Discussion I don't care about feminism, but feminism is female nationalism.

[_meh]

In any situation, they would exclude something based solely on merit and choose people only according to their gender identity. If a man fits the qualifications for a job or entry into a college or university, and a woman meets the same requirements, a woman in charge of the decision (either choosing between them or having oversight) would most often choose the woman.

Women also tend to exhibit female solidarity. They’re more likely to choose other women over men.

They prioritize anything related to being female and sometimes treat their gender identity as if it were a different race or even an entirely separate nation. They also tend to view themselves as superior to men and believe they can do no wrong.

This reminds me of the LGBTQ+ community, who proudly fly the rainbow flag. There’s a strong sense of nationalism in this as well. Some members of the community even speak out about the need to "stop trans genocide," which makes it seem as though they view themselves as a distinct ethnicity. This seems to evolve into a form of queer or homonationalism.

 

[_meh]

People can continue to identify as radical feminists or queer activists, and honestly, I don't care. It’s their choice, and it doesn't concern me. However, what I find interesting is drawing parallels between different movements.

It seems that, in every movement or demographic, there’s always an emphasis on the individual subject. At the core, there’s often a trace of solipsism where the perspective of the individual or group becomes the defining lens through which everything is viewed. This tendency to center the self or a specific identity often leads to a narrow view of the broader societal landscape, as if everything revolves around the experiences and perceptions of that one group.

In a way, this solipsism might be part of what drives the sense of exclusivity within movements. Whether it's radical feminism, queer activism, or other social movements, there’s a tendency to interpret societal issues through the lens of personal experience, often placing the individual's identity or struggle at the center. It’s a pattern where one group’s fight for recognition or equality becomes so personal that it risks overshadowing broader conversations or collective understandings.

 

[_meh]

This all renders into narcissism, ultimately.

@WorthlessSlavicShit @ThisSongGoesVerHard

 

[_meh]

Typically people link nationalism with chauvinism as well.

So there can be a sense of female chauvinism that can exist as well

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Feminism is all about prioritizing women's interests and desires above all else, often at the expense of men.

 

[Yournotcold0]

Feminism is all about prioritizing women's interests and desires above all else, often at the expense of men.

 

[_meh]

Feminism is all about prioritizing women's interests and desires above all else, often at the expense of men.

Yeah, pretty much.

 

[Yournotcold0]

Foids don't give a single fuck about us or our struggles and feminism supports that terrible ideology

 

[_meh]

Foids don't give a single fuck about us or our struggles and feminism supports that terrible ideology

Yes, but also just boils down to individualism anyway, but they'd priortize each other before any man.

They want to exacerbate and this worsens certain conditions, like "more sexual freedom" = "more of us huddling around Chads and being 'lesbians' than being bogged down by a normie-tier guy or an ugly guy"

 

[_meh]

I know there’s already a study where race is prioritized, but I just think this phenomenon is interesting (I have no strong feelings about it, I’m just being objective).

I think female nationalism and homonationalism will consolidate more as time passes.

Recently, a bill was passed in a Western country stating that if LGBTQ individuals (in countries with bad LGBTQ rights) face persecution, they can seek asylum in that Western country. I think it may have been an LGBTQ individual who put forward that bill. So, this issue transcends beyond race, ethnicity, and borders.

So like a lesbian Swedish woman would have more solidarity with a lesbian Chinese woman and vice versa. In this case, they'd be priortizing their sexuality and gender over race/ethnicity.

 

[blackpillednigga]

I call LGBTQ homonationalists because it seems like they care about faggots more than the other so called marginalized groups and feminists care about women more

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

This all renders into narcissism, ultimately.

@WorthlessSlavicShit @ThisSongGoesVerHard

Very good description of feminism.

 

[ThisSongGoesVerHard]

Sorry for the wall of text but I got worked up

Absolutely, it's been proven again and again that women have -both unconsciously and more than ever consciously- a massive in-group bias while men do not, despite their lies and accusations.

While there are some women who may actually want to achieve gender equality and naively label themselves as feminists, thinking that it's a fitting label, any feminist ideologue will know -if not admit- that feminism isn't and never was about equality. Many prominent feminist figures through the history of the movement have openly vilified, dehumanized, and advocated for the discrimination of men, adopted supremacist ideas, or even argued for our population reduction and eventual extermination (if technology allows them to prescind from sperm). Since you also mentioned the LGBTQ movement as an example, it's worth mentioning that female chauvinism is deeply linked with their homosexual tendencies and the pseudorelationships that are female friendships, and non-surprisingly, a large number of feminists have been lesbians and bisexuals, and held the belief that lesbianism is the natural conclusion to feminism, and that most if not all women can develop feelings for each other and forego men entirely.

For anyone not familiar with them, it would seem paradoxical for an egalitarian movement to become increasingly radical the more it achieved and surpassed its objectives, but this apparent contradiction disappears once one recognizes that supremacism, not equality, was their true goal. The facade of a benevolent movement that justly sought to achieve equality merely was the most convenient way to advance their broader ideological goals, and as full equality was achieved in any area, even skewing the balance in their favor, not only did they not stop, but doubled down, and ramped up their rhetoric from all the media, academia, law and political institutions that they've successfully infiltrated.

