I can't stand vegan logic, but this actually explains why misogyny is rational.

[pedrolopezwasright]

If you like cows, you can still eat them (if you aren't angry vegan of course). I don't like women, why then we should apply any kind of moral rule to them? I eat livestock, women have even lower value for me and I don't like them either. Why laws still apply to women?

Basically women = no value, no humanity (hypergamy imperative)
Cows, pigs, ducks etc. = value, no humanity (animal imperatives which are comparable to imperative of hypergamy).
There is its more moral to treat woman like a livestock than cow.

 

[endoftheskies]

If you like cows, you can still eat them (if you aren't angry vegan of course). I don't like women, why then we should apply any kind of moral rule to them? I eat livestock, women have even lower value for me and I don't like them either. Why laws still apply to women?

Basically women = no value, no humanity (hypergamy imperative)
Cows, pigs, ducks etc. = value, no humanity (animal imperatives which are comparable to imperative of hypergamy).
There is its more moral to treat woman like a livestock than cow.

Misogyny is always rational. Misogyny is simply the hatred of women, not treating women as animals. It just the complete hatred and despite you have for them.

 

[AutistSupremacist]

save the animals, destroy the foids

 

[SupremeSaint]

Misogyny is always rational. Misogyny is simply the hatred of women, not treating women as animals. It just the complete hatred and despite you have for them.

 

[yeetbender_]

THIS. This viewpoint is also why I don't like those who argue against foids being free use for humans by saying that the same logic can justify sodomy (it can't, it's like comparing eating meat to cannibalism, there's a clear and stark difference if you can acknowledge the difference between human and cattle).