blackpill is. The therapist would try to dismount this "blackpill nonsense" but he or she will shock with the wall of the material reality of his patient.
At the end, we incels have existed since ever, but only internet have connected us. That's why it seems that we are a "growing menace" when we are just the usual losers.