However, I believe that the well of victimhood that they have been gleefully drinking from is running dry, and that the men who have been hearing all their lives how privileged, toxic, entitled and horrible they are, while the feminists openly plotted to discriminate them, celebrated their struggles, and lectured them about compassion, have started to see beyond their facade and to call them out for what they truly are.

 

[_meh]

Sorry for the wall of text but I got worked up

Absolutely, it's been proven again and again that women have -both unconsciously and more than ever consciously- a massive in-group bias while men do not, despite their lies and accusations.

While there are some women who may actually want to achieve gender equality and naively label themselves as feminists, thinking that it's a fitting label, any feminist ideologue will know -if not admit- that feminism isn't and never was about equality. Many prominent feminist figures through the history of the movement have openly vilified, dehumanized, and advocated for the discrimination of men, adopted supremacist ideas, or even argued for our population reduction and eventual extermination (if technology allows them to prescind from sperm). Since you also mentioned the LGBTQ movement as an example, it's worth mentioning that female chauvinism is deeply linked with their homosexual tendencies and the pseudorelationships that are female friendships, and non-surprisingly, a large number of feminists have been lesbians and bisexuals, and held the belief that lesbianism is the natural conclusion to feminism, and that most if not all women can develop feelings for each other and forego men entirely.

For anyone not familiar with them, it would seem paradoxical for an egalitarian movement to become increasingly radical the more it achieved and surpassed its objectives, but this apparent contradiction disappears once one recognizes that supremacism, not equality, was their true goal. The facade of a benevolent movement that justly sought to achieve equality merely was the most convenient way to advance their broader ideological goals, and as full equality was achieved in any area, even skewing the balance in their favor, not only did they not stop, but doubled down, and ramped up their rhetoric from all the media, academia, law and political institutions that they've successfully infiltrated.

However, I believe that the well of victimhood that they have been gleefully drinking from is running dry, and that the men who have been hearing all their lives how privileged, toxic, entitled and horrible they are, while the feminists openly plotted to discriminate them, celebrated their struggles, and lectured them about compassion, have started to see beyond their facade and to call them out for what they truly are.

It's all good, no problem, and no need to apologize. You always say interesting things (I also thought this thread might be up your alley as well) and we see some things eye-to-eye especially regarding women being interested in each other than men. Hence, why I've tagged you.

You also seem to be one of the very few guys that recognize that a majority of women are lesbians/bisexuals (which many guys here choose to not acknowledge or purposely ignore about it). Lesbianism is a big phenomena among women and a lot of guys (as well as incels) are blind to this, which just seems frustrating as well because most of the time women favor each more (even in terms of being attracted to each other and they'd choose to date each other before they pick any man - mostly average/ugly guys).

Anyways what you've said was spot on.

Their hatred of men comes from their homosexual proclivities (since a majority of women have lesbian/bisexual feelings). Seeing the sight of men, just makes them feel oppressed and offended. Another funny thing from my observation is that they seem to be more friendly to feminine guys (which they usually deem as attractive, not shocker) and since they're closer to their gender percieved gender. They do have intense feelings of wanting to eliminate all men. Another funny thing is that a subsection of them want to become men and some of them even start emulating/mirroring/larping as men, but they usually fail at it, and just end up becoming more angry/mad as a result of it. They have a lot of gender envy towards men, I think some of them are under the delusions that men live great lives, but the men they usually envision are usually just Chads (or pretty boys).

The obvious reason why they try to make it seem like an egalitarian movement is just to make it more palatable and try to have more men support it. Yeah, nowadays, much guys don't buy into their schtick. Anyway, I suspect that female nationalism/supremacism will intensify more in the future, but I'm just like whatever at this point, lol. Always used to wild stuff happening anyway.

 

[Rick prime]

In any situation, they would exclude something based solely on merit and choose people only according to their gender identity. If a man fits the qualifications for a job or entry into a college or university, and a woman meets the same requirements, a woman in charge of the decision (either choosing between them or having oversight) would most often choose the woman.

Women also tend to exhibit female solidarity. They’re more likely to choose other women over men.

They prioritize anything related to being female and sometimes treat their gender identity as if it were a different race or even an entirely separate nation. They also tend to view themselves as superior to men and believe they can do no wrong.

This reminds me of the LGBTQ+ community, who proudly fly the rainbow flag. There’s a strong sense of nationalism in this as well. Some members of the community even speak out about the need to "stop trans genocide," which makes it seem as though they view themselves as a distinct ethnicity. This seems to evolve into a form of queer or homonationalism.

View attachment 1350636View attachment 1350638

Look at them all.,..

What I want to do in that crowd in gta vi

 

[Regenerator]

Feminism is just one form of gynocentrism though.
All females are gynocentric & care about their own interests at the expense of men.

 

[sexualeconomist]

The word you are seeking is females collectivism and yes that's in itself isn't necessary a bad thing it's the retardation and incompetency of females which is bad